From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/07/28 Fri AM 03:21:41 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: [OT] Whales for lunch (was PESO - Jump)
Personally I like Reunite Pangaea!
The Canon of continents.
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Jul 25, 2006, at 8:17
Personally I like Reunite Pangaea!
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Jul 25, 2006, at 8:17 AM, Charles Robinson wrote:
Friend of mine has a bumper sticker designed to offend almost
everybody. It reads NUKE THE GAY WHALES!
I always thought it was Nuke the Gay Whales for Christ
It
On 7/23/06, Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Friend of mine has a bumper sticker designed to offend almost
everybody. It reads NUKE THE GAY WHALES!
As a person who knows someone who works in the nuclear energy
industry, I find that offensive...
g
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a
On Jul 25, 2006, at 7:24, frank theriault wrote:
On 7/23/06, Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Friend of mine has a bumper sticker designed to offend almost
everybody. It reads NUKE THE GAY WHALES!
As a person who knows someone who works in the nuclear energy
industry, I find that
I've seen, Nuke the unborn baby whales. Still more offensive material:-).
-- Original message --
From: Charles Robinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Jul 25, 2006, at 7:24, frank theriault wrote:
On 7/23/06, Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Friend of mine has a
On Jul 25, 2006, at 8:17 AM, Charles Robinson wrote:
Friend of mine has a bumper sticker designed to offend almost
everybody. It reads NUKE THE GAY WHALES!
I always thought it was Nuke the Gay Whales for Christ
It goes right next to the bumper sticker that says
STOP NUCLEAR DECAY!
G
--
Den 25. jul. 2006 kl. 18.42 skrev Godfrey DiGiorgi:
On Jul 25, 2006, at 8:17 AM, Charles Robinson wrote:
Friend of mine has a bumper sticker designed to offend almost
everybody. It reads NUKE THE GAY WHALES!
I always thought it was Nuke the Gay Whales for Christ
It goes right next to
No, he died from pneumonia. Before that he played with some kids,
ate some fish and had a nice time.
DagT
Den 23. jul. 2006 kl. 01.39 skrev Norman Baugher:
Where he was promptly eaten. His running probably had something to
do with
Michael Jackson...
Norm
From: DagT
Here´s a small
On Jul 21, 2006, at 9:36 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Championing freedom of speech in regard to nude photos of children
might be considered PC in some circles. But eating whales is a
definite no-no among that same constituency.
Friend of mine has a bumper sticker designed to offend almost
On Jul 23, 2006, at 7:49 AM, Bob Shell wrote:
On Jul 21, 2006, at 9:36 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Championing freedom of speech in regard to nude photos of children
might be considered PC in some circles. But eating whales is a
definite no-no among that same constituency.
Friend of mine
I spent a lot of time in RI, The area that Narragansett Bay takes up is
nearly the same size as the total land area of the state. It's a local
joke but you can get bumper stickers that say Pave the Bay, (instead
of Save the Bay).
Bob Shell wrote:
On Jul 21, 2006, at 9:36 PM, Paul Stenquist
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af
Keith McGuinness
Sendt: 22. juli 2006 03:24
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: Re: [OT] Whales for lunch (was PESO - Jump)
DagT wrote:
The Norwegian name is Vågehval, and in latinBalaenoptera
acutorostrata. I´m not sure what
Den 22. jul. 2006 kl. 03.24 skrev Keith McGuinness:
DagT wrote:
The Norwegian name is Vågehval, and in latin Balaenoptera
acutorostrata. I´m not sure what it is called in English but
according to the International Whaling Commission there were about
18 of them in 2004. Not
2006 03:24
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: Re: [OT] Whales for lunch (was PESO - Jump)
DagT wrote:
The Norwegian name is Vågehval, and in latin Balaenoptera
acutorostrata. I´m not sure what it is called in English but
according to the International Whaling Commission there were
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of DagT
Sent: 22 July 2006 08:37
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: [OT] Whales for lunch (was PESO - Jump)
We are only about 4,5 million, and whales are large. I think they
only kill a few
Den 22. jul. 2006 kl. 09.55 skrev Bob W:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of DagT
Sent: 22 July 2006 08:37
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: [OT] Whales for lunch (was PESO - Jump)
We are only about 4,5 million, and whales
Maybe so, but it's not sustainable.
40 or so years ago people were saying There's plenty of fish in the
sea. Well there isn't now. Just because there are a lot of whales
now, doesn't mean there always will be.
You talk to anyone who is involved in commercial fishing. Wild fish
stocks are in
In principle I agree, but the problem around here (one of our main
incomes is from fish) is that the increasing number of whales and
seals is also hurting the amount of fish in the sea. So, the natural
balance has been shifted by us long ago and now we have to control
all parts to provide
No chance of you being lost in the crowd, DagT, I would have
thought! 8-)
Keith McG
DagT wrote:
Den 22. jul. 2006 kl. 03.24 skrev Keith McGuinness:
DagT wrote:
The Norwegian name is Vågehval, and in latin Balaenoptera
acutorostrata. I´m not sure what it is called in English but
Here´s a small question:
Where did Keiko (from the Free Willy movies) run to get away from the
americans?
To a safe Norwegian fjord! .-)
DagT
Den 22. jul. 2006 kl. 03.36 skrev Paul Stenquist:
Championing freedom of speech in regard to nude photos of children
might be considered PC in some
On 7/22/06, DagT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here´s a small question:
Where did Keiko (from the Free Willy movies) run to get away from the
americans?
To a safe Norwegian fjord! .-)
And people say whales are smart.
vbg
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of DagT
Sent: 22 July 2006 09:58
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: [OT] Whales for lunch (was PESO - Jump)
In principle I agree, but the problem around here (one of our main
incomes is from fish) is that the increasing number of whales and
seals is also
David Savage wrote:
On 7/22/06, DagT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here´s a small question:
Where did Keiko (from the Free Willy movies) run to get away from the
americans?
To a safe Norwegian fjord! .-)
And people say whales are smart.
vbg
But they don't read newspapers...
Carlos
--
Den 22. jul. 2006 kl. 15.16 skrev Carlos Royo:
David Savage wrote:
On 7/22/06, DagT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here´s a small question:
Where did Keiko (from the Free Willy movies) run to get away from
the
americans?
To a safe Norwegian fjord! .-)
And people say whales are smart.
vbg
ROTFLMAO...
From: DagT
snip So, the natural
balance has been shifted by us long ago and now we have to control
all parts to providesnip
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Where he was promptly eaten. His running probably had something to do with
Michael Jackson...
Norm
From: DagT
Here´s a small question:
Where did Keiko (from the Free Willy movies) run to get away from the
americans?
To a safe Norwegian fjord! .-)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Norman Baugher wrote:
ROTFLMAO...
From: DagT
snip So, the natural
balance has been shifted by us long ago and now we have to control
all parts to providesnip
But DagT is right (for at least some environments).
For instance, it is known that indigenous Australians, in
northern
They used fires to modify the landscape to produce a given resultnot
balance nature (which is impossible for humans to do).
Norm
From: Keith McGuinness
Norman Baugher wrote:
ROTFLMAO...
From: DagT
snip So, the natural
balance has been shifted by us long ago and now we have to control
Not entirely true, much of what we naively see as the balance of nature
is a result of human interference.
Norman Baugher wrote:
They used fires to modify the landscape to produce a given resultnot
balance nature (which is impossible for humans to do).
Norm
From: Keith McGuinness
In a message dated 7/22/2006 5:10:49 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Not entirely true, much of what we naively see as the balance of nature
is a result of human interference.
=
Yup. The golden hills we see here in California are actually the result of
the out of
Norman Baugher wrote:
They used fires to modify the landscape to produce a given resultnot
balance nature (which is impossible for humans to do).
That was part of the point.
Is the indigenous burning natural? If it is not, why not?
And it is impossible for humans to balance for the
DagT wrote:
The Norwegian name is Vågehval, and in latinBalaenoptera
acutorostrata. I´m not sure what it is called in English but
according to the International Whaling Commission there were about
18 of them in 2004. Not exactly extinct, and this is the type
that
Championing freedom of speech in regard to nude photos of children
might be considered PC in some circles. But eating whales is a
definite no-no among that same constituency.
Paul Stenquist
On Jul 21, 2006, at 9:24 PM, Keith McGuinness wrote:
DagT wrote:
The Norwegian name is Vågehval, and
In a message dated 7/21/2006 6:25:21 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I would like to nominate DagT for this month's Most Un-Polically
Correct award (actually, perhaps this year's...).
Keith McG 8-)
I second it.
Marnie aka Doe :-)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
34 matches
Mail list logo
