David Savage wrote:
On 1/4/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's great. I've been looking for a low-light PS. ISO800 with antishake might
be just the ticket.
Pity about the name. The A10 brings up an image of a very evil and ugly looking
tank-busting plane :P
D
IMO
I've just talked to Pentax, and I've been promised some more details on
that.
I'm going to post something as soon as I get it.
Dario
Did they disclose the CCD shift technology used somewhere? Pentax patented
a way to shift the CCD a while ago, using bending arms to shift a platform
with the
fra: Kostas Kavoussanakis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 3 Jan 2006, Adam Maas wrote:
Depends on licensing, as it sounds like the same tech KM is using. If it's
home-grown, it's a given.
I am wondering what featuring a proprietary Shake Reduction system
could mean. Proprietary Pentax?
From: cbwaters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/01/04 Wed AM 01:05:17 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: New Pentax: 8MP IS
I've never understood why people don't like the looks of the plane.
It's all Engines and Armaments...Badass. Just what it should be...
http://www.a-10.org
Op Wed, 04 Jan 2006 09:59:25 +0100 schreef Dario Bonazza
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've just talked to Pentax, and I've been promised some more details on
that. I'm going to post something as soon as I get it.
Oh wow. Looking forward to it.
--
Thanks, Lucas
Did they disclose the CCD shift
-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 10:56 AM
Subject: Re: New Pentax: 8MP IS
Op Wed, 04 Jan 2006 09:59:25 +0100 schreef Dario Bonazza
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've just talked to Pentax, and I've been promised some more details on
that. I'm going to post something as soon as I get
Did they disclose the CCD shift technology used somewhere? Pentax
patented a way to shift the CCD a while ago, using bending arms to
shift a platform with the CCD. That system would be possible on a
compact, but very hard on a SLR because the arms would be in the way
of light path to the
- Original Message - From: Lucas Rijnders [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 10:56 AM
Subject: Re: New Pentax: 8MP IS
Op Wed, 04 Jan 2006 09:59:25 +0100 schreef Dario Bonazza
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I've just talked to Pentax, and I've been promised
On 4 Jan 2006 at 12:04, Dario Bonazza wrote:
Got it. No written explanations, but rather intellegible CAD pictures:
http://www.dariobonazza.com/provv/SR01.jpg
http://www.dariobonazza.com/provv/SR02.jpg
http://www.dariobonazza.com/provv/SR03.jpg
Interesting, little linear motors (er,
On 1/3/06, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IMO the A-10 Warthog is one of the coolest looking planes around.
But I've been told I have no taste
Yes.
They call it the Warthog, because those animals are both beautiful and cool.
cheers,
frank
g
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept.
I'm sure the warthogs think their cool, and the mothers think the
littlen's are beautiful :-)
Warthog is it's unofficial working name (officially it's the
Thunderbolt). Like the B-52 Stratofortress, which is not so politely
referred to as the B.U.F.F.. I'll leave it to you to work that one
out.
David Savage wrote:
I'm sure the warthogs think their cool, and the mothers think the
littlen's are beautiful :-)
Warthog is it's unofficial working name (officially it's the
Thunderbolt).
Thunderbolt II The original Thunderbolt was the Republic P-47 from WWII
Like the B-52
Actually it's the Thunderbolt II, IIRC. The original Thunderbolt being
the P47, another plane built around the concept of applied brute force.
David Savage wrote:
I'm sure the warthogs think their cool, and the mothers think the
littlen's are beautiful :-)
Warthog is it's unofficial working
Thanks Peter Christian for the clarification.
Dave
On 1/5/06, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually it's the Thunderbolt II, IIRC. The original Thunderbolt being
the P47, another plane built around the concept of applied brute force.
More pics of Pentax IS:
http://www.ces-show.com/2006/review/pentax/pentax_optio_a10_camera.html
Warning: lots of camera shake there LOL
Dario
Wonder (and hope) if we'll get that nice feature in the next DSLR.
-Adam
Dario Bonazza wrote:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0601/06010307pentax_a10.asp
On Jan 3, 2006, at 16:07, Dario Bonazza wrote:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0601/06010307pentax_a10.asp
Although it is a different-sized CCD from what is used in a DSLR, it
is hard to imagine Pentax coming out with built-in IS on a point-'n'-
shoot and not considering it for use in a
Take it for granted.
Dario
- Original Message -
From: Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Tuesday, January 03, 2006 11:13 PM
Subject: Re: New Pentax: 8MP IS
Wonder (and hope) if we'll get that nice feature in the next DSLR.
-Adam
Dario Bonazza wrote
On 3 Jan 2006 at 16:16, Charles Robinson wrote:
Although it is a different-sized CCD from what is used in a DSLR, it
is hard to imagine Pentax coming out with built-in IS on a point-'n'-
shoot and not considering it for use in a future DSLR as well. My
fingers are crossed!
Be careful,
Adam Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wonder (and hope) if we'll get that nice feature in the next DSLR.
Mysterious voices from the ether say yes
;-)
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
Rob Studdert wrote:
Although it is a different-sized CCD from what is used in a DSLR, it
is hard to imagine Pentax coming out with built-in IS on a point-'n'-
shoot and not considering it for use in a future DSLR as well. My
fingers are crossed!
Be careful, they might stay that way, this is
Depends on licensing, as it sounds like the same tech KM is using. If
it's home-grown, it's a given.
-Adam
Charles Robinson wrote:
On Jan 3, 2006, at 16:07, Dario Bonazza wrote:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0601/06010307pentax_a10.asp
Although it is a different-sized CCD from what is
Quoting Dario Bonazza [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0601/06010307pentax_a10.asp
That's great. I've been looking for a low-light PS. ISO800 with antishake might
be just the ticket.
Pity about the name. The A10 brings up an image of a very evil and ugly looking
On 3 Jan 2006 at 23:29, Dario Bonazza wrote:
Rob, I won't believe that for a nanosecond.
They'll use that technology on their upcoming DLRS's too, take it for
granted.
Sorry, until I see it on the shelves I believe nothing.
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT)
It seems like someone at pentax actually listen to their customers
(i.e. they read this list :)
my fingers are crossed for you all.
bye,
Danilo
If only the power supply were AA or AAA batteries.
Jim A.
From: Dario Bonazza [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006 23:07:14 +0100
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: New Pentax: 8MP IS
Resent-From: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Resent-Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2006
This makes me optimistic.
I'll start saving up for the new DSRL. When my wallet has recovered after my
last enablement's the prizes will probably have fallen a lot.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very freely after Arthur
Very interesting. I was thinking along the lines of the new Fujifilm
Finepix F11 but this Pentax looks better in several aspects – it even
has a Food mode!
The Fuji excels in low level light with low noise levels but the
antishake should allow the Pentax to operate at comfortable ISO levels.
On 4/1/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
Pity about the name. The A10 brings up an image of a very evil and ugly
looking
tank-busting plane :P
Hmmm, it reminded me more of this:
http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/A10/A10A.HTM
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) |
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Dario Bonazza [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0601/06010307pentax_a10.asp
That's great. I've been looking for a low-light PS. ISO800 with antishake might
be just the ticket.
I've been looking for a good low-light PS too. I like
In England, the A10 is a slow road to nowhere special.
John
On Tue, 03 Jan 2006 22:31:10 -, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Dario Bonazza [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0601/06010307pentax_a10.asp
That's great. I've been looking for a low-light PS. ISO800 with
Har, that's even uglier.
D
Quoting Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 4/1/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
Pity about the name. The A10 brings up an image of a very evil and ugly
looking
tank-busting plane :P
Hmmm, it reminded me more of this:
It seems like someone at pentax actually listen to their customers
(i.e. they read this list :)
Someone here actually wanted an Image Stabilized P+S?
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: danilo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: New Pentax: 8MP IS
It seems like someone
I've never understood why people don't like the looks of the plane.
It's all Engines and Armaments...Badass. Just what it should be...
http://www.a-10.org/photos/Photos69804/25.jpg
CW
There's no dispute that four thousand rounds of depleted uranium per minute
won't solve.
- Original
In a message dated 1/3/2006 2:09:18 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0601/06010307pentax_a10.asp
Hey, hey, things are looking up in Pentaxland.
I would guess, yes, it's going to come to a DSLR too. Just a matter of when.
Anyway, shows
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anyway, shows that Pentax RD isn't asleep at the wheel. Like some have
thought.
The appropriate question might be Where did they get their Driver's
Liscense?. :-)
Not knocking the new product or IS/AS whatever they want to call it.
Tom C.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :
Hey, hey, things are looking up in Pentaxland.
I would guess, yes, it's going to come to a DSLR too. Just a matter of when.
Anyway, shows that Pentax RD isn't asleep at the wheel. Like some have
thought.
Keep on, Pentax RD guys, make a bigger version of this for
I think that's one of it's most endearing features, at least it's
pronounceable.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Dario Bonazza [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0601/06010307pentax_a10.asp
That's great. I've been looking for a low-light PS. ISO800 with antishake
Tom C a écrit :
Not knocking the new product or IS/AS whatever they want to call it.
Seems they want to call it SR for Shake Reduction.
In a message dated 1/3/2006 5:19:15 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Anyway, shows that Pentax RD isn't asleep at the wheel. Like some have
thought.
The appropriate question might be Where did they get their Driver's
Liscense?. :-)
Not knocking the
On Tue, 3 Jan 2006, Adam Maas wrote:
Depends on licensing, as it sounds like the same tech KM is using. If it's
home-grown, it's a given.
I am wondering what featuring a proprietary Shake Reduction system
could mean. Proprietary Pentax? Or K-M? :-)
Kostas
On 1/3/06, Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems like someone at pentax actually listen to their customers
(i.e. they read this list :)
Someone here actually wanted an Image Stabilized P+S?
Kenneth Waller
Especially one with a very modest zoom. Most other PS' with IS are
long
On 1/4/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's great. I've been looking for a low-light PS. ISO800 with antishake
might
be just the ticket.
Pity about the name. The A10 brings up an image of a very evil and ugly
looking
tank-busting plane :P
D
IMO the A-10 Warthog is
SR
Dario
Not knocking the new product or IS/AS whatever they want to call it.
Op Tue, 03 Jan 2006 23:29:11 +0100 schreef Dario Bonazza
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Rob Studdert wrote:
Although it is a different-sized CCD from what is used in a DSLR, it
is hard to imagine Pentax coming out with built-in IS on a point-'n'-
shoot and not considering it for use in a future DSLR as
45 matches
Mail list logo
