OK, just bit the bullet and ordered the Q with the 01 prime.
It is just 599 Euros here now, and an additional 100 Euros
cashback from Pentax valid until the end of the month ...
On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 19:07:15 -0600 William Robb wrote:
Did you get such an adapter already ?
(I think there is no
...@dfsee.com]
Sendt: 3. desember 2011 17:19
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: RE: Q v. K7
No, autofocus IS NOT available while recording video.
OK, too bad.
That is one of the things I miss on the K5 whan making the occasional video :-)
Regards, JvW
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML
On 03/12/2011 4:08 AM, Jan van Wijk wrote:
Hi Bill,
Did you get such an adapter already ?
(I think there is no Pentax one yet)
I bought the Jinfinance one that's on ebeigh. It's pretty good. You can
set the camera on AE and set the lens for minimum aperture, and use the
click stops on the
Hi Bill,
On Mon, 05 Dec 2011 19:07:15 -0600 William Robb wrote:
Did you get such an adapter already ?
(I think there is no Pentax one yet)
I bought the Jinfinance one that's on ebeigh. It's pretty good.
Yes, I have seen that listing.
Looks good indeed, including the tripod attachement ...
Hi Bill,
On Fri, 02 Dec 2011 12:47:44 -0600 William Robb wrote:
The key thing to note here is that the Q had perfectly acceptable IQ.
Maybe not under all conditions, but certainly good enough to make it a
real photographic tool.
And with the K-Q lens adapter, there are some pretty sweet super
Of Jan van
Wijk
Sent: Saturday, December 03, 2011 11:09 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Q v. K7
Did you get such an adapter already ?
(I think there is no Pentax one yet)
Another question on the Q:
Do you know if autofocus can be enabled for Video, to have autofocus while
recording
OK, Thanks Stig.
On Sat, 3 Dec 2011 13:41:37 + SV Hovland wrote:
There is adapters. I have one with tripod mount and aperture control. I can
search it up for you on ebay if interested.
I think I have seen that one, it looks good (about 60$ I think).
Was wondering if the Pentax would offer
I have drawers full of 35 mm cameras that could be described like that.
William Robb anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/12/2011 8:27 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
A page from the Pentax Forums review of the Pentax Q. This page
shows
a comparison of images from the K7 and the Q. The K7
The key thing to note here is that the Q had perfectly acceptable IQ.
Maybe not under all conditions, but certainly good enough to make it a
real photographic tool.
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 9:39 PM, William Robb
anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/12/2011 8:27 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
A
Maybe in the past tense? ;-)
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 4:57 AM, Larry Colen, l...@red4est.com (From
Droid) l...@red4est.com wrote:
I have drawers full of 35 mm cameras that could be described like that.
William Robb anotherdrunken...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/12/2011 8:27 PM, Steven Desjardins
On 02/12/2011 11:18 AM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
The key thing to note here is that the Q had perfectly acceptable IQ.
Maybe not under all conditions, but certainly good enough to make it a
real photographic tool.
And with the K-Q lens adapter, there are some pretty sweet super
telephoto
On 01/12/2011 8:27 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
A page from the Pentax Forums review of the Pentax Q. This page shows
a comparison of images from the K7 and the Q. The K7 does better, but
the Q is surprisingly close.
http://www.pentaxforums.com/reviews/pentax-q/shutter-raw-jpg.html
I'm
12 matches
Mail list logo
