Re: OT English test

> >On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 8:09 PM, mike wilson <m.9.wil...@ntlworld.com> >wrote: >> I managed 40,100 on the academic test. I deny all knowledge of >diddling Mrs >> Slocombe's pussy. I am also impressed (but not surprised) by Boris >and >> Jostein's scores

Re: OT English test

29100 harumph -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__Broadcast, Corporate, || (O) |Web Video Production -- _ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the

Re: OT English test

> On 13 July 2016 at 19:14 Boris Liberman wrote: > > > The sad part about these tests is that they don't help me to improve > on my bloody Russian accent... Thick and heavy as it is... Jostein > wins hands down here... :-) I don't remember much of an accent. Tovarich. --

Re: OT English test

The sad part about these tests is that they don't help me to improve on my bloody Russian accent... Thick and heavy as it is... Jostein wins hands down here... :-) On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 8:09 PM, mike wilson <m.9.wil...@ntlworld.com> wrote: > I managed 40,100 on the academic test. I

Re: OT English test

I managed 40,100 on the academic test. I deny all knowledge of diddling Mrs Slocombe's pussy. I am also impressed (but not surprised) by Boris and Jostein's scores. > On 13 July 2016 at 12:13 Bob W-PDML <p...@web-options.com> wrote: > > > Those are very impressive numb

Re: OT English test

Glad to be of service. > On 13 Jul 2016, at 17:13, Boris Liberman <bori...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Bob, just out of my never ending curiosity, I've taken the test that > you indicated. I got my result at 21,400 words, which puts me just > above the bottom level of native E

Re: OT English test

Bob, just out of my never ending curiosity, I've taken the test that you indicated. I got my result at 21,400 words, which puts me just above the bottom level of native English speakers (said to be between 20,000 and 35,000 words). This is extremely fascinating. I've bookmarked this page as I am

Re: OT English test

t; Uh huh. > > >> On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 3:52 PM, mike wilson <m.9.wil...@ntlworld.com> wrote: >> It's actually an American test but we can forgive a few spelling mistakes... >> >> I'm not sure that some of the options are the best syn/antonyms to offer and >

Re: OT English test

Also 30150. And it adds, "You are Shakespeare! You can even create new words that will expand the English dictionary." Uh huh. On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 3:52 PM, mike wilson <m.9.wil...@ntlworld.com> wrote: > It's actually an American test but we can forgive a few spelling

Re: OT English test

I need to spend more hollidays in the US or UK :) Only scored close to 11000 as a non-native speaker (Dutch). Regards, Jan van Wijk On Tue, 12 Jul 2016 20:52:18 +0100 (BST) mike wilson wrote: > >It's actually an American test but we can forgive a few spelling mistakes... > >

Re: OT English test

More likely, it's because American English is not your native language. On 7/13/2016 6:59 AM, Alan C wrote: We didn't use dictionaries! Alan C -Original Message- From: Jostein Øksne Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2016 10:46 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: OT English test I'll

Re: OT English test

On 7/12/2016 7:47 PM, Stanley Halpin wrote: On Jul 12, 2016, at 3:52 PM, mike wilson <m.9.wil...@ntlworld.com> wrote: It's actually an American test but we can forgive a few spelling mistakes... I'm not sure that some of the options are the best syn/antonyms to offer and I've no ide

Re: OT English test

Those are very impressive numbers for non-native speakers. There is what I believe to be a more accurate test, relying on honesty, here. It also discusses the methodology used, and feeds the results back into itself - it is part of an academic research project. http://testyourvocab.com I do

Re: OT English test

> > > >Alan C > > > >-Original Message- > >From: mike wilson > >Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2016 9:52 PM > >To: pdml > >Subject: OT English test > > > >It's actually an American test but we can forgive a few spelling > >mistakes..

Re: OT English test

We didn't use dictionaries! Alan C -Original Message- From: Jostein Øksne Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2016 10:46 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: OT English test I'll hang with you, Alan. 22350 Jostein Den 13. juli 2016 06.59.24 CEST, skrev Alan C <c...@lantic.net>:

Re: OT English test

I'll hang with you, Alan. 22350 Jostein Den 13. juli 2016 06.59.24 CEST, skrev Alan C <c...@lantic.net>: >22950 > >Alan C > >-Original Message- >From: mike wilson >Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2016 9:52 PM >To: pdml >Subject: OT English test > >It

RE: OT English test

30325 - but then I'm a pedant. John in Brisbane -Original Message- From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of mike wilson Sent: Wednesday, 13 July 2016 5:52 AM To: pdml Subject: OT English test It's actually an American test but we can forgive a few spelling mistakes

Re: OT English test

22950 Alan C -Original Message- From: mike wilson Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2016 9:52 PM To: pdml Subject: OT English test It's actually an American test but we can forgive a few spelling mistakes... I'm not sure that some of the options are the best syn/antonyms to offer and I've

Re: OT English test

, 2016 3:53 PM To: pdml Subject: OT English test It's actually an American test but we can forgive a few spelling mistakes... I'm not sure that some of the options are the best syn/antonyms to offer and I've no idea what the scoring system is but it's reasonable fun. http://www.arealme.com/vocabulary

Re: OT English test

Geez only 30325, I wonder how it's scored and which ones I missed... On 7/12/2016 3:52 PM, mike wilson wrote: It's actually an American test but we can forgive a few spelling mistakes... I'm not sure that some of the options are the best syn/antonyms to offer and I've no idea what the scoring

Re: OT English test

30325. top 0.01% From: mike wilson Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2016 3:53 PM To: pdml Subject: OT English test It's actually an American test but we can forgive a few spelling mistakes... I'm not sure that some of the options are the best syn/antonyms to offer and I've no idea what the scoring

Re: OT English test

> On Jul 12, 2016, at 3:52 PM, mike wilson <m.9.wil...@ntlworld.com> wrote: > > It's actually an American test but we can forgive a few spelling mistakes... > > I'm not sure that some of the options are the best syn/antonyms to offer and > I've no idea what the sc

Re: OT English test

30325. m > On Jul 12, 2016, at 3:27 PM, Brian Walters <supera1...@fastmail.fm> wrote: > > 29275 > > > Cheers > > Brian > > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016, at 05:52 AM, mike wilson wrote: >> It's actually an American test but we can forgive a few spelling &g

Re: OT English test

29800 -p On 7/12/2016 2:52 PM, mike wilson wrote: It's actually an American test but we can forgive a few spelling mistakes... I'm not sure that some of the options are the best syn/antonyms to offer and I've no idea what the scoring system is but it's reasonable fun. http://www.arealme.com

Re: OT English test

29275 Cheers Brian On Wed, Jul 13, 2016, at 05:52 AM, mike wilson wrote: > It's actually an American test but we can forgive a few spelling > mistakes... > > I'm not sure that some of the options are the best syn/antonyms to offer > and > I've no idea what the scoring

Re: OT English test

On 7/12/2016 3:52 PM, mike wilson wrote: It's actually an American test but we can forgive a few spelling mistakes... I'm not sure that some of the options are the best syn/antonyms to offer and I've no idea what the scoring system is but it's reasonable fun. http://www.arealme.com/vocabulary

Re: OT English test

On 2016-07-12 13:52 , mike wilson wrote: http://www.arealme.com/vocabulary-size-test/en/ 30150 29800, the internet exists to praise us while our life drains away -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML

OT English test

It's actually an American test but we can forgive a few spelling mistakes... I'm not sure that some of the options are the best syn/antonyms to offer and I've no idea what the scoring system is but it's reasonable fun. http://www.arealme.com/vocabulary-size-test/en/ 30150 -- PDML Pentax

Re: A test outing with the K-1

A very fine test—and good commentary on the features. Cheers, Christine > On May 17, 2016, at 8:45 AM, Mark Roberts <postmas...@robertstech.com> wrote: > > Lisa and I went up to New Hampshire last weekend for a bit of hiking > in the White Mountains. I took the K-1 along,

Re: A test outing with the K-1

weight and the SDM in the *DA I wonder what folks think of the two. Kenneth Waller http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller - Original Message - From: "Mark Roberts" <postmas...@robertstech.com> Subject: A test outing with the K-1 Lisa and I went up to New Hampsh

Re: A test outing with the K-1

Love 0025 and like 0006, Mark! Envy you! J - Original Message - From: "Mark Roberts" <postmas...@robertstech.com> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <pdml@pdml.net> Sent: Tuesday, May 17, 2016 6:45:01 AM Subject: A test outing with the K-1 Lisa and I went

A test outing with the K-1

Lisa and I went up to New Hampshire last weekend for a bit of hiking in the White Mountains. I took the K-1 along, though this outing was more of a "get to learn the camera" effort than any serious attempt to get good photos. Here's 4 quick shots:

Re: Pentax K-1 Hands-On Field Test (The CameraStoreTV)

Feels like really a well balanced review. Pentax made truly an outstanding job with this camera. I should be looking forward to seeing PESOs and other pictures posted here... On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 8:28 PM, Stanley Halpin wrote: > >> On May 16, 2016, at 12:09 PM,

Re: Pentax K-1 Hands-On Field Test (The CameraStoreTV)

> On May 16, 2016, at 12:09 PM, Henk Terhell wrote: > > Here a new review on the K-1 from TheCameraStoreTV: > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=87yGmD71nyA > > Henk > Thanks Henk. They do a good presentation. stan -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net

Re: Pentax K-1 Hands-On Field Test (The CameraStoreTV)

I agree, though I started to bite my nails at the opening page. These guys speak a bit fast, so I have to watch it again. Henk Op 2016-05-16 om 18:34 schreef Steve Cottrell: On 16/5/16, Henk Terhell, discombobulated, unleashed: Here a new review on the K-1 from TheCameraStoreTV:

Re: Pentax K-1 Hands-On Field Test (The CameraStoreTV)

On 16/5/16, Henk Terhell, discombobulated, unleashed: >Here a new review on the K-1 from TheCameraStoreTV: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=87yGmD71nyA I like The Camera Store's videos and this is no exception. Really positive video review - great watch!

Pentax K-1 Hands-On Field Test (The CameraStoreTV)

Here a new review on the K-1 from TheCameraStoreTV: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=87yGmD71nyA Henk -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.

Re: test posting

That's the idea--it converts rtf and html to plain text. On Wednesday, May 11, 2016, Bob Sullivan wrote: > All looks like plain text to me... > > On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 1:02 PM, ann sanfedele > wrote: > > Comes through here but hard to

Re: test posting

All looks like plain text to me... On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 1:02 PM, ann sanfedele wrote: > Comes through here but hard to read that font - in my reply it will show up > as a different font .. the one I use > > I think > > ann > > > > On 5/10/2016 1:05 PM, Gonz wrote: >> >>

test

just testing -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.

Re: test posting

Comes through here but hard to read that font - in my reply it will show up as a different font .. the one I use I think ann On 5/10/2016 1:05 PM, Gonz wrote: Doug, Here's a non "Plain Text" formatted posting. Let me know if it works. Formatted text: "*Large font*" Gonz -- PDML

Re: test posting

Awesome. Thought it had fallen off the list On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 12:18 PM, Doug Brewer wrote: > Looks righteous, Gonz. Thanks. > > On 5/10/16 1:05 PM, Gonz wrote: >> >> Doug, >> >> Here's a non "Plain Text" formatted posting. Let me know if it works. >> >>

Re: test posting

Looks righteous, Gonz. Thanks. On 5/10/16 1:05 PM, Gonz wrote: Doug, Here's a non "Plain Text" formatted posting. Let me know if it works. Formatted text: "*Large font*" Gonz -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE

test posting

Doug, Here's a non "Plain Text" formatted posting. Let me know if it works. Formatted text: "*Large font*" Gonz -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the

Re: Another test

On 5/9/2016 12:34 PM, Chris Mitchell wrote: Trying to donate, but get the message "Your request failed due to technical difficulties. Please try again after some time". It happened on Mark's book donation page too. I waited some time (24 hours) and it still happens. Has anyone else seen the

Re: Another test

o send on to The List. That way, >> those of you with email clients that revert to or can only compose in >> formatted text can still post your messages and they won't be sent off to >> the bit bucket with extreme prejudice. >> >> So, I'm writing this in HTML, whic

Re: Another test (for Chris)

nts that revert to or can only compose in >>> formatted text can still post your messages and they won't be sent off to >>> the bit bucket with extreme prejudice. >>> >>> So, I'm writing this in HTML, which offends every fiber of my being, in >>> order

Re: Another test (for Chris)

at revert to or can only compose in >> formatted text can still post your messages and they won't be sent off to >> the bit bucket with extreme prejudice. >> >> So, I'm writing this in HTML, which offends every fiber of my being, in >> order to test a new setting I've enabled

Re: Another test

with email clients that revert to or can only compose in >> > formatted text can still post your messages and they won't be sent off >> > to >> > the bit bucket with extreme prejudice. >> > >> > So, I'm writing this in HTML, which offends every fiber

Re: Another test

t revert to or can only compose in > formatted text can still post your messages and they won't be sent off to > the bit bucket with extreme prejudice. > > So, I'm writing this in HTML, which offends every fiber of my being, in > order to test a new setting I've enabled in the software. If it

Re: Another test

u with email clients that revert to or can only compose in >>> formatted text can still post your messages and they won't be sent off to >>> the bit bucket with extreme prejudice. >>> >>> So, I'm writing this in HTML, which offends every fiber of my being, in &g

Re: Another test

On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Doug Brewer wrote: > Hi, kids. > > > Now might be a good time to remind you to throw some cash into the PDML > kitty, since it is currently as empty as campaign promises. > > much love, > > Doug Done > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail

Re: Another test

Doug Brewer wrote: Now might be a good time to remind you to throw some cash into the PDML kitty, since it is currently as empty as campaign promises. Done. much love, Doug There's nothing in this world quite like love from Doug Brewer. -- Larry Colen l...@red4est.com (postbox

Re: Another test

o the bit bucket with extreme prejudice. So, I'm writing this in HTML, which offends every fiber of my being, in order to test a new setting I've enabled in the software. If it gets nuked, you'll never know. Now might be a good time to remind you to throw some cash into the PDML kitty, since it is cu

Re: Another test

only compose in formatted text can still post your messages and they won't be sent off to the bit bucket with extreme prejudice. So, I'm writing this in HTML, which offends every fiber of my being, in order to test a new setting I've enabled in the software. If it gets nuked, you'll never know

Re: Another test

this in HTML, which offends every fiber of my being, in > order to test a new setting I've enabled in the software. If it gets nuked, > you'll never know. > > Now might be a good time to remind you to throw some cash into the PDML > kitty, since it is currently as empty as campaign p

Re: Another test

of my being, in order to test a new setting I've enabled in the software. If it gets nuked, you'll never know. Now might be a good time to remind you to throw some cash into the PDML kitty, since it is currently as empty as campaign promises. much love, Doug -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pd

Re: Another test

So, I'm writing this in HTML, which offends every fiber of my being, in > order to test a new setting I've enabled in the software. If it gets nuked, > you'll never know. > > Now might be a good time to remind you to throw some cash into the PDML > kitty, since it is curren

Another test

be sent off to the bit bucket with extreme prejudice. So, I'm writing this in HTML, which offends every fiber of my being, in order to test a new setting I've enabled in the software. If it gets nuked, you'll never know. Now might be a good time to remind you to throw some cash into the PDML

Re: a different test

Bless you steve! ann On 4/21/2016 12:11 PM, steve harley wrote: On 2016-04-20 19:30 , ann sanfedele wrote: [...] Now, there is a column entitiled "Correspondents" [...] Am I stuck with this, Fellow users of Thunderbird? do ya know? Do you see the mail coming from me as being from the list

Re: a different test

On 2016-04-21 10:11 , steve harley wrote: i don't have a "Correspondents" column i take this part back — it turns out the first update didn't get me all the way to Thunderbird 45; now i have that version and see Correspondents, (though it's not acting like yours) and the instructions i

Re: a different test

On 2016-04-20 19:30 , ann sanfedele wrote: [...] Now, there is a column entitiled "Correspondents" [...] Am I stuck with this, Fellow users of Thunderbird? do ya know? Do you see the mail coming from me as being from the list in the indexes of your mail? OR can you see my name in that column?

Re: a different test

10:26 PM, Ken Waller wrote: Are you breathing better ? -Original Message- From: ann sanfedele <ann...@nyc.rr.com> Subject: a different test crossing fingers changed filter -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSC

Re: a different test

Are you breathing better ? -Original Message- >From: ann sanfedele <ann...@nyc.rr.com> >Subject: a different test > >crossing fingers changed filter -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE fro

Re: a different test

Phew!... well I'm grateful for that! ann On 4/20/2016 8:57 PM, Brian Walters wrote: Both test posts show you as the sender here. Cheers Brian ++ Brian Walters Western Sydney Australia http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/ On Thu, Apr 21, 2016, at 08:42 AM

Re: a different test

WAHWAHWAH!! No, seriously - when I look at the index in my PDML folder - as soon as I Updated to the latest Thunderbird version that they begged me to for security reasons, Now, there is a column entitiled "Correspondents" (I can do a screen shot later and put it on smugmug) in my

Re: a different test

ann sanfedele wrote: >crossing fingers changed filter Amazing! Your post now shows up as being from "Mrs. Nelson Mandella" and asks for my help in getting $25,000,000.00 in gold out of Nigeria! -- Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia www.robertstech.com --- This email has been checked

Re: a different test

Both test posts show you as the sender here. Cheers Brian ++ Brian Walters Western Sydney Australia http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/ On Thu, Apr 21, 2016, at 08:42 AM, ann sanfedele wrote: > crossing fingers changed filter > > > -- > PDML

Re: a different test

nope still can't see it.:-) Dave On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 6:42 PM, ann sanfedele wrote: > crossing fingers changed filter > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the

a different test

crossing fingers changed filter -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.

Re: test

just replied to a thread i'm getting through Dave On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 1:24 PM, Nicole Jacque wrote: > That sounds like the problem I’ve been having… > >> On Feb 24, 2016, at 10:07 AM, ann sanfedele wrote: >> >> P.j. Me too >> One appeared back to me - the

Re: test

That sounds like the problem I’ve been having… > On Feb 24, 2016, at 10:07 AM, ann sanfedele wrote: > > P.j. Me too > One appeared back to me - the other didnt hmmm > ann > > On 2/24/2016 10:30 AM, P.J. Alling wrote: >> Sent a couple of messages none appeared. >> > > > --

Re: test

P.j. Me too One appeared back to me - the other didnt hmmm ann On 2/24/2016 10:30 AM, P.J. Alling wrote: Sent a couple of messages none appeared. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link

Was Re: test : Nevermind

On 2/24/2016 10:30 AM, P.J. Alling wrote: Sent a couple of messages none appeared. -- I don't want to achieve immortality through my work; I want to achieve immortality through not dying. -- Woody Allen -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net

test

Sent a couple of messages none appeared. -- I don't want to achieve immortality through my work; I want to achieve immortality through not dying. -- Woody Allen -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please

Re: test message

I wonder if the server is having trouble keeping up with today's list traffic? On 2/18/2016 6:30 PM, Igor PDML-StR wrote: Test I've send a 2 short responses today in the morning, and neither of them showed up on the list (via e-mail or in archives). I am not sure if it is the same problem

Re: test message

I’ve seen a couple of your posts today… > On Feb 18, 2016, at 6:37 PM, Igor PDML-StR <pdml...@komkon.org> wrote: > > > > It went through... now, let's see if the response will go through as well.. > > > On Thu, 18 Feb 2016, Igor PDML-StR wrote: > &g

Re: test message

It went through... now, let's see if the response will go through as well.. On Thu, 18 Feb 2016, Igor PDML-StR wrote: Test I've send a 2 short responses today in the morning, and neither of them showed up on the list (via e-mail or in archives). I am not sure if it is the same

test message

Test I've send a 2 short responses today in the morning, and neither of them showed up on the list (via e-mail or in archives). I am not sure if it is the same problem that Nicole experienced. Igor -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo

Re: Used Lens Test

convince myself to do it. > > My questions to PDML... > > Since I can physically handle the lens and take test shots with my own > camera, what am I looking for? Is there a set of shots I should take > to test the lens? What am I looking for in a used lens? > > Thanks! >

Re: Used Lens Test

I'm itching to pull the trigger on the 16-50, it's a little higher than I want to spend, but I might be able to convince myself to do it. My questions to PDML... Since I can physically handle the lens and take test shots with my own camera, what am I looking for? Is there a set of shots I

Re: Used Lens Test

on the 16-50, it's a little higher than I want to spend, but I might be able to convince myself to do it. My questions to PDML... Since I can physically handle the lens and take test shots with my own camera, what am I looking for? Is there a set of shots I should take to test the lens? What am I

Used Lens Test

higher than I want to spend, but I might be able to convince myself to do it. My questions to PDML... Since I can physically handle the lens and take test shots with my own camera, what am I looking for? Is there a set of shots I should take to test the lens? What am I looking for in a used lens

Re: TEST 3

me three Sent with AquaMail for Android http://www.aqua-mail.com On 15 February 2016 15:34:58 Paul Sorenson wrote: Me, too Sent from my iPad On Feb 15, 2016, at 7:28 AM, David J Brooks wrote: got it On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 8:01 AM, Alan C

Re: TEST 3

Me, too Sent from my iPad > On Feb 15, 2016, at 7:28 AM, David J Brooks wrote: > > got it > >> On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 8:01 AM, Alan C wrote: >> This is driving me nuts. Trying gmail now >> >> A >> >> --- >> This email has been checked for viruses by

Re: TEST 3

got it On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 8:01 AM, Alan C wrote: > This is driving me nuts. Trying gmail now > > A > > --- > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. > https://www.avast.com/antivirus > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net >

TEST 3

This is driving me nuts. Trying gmail now A --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the

Re: TEST 2

I can see you. Replying to the list and to you directly. That might help you figure out if it's a list problem or not. On 2/13/2016 11:46 PM, Alan C wrote: I have received no PDML e-mails for 2 days. I can only read them in the archives. Any ideas? Alan C -- Science - Questions we may

TEST

--- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.

Re: TEST

fail On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 6:59 AM, Alan C wrote: > > > --- > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. > https://www.avast.com/antivirus > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to

Re: TEST

Naa, he deserves a mixed grade c- for effort, f for content. On 2/13/2016 10:29 AM, David J Brooks wrote: fail On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 6:59 AM, Alan C wrote: --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus -- PDML

Re: TEST

Presentation was good, no spelling or grammar issues… I would say at least C+, maybe even B- As for the content, I myself appreciated the zen-masterful style of presenting nothing, thereby causing us to explore for deeper meanings and the relation of our lives to the cosmic forces of change and

Re: TEST

HAR ! -Original Message- >From: Stanley Halpin <s...@stans-photography.info> >Sent: Feb 13, 2016 1:34 PM >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <pdml@pdml.net> >Subject: Re: TEST > >Presentation was good, no spelling or grammar issues… I would say at least C+, >

Re: TEST 2

I don't know what your problem is, but I received this post from you through the PDML> Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola On Sat, Feb 13, 2016 at 11:46 PM, Alan C wrote: > I have received no PDML e-mails for 2 days. I can only read them in the >

TEST 2

I have received no PDML e-mails for 2 days. I can only read them in the archives. Any ideas? Alan C --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net

Re: TEST 2

On Sun, Feb 14, 2016, at 03:46 PM, Alan C wrote: > I have received no PDML e-mails for 2 days. I can only read them in the > archives. Any ideas? I don't suppose they're being treated as spam by your ISP? Something similar happened to me a couple of years ago with my Fastmail account (the one

Re: test... not seeing my posts in my PDML folder

Well I saw this one. On 1/29/2016 10:36 AM, ann sanfedele wrote: Last couple of days I'm not seeing my responses to other's posts in my PDML folderin Thunderbird.. are you guys seeing them? I just replied to the viemo one with the Pentax in it which I think could be a KX ann -- I don't

test... not seeing my posts in my PDML folder

Last couple of days I'm not seeing my responses to other's posts in my PDML folderin Thunderbird.. are you guys seeing them? I just replied to the viemo one with the Pentax in it which I think could be a KX ann -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net

Re: test... not seeing my posts in my PDML folder

nevermind - it seems to be there now On 1/29/2016 10:36 AM, ann sanfedele wrote: Last couple of days I'm not seeing my responses to other's posts in my PDML folderin Thunderbird.. are you guys seeing them? I just replied to the viemo one with the Pentax in it which I think could be a KX ann

Re: test... not seeing my posts in my PDML folder

On 1/29/2016 10:36 AM, ann sanfedele wrote: Last couple of days I'm not seeing my responses to other's posts in my PDML folderin Thunderbird.. are you guys seeing them? I just replied to the viemo one with the Pentax in it which I think could be a KX ann FWIW, I see this one and looking

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >