[Default] On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 15:20:56 -0700, Larry Colen
l...@red4est.com wrote:
Redundant Array of Inexpensive DSLRs
snip
Don't ever change, Larry. If you didn't exist we'd have to invent you.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
[Default] On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 22:02:51 -0400, Matthew Hunt
m...@pobox.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 9:10 PM, Philip Northeast
rnort...@bigpond.net.au wrote:
Somebody has beaten you to it
Hasselblad use sensor shift technology to create multiple images and move
the sensor slightly to
On 6/22/2011 15:53, Mark Roberts wrote:
Don't ever change, Larry.
Do I sense a strong (plain) C Force here?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 3:20 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
Redundant Array of Inexpensive DSLRs
On my drive home from San Luis Obispo today, I had the crazy idea that for
the price of a medium format camera, you could make a bracket that would
securely hold four (or more)
On Jun 22, 2011, at 6:59 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 3:20 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
Redundant Array of Inexpensive DSLRs
On my drive home from San Luis Obispo today, I had the crazy idea that for
the price of a medium format camera, you could make
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 1:02 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
I'm sure that someone more proficient at math than I can figure out minimum
shooting distance for each focal length at a particular pixel density were
the parallax difference is less than a pixel.
Far. Let's suppose your
What makes RAID work in computers is that the controller interface
doesn't really increase the cost of building the array by very much.
How would that work with cameras?
What would be the cost of a mechanism to hold and control 4 identical
camera bodies, not to mention 4 identical lenses?
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 07:15:19PM -0400, John Sessoms wrote:
And how would you assure that all 4 cameras were simultaneously
focused the same distance?
Auto-focus.
If all cameras were pointed in the same direction, they should
(in theory) all auto-focus on the same object.
Of course we all
From: Mark Roberts
[Default] On Tue, 21 Jun 2011 22:02:51 -0400, Matthew Hunt
m...@pobox.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 9:10 PM, Philip Northeast
rnort...@bigpond.net.au wrote:
Somebody has beaten you to it
Hasselblad use sensor shift technology to create multiple images and move
On Jun 22, 2011, at 4:15 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
What makes RAID work in computers is that the controller interface doesn't
really increase the cost of building the array by very much.
How would that work with cameras?
What would be the cost of a mechanism to hold and control 4
The phrase this calls to my mind is A solution in search of a problem.
From: Larry Colen
On Jun 22, 2011, at 6:59 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 3:20 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
Redundant Array of Inexpensive DSLRs
On my drive home from San Luis
Redundant Array of Inexpensive DSLRs
On my drive home from San Luis Obispo today, I had the crazy idea that for the
price of a medium format camera, you could make a bracket that would securely
hold four (or more) relatively inexpensive DSLRs, with identical(*) decent
lenses, trigger them
-boun...@pdml.net
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 15:20:56
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail Listpdml@pdml.net
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Today's crazy idea: RAID
Redundant Array of Inexpensive DSLRs
On my drive home from San Luis Obispo today, I had the crazy idea that for the
price
That's Ricoh, not Rich.
-Original Message-
From: Larry Colen l...@red4est.com
Sender: pdml-boun...@pdml.net
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 15:20:56
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail Listpdml@pdml.net
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Today's crazy idea: RAID
Redundant Array
Somebody has beaten you to it
Hasselblad use sensor shift technology to create multiple images and
move the sensor slightly to increae the effective pixel count.
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/766903-REG/Hasselblad_70490520_H4D_200MS_Digital_Camera.html
--
Philip Northeast
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 9:10 PM, Philip Northeast
rnort...@bigpond.net.au wrote:
Somebody has beaten you to it
Hasselblad use sensor shift technology to create multiple images and move
the sensor slightly to increae the effective pixel count.
True,
but the Hasselblad effort does show the software required to stitch the
multiple images together does work, so the idea is feasible
On 22/06/11 12:02 PM, Matthew Hunt wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 9:10 PM, Philip Northeast
rnort...@bigpond.net.au wrote:
Somebody has beaten you to
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 10:02:51PM -0400, Matthew Hunt wrote:
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 9:10 PM, Philip Northeast
rnort...@bigpond.net.au wrote:
Somebody has beaten you to it
Hasselblad use sensor shift technology to create multiple images and move
the sensor slightly to increae the
pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Tue, June 21, 2011 6:20:56 PM
Subject: Today's crazy idea: RAID
Redundant Array of Inexpensive DSLRs
On my drive home from San Luis Obispo today, I had the crazy idea that for the
price of a medium format camera, you could make a bracket that would securely
hold four
On 6/22/2011 01:20, Larry Colen wrote:
Redundant Array of Inexpensive DSLRs
On my drive home from San Luis Obispo today, I had the crazy idea
that for the price of a medium format camera, you could make a
bracket that would securely hold four (or more) relatively
inexpensive DSLRs, with
20 matches
Mail list logo
