Re: Too Much PAW

2004-02-26 Thread Robert Gonzalez
yourselves... ...And no fondling ass you walk there, ok?!? vbg tan. -Original Message- From: Lasse Karlsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, 26 February 2004 7:03 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Too Much PAW From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] On 24/2/04, TAN THE FONDLER

RE: Too Much PAW

2004-02-26 Thread Cotty
On 25/2/04, FRANK disgorged: Tanya, Call hubby over to the computer right now. Show him this: http://www.nrg666.com/pdml/portraits/pages/FrankTheriault.htm Oh no! - too late. Well, it was nice while she lasted... Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche

RE: Too Much PAW

2004-02-26 Thread Cotty
On 25/2/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged: Just remember, at least five of us WIMMEN are planning to be there! I'm bringing my own bodyguard, though ... ERN Don't forget, one of my specialties is picturing people who don't want to be pictured... No worries, you'll never even know it's happened

RE: Too Much PAW

2004-02-26 Thread Cotty
On 25/2/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged: Yeah, somehow, judging by the looks of Frank's bunny ears, I think I'll be pretty safe. Unless that is, Cotty squashes me in the back of tv's car on the drive to GFM! hehe... tan. Stone the crows. I thought she was riding on the roof with a supply of

RE: Too Much PAW

2004-02-26 Thread Tanya Mayer Photography
me things aren't looking to great tan. -Original Message- From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, 26 February 2004 8:55 PM To: pentax list Subject: RE: Too Much PAW On 25/2/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged: Yeah, somehow, judging by the looks of Frank's bunny ears, I

Re: Too Much PAW

2004-02-26 Thread graywolf
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Too Much PAW From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] On 24/2/04, TAN THE FONDLER disgorged: hehe, the challenge is on! tan. (who fondles AS she photographs) ps no wise arse comments about fondling, ok Cotty? hehe. I'll let someone else have a go :-) Cue Lasse... Yes

RE: Too Much PAW

2004-02-25 Thread Cotty
On 24/2/04, TAN THE FONDLER disgorged: hehe, the challenge is on! tan. (who fondles AS she photographs) ps no wise arse comments about fondling, ok Cotty? hehe. I'll let someone else have a go :-) Cue Lasse... Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche

Re: Too Much PAW

2004-02-25 Thread Lasse Karlsson
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] On 24/2/04, TAN THE FONDLER disgorged: hehe, the challenge is on! tan. (who fondles AS she photographs) ps no wise arse comments about fondling, ok Cotty? hehe. I'll let someone else have a go :-) Cue Lasse... Yes, yes, Cotty... You want me to have

RE: Too Much PAW

2004-02-25 Thread Tanya Mayer Photography
are very naughty boys, now go to the back of the classroom and behave yourselves... ...And no fondling ass you walk there, ok?!? vbg tan. -Original Message- From: Lasse Karlsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, 26 February 2004 7:03 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Too Much PAW

Re: Too Much PAW

2004-02-25 Thread Cotty
On 25/2/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged: On 24/2/04, TAN THE FONDLER disgorged: hehe, the challenge is on! tan. (who fondles AS she photographs) ps no wise arse comments about fondling, ok Cotty? hehe. I'll let someone else have a go :-) Cue Lasse... Yes, yes, Cotty... You want

RE: Too Much PAW

2004-02-25 Thread Cotty
On 25/2/04, TANJA THE SWEET disgorged: OMG - no wonder my poor hubby worries about me and that bloody photography list. I spend half of my life convincing him that hanging out with you lot is safe! He is petrified at the possibility of me going to GFM and meeting with a bunch of internet

RE: Too Much PAW

2004-02-25 Thread frank theriault
Tanya, Call hubby over to the computer right now. Show him this: http://www.nrg666.com/pdml/portraits/pages/FrankTheriault.htm It will calm any concerns he might have about the quality of people you'll meet at GFM. cheers, frank PS: I couldn't help thinking, when I read your husband's

RE: Too Much PAW

2004-02-25 Thread Tanya Mayer Photography
:45 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Too Much PAW Tanja said: OMG - no wonder my poor hubby worries about me and that bloody photography list. I spend half of my life convincing him that hanging out with you lot is safe! He is petrified at the possibility of me going to GFM and meeting

Re: Too Much PAW

2004-02-25 Thread Peter J. Alling
And a shotgun? [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tanja said: OMG - no wonder my poor hubby worries about me and that bloody photography list. I spend half of my life convincing him that hanging out with you lot is safe! He is petrified at the possibility of me going to GFM and meeting with a bunch

Re: Too Much PAW

2004-02-25 Thread Doug Franklin
On Wed, 25 Feb 2004 23:02:54 +0200, Lasse Karlsson wrote: Lasse (who fondless ass she photographss) You're a _bad_, _bad, boy Lasse. But it's the comment I would have made, had I been so bold, so I guess that makes me one, too. :-) TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ

Re: Too Much PAW

2004-02-25 Thread ernreed2
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tanja said: OMG - no wonder my poor hubby worries about me and that bloody photography list. I spend half of my life convincing him that hanging out with you lot is safe! He is petrified at the possibility of me going to GFM and meeting with a bunch of

RE: Too Much PAW

2004-02-25 Thread Cesar Matamoros II
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2004 9:45 PM Tanja said: OMG - no wonder my poor hubby worries about me and that bloody photography list. I spend half of my life convincing him that hanging out with you lot is safe!

Re: PAW: Too Much PAW

2004-02-24 Thread Cotty
On 23/2/04, SHEL disgorged: I've also noticed that some of the more tech oriented people haven't participated in the PAW yet ... after all their talk about how valuable the technical and high tech side of gear and peripherals is to making a good photo, I haven't seen any of those good, high-tech

Re: PAW: Too Much PAW

2004-02-24 Thread Shel Belinkoff
Hi, Why not make the URL to your site more noticeable by making it, what do you call it, a dynamic link ... y'know, with the http in front of it. I agree about the community feel to this list. shel Cotty wrote: I haven't participated because I have a web site with galleries on it, and the

Re: Too Much PAW

2004-02-24 Thread Cotty
On 23/2/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged: Too Much PAW!?!?!?!?! Wow, this list is nuttier than I thought. There are threads on whisky, sports cars and, in the past, an incredible number of goofy off-topics. Now people are threatening to unsubscribe because there are too many threads about

OT - Dynamic links (was:Re: PAW: Too Much PAW)

2004-02-24 Thread Cotty
On 24/2/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged: Why not make the URL to your site more noticeable by making it, what do you call it, a dynamic link ... y'know, with the http in front of it. Will this make a difference? In my plain text email application (Powermail 4.2), anything beginning with 'www'

Re: PAW: Too Much PAW

2004-02-24 Thread alex wetmore
On Mon, 23 Feb 2004, Shel Belinkoff wrote: I've also noticed that some of the more tech oriented people haven't participated in the PAW yet ... after all their talk about how valuable the technical and high tech side of gear and peripherals is to making a good photo, I haven't seen any of

RE: Too Much PAW

2004-02-24 Thread Tanya Mayer Photography
hehe, the challenge is on! tan. (who fondles AS she photographs) ps no wise arse comments about fondling, ok Cotty? hehe.

Re: Too Much PAW

2004-02-24 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - From: Shel Belinkoff Subject: PAW: Too Much PAW Rob Studdert commented that the PAW postings are becoming too much, and suggested that we only post PAW pics on Friday. Phtooey! I say. Phooey agreed. At least the PAW is on topic. William Robb

RE: Too Much PAW

2004-02-24 Thread Tanya Mayer Photography
OMG, I SO did NOT need to know that!! lol... Cotty... HELP!! vbg Paul, you aren't going to be at GFM are you?!? *eek*! tan. -Original Message- From: Paul Stenquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 25 February 2004 11:17 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Too Much PAW

Re: Too Much PAW

2004-02-24 Thread Paul Stenquist
... HELP!! vbg Paul, you aren't going to be at GFM are you?!? *eek*! tan. -Original Message- From: Paul Stenquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, 25 February 2004 11:17 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Too Much PAW I sometimes fondle as I photograph. That does make

PAW: Too Much PAW

2004-02-23 Thread Shel Belinkoff
Rob Studdert commented that the PAW postings are becoming too much, and suggested that we only post PAW pics on Friday. Phtooey! I say. The pics should come as the mood strikes you, when you have a good one you want to share, or when you have one you're looking for comments about. And why just

Re: PAW: Too Much PAW

2004-02-23 Thread brooksdj
Party Poopers:-)vbg I think this is great. A new rush so to speak has happened.I can finally show some of my Nikon and Yashica Mat camera pic's that i like, that cannot go on the PUG.Others have shown pic's from film and digi cameras that are non Pentax too. I find this very refreshing.

Re: Too Much PAW

2004-02-23 Thread Kenneth Waller
Shel, I think we're finding the answer to the question you posed when you started this... Are you photographers or equipment fondlers? Let's find out ;-)) Kenneth Waller - Original Message - From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: PAW: Too Much PAW Rob Studdert commented

RE: Too Much PAW

2004-02-23 Thread Tanya Mayer Photography
!)... vbg tan. -Original Message- From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, 24 February 2004 11:59 AM To: PDML Subject: PAW: Too Much PAW Rob Studdert commented that the PAW postings are becoming too much, and suggested that we only post PAW pics on Friday. Phtooey! I

Re: PAW: Too Much PAW

2004-02-23 Thread Rob Studdert
On 23 Feb 2004 at 17:59, Shel Belinkoff wrote: Anyway, Rob's comment was in response to Raimo's comment that the list traffic was a bit heavy and that he was going to unsubscribe for a while. I don't believe Raimo said anything specific about the PAW being the reason for his decision ...

Re: Too Much PAW

2004-02-23 Thread Steve Jolly
Tanya Mayer Photography wrote: hehehe, from fairygirl who is feeling a trifle hippyesque today (well, I WAS born in the 70s!)... That means you should be a hard-bitten, cynical member of Generation-X, surely? ;-) S

RE: PAW: Too Much PAW

2004-02-23 Thread frank theriault
say, keep PAW alive!! cheers, frank The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: PDML [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: PAW: Too Much PAW Date: Mon, 23 Feb

Re: PAW: Too Much PAW

2004-02-23 Thread Boris Liberman
Hi! Shel, I agree with you - The Spice Must Flow! VBG Boris