Re: Vs: Flash sync at 1/6000?!

2001-02-12 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: February 12, 2001 12:36 AM Subject: Re: Vs: Flash sync at 1/6000?! Does anyone know what the flash sync *actually* is when either a LX or SUPER PROGRAM are setup to do "sequential" shooting with Motor

Re: Sequential shooting Was: Re: Vs: Flash sync at 1/6000?!

2001-02-12 Thread SudaMafud
In a message dated 2/12/01 7:16:03 AM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: LX is 1/75th second, SP is 1/125 second. At least, thats the specification. William Robb Hello Bill! But...but, my AF400T manual states: "In the TTL Auto mode, approximately 15 flashes are obtainable

Re: Sequential shooting Was: Re: Vs: Flash sync at 1/6000?!

2001-02-12 Thread Jan van Wijk
Hi Mafud, Are we to take it then that "high speed sync" is not at the same time the same as PENTAX bodies performing "high speed sequential" (consecutive frames) shooting? Indeed, the "high speed sync" now talked about for the MZ-S body are multiple, and probably lower energy, flashes that

Vs: Flash sync at 1/6000?!

2001-02-11 Thread Raimo Korhonen
All the others. If I remember correctly, Olympus was the first to introduce this with OM-4. You need a special flash unit with a long duration of the light pulse(s). A good idea but the flash must be powerful - a good idea for daylight sync anyway. All the best! Raimo Personal photography