Macworld Expo is going on and I hear a lot of WOW this and that on the
news and on line. I was in SF yesterday. Did a bit of gallery
visiting. Visited the Macworld exhibition too.
Saw tons of people wandering around with massive DSLRs and big lenses
hung from their necks, as well as big
really enjoyed your reflections here, Godfrey! Thanks. Christine
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi ramar...@mac.com
To: PDML List pdml@pdml.net; SeePhoto Talk seeph...@micapeak.com
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 5:06 PM
Subject: WOWs
Macworld Expo is going on and I
Godfrey, to some people there is no Photography - just Cameras and
lenses and this and that.
Know one of them - buying gear every week, an awesome collection - and
every time we meet he goes on and on about how this and that would be
great for this and that situation. Then shows me latest
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Saw tons of people wandering around with massive DSLRs and big lenses
hung from their necks, as well as big bag or backpack stuffed full of
photo gear. I didn't see many pictures being taken, and I have to say
that I wonder what the point of carrying 20 pounds of
I've done that though... Carry around my camera at say...an art fair and
never really take any pictures. Some of it is not wanting to look like
a dork, some is never really seeing anything that I want to shoot, some
may be that I'm with my family who have little patience for my walking
around
Interesting perspective, Godders.
I've never felt encumbered by equipment, but I've learned to take no
more than I need for the task at hand. For a walkaround, it's always
one lens and a camera. And I have to admit that my Leica was perfect
for that role. But film is itself an encumbrance.
On Wed, Jan 07, 2009 at 03:06:18PM -0800, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Macworld Expo is going on and I hear a lot of WOW this and that on the
news and on line. I was in SF yesterday. Did a bit of gallery visiting.
Visited the Macworld exhibition too.
I stopped off at Macworld today.
Saw tons
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
[...]
I had my modest shoulder bag, the G1 fitted with Olympus 25mm lens...
The G1 being a micro 4/3 format, which Oly 25mm, please?
Thanks,
keith whaley
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE
On Jan 7, 2009, at 6:50 PM, keith_w wrote:
I had my modest shoulder bag, the G1 fitted with Olympus 25mm lens...
The G1 being a micro 4/3 format, which Oly 25mm, please?
The Olympus Zuiko Digital 25mm f/2.8 fitted to the Panasonic DMW-MA1
FourThirds-micro43 adapter. It's a beautiful fit
Good day, sir ;-).
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I had my modest shoulder bag, the G1 fitted with Olympus 25mm lens, some
stuff for the galleries (a folio or two), and my usual complement of
carryabout junk in the form of cell phone, ipod, notebook, voice
recorder, pens, etc. About two-three pounds
On Jan 7, 2009, at 8:53 PM, Boris Liberman wrote:
I had my modest shoulder bag, the G1 fitted with Olympus 25mm lens,
some stuff for the galleries (a folio or two), and my usual
complement of carryabout junk in the form of cell phone, ipod,
notebook, voice recorder, pens, etc. About
So i played around again to day. Rainy and sty so what better thing to do.:-)
Snag still when setting the epson profiles, then i realized i had not
unzipped the profiles i downloaded during installation, they were
still on the desktop.
All i was getting was epson rgb etc.
Using those and
The 2400 will print on premium luster (along with velvet fine art, my
favorite Epson paper) or premium semigloss with no bronzing. You
might see a bit of bronzing on premium glossy.
Paul
On Mar 24, 2007, at 3:54 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
So i played around again to day. Rainy and sty so what
Are you referring to BW prints Paul??
I'll have to research places to buy paper. Most Stables etc i have
been into sell a few kinds, not all.
I still have never seen Matte enhanced around.
I know there is a store near work, maybe i'll just have to go that route
Staples stocks a lot of the
On 21/3/07, Mat Maessen, discombobulated, unleashed:
There's your problem right there. Set the printer color management to
No Color Adjustment.
When Print with Preview in Photoshop, select Let Photoshop Manage
Colors in the dialog that comes up, and select the color profile that
matches your
Sorry for the late replies to thiw. I had a household problem that
needed attention first.
Last time i buy a house lower than everyone elses. Its a bugger at
snow melt season in the basement.
Any way to answer your question, I'm on the PC at the moment. I was
going to set the 2400 up on the mac
Maessen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/21/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: David J Brooks
Subject: OT Printing wows with the 2400
Today, the prints have an over saturated look to them. The brown horse
is redder than on the screen.
...
PS i see
I assigned the srgb space to the picture as it didi seem to give the
horse a reddish oversaturated look in RGB.
I'm fairly sure its a setting i'm missing here, just not sure wht.
Dave
On 3/22/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 3/21/2007 8:04:41 P.M. Pacific
Sorry for the late replies to thiw. I had a household problem that
needed attention first.
Last time i buy a house lower than everyone elses. Its a bugger at
snow melt season in the basement.
Any way to answer your question, I'm on the PC at the moment. I was
going to set the 2400 up on the mac
PM
Subject: OT Printing wows with the 2400
Hi ganag.
I suppose this was just a matter of time, eh.
I was trying to print out a page of 2 4x6's on the basic glossy epson
paper tonight and i'v hit a snag.
I calibtated my monitor about 4 weeks ago and the two test prints were
fine
I had glanced at the mac part of the book, but not in detail, as i
have not loaded the 2400 on the ibook just yet.
Saturday is planed for that task.
Thanks for that info Cotty. Might save panic email number II.
Dave
On 3/22/07, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 21/3/07, Mat Maessen,
On Mar 22, 2007, at 12:39 AM, Cotty wrote:
On 21/3/07, Mat Maessen, discombobulated, unleashed:
There's your problem right there. Set the printer color management to
No Color Adjustment.
When Print with Preview in Photoshop, select Let Photoshop Manage
Colors in the dialog that comes up,
On 3/22/07, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I did the printing from the print preview screen. I set the one box to
Let PS magae colour.
I also had it set of relative, i believe. The profile was Epson RGB,
maybe that was my problem. Should i have set it for Adobe rgb or in
this case,as
If you're printing with PS CS, the directions for advanced printing
in Epson's 2400 manual work perfectly on a Mac. They would probably
work with elements as well. CS2 parameters are slightly different.
Paul
On Mar 22, 2007, at 8:09 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
Sorry for the late replies to
I have to agree with Godders. I used ColorSynch for quite a while,
but after reading Godfrey's post about color managed workflow, I
switched to that method. It does provide better results, particularly
when printing BW. The Epson paper profiles are very refined. I had
some problems getting
Its the plan old glossy paper, i dont see it on the list so i used ther closest.
I'll be home in a few hours, i'll re red the manual, but i think i'll
be calling again.:-)
I don't want to change my web site to announce what printing equipment
i have upgraded to until i fiqurt this out
Dave
On
Since I had this hanging about, I figured I'd repost it.
Photoshop CS2 - Epson R2400 color managed workflow on Mac OS X
(Windows interface details are slightly different for Page Setup and
Print dialogs, but the methodology is identical.)
First calibrate the monitor and set up Photoshop
Hi ganag.
I suppose this was just a matter of time, eh.
I was trying to print out a page of 2 4x6's on the basic glossy epson
paper tonight and i'v hit a snag.
I calibtated my monitor about 4 weeks ago and the two test prints were fine.
Today, the prints have an over saturated look to them.
- Original Message -
From: David J Brooks
Subject: OT Printing wows with the 2400
Hi ganag.
I suppose this was just a matter of time, eh.
I was trying to print out a page of 2 4x6's on the basic glossy epson
paper tonight and i'v hit a snag.
I calibtated my monitor about 4
Ok, thanks
Its just one part of the picture, the horse itself.
Dave
On 3/21/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: David J Brooks
Subject: OT Printing wows with the 2400
Hi ganag.
I suppose this was just a matter of time, eh.
I was trying
On 3/21/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: David J Brooks
Subject: OT Printing wows with the 2400
Today, the prints have an over saturated look to them. The brown horse
is redder than on the screen.
...
PS i see printer managment is on Adobe 1998
First, are you on a Mac or a PC?
Paul
On Mar 21, 2007, at 7:12 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
Hi ganag.
I suppose this was just a matter of time, eh.
I was trying to print out a page of 2 4x6's on the basic glossy epson
paper tonight and i'v hit a snag.
I calibtated my monitor about 4 weeks
Not that it affects Dave's problem, but most of what I've read says srgb is
for web posting - narrower gamut than rgb or pro rgb for printing.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT Printing wows with the 2400
In a message dated 3/21/2007 4:17:16
Nozzle check?
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax Discuss pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 6:12 PM
Subject: OT Printing wows with the 2400
Hi ganag.
I suppose this was just a matter of time, eh.
I was trying to print
In a message dated 3/21/2007 8:04:41 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Not that it affects Dave's problem, but most of what I've read says srgb is
for web posting - narrower gamut than rgb or pro rgb for printing.
Kenneth Waller
===
Yup. It is. But I find Adobe RGB
35 matches
Mail list logo
