I think this one is more user friendly than the previous. I think you
need more photos in your galleries, but you probably already knew that
:)
Russ
On 3/26/07, Nick Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay, so you all thought my last one sucked. I was trying to go for
something specific, and
From:
Nick Wright
Okay, so you all thought my last one sucked. I was trying to go for
something specific, and apparently I failed pretty big.
Didn't say it sucked, only offered suggestions for improvement.
So I was digging around and found the code for my site I did back in
early 2003. I
- make
it shorter, leave out the experience bit and just say what you want to
offer.
HTH
John Coyle
Brisbane, Australia
- Original Message -
From: Nick Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 12:42 AM
Subject: Spam: Web site review
Okay, so you all thought my last one sucked. I was trying to go for
something specific, and apparently I failed pretty big.
So I was digging around and found the code for my site I did back in
early 2003. I still liked the layout so I updated it and put it up
instead.
I'm interested to know what
On 3/26/07, Nick Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay, so you all thought my last one sucked. I was trying to go for
something specific, and apparently I failed pretty big.
So I was digging around and found the code for my site I did back in
early 2003. I still liked the layout so I updated
In a message dated 3/26/2007 7:49:37 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Okay, so you all thought my last one sucked. I was trying to go for
something specific, and apparently I failed pretty big.
So I was digging around and found the code for my site I did back in
early
Nick,
I didn't comment on the first version, but I like this
better. Perfect shot to use for the portrait area, BTW
;-]
-Brendan
--- Nick Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay, so you all thought my last one sucked. I was
trying to go for
something specific, and apparently I failed pretty
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick
Wright
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 4:42 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Web site review part the second
Okay, so you all thought my last one sucked. I was trying to go for
something specific
Nick Wright wrote:
Okay, so you all thought my last one sucked. I was trying to go for
something specific, and apparently I failed pretty big.
So I was digging around and found the code for my site I did back in
early 2003. I still liked the layout so I updated it and put it up
instead.
I'm
The slant I like better - it is about what you do more than about you.
If I were looking to hire a photographer, this is better than the
first.
Things to consider:
Don't link to a whole different site for your galleries - when they
click on the portraits or weddings, take them directly to your
Now this looks like a wedding photographers site. (This can be good or
bad depending on how you look at it). The navigation is clean and easy
to understand. Unfortunately it looks like about 1000 other sites.
It's difficult to differentiate yourself from everybody else. This is
an
I like this better but I still think you should specify a basic preferred font
- I think the page looks better in a sans-serif font rather than the Times New
Roman that is the default for most browsers.
Also the links at the bottom might look better in a slightly smaller font and
bolded. On
12 matches
Mail list logo
