Dario Bonazza wrote:
K-7 manual, page 192:
Mark!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Yes indeed. Apparently I wasn't sufficiently thorough :-). Corrected
that little bugger :-). There is another interesting option on the same
menu page. It says how WB behaves when flash is attached. Default is - AWB.
Boris
On 12/3/2010 1:04 AM, Miserere wrote:
I think you might be
On 12/1/2010 10:01 PM, Miserere wrote:
Boris,
This is the issue:
http://shutterfinger.typepad.com/shutterfinger/2010/08/automation-strikes-again.html
Igor might want to run a test similar to Gordon's to make sure his
camera is fine, but I suspect it is. This is simply a case of Pentax
trying
I think you might be unpleasantly surprised :-D
On 02/12/2010, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12/1/2010 10:01 PM, Miserere wrote:
Boris,
This is the issue:
http://shutterfinger.typepad.com/shutterfinger/2010/08/automation-strikes-again.html
Igor might want to run a test
On 11/30/2010 5:42 PM, Igor Roshchin wrote:
Bob and Boris: I usually shoot with AWB (and RAW), but this time I fixed
it the WB to minimize necessity for corrections, as the light was very
consistent and the flash was not allowed at all.
Igor, is it at all possible then to have you make a
Boris Liberman wrote:
On 11/30/2010 5:42 PM, Igor Roshchin wrote:
Bob and Boris: I usually shoot with AWB (and RAW), but this time I fixed
it the WB to minimize necessity for corrections, as the light was very
consistent and the flash was not allowed at all.
Igor, is it at all possible then
On 12/1/2010 11:05 AM, Dario Bonazza wrote:
Uh? Why do you suppose Igor's camera to be broken when Igor himself
agreed on my suggestion to just change the set WB from go where you
like (Pentax default) to fixed? Let's wait and see if such a menu
setting is enough to solve the problem.
Dario
On 1 December 2010 03:57, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11/30/2010 5:42 PM, Igor Roshchin wrote:
Bob and Boris: I usually shoot with AWB (and RAW), but this time I fixed
it the WB to minimize necessity for corrections, as the light was very
consistent and the flash was not
On Nov 29, 2010, at 23:15 , Dario Bonazza wrote:
Strong means the camera compensates for the warm cast, perfoming a
white-balanced (neutral) shot.
The default is strong which looking at the proof sheet of the dancers
submitted is what the camera tried to do on some of the shots, leaving the
Igor,
On 11/29/2010 5:39 PM, Igor Roshchin wrote:
Has anybody experienced anything of this sort?
What could be the reason (besides some malfunction of the camera)?
I will have to look in my collection but I am fairly certain that all
three cameras I've been shooting with (*istD, K10D, K-7)
Mon Nov 29 16:00:51 CST 2010
Dario Bonazza wrote:
Charles Robinson wrote:
On Nov 29, 2010, at 14:46, Dario Bonazza wrote:
Is [11. WB Adjustable Range] in the [C Custom Setting 2] menu set to
[Fixed]?
If not, that could explain that behaviour. Don't ask me why one
should
select
Hi,
I've experienced the same problem and it seems that Tungsten WB is not
fixed WB setting. Instead, it tries to adopt to lighting conditions.
Shooting JPEG, try fixed K value instead - for me it have been worked
fine. Of course, RAW would be the best (but a bit more time-consuming)
Margus Männik wrote:
I've experienced the same problem and it seems that Tungsten WB is not
fixed WB setting. Instead, it tries to adopt to lighting conditions.
Shooting JPEG, try fixed K value instead - for me it have been worked
fine. Of course, RAW would be the best (but a bit more
Hi All,
While shooting an argentine tango performance over the weekend
I set the WB of my K-7 to Tungsten light.
I was surprised to see that while ~80% of shots were with about the right
color, some considerable number of shots had a distinctive.
It was not as red as it would have been if I
On Nov 29, 2010, at 10:39 AM, Igor Roshchin wrote:
Hi All,
While shooting an argentine tango performance over the weekend
I set the WB of my K-7 to Tungsten light.
I was surprised to see that while ~80% of shots were with about the right
color, some considerable number of shots had a
Mon Nov 29 09:52:30 CST 2010
P N Stenquist wrote:
On Nov 29, 2010, at 10:39 AM, Igor Roshchin wrote:
Hi All,
While shooting an argentine tango performance over the weekend
I set the WB of my K-7 to Tungsten light.
I was surprised to see that while ~80% of shots were with about
On Nov 29, 2010, at 1:57 PM, Igor Roshchin wrote:
Mon Nov 29 09:52:30 CST 2010
P N Stenquist wrote:
On Nov 29, 2010, at 10:39 AM, Igor Roshchin wrote:
Hi All,
While shooting an argentine tango performance over the weekend
I set the WB of my K-7 to Tungsten light.
I was
Shooting RAW and AWB I know the colors will shade differently in the
same light as composition changes.
The Synch function in lightroom is your friend in such cases.
Regards, Bob S.
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 12:57 PM, Igor Roshchin s...@komkon.org wrote:
Mon Nov 29 09:52:30 CST 2010
P N
I have experienced the same thing with my k-7! Here is an example:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/23028...@n04/sets/72157625120080220/
Two photos, same subject framing, same WB, exposure settings.
Correctable in post, but, still odd.
-c
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 10:39 AM, Igor Roshchin
I wonder if some of this isn't connected to flourescent lighting and
the new energy efficient bulbs that are replacing incandescents. I
wonder if these bulbs flicker at a 60 cycle per second rate and
deliver different color temperatures in different parts of the cycle.
Regards, Bob S.
On Mon,
On Nov 29, 2010, at 14:38, Bob Sullivan wrote:
I wonder if some of this isn't connected to flourescent lighting and
the new energy efficient bulbs that are replacing incandescents. I
wonder if these bulbs flicker at a 60 cycle per second rate and
deliver different color temperatures in
Igor Roshchin wrote
While shooting an argentine tango performance over the weekend
I set the WB of my K-7 to Tungsten light.
I was surprised to see that while ~80% of shots were with about the
right
color, some considerable number of shots had a distinctive.
It was not as red as it would have
On Nov 29, 2010, at 14:46, Dario Bonazza wrote:
Is [11. WB Adjustable Range] in the [C Custom Setting 2] menu set to [Fixed]?
If not, that could explain that behaviour. Don't ask me why one should select
a given white balance and then allow the camera to change it, but Pentax
thinks of
Charles Robinson wrote:
On Nov 29, 2010, at 14:38, Bob Sullivan wrote:
I wonder if some of this isn't connected to flourescent lighting and
the new energy efficient bulbs that are replacing incandescents. I
wonder if these bulbs flicker at a 60 cycle per second rate and
deliver different
Charles Robinson wrote:
On Nov 29, 2010, at 14:46, Dario Bonazza wrote:
Is [11. WB Adjustable Range] in the [C Custom Setting 2] menu set to
[Fixed]?
If not, that could explain that behaviour. Don't ask me why one should
select a given white balance and then allow the camera to change it,
I wrote:
it looks a lot like that mad idea of allowing you to select SEL for AF
points selector and then reverting back to auto select, which was the
behaviour of the AF selector before a firmware fix.
Please read it as:
it looks a lot like that mad idea of allowing you to set the AF points
On Nov 29, 2010, at 16:00, Dario Bonazza wrote:
Charles Robinson wrote:
On Nov 29, 2010, at 14:46, Dario Bonazza wrote:
Is [11. WB Adjustable Range] in the [C Custom Setting 2] menu set to
[Fixed]?
If not, that could explain that behaviour. Don't ask me why one should
select a given
On Nov 29, 2010, at 14:24 , Charles Robinson wrote:
On Nov 29, 2010, at 16:00, Dario Bonazza wrote:
Charles Robinson wrote:
On Nov 29, 2010, at 14:46, Dario Bonazza wrote:
Is [11. WB Adjustable Range] in the [C Custom Setting 2] menu set to
[Fixed]?
If not, that could explain that
I'm pretty sure it's what Dario is saying. When I received the K-5
last week the first thing I did was go through the Custom menu and
change stuff like this. I don't understand why the default setting is
to allow the camera to change WB when on AutoWB, but it is.
On 29/11/2010, Dario Bonazza
From: Igor Roshchin
Yes, that could do it in principle, but it doesn't make sense in the
current situation. Since I _fixed_ the WB to a particular setting,
very slight changes shouldn't affect the WB.
To better illustrate what I observe, - let me show you this image:
Joseph McAllister wrote:
B. Custom 12) Subtle or Strong variations in AWB or fixed should
definitely be on Subtle to prevent the very wrong shift in your photos.
No, that's another solution, for a problem other than the one we are
discussing here and, in case, it's the other way round.
That
31 matches
Mail list logo
