- Original Message -
From: "P. J. Alling"
Subject: Re: OT: Wildlife photographer Stripped
And now that you know that it is a "domesticated" wolf.
William Robb
That kind of makes it dog then...
Your canoe is in the mail.
William Robb
--
PDML Pent
On 1/21/2010 7:57 PM, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Ken Waller"
Subject: Re: OT: Wildlife photographer Stripped
It definitely is for me given the rarity of wild wolves and the
knowledge that dogs generally are domesticated and can be trained to
repson
On 1/22/2010 1:29 PM, John Francis wrote:
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 07:15:10AM -0600, Bob Sullivan wrote:
My flash suggestion was tongue-in-cheek and needs a smiley.
You would need a really big flash to freeze the stars in the sky like that. ;-)
Regards, Bob S.
And synchronisation is a
On 1/22/2010 12:29 AM, David Mann wrote:
On Jan 22, 2010, at 3:08 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
Here in the States, the standard response seems to be buying a gun, barging
into the exhibition and killing everyone in sight.
I think the British way works better.
What, a knife instead of a
On 1/21/2010 8:29 AM, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Bob W"
Subject: RE: OT: Wildlife photographer Stripped
I think the wolf photo is brilliant, even if it doesn't comply with the
competition rules.
Is it any more brillaint
From: "Ken Waller"
You could spend weeks/months 'becomming familiar with the wolf's habits',
>> assuming you first located the wolf (ves)
>>
>>> Set up camera pointing at the fence section, set up an IR trigger to
>>> take a picture when the wolf broke the light beam, go have a beer and
>>> co
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 07:15:10AM -0600, Bob Sullivan wrote:
> My flash suggestion was tongue-in-cheek and needs a smiley.
> You would need a really big flash to freeze the stars in the sky like that.
> ;-)
> Regards, Bob S.
And synchronisation is a real problem.
You need to set the flash off e
- Original Message -
From: "paul stenquist"
Subject: Re: OT: Wildlife photographer Stripped
I don't think he used a flash or any artificial light. The light extends
too far into the background, and it's too uniform. However, it could be a
combination of two
My flash suggestion was tongue-in-cheek and needs a smiley.
You would need a really big flash to freeze the stars in the sky like that. ;-)
Regards, Bob S.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 6:39 AM, paul stenquist wrote:
>
> On Jan 22, 2010, at 12:11 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
>
>> From: paul stenquist
>>> O
On Jan 22, 2010, at 12:11 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
> From: paul stenquist
>> On Jan 21, 2010, at 11:08 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
Look closely, he just used a big flash in the photo without star
trails. :-) Regards, Bob S.
>> I don't think he used a flash or any artificial light. The lig
Bob W wrote:
Sounds like these guys are a bunch of wankers to me.
First the pick
a lousy pic for their winner, then they ban it on not
much evidence.
This is Mark Carwardine, one of the 'wankers':
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9T1vfsHYiKY
It's not him that's wanking. That has to be
Mark Roberts wrote:
ann sanfedele wrote:
Mark - um I think the links are reversed :-)
Looks that way. But I'm sure everyone here is smart enough to figure
it out anyway.
ya think?
a
Mark Roberts wrote:
Here's a little controversy that popped up on the DP Review Pent
On Jan 22, 2010, at 3:08 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
> Here in the States, the standard response seems to be buying a gun, barging
> into the exhibition and killing everyone in sight.
>
> I think the British way works better.
What, a knife instead of a gun?
Dave (in my city the modus operandi seem
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: "William Robb"
Subject: Re: OT: Wildlife photographer Stripped
- Original Message -
From: "Ken Waller"
Subject: Re: OT: Wildlife photographer Stripped
You could spend wee
From: paul stenquist
On Jan 21, 2010, at 11:08 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
Look closely, he just used a big flash in the photo without star
trails. :-) Regards, Bob S.
I don't think he used a flash or any artificial light. The light
extends too far into the background, and it's too uniform. H
From: Mark Roberts
ann sanfedele wrote:
>Mark - um I think the links are reversed :-)
Looks that way. But I'm sure everyone here is smart enough to figure
it out anyway.
>Mark Roberts wrote:
>
>>Here's a little controversy that popped up on the DP Review Pentax
>>forum a few weeks back re
On Jan 21, 2010, at 11:08 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
> Look closely, he just used a big flash in the photo without star trails. :-)
> Regards, Bob S.
>
I don't think he used a flash or any artificial light. The light extends too
far into the background, and it's too uniform. However, it could b
Look closely, he just used a big flash in the photo without star trails. :-)
Regards, Bob S.
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 5:54 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
> Here's a little controversy that popped up on the DP Review Pentax
> forum a few weeks back regarding the Pentax Photo Gallery. Two photos
> from t
- Original Message -
From: "Ken Waller"
Subject: Re: OT: Wildlife photographer Stripped
It definitely is for me given the rarity of wild wolves and the knowledge
that dogs generally are domesticated and can be trained to repsond to
their masters wishes.
And now tha
- Original Message -
From: "Ken Waller"
Subject: Re: OT: Wildlife photographer Stripped
You could spend weeks/months 'becomming familiar with the wolf's habits',
assuming you first located the wolf (ves)
Set up camera pointing at the fence section, set
- Original Message -
From: "Bob W"
Subject: RE: OT: Wildlife photographer Stripped
I've only said it once. I said it because in other posts in this thread
other people have pointed out that a shot should not get extra merit for
being difficult to take. In one of your
January 21, 2010 6:21 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: OT: Wildlife photographer Stripped
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: "William Robb"
Subject: Re: OT: Wildlife photographer Stripped
>
> - Original Mes
ann sanfedele wrote:
>Mark - um I think the links are reversed :-)
Looks that way. But I'm sure everyone here is smart enough to figure
it out anyway.
>Mark Roberts wrote:
>
>>Here's a little controversy that popped up on the DP Review Pentax
>>forum a few weeks back regarding the Pentax Photo G
Mark - um I think the links are reversed :-)
ann
Mark Roberts wrote:
Here's a little controversy that popped up on the DP Review Pentax
forum a few weeks back regarding the Pentax Photo Gallery. Two photos
from the same photographer:
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/home#section=ARTIST&subSe
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 12:40:48 -0500
Mark Roberts wrote:
> >Is it any more brillaint than this?
> >http://www.akamairottweilers.ca/flying%20kratos.jpg
>
> That *is* brilliant! They should have Photoshopped in a trractor beam
> from a UFO in the upper left-hand corner...
broken hover-dog goes wrr
Here's a little controversy that popped up on the DP Review Pentax
forum a few weeks back regarding the Pentax Photo Gallery. Two photos
from the same photographer:
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/home#section=ARTIST&subSection=2245441&subSubSection=3826178&language=EN
EXIF says the exposure tim
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 3:52 PM, wendy beard wrote:
>
> I managed to capture a wolf attack ;-)
> http://www.pbase.com/wendybeard/image/93652625
>
> He likes to play football too
> http://www.pbase.com/wendybeard/image/121289483
>
> and frisbee
> http://www.pbase.com/wendybeard/image/106555213
Th
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: "William Robb"
Subject: Re: OT: Wildlife photographer Stripped
- Original Message -
From: "Bob W"
Subject: RE: OT: Wildlife photographer Stripped
Is it any more brill
From: "wendy beard"
I managed to capture a wolf attack ;-)
http://www.pbase.com/wendybeard/image/93652625
He likes to play football too
http://www.pbase.com/wendybeard/image/121289483
and frisbee
http://www.pbase.com/wendybeard/image/106555213
--
Wendy Beard
Carp, Ontario
Canada
Wow, We
Good crisp shots, Wendy! Timing, flawless.
Jack
--- On Thu, 1/21/10, wendy beard wrote:
> From: wendy beard
> Subject: Re: OT: Wildlife photographer Stripped
> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
> Date: Thursday, January 21, 2010, 12:52 PM
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 a
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: "William Robb"
Subject: Re: OT: Wildlife photographer Stripped
- Original Message -
From: "frank theriault"
Subject: Re: OT: Wildlife photographer Stripped
On Thu, Jan
The timing of his disqualification makes me think the judges missed it and
it was pointed out to them or the organization after the fact.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: "Bob W"
Subject: RE: OT: Wildlife photographer Stripped
You
On 21/1/10, David Savage, discombobulated, unleashed:
>We're all wankers. Some more than others.
I'll buy that !
Mark!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
-- http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 09:22 -0500, "Christian"
wrote:
> The issue I have with this photographer is that he used a
> trained, captive animal (if the allegations are true; and he is not
> denying them in all accounts I've read he is 'unavailable for comment').
According to the press release issu
wendy beard wrote:
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 8:29 AM, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Bob W"
Subject: RE: OT: Wildlife photographer Stripped
I think the wolf photo is brilliant, even if it doesn't comply with the
competition rules.
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 07:29 -0600, "William Robb"
wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Bob W"
> Subject: RE: OT: Wildlife photographer Stripped
>
> >
> > I think the wolf photo is brilliant, even if it doesn't comply with the
>
>
> >> >As far as the wolf photo is concerned, since photos of
> >> captive animals
> >> >are allowed in the competition he could have won a prize
> >> anyway if he'd
> >> >been open about it. It really is a shame that he wasn't.
> >>
> >> I thought captive animals were prohibited? That's how I r
> >>
> >> I think the wolf photo is brilliant, even if it doesn't
> comply with
> >> the competition rules.
> >>
> >
> > Is it any more brillaint than this?
> > http://www.akamairottweilers.ca/flying%20kratos.jpg
> >
> > William Robb
> >
>
> I managed to capture a wolf attack ;-)
> http://www.pb
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 8:29 AM, William Robb wrote:
>
> - Original Message - From: "Bob W"
> Subject: RE: OT: Wildlife photographer Stripped
>
>
>
>>
>> I think the wolf photo is brilliant, even if it doesn't comply with the
>> competiti
From: Mark Roberts
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 19:22:29 -, you wrote:
>As far as the wolf photo is concerned, since photos of captive animals are
>allowed in the competition he could have won a prize anyway if he'd been
>open about it. It really is a shame that he wasn't.
I thought captive animals
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 19:42:32 -, you wrote:
>> >As far as the wolf photo is concerned, since photos of
>> captive animals
>> >are allowed in the competition he could have won a prize
>> anyway if he'd
>> >been open about it. It really is a shame that he wasn't.
>>
>> I thought captive anim
From: Mark Roberts
The evidence at
http://www.suomenluonto.fi/bbcs-nature-photo-competition-judge-admits-winner-photo-investigated-due-to-fraud-allegations
seems pretty convincing that the location of the shot was the Ca?ada
Real Center zoological park near Madrid. The stone wall could easily
hav
> >As far as the wolf photo is concerned, since photos of
> captive animals
> >are allowed in the competition he could have won a prize
> anyway if he'd
> >been open about it. It really is a shame that he wasn't.
>
> I thought captive animals were prohibited? That's how I read
> the rules. (I
> >
> > The difficulty or ease of taking the photo is not what they
> judge things
> > on
> > in that competition.
> >
>
> You keep saying this.
> I haven't seen a competition yet that judges the photos based on some
> Hurculean effort on the part of the photographer, so I'm not
> really certai
> >> Is it any more brillaint than this?
> >> http://www.akamairottweilers.ca/flying%20kratos.jpg
> >>
> >> William Robb
> >
> > Yes.
> >
> > But that's still a great photo.
> >
>
> Would it be any more brillaint than any other picture of a
> dog going over a
> jump, perhaps at an agility trial?
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 19:22:29 -, you wrote:
>As far as the wolf photo is concerned, since photos of captive animals are
>allowed in the competition he could have won a prize anyway if he'd been
>open about it. It really is a shame that he wasn't.
I thought captive animals were prohibited? That
> > > Sounds like these guys are a bunch of wankers to me.
> First the pick
> > > a lousy pic for their winner, then they ban it on not
> much evidence.
> > >
> >
> > This is Mark Carwardine, one of the 'wankers':
> > http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9T1vfsHYiKY
>
> It's not him that's wanking
> The evidence at
> http://www.suomenluonto.fi/bbcs-nature-photo-competition-judge
> -admits-winner-photo-investigated-due-to-fraud-allegations
> seems pretty convincing that the location of the shot was the
> Cañada Real Center zoological park near Madrid. The stone
> wall could easily have been
- Original Message -
From: "Bob W"
Subject: RE: OT: Wildlife photographer Stripped
Is it any more brillaint than this?
http://www.akamairottweilers.ca/flying%20kratos.jpg
William Robb
Yes.
But that's still a great photo.
Would it be any more brillaint than an
- Original Message -
From: "Bob W"
Subject: RE: OT: Wildlife photographer Stripped
The difficulty or ease of taking the photo is not what they judge things
on
in that competition.
You keep saying this.
I haven't seen a competition yet that judges the photo
> >
> > I think the wolf photo is brilliant, even if it doesn't
> comply with the
> > competition rules.
> >
>
> Is it any more brillaint than this?
> http://www.akamairottweilers.ca/flying%20kratos.jpg
>
> William Robb
Yes.
But that's still a great photo.
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
>
> Sadly, it isn't one of mine.
> It is a terrific photo though.
> I hate to pooh pooh the wolf photo, but if the guy really had become
> familiar with said wolf's habits, it really would have been a
> fairly simple
> shot to take:
> Set up camera pointing at the fence section, set up an IR
>
>
> > The story the photographer gave, as I recall from when I
> first saw the
> > photo, is that this was routine behaviour of the wolf which he had
> > witnessed many times. Accordingly he set up specially for it. He
> > didn't just happen to be walking by with all his gear and
> suddenly s
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Roberts"
Subject: Re: OT: Wildlife photographer Stripped
The time I went I found the children's winners included a suprising
number of 6-year-olds shooting with a Nikon F5 and 600mm f/4.0.
Well, to be fair, the kid probably pus
The evidence at
http://www.suomenluonto.fi/bbcs-nature-photo-competition-judge-admits-winner-photo-investigated-due-to-fraud-allegations
seems pretty convincing that the location of the shot was the Cañada
Real Center zoological park near Madrid. The stone wall could easily
have been modified but I
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 07:29:15 -0600, you wrote:
>From: "Bob W"
>>
>> I think the wolf photo is brilliant, even if it doesn't comply with the
>> competition rules.
>
>Is it any more brillaint than this?
>http://www.akamairottweilers.ca/flying%20kratos.jpg
That *is* brilliant! They should have Photo
In a message dated 1/20/2010 6:12:29 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
ann...@nyc.rr.com writes:
So why didn't they give the prize to the runner up?
ann
==
That puzzled me too.
Marnie aka Doe
-
We can't solve problems by using the s
In a message dated 1/20/2010 9:26:48 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
kwal...@peoplepc.com writes:
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
Do you have any idea how much effort & time is required to even see a wolf
in the wild ? I do.
If that was an honest 'in the wild' shot it would be fan
Rob Studdert wrote:
On 21/01/2010, Ken Waller wrote:
Do you have any idea how much effort & time is required to even see a wolf
in the wild ? I do.
If that was an honest 'in the wild' shot it would be fantastic. To be there
when not only a wolf appeared, but leaped over an obsticle and y
- Original Message -
From: "Christian"
Subject: Re: OT: Wildlife photographer Stripped
And that's his account of how he did it. Some "experts" have suggested
that a wild wolf, skulking around, would not have jumped the fence but
would have climbed thro
2010/1/21 William Robb :
>
> - Original Message - From: "frank theriault"
> Subject: Re: OT: Wildlife photographer Stripped
>
>
>> On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 8:29 AM, William Robb wrote:
>>
>>> Is it any more brillaint than this?
>>&
John Sessoms wrote:
From: "Ken Waller"
Do you have any idea how much effort & time is required to even see a
wolf in the wild ? I do.
If that was an honest 'in the wild' shot it would be fantastic. To be
there when not only a wolf appeared, but leaped over an obsticle and
you were set up to ca
From: "William Robb"
I hate to pooh pooh the wolf photo, but if the guy really had become
familiar with said wolf's habits, it really would have been a fairly simple
shot to take:
Set up camera pointing at the fence section, set up an IR trigger to take a
picture when the wolf broke the light b
William Robb wrote:
I hate to pooh pooh the wolf photo, but if the guy really had become
familiar with said wolf's habits, it really would have been a fairly
simple shot to take:
Set up camera pointing at the fence section, set up an IR trigger to
take a picture when the wolf broke the light
Bob W wrote:
The story the photographer gave, as I recall from when I first saw the
photo, is that this was routine behaviour of the wolf which he had witnessed
many times. Accordingly he set up specially for it. He didn't just happen to
be walking by with all his gear and suddenly see a wolf ju
From: "Bob W"
>
> Sounds like these guys are a bunch of wankers to me. First
> the pick a lousy pic for their winner, then they ban it on
> not much evidence.
>
This is Mark Carwardine, one of the 'wankers':
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9T1vfsHYiKY
Yeah ... like that's NOT staged!
--
- Original Message -
From: "John Sessoms"
Subject: RE: OT: Wildlife photographer Stripped
I think the British way works better.
We might civilize you lot yet.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_p
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Sullivan"
Subject: Re: OT: Wildlife photographer Stripped
Love the tongue. Did you borrow a camera for this. Pentax would
never focus fast enough.
Not one of my shots, but you are right, Pentax wouldn't have AF'd fast
enough
From: "Bob W"
Do you have any idea how much effort & time is required to
> even see a wolf
> in the wild ? I do.
> If that was an honest 'in the wild' shot it would be
> fantastic. To be there
> when not only a wolf appeared, but leaped over an obsticle
> and you were set
> up to capture it
Love the tongue. Did you borrow a camera for this. Pentax would
never focus fast enough.
Regards, Bob S.
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 7:29 AM, William Robb wrote:
>
> - Original Message - From: "Bob W"
> Subject: RE: OT: Wildlife photographer Stripped
>
>
>
>
- Original Message -
From: "frank theriault"
Subject: Re: OT: Wildlife photographer Stripped
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 8:29 AM, William Robb wrote:
Is it any more brillaint than this?
http://www.akamairottweilers.ca/flying%20kratos.jpg
While I know how difficult that
From: "Brian Walters"
You can see low res versions of all of the images here:
http://www.nhmshop.co.uk/veolia-environnement-wildlife-photographer-of-the-year-2009/category.html
That is a really crappy interface. You'd think a museum would want to
make it easy to look at the photos.
--
PDML
From: "Ken Waller"
Do you have any idea how much effort & time is required to even see a wolf
in the wild ? I do.
If that was an honest 'in the wild' shot it would be fantastic. To be there
when not only a wolf appeared, but leaped over an obsticle and you were set
up to capture it would truly
Bob W wrote:
>
> >
> > Sounds like these guys are a bunch of wankers to me. First
> > the pick a lousy pic for their winner, then they ban it on
> > not much evidence.
> >
>
> This is Mark Carwardine, one of the 'wankers':
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9T1vfsHYiKY
It's not him th
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 8:29 AM, William Robb wrote:
> Is it any more brillaint than this?
> http://www.akamairottweilers.ca/flying%20kratos.jpg
While I know how difficult that wolf photo would have been to take
(even if it was staged) it doesn't have ~near~ the excitement and
dynamism of yours.
- Original Message -
From: "Bob W"
Subject: RE: OT: Wildlife photographer Stripped
I think the wolf photo is brilliant, even if it doesn't comply with the
competition rules.
Is it any more brillaint than this?
http://www.akamairottweilers.ca/flying%20kratos.jp
2010/1/21 Bob W :
>
>>
>> Sounds like these guys are a bunch of wankers to me. First
>> the pick a lousy pic for their winner, then they ban it on
>> not much evidence.
>>
>
> This is Mark Carwardine, one of the 'wankers':
> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9T1vfsHYiKY
We're all wankers. Some more
>
> Sounds like these guys are a bunch of wankers to me. First
> the pick a lousy pic for their winner, then they ban it on
> not much evidence.
>
This is Mark Carwardine, one of the 'wankers':
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9T1vfsHYiKY
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
>
> You know, the problem I have with it isn't that they decided
> it was staged; it's that they didn't decide that until AFTER
> they had already awarded it the first prize.
>
> Every reason cited for rejecting it after the fact should
> have been apparent before it won.
>
> Ok, so he (maybe
>
> Do you have any idea how much effort & time is required to
> even see a wolf
> in the wild ? I do.
> If that was an honest 'in the wild' shot it would be
> fantastic. To be there
> when not only a wolf appeared, but leaped over an obsticle
> and you were set
> up to capture it would trul
On 21/01/2010, Ken Waller wrote:
> Do you have any idea how much effort & time is required to even see a wolf
> in the wild ? I do.
> If that was an honest 'in the wild' shot it would be fantastic. To be there
> when not only a wolf appeared, but leaped over an obsticle and you were set
> up to c
.@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
> Daniel J. Matyola
> Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2010 3:11 PM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: OT: Wildlife photographer Stripped
>
> Stripped of the award he won, that is:
>
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8470962.stm
>
>
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: "ann sanfedele"
Subject: Re: Wildlife photographer Stripped
Bob W wrote:
Stripped of the award he won, that is:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8470962.stm
Well, it's a stun
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: "frank theriault"
Subject: Re: OT: Wildlife photographer Stripped
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
I agree but it is THEIR contest.
Honestly?
I don't think it's tha
3:11 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: OT: Wildlife photographer Stripped
Stripped of the award he won, that is:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8470962.stm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, pl
From: frank theriault
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
> I agree but it is THEIR contest.
Honestly?
I don't think it's that great a photo even if it's not staged. Yeah,
I guess catching a wild wolf doing that at night would be pretty
amazing, but that isn't enough to make
Bob W wrote:
Stripped of the award he won, that is:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8470962.stm
Well, it's a stunning photograph even so. What a pity that he appears to
have cheated.
Bob
"Wildlife photographer Mark Carwardine was one of the competition
judges. He told BBC News
- Original Message -
From: "frank theriault"
Subject: Re: OT: Wildlife photographer Stripped
This doesn't look good on anybody involved.
It's not even a very good Malinois.
(Sorry Wendy, It's an old joke)
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mai
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
> I agree but it is THEIR contest.
Honestly?
I don't think it's that great a photo even if it's not staged. Yeah,
I guess catching a wild wolf doing that at night would be pretty
amazing, but that isn't enough to make it a good photo.
It's no
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: "John Sessoms"
Subject: Re: OT: Wildlife photographer Stripped
From: Christian
Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
> Stripped of the award he won, that is:
>
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science
rea," and prohibits
digital alterations
that "add any elements or objects that do not exist in the original scene."
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -----
From: "Daniel J. Matyola"
Subject: OT: Wildlife photographer Stripped
S
On 20/1/10, Daniel J. Matyola, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Stripped of the award he won, that is:
>
>http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8470962.stm
Oops, sorry posted before I saw this :)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
-- http://www.
From: Christian
Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
> Stripped of the award he won, that is:
>
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8470962.stm
>
While in Sydney I saw the exhibition and the photo in question at the
Australian Museum. Next to this photo was a news article about the
controver
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 15:28 -0500, "Christian"
wrote:
> Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
> > Stripped of the award he won, that is:
> >
> > http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8470962.stm
> >
>
> While in Sydney I saw the exhibition and the photo in question at the
> Australian Museum. Next to t
Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
Stripped of the award he won, that is:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8470962.stm
While in Sydney I saw the exhibition and the photo in question at the
Australian Museum. Next to this photo was a news article about the
controversy and questions about wh
> Stripped of the award he won, that is:
>
> http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8470962.stm
>
Well, it's a stunning photograph even so. What a pity that he appears to
have cheated.
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UN
Stripped of the award he won, that is:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8470962.stm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
97 matches
Mail list logo
