I know that he was having a tough year even before the first of the fires in
his neighborhood, and now there’s another one.
Has anyone talked to his wife lately?
--
Larry Colen
l...@red4est.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
Never Enough!
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 5:25 PM, William Robb
wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 12:23 PM Daniel J. Matyola
> wrote:
>
> > It might be fun if you could post those comments here.
>
>
> Don’t you think I’m reviled by eno
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 12:23 PM Daniel J. Matyola
wrote:
> It might be fun if you could post those comments here.
Don’t you think I’m reviled by enough people yet?
Bill
>
>
> Dan Matyola
> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
>
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 2:01 PM, William Robb >
Well, they picked an expert :-)
J
> On April 20, 2018 at 11:01 AM William Robb wrote:
>
>
> It's actually in Mark's hands. All they let me do is make crass comments
> about the submissions as part of the vetting process.
>
> bill
>
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018, 11:24 AM Jack Davis,
Thanks much, Mark
J
> On April 20, 2018 at 12:22 PM Mark Roberts wrote:
>
>
> Jack Davis wrote:
>
> >
> >What's the status of the PDML
> >annual?
>
> It's coming along nicely, albeit slowly. I'm working on it regularly
> and, though it may be a *little* later than usual this year, we should
>
Jack Davis wrote:
>
>What's the status of the PDML
>annual?
It's coming along nicely, albeit slowly. I'm working on it regularly
and, though it may be a *little* later than usual this year, we should
be done in a couple of weeks.
--
Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
It might be fun if you could post those comments here.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 2:01 PM, William Robb
wrote:
> It's actually in Mark's hands. All they let me do is make crass comments
> about the submissions as part of the vetting pr
It's actually in Mark's hands. All they let me do is make crass comments
about the submissions as part of the vetting process.
bill
On Fri, Apr 20, 2018, 11:24 AM Jack Davis, wrote:
> 'Nuf said, Bill.Thanks!
> J
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Apr 20, 2018, at 8:43 AM, Bill wrote:
> >
> >> On 4
'Nuf said, Bill.Thanks!
J
Sent from my iPhone
> On Apr 20, 2018, at 8:43 AM, Bill wrote:
>
>> On 4/20/2018 6:18 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
>> What's the status of the PDML
>> annual?
>
> In production. Sorry, I don't know more.
>
> bill
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> htt
On 4/20/2018 6:18 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
What's the status of the PDML
annual?
In production. Sorry, I don't know more.
bill
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and fol
What's the status of the PDML
annual?
J
Sent from my iPhone
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Also if the Pixel size is smaller than the wave length of light that one
is attempting to captured, you'll miss an awful lot of light in that
wavelength. (I'm not sure how perverse the universe is, I'm betting on
maximum amount of perversity here, in that if what will benefit more one
more in
>Do you mean like two full-frame models with different Mpx count sensors?
>
>What sensors would be available for Ricoh to use for new Pentax DSLR
>cameras? I'm thinking the 42Mpx Sony sensor was chosen because Sony was
>willing to sell it to Ricoh in the quantities Ricoh wants for the
>projected Pe
On 2015-10-09 22:58 , Igor PDML-StR wrote:
2. If noise is generated at the boundary of the sensor. (This could be
relevant for very high-density/small pixel size sensors)
Then the combined boundary length (circumference) of the M smaller pixels
covering the same area as one large pixel will be
Larry, I've had that hypothesis (in the back of my mind) for a while.
Your question made me thinking in more detail about it.
On one hand the argument for why that should be possible is as follows:
If the noise is due to the statistical uncertainty (Sqrt(N)) for the
number of counts (N) on th
May I suggest the cotton duck, it goes well with a nice hot sauce.
On 10/9/2015 4:49 PM, Steve Cottrell wrote:
Funny. I was wondering what's for dinner.
--
I don't want to achieve immortality through my work; I want to achieve
immortality through not dying.
-- Woody Allen
--
P
On 10/9/2015 5:54 PM, Bill wrote:
On 10/9/2015 2:49 PM, Steve Cottrell wrote:
Funny. I was wondering what's for dinner.
http://www.incrediblethings.com/food/chocolate-hats-for-your-dingaling/
Wrong head.
--
Science - Questions we may never find answers for.
Religion - Answers we
Do you mean like two full-frame models with different Mpx count sensors?
What sensors would be available for Ricoh to use for new Pentax DSLR
cameras? I'm thinking the 42Mpx Sony sensor was chosen because Sony was
willing to sell it to Ricoh in the quantities Ricoh wants for the
projected Pentax
On 10/9/2015 2:49 PM, Steve Cottrell wrote:
Funny. I was wondering what's for dinner.
http://www.incrediblethings.com/food/chocolate-hats-for-your-dingaling/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, p
Collin B wrote:
If there will be a Pentax large-sensor in the Spring, might there not be
more than one?
Why come out with only the 42MP? An alternative offering, 24M to 30M would
provide a stepping stone.
It would make marketing sense.
And my K30 @ work is reaching its end. I'm seeing some f
Steve Cottrell wrote:
Funny. I was wondering what's for dinner.
A tip of the hat to Cotty.
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com (postbox on min4est)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visi
Funny. I was wondering what's for dinner.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
|| (O) |Web Video Production
--
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE
On 10/9/2015 1:53 PM, Collin B wrote:
If there will be a Pentax large-sensor in the Spring, might there not be
more than one?
Why come out with only the 42MP? An alternative offering, 24M to 30M would
provide a stepping stone.
It would make marketing sense.
And my K30 @ work is reaching its end
If there will be a Pentax large-sensor in the Spring, might there not be
more than one?
Why come out with only the 42MP? An alternative offering, 24M to 30M would
provide a stepping stone.
It would make marketing sense.
And my K30 @ work is reaching its end. I'm seeing some flakey pixels.
Though
Try
http://usvsth3m.com
See if you can spot the dirty Frenchman in Donna Summers' Disco Sausage Quiz!
B
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions
On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 15:31 +0200, "Boris Liberman"
wrote:
> On 11/21/2010 10:52 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
> > Not quite all, apparently. The K200D doesn't have PZ functionality but
> > it is compatible with SDM lenses.
>
> Software?
>
Don't think so - the manual specifically states non-PZ compa
On 11/21/2010 10:52 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
Not quite all, apparently. The K200D doesn't have PZ functionality but
it is compatible with SDM lenses.
Software?
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,
On Sun, 21 Nov 2010 08:47 -0500, "Adam Maas" wrote:
> They've been back since the K10D and K100D Super, delivering power to
> the SDM lenses and re-enabling basic PZ functionality.
>
Not quite all, apparently. The K200D doesn't have PZ functionality but
it is compatible with SDM lenses.
Che
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 12:45:33PM +, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
> It appears the power zoom has been revived.
> So should it be called the PZ-5d instead of the K-5? :-)
What does the K-5 offer that a K10D (or later) body does not?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.n
They've been back since the K10D and K100D Super, delivering power to
the SDM lenses and re-enabling basic PZ functionality.
-Adam
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 8:13 AM, Collin Brendemuehl
wrote:
> Boris,
>
> I hadn't taken note of those same pins in my K-x.
> But there they are !!!
>
> Sincerely,
>
>
As far as I understand, these pins are used to drive the SDM motor.
On 11/21/2010 3:13 PM, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
Boris,
I hadn't taken note of those same pins in my K-x.
But there they are !!!
Sincerely,
Collin Brendemuehl
http://kerygmainstitute.org
"He is no fool who gives what he cann
Boris,
I hadn't taken note of those same pins in my K-x.
But there they are !!!
Sincerely,
Collin Brendemuehl
http://kerygmainstitute.org
"He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose"
-- Jim Elliott
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://p
Collin, my understanding that all cameras from K10D through K-5 (K20D,
K-7) are supporting some basic PZ operations such as lens retract when
camera is turned off. However, it also seems to me that this is where it
ends. None of the modern cameras fully support PZ (zoom tracking, etc).
So, it c
It appears the power zoom has been revived.
So should it be called the PZ-5d instead of the K-5? :-)
Sincerely,
Collin Brendemuehl
http://kerygmainstitute.org
"He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose"
-- Jim Elliott
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDM
Hi,
welcome on the list, Leon. Finally another slovenian member. :-) I hope you
will enjoy PDML. I'm really busy lately so I don't contribute much to the list,
but I sure was glad to see your name appering here. Welcome.
Matjaz
P.S.: Se malo slovenscine, saj je redka: lep pozdrav prav tako iz
35 matches
Mail list logo
