Am 15.02.15 um 06:41 schrieb Jens Bladt:
The 55-300mm is a surprisingly good lens considering the very low cost.
+1
I've bought mine on the way to our xmas holidays, took a load of photos
with it, and I'm perfectly happy.
Ralf
--
Ralf R. Radermacher - Köln/Cologne, Germany
Blog :
Ralf R Radermacher wrote:
Am 15.02.15 um 06:41 schrieb Jens Bladt:
The 55-300mm is a surprisingly good lens considering the very low cost.
+1
I've bought mine on the way to our xmas holidays, took a load of photos
with it, and I'm perfectly happy.
And the even-less-expensive DA-L 55-300 is
Am 15.02.15 um 16:23 schrieb Mark Roberts:
And the even-less-expensive DA-L 55-300 is the same lens optically.
Do note the missing WR.
Ralf
--
Ralf R. Radermacher - Köln/Cologne, Germany
Blog : http://the-real-fotoralf.blogspot.com
Audio : http://aporee.org/maps/projects/fotoralf
Web :
Ralf R Radermacher wrote:
Am 15.02.15 um 16:23 schrieb Mark Roberts:
And the even-less-expensive DA-L 55-300 is the same lens optically.
Do note the missing WR.
The missing WR probably accounts for the missing two-hundred-or-so
dollars in the price.
--
Mark Roberts - Photography
On 2/15/2015 12:22 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Ralf R Radermacher wrote:
Am 15.02.15 um 16:23 schrieb Mark Roberts:
And the even-less-expensive DA-L 55-300 is the same lens optically.
Do note the missing WR.
The missing WR probably accounts for the missing two-hundred-or-so
dollars in the
On 15 Feb 2015, at 17:38, Mark Roberts postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
P.J. Alling wrote:
On 2/15/2015 12:22 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Ralf R Radermacher wrote:
Am 15.02.15 um 16:23 schrieb Mark Roberts:
And the even-less-expensive DA-L 55-300 is the same lens optically.
Do note the
P.J. Alling wrote:
On 2/15/2015 12:22 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Ralf R Radermacher wrote:
Am 15.02.15 um 16:23 schrieb Mark Roberts:
And the even-less-expensive DA-L 55-300 is the same lens optically.
Do note the missing WR.
The missing WR probably accounts for the missing two-hundred-or-so
On 2/15/2015 3:44 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
Quoting P.J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com:
On 2/15/2015 12:22 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Ralf R Radermacher wrote:
Am 15.02.15 um 16:23 schrieb Mark Roberts:
And the even-less-expensive DA-L 55-300 is the same lens optically.
Do note the
On 2/15/2015 3:52 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
Quoting Bill anotherdrunken...@gmail.com:
On 15/02/2015 2:44 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
My 55-300 (non WR) has a metal lens mount.
How many versions are there of that lens?
42
Thanks.
We haven't had a '42' answer in a while...
Yes the
Am 15.02.15 um 23:55 schrieb P.J. Alling:
I don't think that there's an HD
version yet, but that's next and there will then be 4 versions...
There is and I have it.
Now, if only Adobe would take note of this.
Ralf
--
Ralf R. Radermacher - Köln/Cologne, Germany
Blog :
I have an HD version as well. I believe that they improved the optical
formula or made some tweaks. Its mostly the same lens, but it does
seem to outperform the older versions.
On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 6:11 PM, Ralf R Radermacher fotor...@gmx.de wrote:
Am 15.02.15 um 23:55 schrieb P.J. Alling:
Am 16.02.15 um 00:24 schrieb Zos Xavius:
I have an HD version as well. I believe that they improved the optical
formula or made some tweaks. Its mostly the same lens, but it does
seem to outperform the older versions.
Here's a detailed comparison of the HD and non-HD versions:
Quoting P.J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com:
On 2/15/2015 12:22 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Ralf R Radermacher wrote:
Am 15.02.15 um 16:23 schrieb Mark Roberts:
And the even-less-expensive DA-L 55-300 is the same lens optically.
Do note the missing WR.
The missing WR probably accounts for
On 15/02/2015 2:44 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
Quoting P.J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com:
On 2/15/2015 12:22 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Ralf R Radermacher wrote:
Am 15.02.15 um 16:23 schrieb Mark Roberts:
And the even-less-expensive DA-L 55-300 is the same lens optically.
Do note the
Quoting Bill anotherdrunken...@gmail.com:
On 15/02/2015 2:44 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
My 55-300 (non WR) has a metal lens mount.
How many versions are there of that lens?
42
Thanks.
We haven't had a '42' answer in a while...
--
Cheers
Brian
++
Ralf R Radermacher wrote:
Am 16.02.15 um 00:24 schrieb Zos Xavius:
I have an HD version as well. I believe that they improved the optical
formula or made some tweaks. Its mostly the same lens, but it does
seem to outperform the older versions.
Here's a detailed comparison of the HD and
Hello
The 55-300mm is a surprisingly good lens considering the very low cost.
Only outpassed by the 60-250mm by quite small differences.
Look at:
https://www.flickr.com/search/?w=86896645@N00q=55-300
Regards
Jens
Den 11-01-2015 kl. 20:50 skrev Eric Weir:
A message I attempted to send
17 matches
Mail list logo
