Hello
The 55-300mm is a surprisingly good lens considering the very low cost.
Only outpassed by the 60-250mm by quite small differences.
Look at:
https://www.flickr.com/search/?w=86896645@N00&q=55-300
Regards
Jens
Den 11-01-2015 kl. 20:50 skrev Eric Weir:
A message I attempted to send when it would have been timely. I’m resending as
it remains true.
On Dec 23, 2014, at 4:09 AM, Malcolm Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
Over the last four years, I've reduced the number of lenses I've
owned by about 90%. The acquisition of this lens, if recommended, would
allow me to sell on three more lenses which cover portions of this range. I
would rather have a very small handful of lenses I use frequently, than some
that get used twice a year.
I have only a few lenses already. There is some duplication, and one, said to
be a good one, that I hardly use at all. Within the next couple months I will
have still fewer lenses.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Eric Weir
Decatur, GA USA
[email protected]
"What does it mean...that the world is so beautiful?"
- Mary Oliver
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
