not really based on an MX apart from the shape maybe, but as most M?
cameras, MV1 was an auto-aperture only camera, as well as MV ME and
MG. Of course those all had electronic shutter but B and X-speed which
were mechanical if I'm not mistaken.
In fact I never understood why Pentax made so many
Is the Pentax MV-1 any good? reliable? It looks like an auto-exposure-
only version of the MX ... ??
A guy at the photo store yesterday had one and I thought it looked
pretty nice.
Godfrey
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
Interesting info about the MV-1, thanks.
Given the way I shoot a good bit of the time, a simple camera with
aperture priority AE, EV compensation and a good lens would be
pretty easy to live with. That's pretty much how I used my Minox C
and EC cameras, and the Nikon FE2 as well.
Godfrey
] On
Behalf Of frank theriault
Sent: 07 December 2007 21:57
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: speaking of old and mouldering Pentax bodies ...
On Dec 7, 2007 9:30 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is the Pentax MV-1 any good? reliable? It looks like an
auto-exposure
On Dec 7, 2007 9:30 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is the Pentax MV-1 any good? reliable? It looks like an auto-exposure-
only version of the MX ... ??
A guy at the photo store yesterday had one and I thought it looked
pretty nice.
Was the MV1 the same as (or very similar to)
I bought the MV1 with the m40 for $100 in the early 1980's. I walked
into a camera shop in San Francisco while on vacation and the clerk
made me an offer. I said no to that but bought the camera anyway.
Thibouille [EMAIL PROTECTED] 12/7/2007 11:03 AM
not really based on an MX apart from the
6 matches
Mail list logo
