location I still ran out
of time (and patience!) to get them satisfactorily scanned.
John in Brisbane
-Original Message-
From: PDML On Behalf Of John
Sent: Tuesday, 17 December 2019 2:21 AM
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: spotmatics and unexposed film and gfm, oh my
On 12/1
Yeah, that's why I suggested a piece of "construction paper" with a cutout for
the 110 negative to support the glass. I thought maybe mat board would be too
thick & I couldn't think of a good descriptive name for another thick but not
too thick paper ... maybe a heavy card stock?
Since scannin
: Tuesday, 17 December 2019 2:21 AM
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: spotmatics and unexposed film and gfm, oh my
On 12/13/2019 21:00:07, jco...@iinet.net.au wrote:
> I have the Epson V500: when my mother reached her 100th. birthday in
> 2018, my brother and I scanned all of her negatives, rang
For most flatbed scanners, the focus is fixed and their DOF is such that they
can easily accommodate a mm or two of film curvature. For best results, a glass
plate works well to hold the negative flat, with the caveat that the glass
itself must be extremely clean and the thinner the better to pr
Holding negs down with a piece of glass works after a fashion, but you usually
get some moire. Special glass or plastic made for that purpose works better. I
think Epson sells it.
> On Dec 16, 2019, at 11:20 AM, John wrote:
>
> On 12/13/2019 21:00:07, jco...@iinet.net.au wrote:
>> I have the
On 12/13/2019 21:00:07, jco...@iinet.net.au wrote:
I have the Epson V500: when my mother reached her 100th. birthday in 2018,
my brother and I scanned all of her negatives, ranging in size from 1.5inches
square to 6x9cm and going back in time to the 1900's. We were unable to scan the
110 size neg
Alling
Sent: Saturday, 14 December 2019 9:03 AM
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: spotmatics and unexposed film and gfm, oh my
I'm a little late to this but the Epson Perfection V550 is supposed to be
pretty much the same engine as the V500. I keep looking at one but I haven't
fired up my film
y cheap cameras really did
> > have bottle-bottoms for a lens.
> >
> >
> > John in Brisbane
> >
> >
> >
> > -Original Message-----
> > From: PDML On Behalf Of P. J. Alling
> > Sent: Saturday, 14 December 2019 9:03 AM
> > To: pdml@pdml.net
> > S
ehalf Of P. J. Alling
> Sent: Saturday, 14 December 2019 9:03 AM
> To: pdml@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: spotmatics and unexposed film and gfm, oh my
>
> I'm a little late to this but the Epson Perfection V550 is supposed to be
> pretty much the same engine as the V500. I keep l
riginal Message-
From: PDML On Behalf Of P. J. Alling
Sent: Saturday, 14 December 2019 9:03 AM
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: spotmatics and unexposed film and gfm, oh my
I'm a little late to this but the Epson Perfection V550 is supposed to be
pretty much the same engine as the V500. I kee
I'm a little late to this but the Epson Perfection V550 is supposed to
be pretty much the same engine as the V500. I keep looking at one but I
haven't fired up my film scanner in such a long time...
On 12/10/2019 1:03 AM, Bulent Celasun wrote:
Flatbeds are ok, preferably with 35mm and 120 hol
Interesting. I tried the free version to try & revive an HP2400 scanner.
It wouldn't work properly (parts of scanned pages were blank) so I
contacted Mr Hamrick who asked me to conduct a couple of tests & forward
the resulting files. He informed me that the scanner had croaked! Hard
to get serv
I have been on Linux for more than 10 years.
Never had a single problem with VueScan.
Mr. Hamrick answered my occasional messages in a timely and helpful manner.
Bulent
-
http://patoloji.gen.tr
http://celasun.wordpress.com/
http:
The
> support is impeccable, too.
>
>
> John in Brisbane
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: PDML On Behalf Of Postmaster
> Sent: Tuesday, 10 December 2019 11:34 AM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: spotmatics and unexposed film and gfm, oh my
&
Not only does it work, it works with Linux. You win all the internets today!
On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 1:58 PM Mark Roberts wrote:
>
> Scott Loveless wrote:
>
> >I had looked into Vuescan several years ago, but it did not work with
> >the 8400f at the time. Canon is particularly egregious when it
Scott Loveless wrote:
>I had looked into Vuescan several years ago, but it did not work with
>the 8400f at the time. Canon is particularly egregious when it comes
>to publishing hardware specs. I will re-investigate.
https://www.hamrick.com/vuescan/canon_8400f.html
"VueScan is compatible with t
Might have to consider. That's like almost thinking about it. "Ooh,
what a nice scene! I should take a picture by pushing the button down
on that camera I thought about bringing along"
On Tue, Dec 10, 2019 at 5:16 AM Steve Cottrell wrote:
>
> On 9/12/19, Scott Loveless, discombobulated, un
I had looked into Vuescan several years ago, but it did not work with
the 8400f at the time. Canon is particularly egregious when it comes
to publishing hardware specs. I will re-investigate.
On Mon, Dec 9, 2019 at 8:35 PM Postmaster wrote:
>
> Scott Loveless wrote:
>
> >Which leads me to film
rsion! The
> support is impeccable, too.
>
>
> John in Brisbane
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: PDML On Behalf Of Postmaster
> Sent: Tuesday, 10 December 2019 11:34 AM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: spotmatics and unexposed film and gf
On 9/12/19, Scott Loveless, discombobulated, unleashed:
>See you in May/June. Don't say you weren't warned.
I see. A challenge.
I might have to consider attending.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__UK Shoot / Edit and
|| (O) |Live Broadcast News
--
__
>Flatbeds are ok, preferably with 35mm and 120 holders.
I have Epson V500 with those adapters (no longer on the shelves).
And I am a happy user of VueScan.
It is simply too good for a business model from the customer's point of view.
I also have a Nikon Coolscan V ED, a dedicated film scanner whic
ecember 2019 11:34 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: spotmatics and unexposed film and gfm, oh my
Scott Loveless wrote:
>Which leads me to film scanners. I need one. The Canon 8400turdbucket
>is no longer supported. They say the previous drivers should work with
>DOS10, b
Scott Loveless wrote:
>Which leads me to film scanners. I need one. The Canon
>8400turdbucket is no longer supported. They say the previous drivers
>should work with DOS10, but they don't.
Check if that scanner is supported byVueScan (it probably is). Great
scanning software that's compatible
It's me again, Margaret.
My basement is full. Not "there's some stuff on the shelves we don't
need and I'd like to clean them off to make room for the new Christmas
decorations" full, but "tiny, narrow paths that don't quite get me to
where I need to be, and if I don't come out in fifteen minutes
24 matches
Mail list logo
