Hi,
Friday, November 21, 2003, 4:41:29 AM, you wrote:
[...]
> A friend of mine is a Dr of Music.
> According to him, anyone over the age of 50 who figures they can still
> appreciate the joys of an expensive sound system are fooling themselves. We
> lose much ability to discern subtle tonal varia
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://jcoconnell.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 12:32 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: vinyl Was: RE: Di
Oh, I think you're wrong and I think they call it marketingLOL
Vic
No one would spend $20k for a miniscule difference. The difference
is quite large and very audible. People spend big bucks on audio
equipment because they audition and WANT IT. Far more entertaining
and worth to them, nobody
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 11:11 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: OT: vinyl Was: RE: Digital/Film body pricing (was: A
conversation with Noritsu.)
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
> WRONG about LPs. When using high quality LPs played back on a high en
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
> WRONG about LPs. When using high quality LPs played back on a high end
> phono rig (several thousand dollars), LPS BLOW AWAY even the best CDs.
> That is why all the studios no longer record in 16 bit digital audio and
> SACD and DVD-A have been devel
5 matches
Mail list logo
