On 2 Dec 2004 at 14:29, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
BTW, rectilinear is a distortion, not the lack of it. It's done to produce an
effect which is not natural to either the human eye's vision characteristics
or
to normal lens designs.
Sorry I'll have to respectfully disagree on this one.
- Original Message -
From: David Zaninovic
Subject: Re: E6 with JOBO
Forget it, my wife would kill me if the whole house got the
formaldehyde smell, I ordered D with 16-45 instead.
I would love to play with chemicals but I don't have a separate
room to do it and doing it in the
You make a lot of sense, Frank. I hadn't thought of that, but you're
absolutely correct. Thanks for looking and commenting.
Paul
On Dec 2, 2004, at 4:46 PM, frank theriault wrote:
On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 21:56:45 -0500, Paul Stenquist
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From the park above the palisades just
On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 22:27:36 -0500, Paul Stenquist
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Frank is going to want to borrow those ears. Thanks for the smile.
Paul
Paul,
No need:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2928096
vbg
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri
On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 21:20:18 -0600, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/paw/rolleireindeer.jpg
OK, it's a horrible waste of resources, and is a shamelessly bad
snapshot.
However, that is a 110 pound Rottweiler in the picture
William Robb
I'm not
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 16:24:14 -0600, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm surprised that the PC Nazis haven't gotten hold of that name yet.
William Robb
Ah, but if they tried to do anything about it, the Aboriginal PC
Police would have to jump in to prevent their heritage-appellations
Collin Brendemuehl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In BW we can affect contrast and gray-level representation of color with the
use of filters. Some on the camera, some on the enlarger.
What I'm thinking of is really a question about the raw format. Is it
truely raw, the simple captured sensor
Leon,
In Photoshop under the Adjustments menu there is an option for Photo
filter
Is this feature available in Photoshop CS only ?
Patrick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 13:17:48 -0500, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
In BW we can affect contrast and gray-level representation of
Instead of two you mean?
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
If God had wanted us to use cameras, we'd have all been born with one.
On Tue, 30 Nov 2004 10:53:00 -0800, Bruce Dayton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wasn't able to get this image into the PUG this month, so I'll have
to share it this way. This shot was taken several years ago out back
behind the house my wife grew up in. What makes it so interesting, is
that this
Look for a upscale model in the late spring. If they have not changed their
plans that is.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: Joakim Johansson
Subject: Next Pentax DSLR?
Hi
I'm not sure I understood all of that, but I
believe it qualifies you for the
PDML Weekly Big Word Award! ;-)
Don
-Original Message-
From: Rob Studdert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 5:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: OT: Anyone notice this?
I seriously doubt that there is anything that can hold a candle to the
5n when it comes to the sheer simplicity and intuitiveness of the user
interface. I can simply place my hands on the top plate blindfolded and
know:
metering mode
drive mode
whether the shutter speed is set to A or
I don't know the *ist DS, just it's older s*isDer, but this would apply
nicely to the *ist D too, IMO:
It turns on instantly. It focuses very fast and the shutter lag is
unnoticeable. Even using flash I could shoot pretty much at will
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 26 Nov 2004 22:58:44 -0800, Juan Buhler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My name is Juan and I am a Tri-X user.
Slowly, I am getting familiar with the ist D as a street camera. Today
I went out shooting, trying to forget that it is a digital camera that
takes color, and thinking as I usually
On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 09:03:44 US/Eastern, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.iww.is/art/shs/pages/thumbs.html
My sister just sent me this link.Photos are stunning,so i thought i'd share.
Dave
Another reason to move to Iceland (along with the fact that Bjork
It does. Z-1/Z1p did too.
I don't understand all this exposure failure talk about the TTL-flash and
the *ist D. My *ist D works pretty much exactly like any other TTL-flash
system I have used (Super A, PZ-1/PZ-1p and MZ-S). I have noticed small
diffrerences depending on which FLASH I use. My
On 2 Dec 2004 at 13:17, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
What I'm thinking of is really a question about the raw format. Is it
truely
raw, the simple captured sensor data. If it is, are there techniques in
place
to allow later treatment of the data as though it were the original light,
making
On Sun, 28 Nov 2004 10:41:36 -0500, cbwaters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After a week of rain every day what did we do? You guessed it, we went
camping...
We must have been living right because after it rained on us setting up on
Friday night (in the dark), it was pretty nice the rest of our
On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 16:14:59 -0500 (EST), Fred Widall
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My *ist-DS and SMCP-DA 18-55mm just arrived... whopppe.
Xmas came early this year.
First impressions, feels quite heavy and solidly built, large handgrip
feels good. Controls appear to be pretty straight
On 2 Dec 2004 at 16:22, William Robb wrote:
I think that they are shooting at much higher shutter speeds these
days, but NTSC lockes them into a frame rate. I have noticed for
quite some times that sports broadcasts tend to have a rather
unpleasant jumpiness about them.
It has pretty much
Jens, have you tried this in Manual mode with
an M lens on the D?
I'll look around in the setup and see what I can find.
I saw NO exposure difference over 5 stops!
Don
-Original Message-
From: Jens Bladt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 5:21 PM
To: [EMAIL
Geez, that's old news. :)
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0110/01102401pentaxdslrnomore.asp
Would've been nice though.
t
On 12/2/04 15:30, Patrick Genovese wrote:
Would dreaming of the MZ-D be too much to wish for from Pentax ?
Just think about it. The MZ-S' ergonomics with updated
Here's the first press release about it:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0102/01021106pentaxdigitalslr.asp
t
On 12/2/04 15:50, Tim Sherburne wrote:
Geez, that's old news. :)
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0110/01102401pentaxdslrnomore.asp
Would've been nice though.
t
On 12/2/04
Tim Sherburne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Geez, that's old news. :)
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0110/01102401pentaxdslrnomore.asp
Would've been nice though.
Still would be with a different sensor...
:)
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
William Robb mused:
- Original Message -
From: David Zaninovic
Subject: Re: E6 with JOBO
You may be right... I just ordered D with the 16-45 for around
$1350 after rebate. It will pay for itself after one year in film
and processing savings. I will also shoot more as I
Just to make sure it wasn't lack of caffiene this
morning, I tried this again.
This time at f8/150th, ISO 400, 10ft (3 Meter) distance.
Built in flash, Manual mode, f8 set via aperture ring.
The histogram at -3.0 EC is virtually identical to the
one at +3.0 EC.
Wierd!
Don
-Original
i'd easily pay a few times that. but they are really hard to get by.
the last one i saw
on ebay went for $1500, iirc.
so, yeah, you guys are disgrace to the human race! i only wish i could
join you there :)
best,
mishka
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 13:48:33 +0100 (CET), Frank Wajer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'd second that thought for those of us reading the messages offline on the
train on a PDA (as now) or laptop. Is it worth saving the message to use the
link later, or delete it and never know what we're missing. I generally take
the latter route thinking life's too short, but then wonder about
Hi Cory
Not in Jersey anymore
In Michigan...
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: cbwaters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 29, 2004 6:58 PM
Subject: Re: A Shore shot
M home
Cory
not in Michigan anymore
- Original Message -
-Original Message-
From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I only saw four
or five pics, and while I do think some may have been better
suited to a rectilinear lens, clearly Amita was experimenting
a bit (674 pics seems to indicate that),
No no no, those photos
Jens
sorry to hear of your problems with the Stylus Photo. I've had one since
around 97 and have done thousands of prints with it and it still keeps
chugging along. Paid around $300 USD for it, a complete ink change runs me
about
$35 USD.
One thing I learned along the way was to always shut it
- Original Message -
From: John Francis
Subject: Re: E6 with JOBO
I'd bet that for the majority of slides shot over the last decade
the
prime use is to make a digital scanned image. A digital image
capture
device removes two steps from the process (developing and
scanning),
not to
Quoting Ann Sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
My favorite part, is, of course, when the run the
credits :) - but in the TV
version they go too fast
that's why somebody created VCRs ...
ERN
Quoting Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
My feeling all along and after handling a DS in the store yesterday is
that those who are happy with something less than the MZ-5n, will be
happy with the DS. Basically people who are going to leave it on one
of the program modes and not change much of
Well, there's always the Pentax MX, various K-series cameras, the Leica ...
Of course, these cameras don't have modes perhaps that's why they're
so simple and intuitive.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Patrick Genovese [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I seriously doubt that there is anything that can
Hi,
I've looked at this several times and apart from it doing nothing to move
me, or interest me - it looks like a million other similar shots seen in
tourist brochures - I realized that my biggest objection is the moon. It
has no detail. Just seeing a big, white, overexposed disk in the sky
At 10:17 AM 02/12/2004 , C. Brendemuehl wrote:
In BW we can affect contrast and gray-level representation of color with
the use of filters. Some on the camera, some on the enlarger.
What I'm thinking of is really a question about the raw format. Is it
truely raw, the simple captured sensor
they do lots of computer processing. there are delays now to precent the
wardrobe malfunction, etc.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 02, 2004 5:22 PM
Subject: Re: OT: Anyone notice this?
I think that they
Good score tonight.
A girl I work with has a bunch of darkroom stuff that belonged to a
friend's grandmother that she wants to unload.
A lot of the stuff was deja vu all over agian, with stuff that I
hadn't seen in over 3 decades, however there were some interesting
items.
A whole stack of
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff
Subject: Re: Changing metering modes in Ds?
Well, there's always the Pentax MX, various K-series cameras, the
Leica ...
Of course, these cameras don't have modes perhaps that's why
they're
so simple and intuitive.
I always liked poor
- Original Message -
From: Jens Bladt
Subject: RE: EC with TTL Flash on ist D?
I don't understand all this exposure failure talk about the
TTL-flash and
the *ist D.
Shot within 20 seconds or so of each other..
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/PDMLtemp/
This is typical of how
I have had ZX-10's - it is more capable than those. Almost like a
film *ist, except that the film *ist has most of the dedicated
switches. Probably a ZX-7. Electronically it can do most things
(metering modes, continuous AF, wireless flash, etc), but must use
menus to select all those things
I have to put my 2 cents worth in praise of Epson's printers. Until
recently I was using an 880 that I bought a couple years ago for less than
100USD. It's held up admirably for both text and photos with just a little
cleaning maintenance and is still running off a print server as a network
William Robb mused:
- Original Message -
From: John Francis
Subject: Re: E6 with JOBO
I'd bet that for the majority of slides shot over the last decade
the
prime use is to make a digital scanned image. A digital image
capture
device removes two steps from the
Mark Roberts mused:
Tim Sherburne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Geez, that's old news. :)
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0110/01102401pentaxdslrnomore.asp
Would've been nice though.
Still would be with a different sensor...
:)
And lenses with aperture rings ...
Straight ahead for BW LOL
I didn't realize these were modes.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Changing metering modes in Ds?
Well, there's always the Pentax MX, various K-series cameras, the
Leica ...
Of course, these cameras don't have
That's some cool sh!t, Bill. I recall using some of that gear way back when
I was just learning modes ;-)) Had A Beseler 45MCRX (I believe that was
the model number) set up for wall projection. We'd play Blowup every now
and then LOL
Anyway, congrats on the purchase. I really do hope you get
Hello Paul,
Since so many are piping up for Epson, I guess I better add to the
naysayers. I have had Canons, Epsons and HPs for photo quality
printing. I owned three different Epsons. What I will say positive
about them is that the expensive ones seem to do quite well. My first
was fairly
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff
Subject: RE: Darkroom Equipment Aquisition
I really do hope you get around to
setting up a nice darkroom.
I am really downsizing the amount of space I am giving over to the
darkroom. I am hopefully going to fit it into a 5 8 x 9' 6 (inside
On Wed, 24 Nov 2004 22:54:30 -0800, Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
comments and critiques welcome
www.photosynth.ca/photo/f/bird-splash.html
Francis
I think it's sort of fun.
There's something about the bird's body position, the way he's looking
at the wave, that strikes me as
On 30 Nov 2004 at 16:58, Bruce Dayton wrote:
Now I am going to have to do a little experimenting. I'll let you
know of my findings. One thing I do recall is that the D-Lab prints
at 400 dpi rather than the common 300 dpi of the Frontiers.
Hi Bruce,
I tried to send you an email off list
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 22:19:50 +1300, David Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
As expected I was away for longer than I expected (sorry if that's
confusing). We were only moving across town but it's still been pretty
hectic and I'm totally exhausted.
I didn't know on Friday that the
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 08:53:58 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
My understanding is that Iceland is about the most inaptly named
country in the world.
Greenland is perhaps a bit less aptly named
Named by the same people, right?
The way I
On Thu, 02 Dec 2004 11:19:54 -0800, Tim Sherburne wrote:
I don't have experience with those other models, but changing the metering
mode on the MZ-S rocks. One knob right on the top. In fact, the placement of
the knob makes it almost too easy: I've accidentally bumped it into another
mode a
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 12:15:05 -0800, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
It's terrible. Desaturating an image is the WORST way to make a BW
conversion.
How does desaturating the image compare to converting to CIE*Lab format
and taking only the Luminance channel?
TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ
Glad for you, Bill.
Waiting seems to be what 4x5 has to do. It is waiting around here too, but it is
my health it is waiting upon.
Speaking of my health, for those who may be interested (can't imagine why), they
have finally come up with a theory. See my latest journal entry for more.
? I think I missed something here. I don't own a 15mm, though I'm
always happy to try out equipment other people want to send me. :)
Chris
On Wed, 1 Dec 2004 17:32:58 +0100, Frantisek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh, you are quite advenurous. Aren't you afraid of them - ehm -
marking your 15mm
Er... scratch that. I'm an idiot.
Chris
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 22:01:36 -0600, Chris Brogden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
? I think I missed something here. I don't own a 15mm, though I'm
always happy to try out equipment other people want to send me. :)
Chris
On Wed, 1 Dec 2004
Put the sauna in the back yard. That is where my grandfather had it. Had a big
(compared to me, I was ten or eleven when he died) wooden barrel to take a dip
in after the sauna. You had to break the ice first in the winter (Finns are crazy).
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Idiot Proof ==
What's this?
I can't believe my lens.
Wow!
Oh, I'm supposed to be setting the exposure.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: Jens Bladt
Subject: RE: EC with TTL Flash on ist D?
Hey gang,
Thought I'd post a link to a couple of my recent winter pics that
I'm proud of. Don't know the difference between a PAW or a PESO as I
haven't been keeping up on that, so didn't know quite what to label the
subject. Comments/Criticism welcome.
On 2 Dec 2004 at 22:56, Doug Franklin wrote:
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 12:15:05 -0800, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
It's terrible. Desaturating an image is the WORST way to make a BW
conversion.
How does desaturating the image compare to converting to CIE*Lab format
and taking only the Luminance
- Original Message -
From: Graywolf
Subject: Re: EC with TTL Flash on ist D?
What's this?
I can't believe my lens.
Wow!
Oh, I'm supposed to be setting the exposure.
Right.
This stupid calender is being both lots of fun, and at the same time,
one of the dumbest things I have ever been
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 19:25:40 -0600, William Robb wrote:
I expect you are right, but I also have heard that it is easier to
get good quality scans from negative film.
Hmmm. I suspect that may be based on the type of photos you usually
take. For me, slide films work better for one simple
On Fri, 03 Dec 2004 15:10:29 +1000, Rob Studdert wrote:
Using the Luminance channel only in Lab format gives exactly the same
result as converting to grayscale.
OK. I'm a bit dense tonight. Is that good or bad?
Desaturating (in PS) without adjusting the other sliders gives a
completely
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 20:42:15 -0600, William Robb wrote:
You will note the exposure is correct in one of the four pictures.
I could live with two of the exposures.
TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ
Rob Studdert mused:
If you (or anyone else) would like a copy please let me know, it's about
4.5MB.
Yes please.
On 2 Dec 2004 at 23:17, Doug Franklin wrote:
OK. I'm a bit dense tonight. Is that good or bad?
Good and bad :-)
I always felt that the CIE*Lab Luminance channel was a better rendition
than desaturation, but what the heck do I know. :-)
Well it's definitely closer to the colour/luminance
Bruce Dayton mused:
My Canon experience was pretty good overall and my HP experience has
been similar. I currently have an HP 7960 and frankly can't tell the
difference in output quality between it and the various Epsons that I
have seen.
I've got the HP 9650, which looks pretty good to
Hey, I did say with updated electronics it is just that the MZ-S
handles so beautifully, although there would be a couple of small tweaks
that can make it even better.
I wouldn't touch a camera with the original Philips CCD that Pentax
planned for the MZ-D i beleive that the same ccd was used
Yes, I would like a copy. Just go ahead and send it to my email
account. I'll probably have my lab print it too.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Thursday, December 2, 2004, 8:26:06 PM, you wrote:
RS On 30 Nov 2004 at 16:58, Bruce Dayton wrote:
Now I am going to have to do a little experimenting.
John Francis mused:
Bruce Dayton mused:
My Canon experience was pretty good overall and my HP experience has
been similar. I currently have an HP 7960 and frankly can't tell the
difference in output quality between it and the various Epsons that I
have seen.
I've got the HP 9650,
Alin wrote:
Strange, I thought there is nothing to focus about lasers, after all
those are in-phase, rectilinear beams with extremely low
dispersion!? Could it be the so called focus procedure is rather an
alignment process to insure the three laser spots overlap?
Servus, Alin
That is
On Thu, 02 Dec 2004 12:25:45 -0700, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
3. With an investent in Pentax lenses, it doesn't really matter what a
reviews says or how much a reviewer says one product is better than
another... I'm don't have the money to dump my current system and start
over, or invest
- Original Message -
From: Francis Tang
Subject: Re: *istDS Review on photo.shopping.com
Seriously, for me there's not much reason to stick to Pentax for a
non-fullframe dSLR that cannot use M-series lenses.
My istD does just fine with M lenses.
YMMV
William Robb
*gasp*!
Could this be true? Noone in Singapore can confirm whether M-series
lenses work okay with the *ist-DS (okay, I presume the DS is not so
different from the D wrt lens compatibility). The brochure for the DS
only lists K-A and newer lenses as being compatible.
So, how well does it work
My istDs does just fine too with K and M lenses
Andy
-Original Message-
From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, December 03, 2004 1:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: *istDS Review on photo.shopping.com
- Original Message -
From: Francis Tang
Francis,
Here is a copy of the email I posted a couple of days ago...
**
I got my Ds tonight... it's a little gem. It cost me around USD833 body
only in Taiwan.
I don't know whether this info has been posted before, so I'll post it
again.
Would dreaming of the MZ-D be too much to wish for from Pentax ?
Just think about it. The MZ-S' ergonomics with updated electronics most
of the suff from the *IST-D bigger buffer faster frame rate better AF
finder...
Maybe we'll get luck who knows !
Patrick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-
Here's a little trick that i picked up i've found that in some
situations it works even better than the channel mixer. The concept is
similar to channel mixer except that you get more
1. Create a new adjustment layer for levels or curves, lets call this
layer A. when the layer or curves dialog
Hi Doug ...
It's easier for me to show you than it is for me to explain it:
http://home.earthlink.net/~my-pics/gallery/index.html
The pics should be self explanatory.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Doug Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 12:15:05 -0800, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Quoting Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I have had ZX-10's - it is more capable than those. Almost like a
film *ist, except that the film *ist has most of the dedicated
switches. Probably a ZX-7. Electronically it can do most things
(metering modes, continuous AF, wireless flash, etc),
Quoting Doug Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, 2 Dec 2004 08:53:58 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
My understanding is that Iceland is about the most inaptly named
country in the world.
Greenland is perhaps a bit less aptly named
On Dec 3, 2004, at 6:45 AM, Andy Chang wrote:
My istDs does just fine too with K and M lenses
And, I presume, M-42 lenses are just the same, so you can go back to
those ancient, beautiful Takumar lenses from the Spotmatic era. Not bad
for the digital age. . .
--
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
Close, but not exactly exactly - at least according to my experience and as
seen in the little gallery I just put up:
http://home.earthlink.net/~my-pics/gallery/index.html
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using the Luminance channel only in Lab format gives
Quoting Francis Tang [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
*gasp*!
Could this be true? Noone in Singapore can confirm whether M-series
lenses work okay with the *ist-DS (okay, I presume the DS is not so
different from the D wrt lens compatibility). The brochure for the DS
only lists K-A and newer lenses as
On 2 Dec 2004 at 22:17, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Close, but not exactly exactly - at least according to my experience and as
seen
in the little gallery I just put up:
http://home.earthlink.net/~my-pics/gallery/index.html
True it isn't exact the same, the colours render to gray in similar
Was that mentioned offically anywhere ?
Patrick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Look for a upscale model in the late spring. If they have not changed
their plans that is.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
William Robb wrote:
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mused:
Quoting Francis Tang [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
*gasp*!
Could this be true? Noone in Singapore can confirm whether M-series
lenses work okay with the *ist-DS (okay, I presume the DS is not so
different from the D wrt lens compatibility). The brochure for the DS
When I was looking for a decent method to convert GRB to mono, I came
across this a while back:
Author unknown -
--
Recently at ImagingUSA2003 in Las Vegas, Gary Rogers of R9 (the brains
behind Septone) showed us one of the
101 - 191 of 191 matches
Mail list logo
