Hi,
Thursday, February 17, 2005, 6:04:58 AM, Ann wrote:
cbwaters wrote:
I think it's funny whether or not you agree with the dude about music...
http://www.youhavebadtasteinmusic.com/
Cory
Cory - I looked at the subject line and thought I was on the Scrabble list!
You go first.. you
http://www.pma-show.com/review/canon/001_EOS_digital_rebel_xt.html
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
On 16/2/05, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
I posted a PAW a couple of hours ago, and so far haven't seen one
response. I go to the archives, and there are 5 responses there, none
of which made it to me via the list.
0 for 5. I'm not good at math, but I don't think that's a very
On 16/2/05, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
This poor kid could hardly keep his eyes open. vbg
Taken with the LX at waist level (I'm not taking a photo, I'm just
fixing something on the camera, just ignore me, I'm not doing
anything, dum de dum...) with the K 1.2 50 at about f2.0,
Cotty wrote:
http://www.pma-show.com/review/canon/001_EOS_digital_rebel_xt.html
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
That page has been removed.
/Henri
On 17/2/05, Henri Toivonen, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://www.pma-show.com/review/canon/001_EOS_digital_rebel_xt.html
That page has been removed.
Interesting!
It showed a 'Digital Rebel XT' in black with a battery pack attached,
quoting the 8MP sensor and 3 frames per second
Cotty wrote on 17.02.05 11:30:
Interesting!
It showed a 'Digital Rebel XT' in black with a battery pack attached,
quoting the 8MP sensor and 3 frames per second
Yeah, I've managed to read it all, and responded to your original post, but
it didn't reached PDML... Anyway - letsgodigital
On 17/2/05, Sylwester Pietrzyk, discombobulated, unleashed:
Anyway seems like a new Drebel will be killer DSLR...
Ahh, with the greatest of respect Sylwek - a killer DSLR? In what sense
of the word??
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
Cotty wrote:
On 17/2/05, Sylwester Pietrzyk, discombobulated, unleashed:
Anyway seems like a new Drebel will be killer DSLR...
Ahh, with the greatest of respect Sylwek - a killer DSLR? In what sense
of the word??
Cheers,
Cotty
At night, it will start to kill people. Don't forget, its
On Wed, 16 Feb 2005, John Francis wrote:
But you're still basing your agument on the (apparently unwarranted)
premise that the *ist-DS *does* disable TTL flash for all non-AF lenses.
According to other posters here, that simply isn't the case.
I am wrong and I apologise. Godfrey DiGiorgi set
three words:
Tim Boy Hi
On Feb 17, 2005, at 1:04 AM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
cbwaters wrote:
I think it's funny whether or not you agree with the dude about
music...
http://www.youhavebadtasteinmusic.com/
Cory
Cory - I looked at the subject line and thought I was on the Scrabble
list!
You go
On 17 Feb 2005 at 11:34, Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
Yeah, I've managed to read it all, and responded to your original post, but it
didn't reached PDML... Anyway - letsgodigital removed this page, because
embargo
on new Drebel end on 20.02 :-) Anyway seems like a new Drebel will be killer
Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matrix works with TTL: According to the EXIF ibfo avaliable in the INFO
menu, TTL flash will use matrix/pattern metering (*ist D), when an A or post
A lens is used at A-setting.
Yes, but the matrix metering will only affect the aperture/shutter speed
part of
- Original Message -
From: Herb Chong
Subject: Re: How far can you push it? (BW film that is...)
note that EI2000 isn't real speed gain since the shadows have lost
too much detail to reproduce the full tonal range, but under
moderately low contrast gym lights, it wasn't objectionable.
Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 17/2/05, Henri Toivonen, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://www.pma-show.com/review/canon/001_EOS_digital_rebel_xt.html
That page has been removed.
Interesting!
It showed a 'Digital Rebel XT' in black with a battery pack attached,
quoting the 8MP sensor and 3
To those who (like me) generally go to e* after PDML,
Photo.net classifieds are also a good place to sell.
And it's free.
Sincerely,
C. Brendemuehl
Caveat: This information should be viewed critically. It may merit as much
technical excellence as a CBS news report.
Nicely done JCO, for a lens that deserves it :)
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Club M42 [EMAIL PROTECTED];
pentax discuss pentax-discuss@pdml.net; SLR Manual Mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 16, 2005 10:00 PM
frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
This poor kid could hardly keep his eyes open. vbg
Taken with the LX at waist level (I'm not taking a photo, I'm just
fixing something on the camera, just ignore me, I'm not doing
anything, dum de dum...)
Go Andre! Thanks for pursuing macro exposure performance with two 360's. I've
done wireless macro hand-holding of one 360 at 25cm from the subject and I get
perfect exposures.
Thanks also Arnie for sharing your experience. With respect to controlling the
1/1, 1/2, 2/3, 1/3 output ratio
Quoting Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 17/2/05, Henri Toivonen, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://www.pma-show.com/review/canon/001_EOS_digital_rebel_xt.html
That page has been removed.
Interesting!
It showed a 'Digital Rebel XT' in black with a battery pack attached,
quoting the 8MP
anti or ante?
Sent via the WebMail system at mail.safe-t.net
On 17/2/05, Collin Brendemuehl, discombobulated, unleashed:
anti or ante?
aunty :-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
I disagree; I think the dark strip balances the image
wonderfully.
Beautiful, Frank!
Rick
--- Gianfranco Irlanda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3125114size=lg
Let me know what you think. Thanks to all
http://jcoconnell.com/temp/vs128mm.htm
I promised this page for the SPOTMATIC mailing list based on some
discussions there but I don't see why these other groups might not want
to take a peek at it even if out of context (no context actually!)
Nicely done JCO, for a lens that deserves it :)
I've got the FA100 f2.8, and use it on the *ist D. I've yet to have
any problems with CA.
My favorite macro is the A 100/2.8. However, I've never used it on other
than film bodies. (Has anyone tried this critter on the *ist D or DS ?)
Fred
You can see it on dpreview.com
rg
Henri Toivonen wrote:
Cotty wrote:
http://www.pma-show.com/review/canon/001_EOS_digital_rebel_xt.html
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
That page has been
Auto/manual switch is not needed, the aperture will close or open as you
turn the aperture ring.
All the best!
Raimo K
Personal photography homepage at:
http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
- Original Message -
From: Peter J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent:
I just read the article, and while some of the technical stuff eludes me as
to its value or just what it all means, the camera sure looks tempting.
Interesting points are smaller, black, more pixels with higher quality
images, BW mode, uses CF cards, and a few other things. Any idea of a
price
Hi Arnie. You can change the ratio between the 2 flashes, like 1/3
for one and 2/3 for the second one. Is this what you mean? If so,
I'll check in the manual to see how to do it. I've done it once and
it was effective.
Andre
Jack, it works great when I do that. Just I would like to be able
Ahhh - I see DPreview has the estimated US price - $899.00
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Shel Belinkoff
Any idea of a
price point on this puppy?
Shel
http://www.pma-show.com/review/canon/001_EOS_digital_rebel_xt.html
Rob Studdert wrote:
On 17 Feb 2005 at 11:34, Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
Yeah, I've managed to read it all, and responded to your original post, but it
didn't reached PDML... Anyway - letsgodigital removed this page, because embargo
on new Drebel end on 20.02 :-) Anyway seems like a new Drebel
Canon also put the mode control dial where the shutter speed dial used
to go to give it a more analog appearance, removed
the information LCD, since who needs information if the camera is going
to think for you after all. (The best of all possible worlds).
Still the 8mp is a slight improvement,
DPReview quotes $899.00. Still doesn't excite me I'd have to use Canon
glass, which is expensive if it's good.
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I just read the article, and while some of the technical stuff eludes me as
to its value or just what it all means, the camera sure looks tempting.
Interesting
Really like it, good moment and expressions.
Regards
Albano
--- frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This poor kid could hardly keep his eyes open.
vbg
Taken with the LX at waist level (I'm not taking a
photo, I'm just
fixing something on the camera, just ignore me, I'm
not doing
Can't you just dial in exposure compensation on the flash itself ?
- Original Message -
From: arnie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005 12:11 AM
Subject: Re: Multiple wireless 360FGZ flash
Jack, it works great when I do that. Just I would
If the build quality and feel are anything like the current Rebel D, they can
keep it.
Canon also put the mode control dial where the shutter speed dial used
to go to give it a more analog appearance, removed
the information LCD, since who needs information if the camera is going
to think
In a message dated 2/16/2005 3:50:43 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3125114size=lg
Let me know what you think. Thanks to all who look and/or comment.
cheers,
frank
Ooops, slipped up, frank, that one's really in
Ooooh, they must be serious it's black.
Cotty wrote:
http://www.pma-show.com/review/canon/001_EOS_digital_rebel_xt.html
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
I can understand why mankind hasn't
In a message dated 2/16/2005 4:38:36 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 22:39:48 -0800, Bruce Dayton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another shot of the falls that I recently posted.
Pentax *istD, Tamron 90/2.8 Macro, Tripod mounted
ISO 200, 1 Sec @ F/32.0
Jens,
My understanding is that in TTL mode, the Matrix mode exposure
evalution is working for the *ambient* portion of the light
metering, not for the flash metering. P-TTL allows an integrated
preflash/ambient exposure evalution based on both metering
capabilities.
I could be wrong, I'm
When's the last time you used an M42 lens? I don't think so.
Raimo K wrote:
Auto/manual switch is not needed, the aperture will close or open as
you turn the aperture ring.
All the best!
Raimo K
Personal photography homepage at:
http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
- Original Message -
--- Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My favorite macro is the A 100/2.8. However, I've never used
it on other than film bodies. (Has anyone tried this critter
on the *ist
D or DS ?)
If it works as well as the A50/2.8 Macro, it will be a delight.
BTW:
The Pentax K Auto Extension Tube Set B
To the best of my knowlegde - that is my own test - the flash output will be
differt in two identical shots/scenes - the same available light, the same
shutter speed and aperture - if I - in one picture - choose a focus point
close to me - in the next picture - choose a focus point far away from
Hi!
Yesterday, I received my wide angle :) . It is Sigma 18/3.5 manual focus
but with A setting of aperture. Naturally, thanks to fellow PDMLer it is
in pristine shape.
I shot few shots with it. It is apparent that I will have to buy a hood.
Or I will have to use a hat or a hand :) . Which
I'm considering bying a flash for my *istD. Which one is best of the 500
and the 360? It seems to me that both have functions that the other do
not. Which functions are more useful, and which functions are less
important?
Advantages of the AF 500 FTZ
* more powerful (higher GN)
* possible to
Hi!
http://www.photoforum.ru/rate/photo.php?photo_id=170728
Trying the Sigma lens I enabled myself with...
Boris
Go Andre! Thanks for pursuing macro exposure performance with two
360's. I've done wireless macro hand-holding of one 360 at 25cm
from the subject and I get perfect exposures.
Have you tried f5.6 and f4? Probably not and you probably won't as
these apertures are not usefull for macro. But
If you find a hood for any 18mm lens that's worth a damn, let us all know.
Regards,
Bob...
From: Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi!
Yesterday, I received my wide angle :) . It is Sigma 18/3.5 manual focus
but with A setting of aperture. Naturally, thanks to fellow PDMLer it is
in pristine
Go Andre! Thanks for pursuing macro exposure performance with two
360's. I've done wireless macro hand-holding of one 360 at 25cm
from the subject and I get perfect exposures.
I don't see my post in my mail. Maybe others have not received it:
Manual says Effective flash range starts at 0,7m at
Now, with the *istDS, I found a Pentax-A 50mm f/2.8 Macro at a
reasonable price. It works well and has nice imaging qualities.
I also picked up a set of extension tubes which I'll use with. . .
I also have this lens. It's a good length on the IstD and since I like
short teles as a walk around
Does anybody have any experience with this Microdrive ? Will it work in D ?
How do you transfer files to PC ? Can you connect it somehow to a PC as normal
ATA disk ?
From the manual's Wireless Mode chapter (p. 37): In the P-TTL mode,
the flash amount adjustments (1/1,2/3,1/2,1/3) and flash exposure
compensation (-3.0 - + 1.0) are possible.
Curiously there is no explanation or illustration of how to do the
first thing. But it is simple: when in P-TTL
As some asked for Sigma EX 1.8/20mm samples, here I dug few out. Some
background:
*Nikon D70 - obviously, it produces different images than IstD
(weaker antialiasing filter, different algorithms, colour,...). So
they are just useful to comparing the lens to itself across different
apertures.
*JPEG
I check BH and Adorama this morning and they are both selling the *ist-Ds
for $725.
--Mark
I don't own a dedicated external flash yet so it's hard to
compare P-TTL vs TTL results ... The DS' built-in flash ONLY
support P-TTL operation, so distance measurement when on full
Matrix/Evaluative metering is probably a given.
Do the A series manual focus lenses provide distance readout
to
Yes, you are right. M42 lenses are indeed different from K mount lenses in
this respect. Sorry about the confusion I may have caused.
All the best!
Raimo K
Personal photography homepage at:
http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
- Original Message -
From: Peter J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks to all who responded to me directly concerning missing
messages. I ended up having a span of about 12 hours where no list
messages came through from 11:00 am to 11:00 pm Pacific Daylight Time
here in California.
Messages are continuing to trickle through now, so hopefully things
are as
This could mean one of two things, 1.) They don't have an upgraded
replacement to compete with the
new Canon D-Rebel XT and they've decided to compete on price alone, or
2.) they have a replacement coming
and they want to blow out the old stock and make room before they have
to sell them for
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Do the A series manual focus lenses provide distance readout
to the camera for Matrix/evaluative measurement purposes?
I don't think so:
http://kmp.bdimitrov.de/technology/K-mount/Ka.html
http://kmp.bdimitrov.de/technology/K-mount/Kaf.html
Hi, all (or most) CF cards should conform to some standard. You can
hook them up via PC-Card (PCMCIA) adapter to a PC-Card reader (common
in notebooks, available for desktops too) and it should look just like
a disk. Of course, you can also use USB/Firewire CF reader where it
will work the same,
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005, Peter J. Alling wrote:
This could mean one of two things, 1.) They don't have an upgraded
replacement to compete with the
new Canon D-Rebel XT and they've decided to compete on price alone, or
2.) they have a replacement coming
and they want to blow out the old stock and
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005, Jens Bladt wrote:
Kostas, is this the reason why som flahes allowss you to choose 1/30 sec. as
the SLOWEST speed, others perhaps 1/60 secs.??
I just tried the AF500FTZ on the -5n and the -50 and it went all the
way to the slowest speed these bodies offer. Which flash do
Godfrey DiGiorgi mused:
I don't own a dedicated external flash yet so it's hard to
compare P-TTL vs TTL results ... The DS' built-in flash ONLY
support P-TTL operation, so distance measurement when on full
Matrix/Evaluative metering is probably a given.
Do the A series manual focus
Production may have stopped on the *istD but sales haven't stopped. BH has it
in stock and is selling it for $1199.95 That's the same price I paid for my
second camera, which I bought in August of last year. As reported here, the
*istDS is $724.95.
Paul
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005, Peter J. Alling
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 11:35:14 -0500, Peter J. Alling
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Canon also put the mode control dial where the shutter speed dial used
to go to give it a more analog appearance, removed
the information LCD, since who needs information if the camera is going
to think for you after
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You've been watching too many CSI variations.
The Who?
William Robb
No, it's me, Mike 8-)
Nick Clark wrote:
Figures - that one came back in record time! Anyone spotted a pattern yet (if you get this)?
Yes. It's entirely random. 8-(((
So you're voting for number 2. It's more hopeful than 1.
Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005, Peter J. Alling wrote:
This could mean one of two things, 1.) They don't have an upgraded
replacement to compete with the
new Canon D-Rebel XT and they've decided to compete on price
I use a rubber blower - pear size. No brush.
The kind I can buy in any pharmacy for 6 USD.
I have cleaned the CCD once a week or twice in a month.
All the best.
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Frantisek [mailto:[EMAIL
I used staples canned air yesterday from a nice distance to clean my CCD...
It removed big dust particles that can easily be
seen on f32 in 1:1 macro... It could not remove really small ones, but it is
much better now.
- Original Message -
From: Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005, Peter J. Alling wrote:
This could mean one of two things, 1.) They don't have an upgraded
replacement to compete with the
new Canon D-Rebel XT and they've decided to compete on price alone, or
2.) they have a replacement coming
and they want to blow out the old stock and make
At 09:11 PM 16/02/2005 , you wrote:
Aside from the obvious superiority of the coatings on the SMC Takumars,
not all M42 lenses have an auto manual
switch, which will be necessary if you want to use the lenses at any
aperture other than their maximum.
One way around this is if you are not going
Production may have stopped on the *istD but sales haven't stopped. BH has it
in stock and is selling it for $1199.95 That's the same price I paid for my
second camera, which I bought in August of last year. As reported here, the
*istDS is $724.95.
Paul
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005, Peter J. Alling
Is that for a new one? If it drops a bit more I may have to snap one up.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Erickson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005 11:44 AM
To: pentax-discuss
Subject: *ist-Ds price drop
I check BH and Adorama this morning and they are both
Keith Whaley wrote:
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
cbwaters wrote:
I think it's funny whether or not you agree with the dude about music...
http://www.youhavebadtasteinmusic.com/
Cory
Cory - I looked at the subject line and thought I was on the Scrabble list!
You go first.. you have
http://www.pentax.co.jp/english/news/2005/20050210.pdf
On 17/2/05, Mark Erickson, discombobulated, unleashed:
I check BH and Adorama this morning and they are both selling the *ist-Ds
for $725.
Good grief - that's little more than 370 quid.
I'd pick one up in a jif for that. might have to wait until GFM 2006
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
||
Hi Ann,
Okay, I forgot how scrabble works before posting my last response. Now that I
have it straight, I have revised my entry.
I use my blank square as an O. I place TOM across. I place a B above the
O, and a Y under the O to form BOY. I place an H and an I above the
M to form HIM down and
--- John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do the A series manual focus lenses provide distance
readout
to the camera for Matrix/evaluative measurement purposes?
No. That information is only available over the digital
readout pin, which first appeared on the F-series lenses.
Thank you!
Hi Ann,
Okay, I forgot how scrabble works before posting my last response. Now that I
have it straight, I have revised my entry.
I use my blank square as an O. I place TOM across. I place a B above the
O, and a Y under the O to form BOY. I place an H and an I above the
M to form HIM down and
I thought the were no matrix when using flash?
On Thu, 17 Feb 2005 08:55:02 -0800 (PST), Godfrey DiGiorgi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jens,
My understanding is that in TTL mode, the Matrix mode exposure
evalution is working for the *ambient* portion of the light
metering, not for the flash
http://www.fotocommunity.com/pc/pc/cat/3407/display/2615833
A friend's wedding.
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
[...]
I thought I would cross post this to CGP
(crosswordgamespro) list. ;)
just to see how many people bite
ann
p.s. Keith _ I hope you didn't put the rejects
back in the bag until after
you drew new tiles...
Uhh, no Ma'am! g
No joke tho' ~ when I was first starting out, I
Ahhh, but. You can only make one word at a time, if all you're using is
your own tiles.
I see three plays with your setup, providing someone else doesn't want
to use your letters for plans of his or her own! g
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Ann,
Okay, I forgot how scrabble works before posting my
Well, what I wrote is my understanding having read as much stuff
as I can find. If it's incorrect, I would be delighted to know.
Seems to me this is the primary theoretical advantage of P-TTL
... the ability to integrate a preflash plus ambient exposure
with all the information provided by the
Oh, so now I'm being mocked in my misery... grin
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Wednesday, February 16, 2005, 2:11:51 PM, you wrote:
C On 16/2/05, Bruce Dayton, discombobulated, unleashed:
Well, either the list is losing lots of messages or extremely quiet
today. I'm only getting a few per hour.
- Original Message -
From: Anders Hultman
Subject: Which flash?
I'm considering bying a flash for my *istD. Which one is best of
the 500
and the 360? It seems to me that both have functions that the other
do
not. Which functions are more useful, and which functions are less
important?
- Original Message -
From: Fred
Subject: Re: Which Macro lens do you like the most?
I've got the FA100 f2.8, and use it on the *ist D. I've yet to
have
any problems with CA.
My favorite macro is the A 100/2.8. However, I've never used it on
other
than film bodies. (Has anyone tried
- Original Message -
From: Peter J. Alling
Subject: Re: OT - Anti is Upped
Still the 8mp is a slight improvement,
To put 8mp in perspective, 6mp is 2000x3000 pixels, more or less.
The 8mp Canon is 2300x3450, more or less.
Definitely a slight improvement, in the real world, you can make
Reading the subject line made me think two thoughts:
David Byrne
and
Mike may be about to get his A** kicked...
Then I looked at the photo and it took me a minute to figure it out. (I
didn't read your email message where it says it was a friend's wedding)
Who's the subject of this photo?
Cory
on
- Original Message -
From: Simon King
Subject: RE: LL-60 Screen for istD
Hi William,
Looks just like what I've been after for my *ist-Ds. Are the
dividing
lines evenly (at 1/3 2/3) spread?
They appear to be. The image I posted is an actual viewfinder image
of the screen.
Also, since
Hi,
I sent this earlier today, but it doesn't seem to have made it:
Cory - I looked at the subject line and thought I was on the Scrabble list!
You go first.. you have YHBTIM plus a blank, what do you do??? :)
Depends what else is on the board of course, but in the absence of
other knowledge,
cbwaters wrote:
Reading the subject line made me think two thoughts:
David Byrne
and
Mike may be about to get his A** kicked...
8-) I _was_ going to call it Road to Nowhere.
Then I looked at the photo and it took me a minute to figure it out. (I
didn't read your email message where it says it
Peter J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This could mean one of two things, 1.) They don't have an upgraded
replacement to compete with the
new Canon D-Rebel XT and they've decided to compete on price alone, or
2.) they have a replacement coming
and they want to blow out the old stock and make
Pentax *ist D: AE linked to AF-point affects the output of the RTF-flash:
http://gallery37564.fotopic.net/p11932566.html
All the best
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Thibouille [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 17. februar
I guess the ist DS is selling well enough to be included in today's
(2/17/05) Personal Journal section of the World Street Journal. In an
article (I don't have a link), by Pui-WingTam, about price wars escalating
in DSLRs. Pentax is the second manufacturer mentioned (of course, after
Canon and
Powell Hargrave wrote:
At 09:11 PM 16/02/2005 , you wrote:
Aside from the obvious superiority of the coatings on the SMC Takumars,
not all M42 lenses have an auto manual
switch, which will be necessary if you want to use the lenses at any
aperture other than their maximum.
One way around
8MP vs 6MP is simple to calculate in terms
of larger print sizes while maintaining
same image quality
your print can now be ~15% wider AND ~15%
taller with same absolute (dpi)
quality level. If aspect ratio wasn't locked
it would be easy to see the gain. You could
make a print 33% wider, just
I've been looking for a way to order this, I too prefer a grid screen
and this looks like it's the closest we may get.
Unfortunately Pentax USA doesn't seem to be importing them.
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: Simon King
Subject: RE: LL-60 Screen for istD
Hi William,
SUPERGLUE if you want to later undo it?
You're in for a big surprise!
JCO
-Original Message-
From: Peter J. Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 17, 2005 5:59 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: M42 adaptor
Powell Hargrave wrote:
At 09:11 PM 16/02/2005 ,
1 - 100 of 190 matches
Mail list logo
