On 16/5/09, Nick Wright, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://kansasphotography.wordpress.com/2009/05/08/lightning/
Thanks for your time and for putting up with my wiffle-waffling.
Beautiful.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
Canon made their own 15 years ago. It's been upgraded since several
times, and is still used. But it's a compromise, and not up to
today's standards.
XL-1 and XL-2 are the ones I remember.
On May 16, 2009, at 17:40 , Graydon wrote:
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 05:31:31PM -0700, Larry Colen
On May 16, 2009, at 16:46 , Joseph McAllister wrote:
Thank you for your comments John, Frank, and Christine.
I went out yesterday afternoon to re-shoot for an hour or so with
the A* 300 ƒ4 and the DA* 200 ƒ2.8 with various TCs, but I got
nothing worthy. Took the TCs for the Tamron 300 ƒ2.8
Wow... In my garden the lilacs have just got to popping their leaves out.
I know spring is playing catch-up at higher latitudes, but it must
still be at least a forthnight ahead at your place.
Nice pic. :-)
Today is Norwgian Constitution Day, btw, so I expect to get the 60-250
a real workout on
Tough deadline, mate... :-)
Jostein
2009/5/17 John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com:
The Wolf Camera upstairs from where my lab is located is down to its last
two days. They don't have much Pentax stuff left, but they do have a few
Battery Grip Fgs left. About $4 each.
If anyone needs or wants
The past several months I've been trying to figure out who I am as a
photographer. Turns out there wasn't anything really to figure out,
just took me a while to figure that out.
Hall of fame. Mark!
http://www.cartoonbank.com/product_details.asp?mscssid=3H6D899GSCBB9JA8TSCU6
The past several months I've been trying to figure out who I am as a
photographer. Turns out there wasn't anything really to figure out,
just took me a while to figure that out.
Hall of fame. Mark!
--
http://tinyurl.com/pdf36a
Gonz wrote:
Well, I got an incredible surprise today. Seems that my wife and
daughter have been conspiring to send me to the mountain (ok, no jokes
here...cotty :). Grandfather Mountain... that is... They bought a
ticket to NPW and a flight to get there! I was handed the gift this
morning
Alright, I knew about your ticket before you did (though I didn't know
who my dad was).
I'll bring extra sleeping bags and an extra outlet in the plug strip.
Let me know if you need anything else, I'm driving solo again this year
so I have lots of space.
Cory
Gonz wrote:
Well, I got an
Thats a nice clear shot Paul.
Ours have yet to open yet, probably late next week.
Dave
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 9:30 PM, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
The Lilacs are blooming, and my yard is full of perfume. This Lilac is a
hybrid with large and very fragrant flower clusters.
It usually starts to rain an hour after Mark starts his hike up the
mounyain, to about an hour after he gets back.
This is just a givin.,:-)
Dave
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 11:30 PM, Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com wrote:
Gonz,
Look forward to meeting you there.
It's always rainy and cold on
Electrifying shot.
I've tried this a number of times with out success.
Good job.
Dave
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 6:52 PM, Nick Wright nickwright1...@gmail.com wrote:
The past several months I've been trying to figure out who I am as a
photographer. Turns out there wasn't anything really to
Nice composition and light.
Back ground is very pleasing.
Dave
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi!
Have a look here:
http://pentax-ways.blogspot.com/2009/05/peso-2009-019.html.
Be brutal and honest as usual.
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
On 17/5/09, Cory Waters, discombobulated, unleashed:
I'll bring extra sleeping bags and an extra outlet in the plug strip.
Let me know if you need anything else, I'm driving solo again this year
so I have lots of space.
Plug strips are good :-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) |
I can only imagine, (with a shudder), what Cotty's thinking...
Cotty wrote:
On 17/5/09, Cory Waters, discombobulated, unleashed:
I'll bring extra sleeping bags and an extra outlet in the plug strip.
Let me know if you need anything else, I'm driving solo again this year
so I have lots of
On May 17, 2009, at 2:57, Joseph McAllister wrote:
On May 16, 2009, at 16:46 , Joseph McAllister wrote:
Thank you for your comments John, Frank, and Christine.
I went out yesterday afternoon to re-shoot for an hour or so with
the A* 300 ƒ4 and the DA* 200 ƒ2.8 with various TCs, but I got
I like the whimsy in this shot, Dave. I think the framed photo on the right is
a major distraction, though.
Cheers,
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
--- On Sat, 5/16/09, David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com wrote:
From: David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com
Subject: Peso Elephant rides,
I like these.
Imagine--a whole gallery of Knarf, in =color=! Weird.
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
--- On Thu, 5/14/09, frank theriault knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
From: frank theriault knarftheria...@gmail.com
Subject: GESO - Ring my Bell - the show
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail
2009/5/17 Nick Wright nickwright1...@gmail.com:
The past several months I've been trying to figure out who I am as a
photographer. Turns out there wasn't anything really to figure out,
just took me a while to figure that out.
Mark!
Your wiffle-waffles seem to be made from a good recipe, btw.
David,
I believe the tripod collar is placed so as to give exact balance with
K10/20D without grips. It feels slightly back-heavy with my K20D + BG2
+ L-bracket combo. Since it is a trombone-style zoom, it shifts the
weight forward as you zoom in. Since the total weight of the lens is
about 1 kg,
You will bitch against older lenses (FA and older)... ;)
Well, at least those upgrading to K-7 (no, it's not compatibility
related, don't worry).
Simply, that feature is DA/DFA only.
--
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
--
Photo: K10D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ...
I'm sorry, could you rephrase all of that? I didn't understand a lick.
CW
Thibouille wrote:
You will bitch against older lenses (FA and older)... ;)
Well, at least those upgrading to K-7 (no, it's not compatibility
related, don't worry).
Simply, that feature is DA/DFA only.
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Thibouille pentaxl...@gmail.com wrote:
You will bitch against older lenses (FA and older)... ;)
Well, at least those upgrading to K-7 (no, it's not compatibility
related, don't worry).
Simply, that feature is DA/DFA only.
--
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
Been out of the loop...what's with the K-7? And oh...none, I don't
have an D lens. Even with the K10D previously the DS, I use the Ks,
As FAs.
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 12:14 AM, Thibouille pentaxl...@gmail.com wrote:
You will bitch against older lenses (FA and older)... ;)
Well, at least
- Original Message -
From: Cory Waters
Subject: Re: How many DA/DFA lenses do you own?
I'm sorry, could you rephrase all of that? I didn't understand a lick.
CW
Thibouille wrote:
You will bitch against older lenses (FA and older)... ;)
Well, at least those upgrading to K-7 (no,
The K-7 is Pentax's next DSLR, due to be announced at the end of the week.
-Adam
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Bong Manayon bongmana...@gmail.com wrote:
Been out of the loop...what's with the K-7? And oh...none, I don't
have an D lens. Even with the K10D previously the DS, I use the Ks,
21mm
10-17mm
16-45mm
16-50mm
DS
2009/5/18 Thibouille pentaxl...@gmail.com:
You will bitch against older lenses (FA and older)... ;)
Well, at least those upgrading to K-7 (no, it's not compatibility
related, don't worry).
Simply, that feature is DA/DFA only.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
I know that much but like William, I never bothered with the specs
(speculation or otherwise). Thibouille's post sounds foreboding
though...
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 12:32 AM, Adam Maas a...@mawz.ca wrote:
The K-7 is Pentax's next DSLR, due to be announced at the end of the week.
-Adam
On
Nobody not sworn to at least partial secrecy really knows what the
specs are yet, although some people who've seen things have been
hinting (Thibouille in particular).
All that's solidly known is it's smaller than the K10D/K20D and shares
control layout with the current incarnation of the 645D
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 6:48 PM, Adam Maas a...@mawz.ca wrote:
Nobody not sworn to at least partial secrecy really knows what the
specs are yet, although some people who've seen things have been
hinting (Thibouille in particular).
All that's solidly known is it's smaller than the K10D/K20D
Simply put Cory, one feature will be only available when using DA/DFA lens.
And it is a useful feature, you will undertand why only the latest
lenses (poor Pentax testing all Pentax lenses ever made, imagine
that).
--
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
--
Photo:
So you say, the aperture control on DA lenses and older lenses is
different, right? Or may be it is quick shift focus? But not all DA
lenses are quick shift.
Well, I own only DA 21 and in fact I am not sure I am going to buy any
more DA lenses. I may opt for K-7 with kit lens so as to use the
Boris, you may want to keep the new kit lens if you shoot in rain
since .. well it is obvious isn't it ? ;)
I may opt for K-7 with kit lens so as to use the kit lens for Galia
but she is shooting so well with FA limiteds that it may be a step
back for her.
--
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
P. J. Alling wrote:
I can only imagine, (with a shudder), what Cotty's thinking...
You are (at least) one up on the rest of us, then.
Cotty wrote:
On 17/5/09, Cory Waters, discombobulated, unleashed:
I'll bring extra sleeping bags and an extra outlet in the plug strip.
Let me know if
none - although I do own between 90-100 Pentax mount SLR lenses.
JC O'Connell (mailto:hifis...@gate.net)
Honesty is the first chapter in the book of wisdom - Thomas Jefferson
The old Ferry House in the harbor of Key West:
http://blogs.delphiforums.com/n/blogs/blog.aspx?nav=mainwebtag=djm1963entry=10
Comments ande criticisms are welcome and invited.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the
Thanks, I wasnt planning on bringing rain gear. Now I am!
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 10:03 PM, Scott Loveless sdlovel...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5/16/09, Cotty cotty...@mac.com wrote:
On 16/5/09, Gonz, discombobulated, unleashed:
Does anybody have
any room in their tents, RVs, etc?
Scott
Wow, seems like the whole world knew about this! It was a complete
surprise to me. How far back did you know?
gonz
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 6:48 AM, Cory Waters cbwat...@bellsouth.net wrote:
Alright, I knew about your ticket before you did (though I didn't know who
my dad was).
I'll bring
Likewise Bob. I just found out about bringing rain gear. Makes
sense, NC in the mountains.
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com wrote:
Gonz,
Look forward to meeting you there.
It's always rainy and cold on Friday.
Bring stuff to stay dry.
Regards, Bob S.
I only wish it rained more often over the Middle East. But yes, it will
be the cheapest way into fully WR combo...
I may end up buying the kit lens only once it becomes available...
;-)
Boris
Thibouille wrote:
Boris, you may want to keep the new kit lens if you shoot in rain
since .. well
I'll bring my homebrew on another GFM trip, since I dont have any
ready at the moment and it takes at least two weeks before I can brew
a reasonable one. Besides, I have to formulate a brew worthy of the
pdml guys (and gals)!
gonz
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 7:36 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com
http://www.diskusjon.no/index.php?act=attachtype=postid=301376
Just a simple Puffin.
Comments welcomed.
I haven't been able to comment much lately. Sorry about that.
--
MaritimTim
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from
Does this include 3rd party Sigma, Tamron PKAF fitting? I own 2 Tamrons and 4
Sigmas, and I'm thinking of getting the newly released Sigma 120-400 APO HSM.
Regards,
John
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Thibouille
Seems a little shy.
John
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Tim Øsleby
[maritim...@gmail.com]
Sent: 17 May 2009 18:42
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: PESO - Puffin
On the contrary. He was very expressive.
We had a very interesting debate about E = mc2.
Here he was turning towards his wife telling her not to interfere in
the conversation.
--
MaritimTim
2009/5/17 John Whittingham jo...@carmel.ac.uk:
Seems a little shy.
John
LOL
JOhn
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Tim Øsleby
[maritim...@gmail.com]
Sent: 17 May 2009 19:09
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: PESO - Puffin
On the contrary. He was very expressive.
We had a very interesting
It might be pining..
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: John Whittingham jo...@carmel.ac.uk
Subject: RE: PESO - Puffin
Seems a little shy.
John
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On
Probably not.
In theory Pentax could provide a way in body to input user-based
corrections but I highly doubt that.
I suspect it [the feature] takes into account lens model but focus
distance as well as aperture and focal length so it would be quite
difficult IMO to build such profile for other
Hmm... I've got 4 DA/DA* lenses in regular use.
But I've also got both an FA* and an A* lens that are important for
me, and some other FA lenses. Now you got me worried.
Jostein
2009/5/17 Thibouille pentaxl...@gmail.com:
You will bitch against older lenses (FA and older)... ;)
Well, at least
You shouldn't be worried, there is no loss of functionality.
Simply that feature will not work. Nothing bad, only good, even though
limited to some lenses.
In an interview, a Pentax rep said they had to change something in
already roadmapped lenses.
This is it (or part of it). Think MTF, it is
2009/5/17 Thibouille pentaxl...@gmail.com:
Oh, anybody likes HDR, by the way?
Not really. :-)
Jostein
--
http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/
http://alunfoto.blogspot.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,
A well seen building with great character. Seems a smidg too snugly cropped,
but as I don't know what is on either side, I can't advise opening it up a bit.
Small nit, kind of washed out overall..at least per my monitor and taste.
Jack
--- On Sun, 5/17/09, Daniel J. Matyola
I see limited pun and yes, in three days the wait will be over, oh
yeah! Therefore you might wanna stop teasin' us, or else ;-).
Boris
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 9:25 PM, Thibouille pentaxl...@gmail.com wrote:
You shouldn't be worried, there is no loss of functionality.
Simply that feature will
Probably rolling its eyes over another damn, camera draped, nuisance, tourist.
;)
Jack
--- On Sun, 5/17/09, John Whittingham jo...@carmel.ac.uk wrote:
From: John Whittingham jo...@carmel.ac.uk
Subject: RE: PESO - Puffin
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Sunday, May 17,
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 07:42:48PM +0200, Tim Øsleby scripsit:
http://www.diskusjon.no/index.php?act=attachtype=postid=301376
Just a simple Puffin.
Comments welcomed.
I don't recall the last time I saw a puffin photo that didn't include
the beak!
The detail in the primaries and the angle
Not much to say. Except
http://www.diskusjon.no/index.php?act=attachtype=postid=301389
--
MaritimTim
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Like it, Tim. Looks like a serious bedtime discussion. :(
No biggy, but I'd crop a little off the right side.
Jack
--- On Sun, 5/17/09, Tim Øsleby maritim...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Tim Øsleby maritim...@gmail.com
Subject: PESO - Sheep in sunset
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 06:55:34PM +0200, Thibouille scripsit:
Simply put Cory, one feature will be only available when using DA/DFA lens.
And it is a useful feature, you will undertand why only the latest
lenses (poor Pentax testing all Pentax lenses ever made, imagine
that).
All they'd need
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 08:38:53PM +0200, Tim Øsleby scripsit:
Not much to say. Except
http://www.diskusjon.no/index.php?act=attachtype=postid=301389
Are those some highly traditional breed of sheep, by any chance?
-- Graydon
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
- Original Message -
From: Tim Øsleby
Subject: PESO - Sheep in sunset
Not much to say. Except
http://www.diskusjon.no/index.php?act=attachtype=postid=301389
They look like they are having a nice yak.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Hm. Thats interesting.
In fact I've cropped off a pinch at the left side. The idea was to
draw attention towards the talking sheep, by placing his mouth in the
golden ratio. Your first sentence suggests that I was successful on
that.
Anyway thanks for commenting.
--
MaritimTim
2009/5/17 Jack
Tim Øsleby wrote:
Not much to say. Except
http://www.diskusjon.no/index.php?act=attachtype=postid=301389
Hey, that's not baaad.
:-)
-bmw
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
Nick Wright wrote:
I apologize that this is from my in-between Pentax period (also known
as the Dark Ages [i.e.- Canon]). But one of my favorite lightning
pictures:
http://kansasphotography.wordpress.com/2009/05/08/lightning/
Outstanding image.
-bmw
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
It sounds like something I'm not going to need, or be concerned about.Think
I'll wait for the K20D replacement.
John
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Thibouille
[pentaxl...@gmail.com]
Sent: 17 May 2009 19:20
To:
A little background info on the title.
About 100 years ago many norwegain painters painted Elks in Sunset.
It is so common to make ironic comments about them, that the irony has
became cliche on its own.
--
MaritimTim
2009/5/17 Tim Øsleby maritim...@gmail.com:
Not much to say. Except
I suspect it [the feature] takes into account lens model but focus
distance as well as aperture and focal length so it would be quite
difficult IMO to build such profile for other lenses.
You make it sound like a hyperfocal/pan-focus function. Is that close?
John
--
http://www.neovenator.com
HDR. only when it's done well and doesn't end up looking like animea, then it
ceases to be photography IMHO.
John
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Thibouille
[pentaxl...@gmail.com]
Sent: 17 May 2009 19:25
To:
In-camera lens correction is a safe bet. My G1 does this with m43
lenses (but not 4/3rds lenses mounted via adaptor). Useful, especially
with wide-angles (say goodbye to distortion), but also impractical to
evaluate all F and later lenses (A and earlier lenses don't identify
the model to the
Yeah. don't need that. no worries.
John
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Adam Maas
[a...@mawz.ca]
Sent: 17 May 2009 20:14
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: How many DA/DFA lenses do you own?
In-camera lens
Paul Stenquist wrote:
The Lilacs are blooming, and my yard is full of perfume. This Lilac is a
hybrid with large and very fragrant flower clusters. Shot at twilight.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=9197994size=lg
K20D with DA* 60-250, f4 @ 1/250th, ISO 560
I can just about smell
I like Thibouille's hinting game. I miss being in the loop about upcoming
products, and I think this is about as close as most of us are going to get.
It's fun, like a slowly unravelling mystery.
Anyway, I own a decent amount of DA lenses.
DA 10-17
DA 16-50
DA 18-55
DA 21
DA 50-200
D-FA 100
Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
Have a look here:
http://pentax-ways.blogspot.com/2009/05/peso-2009-019.html.
Be brutal and honest as usual.
Boris
Your former co-worker's wife is very skilled--those look very tasty! I
really like all three shots; excellent detail and colour.
-bmw
--
PDML
Thibouille wrote:
You will bitch against older lenses (FA and older)... ;)
Well, at least those upgrading to K-7 (no, it's not compatibility
related, don't worry).
Simply, that feature is DA/DFA only.
I'll bite:
DA* 50-135
DA* 16-50
DA 35 macro
DA 18-55
DA 50-200
My wish-list:
DA* 55
I'm
- Original Message -
From: Tim Xsleby
Subject: PESO - Sheep in sunset
Not much to say. Except
http://www.diskusjon.no/index.php?act=attachtype=postid=301389
They look like they are having a nice yak.
William Robb
I see no yak. I think some people would pay good
On 17/5/09, Tim Øsleby, discombobulated, unleashed:
Not much to say. Except
http://www.diskusjon.no/index.php?act=attachtype=postid=301389
Very nice.
The sheep on the left is saying, I keep thinking it's Tuesday.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
Not much to say. Except
http://www.diskusjon.no/index.php?act=attachtype=postid=301389
They look like they are having a nice yak.
It's a stock photo.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit
I'm really looking forward to next week so we can be done with
these smug I know something *you* don't postings that contain
absolutely no useful information.
Either post real details or STFU.
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 12:23:12PM -0400, Cory Waters wrote:
I'm sorry, could you rephrase all of
2009/5/17 Tim Øsleby maritim...@gmail.com:
Not much to say. Except
http://www.diskusjon.no/index.php?act=attachtype=postid=301389
I've tried to find some sheepish comment to post, but I give up. Nice
pic. Wish I'd been there with you guys.
--
http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/
Shot entirely on a Canon 5D Mk II using Lensbaby lenses:
http://vimeo.com/4626809
-Marco
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
There _will_ be a next time.
--
MaritimTim
2009/5/17 AlunFoto alunf...@gmail.com:
2009/5/17 Tim Øsleby maritim...@gmail.com:
Not much to say. Except
http://www.diskusjon.no/index.php?act=attachtype=postid=301389
I've tried to find some sheepish comment to post, but I give up. Nice
pic.
If, as you suggest, it's anything implemented in software, then I'm
not going to worry about it one whit - that's what Photoshop is for.
The only in-camera processing I use (apart from ISO variations) is
JPEG conversion (RAW+JPEG or just plain JPEG output for happy-snaps).
While I did notice,
Of course John, I wouldn't replace my older (or other brand) lenses
because of that.
It may however, influence purchase choices for next lenses to buy.
(not speaking for me, just general buyer).
I've got a good number of older
lenses that come out occasionally. There's no way I'm going to
Well, nobody forces you to read anything.
If you read, you wanted it.
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 9:55 PM, John Francis jo...@panix.com wrote:
I'm really looking forward to next week so we can be done with
these smug I know something *you* don't postings that contain
absolutely no useful
Agreed some HDR pictures are sure fun but so unreal, I do not see the
point (except for the fun of it).
We'll see if it is done well or not.
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 9:09 PM, John Whittingham jo...@carmel.ac.uk wrote:
HDR. only when it's done well and doesn't end up looking like animea, then it
No. But then I do not know everything. There may be more goodies.
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 9:11 PM, John Celio n...@neovenator.com wrote:
I suspect it [the feature] takes into account lens model but focus
distance as well as aperture and focal length so it would be quite
difficult IMO to build
K20D and DA* 60-250, 180mm f5.6, 1/750th, ISO 400,
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=9202263
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
John, I can tell this is pssing you off. Me too. Bob S.
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 2:55 PM, John Francis jo...@panix.com wrote:
I'm really looking forward to next week so we can be done with
these smug I know something *you* don't postings that contain
absolutely no useful information.
Thibouille wrote:
You shouldn't be worried, there is no loss of functionality.
Simply that feature will not work. Nothing bad, only good, even though
limited to some lenses.
In an interview, a Pentax rep said they had to change something in
already roadmapped lenses.
This is it (or part of it).
Sure hope it's not her last.
You really nailed the focus in this one. Manual?
--
MaritimTim
2009/5/17 Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net:
K20D and DA* 60-250, 180mm f5.6, 1/750th, ISO 400,
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?p
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Yes. You've become more than a little obnoxious.
Well, stop reading then.
--
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
--
Photo: K10D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ;) ...
Thinkpad: X23+UB,X60+UB
Programing: D7 user (trying out D2007)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Something sensual about these.
Well done.
--
MaritimTim
2009/5/16 Boris Liberman bori...@gmail.com:
Hi!
Have a look here:
http://pentax-ways.blogspot.com/2009/05/peso-2009-019.html.
Be brutal and honest as usual.
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 11:01:50PM +0200, Thibouille scripsit:
Yes. You've become more than a little obnoxious.
Well, stop reading then.
Gloating is unseemly, even when done in silence to the dark between the
stars.
In the present absence of de-illuminated astrographic elements, permit
me
13, why?
On May 17, 2009, at 10:40 , John Whittingham wrote:
Subject: How many DA/DFA lenses do you own?
You will bitch against older lenses (FA and older)... ;)
Well, at least those upgrading to K-7 (no, it's not compatibility
related, don't worry).
Simply, that feature is DA/DFA only.
Thibouille wrote:
Yes. You've become more than a little obnoxious.
Well, stop reading then.
Lacking the necessary clairvoyance to know what's in a post before
reading it, I see only one alternative for dealing with someone who
openly states his intention of being obnoxious:
Good night, Gracie.
You will remember a while back the discussion of the new Pentax
copyright for a lens mount / sealing rings?
I suspect the DA and DFA, which have two different types of rubber 'O'
ring, one called WR, the other not mentioned, will both be
accommodated in the new camera. I'm not going to
This might be why my K20 did not ask the focal length of my A* 300 ƒ4
when attached to the AF 1.7x tc. It should have, but perhaps it DID
get something from the 300 as to focal length. Of course, the photos
were soft on tripod, so maybe I should have gone to the Custom
Functions and forced
Thanks Tim. No, it was autofocus.
On May 17, 2009, at 4:58 PM, Tim Øsleby wrote:
Sure hope it's not her last.
You really nailed the focus in this one. Manual?
--
MaritimTim
2009/5/17 Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net:
K20D and DA* 60-250, 180mm f5.6, 1/750th, ISO 400,
Jack, it's a very characterful building, and I like the composition and the
golf cart parked in front. Methinks this could use some playing with curves,
though, because it seems a bit washed out.
Cheers,
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
--- On Sun, 5/17/09, Daniel J. Matyola
On May 17, 2009, at 12:39 , Bob W wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Tim Xsleby
Subject: PESO - Sheep in sunset
Not much to say. Except
http://www.diskusjon.no/index.php?act=attachtype=postid=301389
They look like they are having a nice yak.
I see no yak. I think some people
A more classical Brugge (Belgium) shot, of the old harbor at dusk.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=9202604
(K10D, DA 16-45, ISO 1600, f/4 @ 1/30)
Rick
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,
1 - 100 of 151 matches
Mail list logo
