No I am not appealing to authority. Paul was.
Paul made the assertion that we're hard wired in a certain way basing that
claim on studies. The authority was studies. That's what he was appealing
to. Hence: Appeal to Authority.
The problem with it is that I can't refute it. I don't know to
Giving me authors' names and nothing else is still an appeal to authority.
Cheers,
frank
Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
Paul via phone
Masters and Johnson, Kinsey and others.
Who says we're hard wired that way? And how do they know it? And just
because we're hard wired
http://www.alpert.com/marco/photo13/peso20.html
Comments, as always, welcomed.
-Marco
---
http://www.alpert.com/marco
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
I hope we're not going to take this into a nature vs. nurture debate. That
subject has remained unresolved since the renessance and will stay that way for
as long as the division exist between humanistic and natural sciences.
Jostein
knarf knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
No I am not appealing
I have no plans for a book. I probably don't have the time and energy either,
but as I said I'll think about it. With me, decision making is sometimes the
slowest part of the process.
But there'll be no penguins. Next time I'll bring a WTD prop.
Jostein
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
On
The incoming shot is a single exposure with K-5 and a 500mm lens, no flash.
Not at my computer now, but IIRC the exposure time was 1/10s at ISO 1600.
The light was pretty dim. I turned AF off and used LiveView with zoom function
to prefocus on the birds on the ground. I took several exposures
101 - 106 of 106 matches
Mail list logo
