On Mar 16, 2005, at 3:38 PM, Fred Widall wrote:
The discussion regarding who would buy the new D645 made me wonder how
much you folk spend on your career/hobby/addiction.
About NZ$22,000, which accounts for items I've owned then sold again.
I think this figure is pretty up-to-date.
The items
--- David Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No wobble on mine. I think this lens uses IF so any looseness would
indicate a serious mechanical problem.
The rear element group wobbles a little on my F*300, although not as serious as
the
FA*24 (sounds almost like ready to separate).
Alan Chan
On Mar 16, 2005, at 12:37 PM, Cotty wrote:
I would guess because with the advent of a 645D, it seems pretty
unlikely
we'll see a 24X36 full frame 35mm-style DSLR anytime if at all
Maybe to reduce cost by economies of scale we'll see Pentax making 35mm
DSLRs with the big Kodak 645D sensor.
Hi Boris
at least the 150 bucks for the tamron 90 (macro) are very well spent
I got some prints back with close-up shots with the Tamron I like a lot
yesterday.
greetings
Markus
Tamron 90 (soon to arrive :) ) - $150
Perkeo I - $100
Misc - $100
Summing up... $1540. Ok, make it $1600.
Well,
On Mar 17, 2005, at 4:06 PM, John Francis wrote:
FWIW, I prefer design C.
Me too.
I think it'd look a lot better with a square hood fitted to the lens,
too.
Cheers,
- Dave
http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/
On Mar 17, 2005, at 1:07 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Schneider has recently jumped into digital with a set of B+W filters
to be
used as a Plug-in for Photoshop.
Reminds me of FilterSim. I am quite fond of the idea behind this
because I sometimes wish I'd used a warming filter. Having said that I
Rob Studdert wrote on 17.03.05 9:14:
If the C body (*ist D family likeness) is really an option then we can
pretty
much assume that mechanical aperture coupling won't be an option since the
aperture ring will be difficult to operate because of the superfluous prism
overhang. Probably as
David wrote:
DM Maybe to reduce cost by economies of scale we'll see Pentax making 35mm
DM DSLRs with the big Kodak 645D sensor.
DM (no I'm not being serious:)
The way to have in camera image stabilization with full frame
format.
Servus, Alin (just as serious)
ft I actually didn't save the speck version, and it's not on the print,
ft so I can't help you out, sadly. It was about the size of a grain of
ft sand. Not big at all.
Frank, you will surely be glad that I still have your first version
when you sent it to me offlist - remember?
See here:
- Original Message -
From: John Francis
Subject: Re: *istD creation/modification dates
Arguing about what it is called doesn't change the fact
that there's a problem somewhere in the Mac software.
OH MY GAWD!
WW
I.will.resist...
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
||
See Peter, you could hardly notice it.
g
Dave S
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 09:57:25 +0100, Frantisek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ft I actually didn't save the speck version, and it's not on the print,
ft so I can't help you out, sadly. It was about the size of a grain of
ft sand. Not big at all.
That sounds like fun.
Common Don. Do it, do it, do it, do it.
Dave S
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 22:33:52 -0600, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: glenn murphy
Subject: Re: Not so good this time.
It looks like someone already tried to bury it
On 16/3/05, Mark Cassino, discombobulated, unleashed:
Hi Ken -
What's chimping ?
The definitive video...
http://www.sportsshooter.com/special_feature/chimping/index.html
large file
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
TU You can see the image of DA12-24 here;
TU http://dc.watch.impress.co.jp/cda/parts/image_for_link/16927-1200-2-3.html
Contrary to few rumours that are floating on dpreview (pure
speculation forums as always), the lens doesn't reminiscence the
Tokina 12-24 at all.
Good light!
fra
Gawd! That's a bad one, even for your Cotty! GROANN vbg
cheers,
frank
nyuk nyuk nyuk
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
On 16/3/05, Yefei He, discombobulated, unleashed:
There is a big risk! The person that knows your account info can
make a deposit of say 2 million dollars, and then you can be
incriminated for accepting bribes or taking public funds or anything
because of the income that's unaccounted for.
On 16/3/05, Mark Cassino, discombobulated, unleashed:
I followed Mark's suggestion below and, indeed, it appears to be a
reasonably priced and 'almost' risk free process. Probably more risk free
than PayPal. So I got the SWIFT code, my bank's peculiar routing number
(they don't use the one
Give into temptation :-)
Dave S
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 08:58:51 +, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: John Francis
Subject: Re: *istD creation/modification dates
Arguing about what it is called doesn't change the fact
that there's a problem
Frantisek wrote on 17.03.05 10:11:
Contrary to few rumours that are floating on dpreview (pure
speculation forums as always), the lens doesn't reminiscence the
Tokina 12-24 at all.
No, it doesn't. But on the other side Nikkor ED 70-300/4-5.6 doesn't
reminiscent Tamorn 70-300 at all but all
Frantisek wrote:
ft I actually didn't save the speck version, and it's not on the print,
ft so I can't help you out, sadly. It was about the size of a grain of
ft sand. Not big at all.
Frank, you will surely be glad that I still have your first version
when you sent it to me offlist - remember?
Frank, you will surely be glad that I still have your first version
when you sent it to me offlist - remember?
See here:
http://3web.dkm.cz/fotof/temp/dust.jpg
Holy moly, it's mutating!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
Mark Cassino escribi:
So what's the deal? I can go to any post office here and buy an
international money order for a reasonable fee. Can't that be done in
Europe as well?
Yes, you can do it in Europe too, at least in Spain. But sending an
international money order from here to the US is more
The lens gives some sense of scale. All of them seem to be smaller than
a Canon 1DS. That could be a very good thing.
Paul
On Mar 16, 2005, at 11:36 PM, Village Idiot wrote:
IMHO C is by far the best looking and A is definitely the ugliest.
Then again, what do I know?
Village Idiot
OK, so
Boris Liberman wrote:
[...]
By the way, all one has to have to be able to open a PayPal acct is a
credit card that is not local to their country. If that person has no
such credit card, it is suspicious already.
But then again, when it comes to banking I am mighty paranoid myself.
Boris
Try to
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/03/17 Thu AM 10:55:04 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: 645D Photos (under glass) here
The lens gives some sense of scale. All of them seem to be smaller than
a Canon 1DS. That could be a very good thing.
B looks like it
i do it sometimes to check exposure or composition.
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: Mark Cassino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, March 16, 2005 10:51 PM
Subject: Re: isDS - low batteries.
Har!
or should I say 'hoo-hoo-hoo-hoo-hoo
I quit chimping
William Robb wrote:
I bought a spyder, and discovered it does just as good a job as Adobe
Gamma for screen calibration.
For me, Adobe Gamma works just fine.
FWIW it works fine for me too. In fact I will even do without any
calibration at all, but this if after some years of serious work in the
I mentioned this idea a couple years ago when we hosted the Final Four.
There were scores of photographers and each agency had a couple runners who
would take the cards out of the photogs' cameras and run them back to the
editing area. There were photos from the first half online before the
i think it would be one of the best things that have ever happen to cameras.
no more digital wallets, worries about corrupted cards/ruined films, and
police officers trying to confiscate them. just have a built in FTP client
mishka
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 19:30:25 +, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Juan,
http://www.jbuhler.com/html/ca020262_hi.html
that jumping lady... Great shot!
Bedo.
why not? i would imagine, people who bought p645 were budget-conscious
(or they would have bought contax instead), and for those, digital MF
right now exists only in theory (pricewise). hopefully, D645 would
cost less than a new
car. then i would buy one.
best,
mishka
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005
m9wnc B looks like it might have an electronic viewfinder.
m9wnc There is very little space for a prism, if you compare it to
m9wnc the other two. Of the other two, C looks like it might be a
m9wnc little cramped for a prism, also. Difficult to judge on such
m9wnc slim evidence but that doesn't
On 17 Mar 2005 at 11:18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
B looks like it might have an electronic viewfinder. There is very little
space
for a prism, if you compare it to the other two. Of the other two, C looks
like
it might be a little cramped for a prism, also. Difficult to judge on such
On 17/3/05, Mishka, discombobulated, unleashed:
i think it would be one of the best things that have ever happen to cameras.
no more digital wallets, worries about corrupted cards/ruined films, and
police officers trying to confiscate them. just have a built in FTP client
Yeah but still keep a
- Original Message -
From: Tom C
Subject: Re: OT: European Banking / Ebay Payment Question
I just said that today... one person in particular where I work is
paranoid, and deserves to be gotten.
Never worked with a more arrogant, obnoxious, rude, disagreeable,
ignorant person in my
Frantisek wrote on 17.03.05 13:17:
All have square body with mirror housing, definitely. Also, the Kodak
sensor is not capable of electronic viewfinder at all. That's just
technological impossibility at this moment. Third, IstD has a very
small prism too.
Actually I think all MZ-series
- Original Message -
From: Mishka
Subject: Re: Potential buyrs of a D645?
why not? i would imagine, people who bought p645 were
budget-conscious
(or they would have bought contax instead), and for those, digital
MF
right now exists only in theory (pricewise). hopefully, D645 would
Any online tests or anyone have any experience with this lens? Does it
compare favorably with the FA 50 macro?
It is lightweight and seems like a good match for the istD. I have a Tamron
90 2.5 but it large and heavy.
I've searched past postings but nothing turns up any personal experiences.
On 2005-03-17 12:45, MartinTrautmann wrote:
2005: in: 2 / out: 24? / total: 14?
DA14 / 2.82005 ~ @
Actually, the DA 14 / 2.8 was announced around 2004-05,
should be available 2004-06.
another new 2005:
DA12-24 / 4 2005 ~ n.y.
So it's
2005: in: 2 / out: 24? / total:
Doesn't A look a little bit like the Leica R8?
Cheers,
Ronald
From: Marco Alpert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: Pentax List pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: 645D Photos (under glass) here
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 18:36:16 -0800
Not one, not two, but three different mock
On 17 Mar 2005 at 7:16, Mishka wrote:
hopefully, D645 would
cost less than a new
car. then i would buy one.
Hmm, a Maybach or a Picanto?
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/
Pentax
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan/cb2005
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business - Try our new resources site!
http://smallbusiness.yahoo.com/resources/
Hi all,
I was surprised recently that not only the FA 50/1.7 is gone by now, but
that the FA 50/1.4 ist not longer available as well.
I did a quick search on www.pentax.de for listed lenses and compared this
to Dimitrovs list of lenses.
The short summary:
Pentax introduced 4 new lenses in
On 17 Mar 2005 at 13:40, Ronald Arvidsson wrote:
Doesn't A look a little bit like the Leica R8?
I think maybe it's more like mongrel cross between a Canon IX APS SLR and an
Oly E-10 :-(
I think the B camera is short for Butt-ugly
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005, Alan Chan wrote:
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan/cb2005
Errr, what happened to this guy?
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan/image/40903324
K (really like 2 and the composition in 3)
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005, Jostein wrote:
To be honest, I don't quite see how the buyer can abuse your account
number. :-)
As an indication, both cheques and Giro slips (the ones you give to
strangers to pay money in your account) have the account number on
them. I am based in the UK.
Kostas
The Pentax 645 has been around for a very long time, at least a
couple of decades. and there are a lot of 645 lenses out there.
It precedes the Contax by a very long time.
Although I don't have any 645 equipment, I imagine that someone who
has invested in that camera and format over the past
I only took a quick look when I posted the link. This morning I spent more
time with the plug-ins. From what I can see they offer for many users some
good features at a reasonable price. I think the list price is about
$60.00. It's nice that the filters will work with several versions of PS,
One downside that I just discovered is that the filters only work in 8-bit
format. It would be much nicer if they'd be available in 16-bit.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Amita Guha [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.schneider-kreuznach.com/filter_e/sfilter_set.htm
Wow, this is very cool
On 17/3/05, Rob Studdert, discombobulated, unleashed:
Hmm, a Maybach or a Picanto?
They sound like cooking sauces
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
I'm not going to post the techniques used, but it's VERY easy.
Shel
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005, Jostein wrote:
To be honest, I don't quite see how the buyer can abuse your account
number. :-)
Agreed! Left border's a bit close, but that jumping lady's priceless! Great
eye, Juan..
Cheers,
Ryan
- Original Message -
From: Peter Lacus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2005 10:13 PM
Subject: Re: Photo exhibit
Juan,
On 17/3/05, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
I'm not going to post the techniques used, but it's VERY easy.
Interesting. Perhaps security levels differ from country to country? I
understand that it is not possible to withdraw money from a UK bank
account without express consent from
Are they really? I find that funny. Let's take an official vote on the
PDML.
According to another web site (in Japanese), they are
taking votes as to which of the three everyone prefers
best at the exhibition.
You can see the image of DA12-24 here;
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 10:37:01 -0500, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Frank's after your fisheye lenses.
Frank then answered:
I've already got one.
I'd like on though.:-)
Then he went on some insane babbleg
I want his *istD. And his 6x7 (with all his lenses). I'll take his
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
There are numerous ways, some used daily by reputable businesses in the
normal process of getting paid for goods and services. I've used such
techniques myself to pay for everything from utility bills to car payments.
Once someone has your account
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Schneider has recently jumped into digital with a set of B+W filters to be
used as a Plug-in for Photoshop.
Is it worth my mentioning that there are virtually no traditional
photographic filters that can be *accurately* simulated digitally? The
best you can do is come up
When the hot weather arrives, go to the corner drug store or Wal-Mart
and buy some of those foam rubber covers for keeping your beer can
cold on the beach. They cost $1.00 each, they can hold viewfinders
(or lenses for that matter), and they are indestructable.
Regards, Bob S.
On Thu, 17 Mar
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/03/17 Thu PM 12:27:22 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Potential buyrs of a D645?
- Original Message -
From: Mishka
Subject: Re: Potential buyrs of a D645?
why not? i would imagine, people who bought p645 were
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 20:25:22 +1300, David Mann wrote:
On Mar 16, 2005, at 6:13 AM, Powell Hargrave wrote:
Do you desire a wireless camera? Instant PESOs anyone.
I think it has great potential
Bluetooth phones hacked from a mile away
Mar-15-05
Bluetooth phones may be vulnerable to
On 17 Mar 2005 at 12:50, Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005, Alan Chan wrote:
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan/cb2005
Errr, what happened to this guy?
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan/image/40903324
He is suffering from the perspective distortion that's supposed to look more
On 17 Mar 2005 at 14:56, Antti-Pekka Virjonen wrote:
I am sure most of the people on this list will not consider the 645D
as an option (because of the cost) but I see it can be very competitive
with the 35mm FF DSLR's if the price is right!
As will be the 22MP Mamiya ZD which will likely be
This one time, at band camp, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 15/3/05, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
Why do you say that, Rob?
I would guess because with the advent of a 645D, it seems pretty unlikely
we'll see a 24X36 full frame 35mm-style DSLR anytime if at all
or a
This one time, at band camp, Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm probably going to p*ss devotees off with my bitching and moaning but I
think Pentax has lost sight of the ball and the goals in this 645
announcement.
I predict that if and when Pentax actually get a D645 body to
This one time, at band camp, Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So who here has it in their sights and how much would you be prepared to
spend
on such a beast?
I would consider it, but I prefer the 6x7, $5k would be my limit on this as I
would
need to buy glass
Kevin
--
Democracy is
Rob Studdert wrote on 17.03.05 15:40:
As will be the 22MP Mamiya ZD which will likely be in users hands well before
the Pentax offering
Let's hope this difference will be as small as possible :-) Much smaller
than between Nikon D1 and *istD ;-) AFAIR it took Pentax about one year from
showing
RS I think the B camera is short for Butt-ugly
Yes, some of them look like they have left them for too long out in
the sun... and the poor beast had melted...
Good light!
fra
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 17.03.05 14:25:
So. Where does all this leave the 67 system?
Sorry Mike, they'll have to wait for 67 D ;-)
--
Balance is the ultimate good...
Best Regards
Sylwek
From: Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/03/17 Thu PM 02:09:54 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Potential buyrs of a D645?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 17.03.05 14:25:
So. Where does all this leave the 67 system?
Sorry Mike,
Marco,
http://www.alpert.com/marco/pdml/norcal3.html
http://www.alpert.com/marco/pdml/norcal4.html
great, funny shots. Enjoyed. :-)
Bedo.
Someone on Dpreview forum was keen enough to check it and translate so here
we have future lenses to be introduced 2005-2006
- DA Fisheye zoom (approximately 10-20mm zoom range)
- DA thin LIMITED wide prime (20-30mm range)
- DA thin LIMITED mid-tele prime (60-70mm range)
- DFA high performance
Nah, they have an eye on Canon Eos 1 whatever. Mockup B is there
just to show you how nice Pentaxes are. ;o)
Actually I find it interesting that Pentax is looking for user feed
back on details such as design. I think they've taken very seriously
the goal of satisfying the Pentax fans.
Ktos na dpreview przetlumaczyl co i jak, tak wiec mamy to co bylo na tej
tablicy a co Pentax planuje wprowadzic do produkcji 2005-2006:
- DA Fisheye zoom (approximately 10-20mm zoom range)
- DA thin LIMITED wide prime (20-30mm range)
- DA thin LIMITED mid-tele prime (60-70mm range)
- DFA high
This looks like the decade long awaited FA 70-210/4 with ED glass.
I'll believe when I see it.
Servus, Alin
Sylwester wrote:
SP - DFA high performance tele zoom (approximately 50-200mm zoom range)
Quoting Alin Flaider [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Perhaps these are all the available customizations, with B aimed to
Canon fans. ;o)
Servus, Alin
AC So do I. I think the body shape of B looks really stupid, but it's just
me. G
Nope, it's not just you.
However, doesn't matter what *I*
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 23:12:40 -0500, frank theriault
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 10:37:01 -0500, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Frank's after your fisheye lenses.
I've already got one.
I want his *istD. And his 6x7 (with all his lenses). I'll take his
Sorry for this post! I have too fst fingers sometimes :-)
--
Balance is the ultimate good...
Best Regards
Sylwek
Alin Flaider wrote on 17.03.05 15:40:
This looks like the decade long awaited FA 70-210/4 with ED glass.
I'll believe when I see it.
Yup, at last! And very likely because FA* 80-200/2.8 has disappeared lately
from japanese Pentax lens catalogue. Nice thing is that it will be D-FA lens
- so film
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 12:45:54 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I was surprised recently that not only the FA 50/1.7 is gone by now, but
that the FA 50/1.4 ist not longer available as well.
I did a quick search on www.pentax.de for listed lenses and compared this
Quoting Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
When the hot weather arrives, go to the corner drug store or Wal-Mart
and buy some of those foam rubber covers for keeping your beer can
cold on the beach. They cost $1.00 each, they can hold viewfinders
(or lenses for that matter), and they are
Quoting Frantisek [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
RS I think the B camera is short for Butt-ugly
Yes, some of them look like they have left them for too long out in
the sun... and the poor beast had melted...
Yeah, but Canon has sold a huge number of SLRs that look like that happened
to them. :-(
I actually like the shape of 'B'. It has curves. I've aways thought the
645 looked too much like a box.
Tom C. (also likes Citroens)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: 645D Photos (under glass) here
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005
Alan,
Those are beautiful! I particularly like the
composition of pix 2 and 6. Wherever you are, the
cherry trees seem a lot larger than they are here in
Philly, too.
Did you use the panoramic mask on the Z-1p for photo
1? I have never used it, myself.
Rick
--- Alan Chan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I share the same sentiments.
Leonard Tan
Ability will never catch up with the demand for it.
Confucius (551-479 a. C.); Chinese philosopher.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2005 7:46 PM
To: Pentax list
Subject: How many
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
When the hot weather arrives, go to the corner drug store
or Wal-Mart
and buy some of those foam rubber covers for keeping your beer can
cold on the beach. They cost $1.00 each, they can hold viewfinders
(or lenses
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemcategory=48558item=3880182806rd=1ssPageName=WDVW
I really wanted to bid on this but I knew It would soon climb out of
range of my current budget...
--
I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war.
During a war you get to drive tanks through the
Did a pretty thorough search of the archives to find not much posted
about this lense. I've read the ~ 50 reviews of this floating around
from users of other camera makers (not sure if there's some unofficial
cultural taboo about using other brand names in here) and it seems
very good to
Alan,
Love the first shot with the panorama crop. Nice work.
Paul
On 17 Mar 2005 at 12:50, Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005, Alan Chan wrote:
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan/cb2005
Errr, what happened to this guy?
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan/image/40903324
He
You could probably use your 6x7 glass on a 645D, although it would probably be
like using K glass on an *istD -- at best. However, I wouldn't mind having to
use a handheld meter, as I do with my 6x7.
Paul
This one time, at band camp, Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So who here has
If you are going to smash it, could you remove the ISO setting mechanism
and rewind crank, I kind of bunged it up on an ME-SE and it would be
almost mint otherwise.
David Savage wrote:
That sounds like fun.
Common Don. Do it, do it, do it, do it.
Dave S
On Wed, 16 Mar 2005 22:33:52 -0600,
Same happened here with me:
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=3880188526
John
-- Original Message ---
From: Peter J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 10:19:46 -0500
Subject: Pentax Lens explosion on e-bay continues
Citroens follow the shape of a falling blob, the B (and the thing that
inspired it) look like inflated frogs.
Servus, Alin
Tom wrote:
TC Tom C. (also likes Citroens)
On 2005-03-17 09:47, Scott Loveless wrote:
I've looked at pentax.de. I've also looked at the rest of the
European official Pentax sites. The offerings vary from region to
region. I have noticed that the European online catalogs just don't
have quite as much listed as the US or Canadian
Supposedly they are replacing most of the FA lenses with D-FA
equivalents. We'll see.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
I was surprised recently that not only the FA 50/1.7 is gone by now, but
that the FA 50/1.4 ist not longer available as well.
I did a quick search on www.pentax.de for listed
Yep, just dead cell phone spaces, bad transmissions, intercepted
signals, and electronic jamming.
Mishka wrote:
i think it would be one of the best things that have ever happen to cameras.
no more digital wallets, worries about corrupted cards/ruined films, and
police officers trying to
Overall Pentax was known as being the best bang for the buck of the
Medium Format producers,
the total system price (camera and a couple of lenses), were near the
bottom in most comparisons
and quality, near the top. It will be hard to maintain that first one
with a digital body. To keep
that
I just bought a new FA50/1.4 from BH, and they had to order it from Pentax
because it was out of stock. I think it's still available. By the way, I paid
$209.95. A used one sold for $330 last week on ebay.
Paul
On 2005-03-17 09:47, Scott Loveless wrote:
I've looked at pentax.de. I've also
Some thoughts on the D645...
Pentax' strategy in MedF has all the time been to create robust, compact
packages that would suit the outdoor photographer better than the competition.
I would expect this tradition to be carried on into digital. For such a kind of
camera, there are some quite
Cotty wrote:
Nothing I can add to this!
http://www.cottysnaps.com/snaps/spare5.html
uahaa, that Canon is HUGE! (in fact, for my liking even the ist-Ds is
rather big as I'm used to the MX or even smaller point-and-shots).
BTW which size bullets it does accept? g
Bedo.
With film.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/03/17 Thu PM 12:27:22 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Potential buyrs of a D645?
- Original Message -
From: Mishka
Subject: Re: Potential buyrs of a D645?
why not? i would imagine,
1 - 100 of 340 matches
Mail list logo
