I place my *ist-DS's image files on a network file server at home (yup,
I'm one of those guys). From there, my wife and I use our notebooks to
view, edit, resize, post, email, and print our images. Our fileserver
is connected to the network with cat-5 and a full duplex 100BaseT NIC.
But our
Anybody knows a software for that?
Of course it wouldn't be anywhere good as a hardware thing but'd be
beter than nothing heh?
2005/6/16, Frits Wthrich [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I am considering to buy a monitor calibration tool, like this one:
- Original Message -
From: Thibouille
Subject: Re: monitor calibration
Anybody knows a software for that?
Of course it wouldn't be anywhere good as a hardware thing but'd be
beter than nothing heh?
Adobe Gamma is actually pretty good. It comes with Photoshop and installs
itself
On 17 Jun 2005 at 0:13, William Robb wrote:
Adobe Gamma is actually pretty good. It comes with Photoshop and installs
itself on your Control Panel (Windows OS)
It's OK but the gamma test swatch is suspect, down-load the Gamagic test
patterns below as they are far better references, after I
Didn't want to frighten him LOL
2005/6/17, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 16/6/05, Thibouille, discombobulated, unleashed:
Be prepared 'cos there's quite an amount of traffic... 50 mails/day
isn't unusual.
50??
Hey Thibouille, I told you the Euro was a con - I get over 200 a day ;-)
Thanks a lot !
2005/6/17, Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 17 Jun 2005 at 0:13, William Robb wrote:
Adobe Gamma is actually pretty good. It comes with Photoshop and installs
itself on your Control Panel (Windows OS)
It's OK but the gamma test swatch is suspect, down-load the Gamagic
Some brands do advertise up to 125Mbps but honestly, this is more
marketing than anything else. It does provides a small boost but
really, nothing to make anyone upgrade.
We'll have to wait about 2 years IMO to get something really beter.
2005/6/17, David Oswald [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I place my
Just looked at the shop I ordered my D (located in France) and saw
following prices:
ist-D: 839 euros
ist-DS: 729 euros
ist-DL: 809 euros
So the DL is definitely suffering from the new thing symptom.
--
Thibouille
--
*ist-D,Z1,SuperA,KX,MX and KR-10x ...
Cable is the answer :-)
I know wifi is nice, I have similar home setup. But to work with large
files I always use wired connection.
Or maybe you could use your notebook as thin client and let the server
process everything..
Regards
Peter Belak
On 6/17/05, David Oswald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Wlan at 54MBps works to some distance, but to get the 108Mbps you need
to have the the both devices (access point and notebook) very close to
each other. Usually I never get more than 54Mbps from my 108MB wlan
gear.
Typical average thruput is still only around 20Mbps.
How about getting
On 17/6/05, Joaquim Carvalho, discombobulated, unleashed:
With all the lens changes I've been doing lately I managed to get dust
on the *ist DS CCD,
any advice on hot to clean it (or not)?
Har! A can(ned air) of worms...
This subject will get you varied replies, anything from nanotechnology
Hi!
Variation on an earlier upload
http://home.earthlink.net/~pdml-pics/d_n_d.html
Shel, I should say this is too abstract to me...
Sorry.
Boris
Hi!
A celestial capture from moments ago:
http://www.home.aone.net.au/audiobias/temp/IMGP2590.jpg
Tech: *ist D, ISO200, 1/15s A300/2.8 + 1.4X-L + 1.7AF TC @ f22
Comments, questions and critiques welcome.
Hey Rob. This is quite great. My daughter and I had a little yet lively
chat. She
On Jun 17, 2005, at 10:49 AM, Cotty wrote:
That's cuz you don't use the PC anymore Dave !
I figured someone would say that ;)
Nowadays it's pretty rarely that I use it - but it does have the SCSI
card that my flatbed scanner needs. One of these days I'll get
around to ordering one of
Hi!
By the way, is there any connection with Jumping and that little circle
on the top left?
Boris the kidding one...
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/06/17 Fri AM 03:00:24 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: home again
In a message dated 6/16/2005 3:43:57 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yo Godders,
Welcome home :-)
SuperCal and it is free.
Software calibrators are as good as or better than any calibration tool,
the problem is not everybody can use them, you have to understand how
they work:
Software calibrators use you as the light sensor, you have to adjust the
brightness of several color areas to
Just an update on this. I asked to buy a manual and was inundated by
free offers from fellow-PDMLers (and lurkers!).
The seller of the camera bought me one from http://www.pentax.co.uk,
so I am sorted.
But this list has quite a few nice guys and gals.
Many thanks!
Kostas
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005, keithw wrote:
Oooo! That'll make the wallet thinner, won't it?
I think it will be a good opportunity for some of us to put our money
where our mouth is.
Kostas
From: Thibouille [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/06/17 Fri AM 06:59:02 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Moving large image files through a LAN
Some brands do advertise up to 125Mbps but honestly, this is more
marketing than anything else. It does provides a small boost but
On 16/6/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
http://www.cottysnaps.com/snaps/photoessays/essays/oxford.html
Cheers,
Cotty
==
Nice shots, Cotty. Hadn't seen them before.
I have to get to England sometime -- what neat cobblestones! ;-)
Marnie aka Doe And strange
I think it will be a good opportunity for some of us to put our money
where our mouth is.
?? I don't understand..
I am happy to see this lens is here (there in US). Anybody knows if
(or when) it is available in EU?
Peter Belak
On Fri, 17 Jun 2005, David Nelson wrote:
Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
I believe a FF (35mm) 50-200/4 is on the cards.
You sure? I think the pentax roadmap didn't mention its speed or exact focal
length (just that it would be a High-performance D FA Telephoto zoom) -
personally I'd expect it
M if you want to support your favorite software company (like
M any reasonable and well behaved person would), you should
Ugh Ogh. I hope you are joking...
Adobe is nice but it's not charity. It's a business intent on
maximising profits, by doing whatever good or bad they can do
(remember the
From: Andre Langevin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/06/16 Thu PM 07:08:39 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Contaflex lens-to-film distance?
I would like to know the lens register for the Contaflex.
Aprroximatively. In fact, I want to know if it is longer than K
mount register
I can't find the roadmap diagram anymore, so no. 210? Why?
Nothing terribly significant but the FL range oval on the roadmap goes
deliberately past 200mm (the DA 50-200 stops obviously at 200).
http://www.tekade.de/news/html/pentax-roadmap.html
This has really nice colors and the sky is great.
I would probably try to take one more picture and compose it without
those trees to see the difference
Anyway, very nice...
Peter Belak
On 6/14/05, Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On a cameraclub oution last weekene, I decided to give my
You sure? I think the pentax roadmap didn't mention its speed or exact
focal
length (just that it would be a High-performance D FA Telephoto zoom) -
personally I'd expect it to be 50-210 f/2.8
Got any other sources?
I can't find the roadmap diagram anymore, so no. 210? Why?
Could
Mon Dieu !!
And I was complaining because the DL was 'only' 30EUR
CHEAPER than the DS...
--- Thibouille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just looked at the shop I ordered my D (located in
France) and saw
following prices:
ist-D: 839 euros
ist-DS: 729 euros
ist-DL: 809 euros
So the DL is
John Whittingham wrote on 17.06.05 11:31:
I think an affordable constant aperture f/4 with excellent image quality
would sell very well.
Especially with ED glass, internal focusing and removable tripod mount :-)
--
Balance is the ultimate good...
Best Regards
Sylwek
On Fri, 17 Jun 2005, David Nelson wrote:
I just reckon that an f/4 version would be hard to market as being better
than the DA unless it was well touted as being super sharp wide open (hard to
imagine). I suppose there's always the FF thing.
Exactly, and the constant aperture. One is clearly
Hi!
Thanks Boris. I liked the Sea of Galilee image that you posted recently. I
think I like it better with about 1/4 cropped off of the bottom making it
more of a panoramic image. There doesn't seem to be a lot of interesting
subject in the bottom 1/4. How do those trees survive out there in
Especially with ED glass, internal focusing and removable tripod
mount :-)
Oooh stop you're getting me all excited now 8)
You only have to look at the Pentax A 70-210 f/4 reputation, people are still
raving about it now and it's been around 20+ years!!!
Constant aperture, reasonable
On Fri, 17 Jun 2005, Peter Belak wrote:
I think it will be a good opportunity for some of us to put our money
where our mouth is.
?? I don't understand..
I mean that many people have (correctly, in my opinion) moaned for a
long time that Pentax never really produced a successor to the
[1] I think we two have had this discussion; I was also talking to
Joaquim Carvalho just yesterday about it; John Whittingham as well in
the past, the list just goes on.
I was actually waiting for this type of telezoom lens.
I have some nice M primes (135, 200) and A70-210 but I wish to have
John Whittingham wrote on 17.06.05 11:47:
Oooh stop you're getting me all excited now 8)
If all that comes true, your wallet will be less excited ;-)
You only have to look at the Pentax A 70-210 f/4 reputation, people are still
raving about it now and it's been around 20+ years!!!
So it
no, i was dead serious.
you either believe that one must pay for software -- then,
well, it costs $600, so cough it up.
or you don't give a damn about them -- then get a demo CS2
from adobe and a free s/n from somewhere else.
mishka
On 6/17/05, Frantisek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
M if you want
move the fileserver somewhere close, so you can run 1Gb ethernet
from it to the computer you do the editing. forget wifi if you are
serving the files.
best,
mishka
On 6/17/05, David Oswald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I place my *ist-DS's image files on a network file server at home (yup,
I'm one
On Fri, 17 Jun 2005, Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
John Whittingham wrote on 17.06.05 11:47:
Oooh stop you're getting me all excited now 8)
If all that comes true, your wallet will be less excited ;-)
How much was the A70-210/4 new? And how much was the Super-A (I don't
expect 1985 money
Oooh stop you're getting me all excited now 8)
If all that comes true, your wallet will be less excited ;-)
Yes, definitely 8)
You only have to look at the Pentax A 70-210 f/4 reputation, people are
still
raving about it now and it's been around 20+ years!!!
So it is the highest
How much was the A70-210/4 new?
I can look it up tonight from the last price list I have.
And how much was the Super-A
Bloody expensive, at least 2 MX's
John
twice as fast isn't really that much faster. wired gigabit Ethernet is the
way to go if you really want to do this. i work with and save double
resolution Photoshop files and cannot imagine doing this on 100BaseT. i use
a local RAID 5 array with 6 drives and a local 10K RPM scratch drive and
it may not have sold well, but it was constantly out of stock and is
definitely an excellent lens.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Kostas Kavoussanakis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, June 17, 2005 5:13 AM
Subject: Re: Look kids, the 50-200mm f/4-5.6 ED
I've been trying to convert some Canon Powershot Pro-1 RAW files for
Ann. The Adobe site shows RAW support for this camera going all the way
back to Camera RAW 2.2. I have 2.4 installed, but the browser can't see
her files. What could cause this kind of problem? Does anyone know if
CTG is the
How does one do street shooting with a 200mm lens? You get out on the
street and trip the shutter vbg. Yes, I frequently shoot on the
street with a 35/2, but I don't always like intimacy in street
shooting. Sometimes I like to catch people unawares. Here's a shot with
the VS1 70-210/3.5 at
You can try emailing me one of those so i can try to convert it with
some other progs
Paul Stenquist wrote:
I've been trying to convert some Canon Powershot Pro-1 RAW files for
Ann. The Adobe site shows RAW support for this camera going all the
way back to Camera RAW 2.2. I have 2.4
On Fri, 17 Jun 2005, John Whittingham wrote:
How much was the A70-210/4 new?
I can look it up tonight from the last price list I have.
And how much was the Super-A
Bloody expensive, at least 2 MX's
And how much is that in MZ-5ns?
Thanks John!
Kostas (if I knew how much the MX was, I
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Sometimes I like to catch people unawares. Here's a shot with the VS1
70-210/3.5 at 210 mm. It may not fit your definition of street
shooting, which is a fuzzy term to begin with, but it's on the
street, and it's a shot.
Thibouille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just looked at the shop I ordered my D (located in France) and saw
following prices:
ist-D: 839 euros
ist-DS: 729 euros
ist-DL: 809 euros
So the DL is definitely suffering from the new thing symptom.
A person in the know whom I spoke to recently suggested
I don't know if he heard the mirror. But I stopped him when he came out
of a store and showed him the pic. I then gave him a card with my
e-mail address and told him I'd be happy to send it to him. Never heard
from him, which is typical in my experience.
Paul
On Jun 17, 2005, at 7:23 AM,
And how much is that in MZ-5ns?
Err dunno 8)
I'd guess the Super A when released c.1983 would be equivalent to what the MZ-
S costs now (New!) IIRC it was somewhere in the region of 250-300 GBP for
the body in the UK. My first MX body c.1979 cost me 89.00 but it was
discounted slightly I
From: John Whittingham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/06/17 Fri AM 11:38:21 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Look kids, the 50-200mm f/4-5.6 ED is here!
And how much is that in MZ-5ns?
Err dunno 8)
I'd guess the Super A when released c.1983 would be equivalent to what
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Does anyone know if
CTG is the correct suffix for this version of Canon RAW.
Paul,
As I recall from my short Dark Side time, the .ctg files are NOT the raw
data - they are small files with some additional information.
The RAW files should be .CRW, or something like
If you would like to add a contest please contact me
and give me the
Name of the contest
The URL
The closing Date
A little Blurb about it
http://www.wildcherry.com.au/index.php?p=contest
Kind regards
Kevin
--
Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch.
Liberty is a
Hi all,
just unpacked my new Pentax 645, and wondering about meaning of life :D
Any websites where i can download some docs?
Gasha
G'day Gasha,
Manuals from the pentax USA site:
http://tinyurl.com/aujw9
Dave
On 6/17/05, Gasha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi all,
just unpacked my new Pentax 645, and wondering about meaning of life :D
Any websites where i can download some docs?
Gasha
What does it look like?
It's not a style typical of Pentax.
Tokina? Tamron?
Sincerely,
Collin
Sent via the WebMail system at mail.safe-t.net
Hi!
just unpacked my new Pentax 645, and wondering about meaning of life :D
Any websites where i can download some docs?
The life is especially beautiful if viewed from 645 viewfinder...
Boris
On 6/16/05, Cesar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
I see that you enjoy the Canadian Connection (Frank, is it the Canada
Connection) at least for their libations :-) snip
We were giving him American beer. I don't think Normie particularly
cared where the beer was from... vbg
-frank
--
frank theriault wrote:
On 6/16/05, Cesar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
I see that you enjoy the Canadian Connection (Frank, is it the Canada
Connection) at least for their libations :-) snip
We were giving him American beer. I don't think Normie particularly
cared where the beer was
On 6/16/05, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Variation on an earlier upload
http://home.earthlink.net/~pdml-pics/d_n_d.html
Shel
I agree with Paul. I like this a lot more. The first one was just
not quite abstract enough to be abstract, but not representational
enough to
On 6/17/05, Tom Reese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Norm the beer s**t. Pot, kettle, black, eh Cesar?
BTW, a couple of my Toronto buds and I enjoyed finishing off the
Yeung-Ling (sp?) that you and Susan left in our cooler. We couldn't
let it go to waste now, could we? vbg
Nice beer.
thanks,
This looks like an interesting resource:
http://www.krages.com/phoright.htm
How much was the A70-210/4 new?
I can look it up tonight from the last price list I have.
And how much was the Super-A
Bloody expensive, at least 2 MX's
Super A body (1983) 249
SMC Pentax A 24mm f2.8 (1984) 110
SMC Pentax-A 35-70 f4 (1984) 110
SMC Pentax-A 70-210 f4 (1984) 150
Motor
Still on the chopping block...
Pentax MZ-S w/ BG-10 grip
MZ-S body with BG-10 battery grip and accessories, including: Pentax strap
FG, body cap, hot shoe cover, finder cover, eye cup, owner's manual, 2 CR-2
lithium batteries, and original packaging.
The body and grip are very clean with no
Hi gang --
On Thursday, 16 June, National Public Radio's Morning Edition
did an extended piece on the problems of post-9/11 photography:
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4705698
There are also a couple of good related links off their site.
Could bringing it (the problem)
On 6/14/05, Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On a cameraclub oution last weekene, I decided to give my laatest
enablement a try.
This is a small harbour on the south coast of Mn - an island 100 km south
of Copenhagen.
The weather wasw quite nice for photographing.
On 6/17/05, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The dark, foreboding clouds make the shot.
Nice one!
Having now read the other comments, I can say I like the trees.
Gives the whole thing a better sense of place and context, IMHO.
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois
This monster brings out memories in me, turning me into old fart mode. Never
actually had one, but I was near, very near.
This is slightly off topic, but I have never introduced myself to this list.
First thing I did here was to scare people off with a steaming (very
steaming) descrition of my
Bounced for enhanced text (!!), so I am deleting the pound marks and
trying again.
On Fri, 17 Jun 2005, John Whittingham wrote:
Super A body (1983) 249
SMC Pentax A 24mm f2.8 (1984) 110
SMC Pentax-A 35-70 f4 (1984) 110
SMC Pentax-A 70-210 f4 (1984) 150
Motor Drive A = battery pack (1984)
Unless you're willing to wire up for gigabit ethernet and a totally
dedicated server, best thing to do is pull the files over to a local
drive, edit, than push them back to the server. That also has the
bonus of always leaving a backup copy of the original file on the
server.
Godfrey
On
Yesterday, while waiting for a client, I parked my butt in a comfortable
chair at the local mega book seller and settled in to read a couple of
photo magazines. One - it may have been Amateur Photography - had an
article about making good photos. Such articles are always fun to read if
for no
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unless you're willing to wire up for gigabit ethernet and a totally
dedicated server, best thing to do is pull the files over to a local
drive, edit, than push them back to the server. That also has the
bonus of always
Thanks. I would guess a D-FA 50-200/4 could be around the 300GBP
mark, then. That's 30% above the FA28-105/3.2-4.5 price and 25%
below the 50/2.8 Macro. Reasonable?
300GBP, yes please put me down for one of those :)
John
-- Original Message ---
From: Kostas Kavoussanakis
Paul,
That's a nice tele-portrait of a man and child, but street shooting
to me captures the environmental context of the street and the people
who populate it. The perspective in such a tele-portrait is not
intimate, nor does it capture the context of the street at all.
Photos like
Some of us look for intimacy and some of us look for voyeurism. vbg
I don't see how you do street shooting with a 200mm lens on 16x24mm
format anyway ... even a 50mm lens on the DS is a portrait telephoto,
a 200mm lens is the equivalent of a 300mm field of view in 35mm film
camera terms
At 7:32 AM -0400 6/17/05, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I don't know if he heard the mirror. But I stopped him when he came
out of a store and showed him the pic. I then gave him a card with
my e-mail address and told him I'd be happy to send it to him. Never
heard from him, which is typical in my
On Jun 16, 2005, at 3:42 PM, Cotty wrote:
Yo Godders,
Welcome home :-)
http://www.cottysnaps.com/snaps/photoessays/essays/oxford.html
Heya Cotty!
Thanks, that's a great set of pages. And it was a splendid day!!!
Thanks really go to Amita for suggesting a mini get-together in
Oxford.
On 17/6/05, Daniel J. Matyola, discombobulated, unleashed:
This looks like an interesting resource:
http://www.krages.com/phoright.htm
Excellent, thanks. There's a link at the bottom for a UK version (the
above link is for a USA version).
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People,
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I don't mean tweaks, like sharpening, color
adjustment, and the like, but changing backgrounds, focus, and major
alterations. The rationale seemed to be that what you'd like to see as a
final result may not always be in the scene.
IMO, this type of article is a
Ok, so while my computer system is being configured for more work
space so I can get digital image processing up and rolling, I pulled
out the $30 MX I bought shortly before leaving on this trip. The
matte focusing screen (SE20, from the LX model) I found used dropped
in without a hitch
I've heard all the narrow, pretentious definitions of street shooting before.
I think anything that defines a genre too narrowly is merely limiting. Yes, HCB
shot with normal lenses, and I frequently shoot with normal to wide lenses as
well. But that's not all I do. I care not a hoot for
In a message dated 6/16/2005 12:49:57 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You can call me dishonest for demanding things like that, I think I
was VERY reasonable.
I always try to be reasonable and understand the other person's point of
view. I only gave bad feedback once; I never
Wouldn't it be similar to e.g. RGBRGBRGB tiff vs. RRGGBB tiff? These
two flavours exist already... I think somebody even mentioned storing
floating point photo data (for HDR photos) in the tiff format...?
Good light!
fra
I don't think so. A Bayer RAW file has *holes* in the
This is a photo I took last year:
http://www.dariobonazza.com/provv/es01.jpg
This is another photo:
http://www.dariobonazza.com/provv/es02.jpg
The hardware I used to take them, and the little usual PC processing
(optimization) won't make them less photos than In case I took them on a
In a message dated 6/17/2005 7:38:49 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 17/6/05, Daniel J. Matyola, discombobulated, unleashed:
This looks like an interesting resource:
http://www.krages.com/phoright.htm
Thanks! I want to photograph some weird things, like the
In a message dated 6/17/2005 3:52:45 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've been trying to convert some Canon Powershot Pro-1 RAW files for
Ann. The Adobe site shows RAW support for this camera going all the way
back to Camera RAW 2.2. I have 2.4 installed, but the browser
- Original Message -
From: E.R.N. Reed [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, June 17, 2005 10:44 AM
Subject: Re: How to make Good Pictures (Let's Free the Captured Images)
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I don't mean tweaks, like sharpening, color
adjustment, and the
On 17/6/05, E.R.N. Reed, discombobulated, unleashed:
FWIW, Shel, I completely agree with your points above.
Photography is photography, and
making-another-picture-out-of-bits-and-pieces-of-photos isn't
photography, it's something else. It probably needs a name, and it too
can be a valid form
A simple WOW!
Regards
Albano
--- Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Team,
A celestial capture from moments ago:
http://www.home.aone.net.au/audiobias/temp/IMGP2590.jpg
Tech: *ist D, ISO200, 1/15s A300/2.8 + 1.4X-L +
1.7AF TC @ f22
Comments, questions and critiques welcome.
If this topic interests you, don't miss http://www.photopermit.org/
Kevin Bjorke's site has quickly become one of the best places to
look for up to date and anecdotal info on photographer's rights, at
least for North America.
At 11:10 AM -0400 6/17/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message
Taken at a show at Toronto's Rex a couple of weeks ago. I'm not
tremendously happy with it; looked better on the neg that it did
blown up. But, since it's the best from the roll (I only took one
roll that night), and I haven't submitted a PAW since pre-GFM, I
figured I'd post it anyway:
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 19:42:15 US/Eastern, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://photobucket.com/albums/v408/divad_b/?action=viewcurrent=slipper2048.jpg
I shot this from several angles, and my SO like this one, so, i submit for
your viewing
pleasure the
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Yesterday, while waiting for a client, I parked my butt in a comfortable
chair at the local mega book seller and settled in to read a couple of
photo magazines. One - it may have been Amateur Photography - had an
article about making good photos.
Editor's reply:
So,
On Fri, 2005-06-17 at 14:13, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Photos like these two from my PAW: People Portaits 2005 series
are a little closer to the notion of street shooting as I see it:
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW5/13.htm
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW5/15.htm
My oldest son, the one I mentioned in a post an hour ago, has bought himself
a second hand ME-super in London. It seemed ok in the store, but it failed
shortly after leaving the shop. We had to go home to Norway before the shop
opened again. We tried to send a mail to the shop telling about the
David,
I'd suggest you look into installing the image editing software on the
server, and use Remote Desktop or similar to connect from the laptop.
Then you don't have to move the files at all.
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: David Oswald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
I never considered adding and removing elements to a photograph as
photography. That was all done later, after the photo was taken or made,
using a variety of techniques that only sometimes took place in a darkroom.
There was physically pasting and cutting of different elements into and out
of a
On 17 Jun 2005 at 10:01, Joaquim Carvalho wrote:
SuperCal and it is free.
Software calibrators are as good as or better than any calibration tool,
the problem is not everybody can use them, you have to understand how
they work:
Software calibrators use you as the light sensor, you have
Which proves that DL is supposed to replace the DS rather than
complement it IMHO.
2005/6/17, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thibouille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just looked at the shop I ordered my D (located in France) and saw
following prices:
ist-D: 839 euros
ist-DS: 729 euros
1 - 100 of 316 matches
Mail list logo
