I was planning to get a K10D for an upcoming overseas trip but it now
looks like I won't be able to manage more than a K100D before I leave
for the trip. I would like to know how the image quality, apart from
any distortion introduced by the lens, differs between the K100D and
the 7.1 MP Olympu
On 15/4/07, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Heck, it's not even a title. It was a request for critique. There are
>some aggressive young women out there lying in wait. Check out the
>critiques here:
>http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5628194&size=lg
The complaint refers
I think so, the rest of the world might think we're dead as the links ...
Bong
On 4/16/07, Digital Image Studio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ..the "Home pages of the pentax-discuss members"
>
> http://www.phred.org/pentax/pdlist.html
>
> There are far more dead links there than live.
>
> --
> Rob
Thanks, Rick.
You can click on one image and then "open phto in new window" - if you don't
want the slide show:-)
Reagrds
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne
On 4/15/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Apr 15, 2007, at 8:07 PM, Mike Hamilton wrote:
>
> http://www.michaelhamilton.ca/2007/04/15/airplane-at-dusk/
> K10D, DA70, iso100.
> >>>
> >>> Nicely rendered but not a terribly special photo.
> >>
> >> You're right, but I en
What a crock of crap!! Anyone who takes issue like that has to be
pretty damn insecure about the value of what they're producing. Add
that to the long list of so-called "reality" shows that I won't be
watching this fall.
-P
Paul Stenquist wrote:
> Heck, it's not even a title. It was a reques
ROTFLMAO
I wonder if she'll get her lawyers onto the army for trademark
infringement also.
I like the photo BTW.
Cheers,
Dave
On 4/16/07, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Heck, it's not even a title. It was a request for critique. There are
> some aggressive young women out there ly
OK.
I'm still a bit confused. I understand the "tax" part, but I'm
struggling with it being used in conjunction with the word "return".
Cheers,
Dave
On 4/16/07, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here we get a chance to fight for our money rather than just letting
> the government ta
Paul, I must admit that I thought US of A was a strange country - a big
mysterious world full of lawyers (no disrespect to Frank, though he is
Canadian anyway). Now I am thinking it is even more than strange - weird
may be the term or bizarre.
First I thought it was funny, then it sank down my
Well it was last updated in Y2K.
Digital Image Studio wrote:
> ..the "Home pages of the pentax-discuss members"
>
> http://www.phred.org/pentax/pdlist.html
>
> There are far more dead links there than live.
>
>
--
Entropy Seminar: The results of a five yeer studee ntu the sekend lw uf
thur
..the "Home pages of the pentax-discuss members"
http://www.phred.org/pentax/pdlist.html
There are far more dead links there than live.
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publications/
Pentax user
On Apr 15, 2007, at 10:42 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> Heck, it's not even a title. It was a request for critique. There are
> some aggressive young women out there lying in wait. Check out the
> critiques here:
> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5628194&size=lg
Nothing like spreading
On 4/15/07, drew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sunset this evening at Beachy head...
>
> http://www.rileyelf.free-online.co.uk/peso2/
Very nice indeed.
Godfrey
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I just clicked on the link below and it worked. I have no idea why it's
not working for you. Try copying and pasting it into the address bar of
your browser.
Maris V. Lidaka Sr. wrote:
> EarthLink reports "Page Not Found" :-(
>
> Maris
>
> P. J. Alling wrote:
>
>> Not me but I did make the
LOL ... How stupid can they be?
G
On Apr 15, 2007, at 7:42 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> Heck, it's not even a title. It was a request for critique. There are
> some aggressive young women out there lying in wait. Check out the
> critiques here:
> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=562819
EarthLink reports "Page Not Found" :-(
Maris
P. J. Alling wrote:
> Not me but I did make the image.
>
> http://www.home.earthlink.net/~morephotos/PESO_--_fishinatsunset.html
>
> Technical Data:
>
> Pentax *ist-Ds ISO 800 % 1/5 sec.
> smc Pentax 43mm f1.9 Limited @ f3.5
>
> Notes: Hand held b
On Apr 15, 2007, at 8:07 PM, Mike Hamilton wrote:
http://www.michaelhamilton.ca/2007/04/15/airplane-at-dusk/
K10D, DA70, iso100.
>>>
>>> Nicely rendered but not a terribly special photo.
>>
>> You're right, but I enjoy it. :)
> Also, thanks Godfrey.
You're welcome.
I think Fernando is
I wouldn't know what to think if I got such a message, I think I'd refer
them to my lawyer.
Paul Stenquist wrote:
> Heck, it's not even a title. It was a request for critique. There are
> some aggressive young women out there lying in wait. Check out the
> critiques here:
> http://www.photo.n
Not me but I did make the image.
http://www.home.earthlink.net/~morephotos/PESO_--_fishinatsunset.html
Technical Data:
Pentax *ist-Ds ISO 800 % 1/5 sec.
smc Pentax 43mm f1.9 Limited @ f3.5
Notes: Hand held braced against stone pier IIRC.
As usual comments are welcome but may be totally ignor
Sounds like Lucille is already sleeping a little too tightly!
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Stenquist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: OT: Threatened over a photo title
> Heck, it's not even a title. It was a request for critique. There are
> some aggressive young wom
Paul Stenquist wrote on Sun, 15 Apr 2007 13:41:12 -0700"
> Nothing going on here. I've got a few. All with the SMC Pentax
> 85/1.8. The first one was yesterday. The second two were shot this
> afternoon.
>
> Grace does lipstick for the first time:
> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5853
Me too. Vista has, also, disabled the ink monitor and printer
nozzle check. When I think I can sustain some control, I'll try a
Windows contact.
Jack
--- David J Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/15/07, Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (Vista came on new > system)
>
> I'm sorry
Paul Stenquist wrote on Sun, 15 Apr 2007 19:49:45 -0700:
> Heck, it's not even a title. It was a request for critique. There are
> some aggressive young women out there lying in wait. Check out the
> critiques here:
> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5628194&size=lg
WAY too many lawyer
On 4/15/07, Mike Hamilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/15/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > On Apr 15, 2007, at 2:21 PM, Mike Hamilton wrote:
> >
> > > http://www.michaelhamilton.ca/2007/04/15/airplane-at-dusk/
> > > K10D, DA70, iso100.
> >
> > Nicely rendered but not a t
On 4/15/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Apr 15, 2007, at 2:21 PM, Mike Hamilton wrote:
>
> > http://www.michaelhamilton.ca/2007/04/15/airplane-at-dusk/
> > K10D, DA70, iso100.
>
> Nicely rendered but not a terribly special photo.
You're right, but I enjoy it. :)
--
Cheers
On 4/15/07, Fernando Terrazzino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> I like it better with a little bit of more contrast, maybe an "S" curve n PS.
Thanks, Fernando. I'll try that!
--
Cheers,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MichaelHamilton.ca
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.
On 16/04/07, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Heck, it's not even a title. It was a request for critique. There are
> some aggressive young women out there lying in wait. Check out the
> critiques here:
> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5628194&size=lg
Morons :-(
--
Rob St
Heck, it's not even a title. It was a request for critique. There are
some aggressive young women out there lying in wait. Check out the
critiques here:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5628194&size=lg
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/
On 16/04/07, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here we get a chance to fight for our money rather than just letting
> the government take it:-).
Here too, however the fight is seriously biased towards the
Government, particularly in the case of the implementation of
retrospective tax leg
Good one. The positioning of the ball and the reflection, combined
with the background hills work powerfully here. Nice work.
Paul
On Apr 15, 2007, at 9:55 PM, Fernando Terrazzino wrote:
> nice
>
> On 4/15/07, drew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Sunset this evening at Beachy head...
>>
>> http://
Thanks Fernando. I like working with that lens. Makes me think a bit:-).
Paul
On Apr 15, 2007, at 9:58 PM, Fernando Terrazzino wrote:
> Great little story you captured Paul, I like it.
>
> On 4/14/07, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I fitted a Takumar 200/4 hood to my K 85/1.8 today,
Here we get a chance to fight for our money rather than just letting
the government take it:-).
Paul
On Apr 15, 2007, at 10:05 PM, David Savage wrote:
> At 04:42 AM 16/04/2007, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>> On Apr 15, 2007, at 7:52 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
... feelin' happy i got mine
Thanks Fernando. Grace had a tough day, better now.
Paul
On Apr 15, 2007, at 9:56 PM, Fernando Terrazzino wrote:
> My vote goes to "sleeping beauty". Nice subject.
>
> On 4/15/07, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Nothing going on here. I've got a few. All with the SMC Pentax
>> 85/1.8.
At 04:42 AM 16/04/2007, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>On Apr 15, 2007, at 7:52 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >> ... feelin' happy i got mine done a week ago ...
> >
> > I've never hated you for your photography. I've been magnanimous
> > about that.
> > But I sort of hate you now.
>
>About the sam
Great little story you captured Paul, I like it.
On 4/14/07, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I fitted a Takumar 200/4 hood to my K 85/1.8 today, by means of a
> step-up ring, so I had to take it out for a test walkaround. This is
> probably my favorite of the day, although I'm still so
nice
On 4/15/07, Jens Bladt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/sets/72157600077914723/show/
> I konda like this. Do you?
> Regards
> Jens Bladt
>
> http://www.jensbladt.dk
>
> --
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.5.4
My vote goes to "sleeping beauty". Nice subject.
On 4/15/07, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nothing going on here. I've got a few. All with the SMC Pentax
> 85/1.8. The first one was yesterday. The second two were shot this
> afternoon.
>
> Grace does lipstick for the first time:
> ht
nice
On 4/15/07, drew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sunset this evening at Beachy head...
>
> http://www.rileyelf.free-online.co.uk/peso2/
>
> Hope you like...
>
> Andy.
>
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
>
--
PDML Pentax-Di
Hi Mike,
I like it better with a little bit of more contrast, maybe an "S" curve n PS.
On 4/15/07, Mike Hamilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.michaelhamilton.ca/2007/04/15/airplane-at-dusk/
>
> K10D, DA70, iso100.
>
> Comments, critiques welcome! Enjoy!
>
> --
>
> Cheers,
>
> [EMAIL P
Like this one Norm.
Call me
Dave
On 4/12/07, Norm Baugher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Shot this in Joshua Tree National Monument, love that place. Pentax ME
> Super SE.
>
> http://home.earthlink.net/~nbaugher/joshuatree.htm
>
> Norm
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> htt
On 4/13/07, Norm Baugher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks Bong, the print is sharp as a tack, I'm just scannally-challenged...
Don't you mean oh never mind.
Great shot.
Dave
> Norm
>
> Bong Manayon wrote:
> > Looks familiar except the street is a whole lot cleaner than what we
> > have he
There is another store in town. I'll see what he has to say, and judge
from there.
I have 4 slots now, but even if i only do 1-2 its better thasn what i have now.
Dave
On 4/15/07, graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It means the guy is clueless. XP SPII works with USB 2.0, but you have
> to hav
On Apr 15, 2007, at 2:21 PM, Mike Hamilton wrote:
> http://www.michaelhamilton.ca/2007/04/15/airplane-at-dusk/
> K10D, DA70, iso100.
Nicely rendered but not a terribly special photo.
Godfrey
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I'm up for that. How about Bill and Mark?
Paul
On Apr 15, 2007, at 7:25 PM, Kenneth Waller wrote:
>> If Ken would just loan me his FA 600/4, I could probably solve
>> the problem :-).
>
> Maybe we should schedule a Michigan PDML meeting?
> Haven't had one for a while.
> Maybe one of the little wil
David J Brooks wrote:
> Good news Mark.
>
> And a very nice shot.
>
> It looks fine on my monitor, now calibrated.:-)
>
> Detail is very good
>
> Dave
Thanks, Dave - really just a test shot till some interesting bugs come
out, but I'm psyched for their arrival. Can't be long now :-0
- MC
On 15/04/07, Markus Maurer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> K10D, Pentax A50mm macro, ISO 400, F5.6 1/2 sec. With the very welcome help
> of SR and the Monostat monopod.
> HDR made out of 1 raw file with 3 different exposures.
The shot has nice illumination but my question is; before applying the
sin
It means the guy is clueless. XP SPII works with USB 2.0, but you have
to have the hardware in the computer for that to happen. However, you
can add a USB 2.0 PCI card to you desktop, or a USB 2.0 PCMCIA card to
your laptop.
-graywolf
David J Brooks wrote:
> Hi gang.
>
> Last month i took my
Win XP supports USB 2.0. Your hardware may not.
David J Brooks wrote:
> Hi gang.
>
> Last month i took my PC into the local shop to add more Ram (was 256,
> now 728 DRAM) and to upgrade my 4 USB 1.1 connections to USB 2
> connections. After rebooting to check the Ram, he looked at my system,
> a
The meter design in Pentax cameras was very voltage tolerant. I believe
that you can use a silver oxide battery and get accurate meter readings.
Jens Bladt wrote:
> A Danish guy, whom I never met or spoke with, called me today. He has a
> Spotmatic SP + a Super Takumar 50mm lens and two Soligor
>If Ken would just loan me his FA 600/4, I could probably solve
> the problem :-).
Maybe we should schedule a Michigan PDML meeting?
Haven't had one for a while.
Maybe one of the little wildlife preserves in the area?
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Stenquist" <[EMAIL
Thanks Boris!
Boris Liberman wrote:
> Norm, if you say (in your reply to Bong) that it is sharp then it is
> even more so. Nicely caught moment.
>
> Boris
>
> Norm Baugher wrote:
>
>> Finally scanned in a couple of pictures I like. This was from my first
>> trip to the Amazon...
>>
>> http://
Hey Boris, thanks for the comments. I feel exactly the opposite :) Which
of course is great!
Tks,
Norm
Boris Liberman wrote:
> Hmmm, does not really work for me. I feel like I want to see it in
> color... B&W seems to take away too much.
>
> Boris
>
> Norm Baugher wrote:
>
>> Shot this in Jos
I try to let them hold as little of my money as possible, but I
always over-pay during the year by a little bit to make sure I don't
have to come up with more cash at tax day. Takes the bite out of it
to get even a little bit back.
Godfrey
On Apr 15, 2007, at 1:53 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Yes I do. Nicely done.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "Jens Bladt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PESO: Golden Sunrise
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/sets/72157600077914723/show/
> I konda like this. Do you?
> Regards
> Jens Bladt
>
> http://www.jensbladt.dk
>
> --
>
Cotty wrote:
> On 15/4/07, drew, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>> Sunset this evening at Beachy head...
>>
>> http://www.rileyelf.free-online.co.uk/peso2/
>>
>> Hope you like...
>>
>> Andy.
>
>
> I like. Very nice.
Thanks Cotty..
Andy.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http:/
On 4/15/07, Mark Cassino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmmm - not sure how I wound up here but looking over the last month:
>
> - In a March snowflake shooting session I fumbled the AF360FGZ and it
> fell just a foot or so, but in the cold that was enough to damage the
> battery door latch. It works
Glad I was able to share the tip & you were able to experience the place.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "David J Brooks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: OT I'm back
> Hey all.
>
> Hope everyone was good. Looks like abit of mail to sift through.
>
> Arrived back from Vegas. L
On 4/15/07, Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(Vista came on new > system)
I'm sorry to hear that.:-)
Dave
>
> Jack
> --- Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Mine had been fine, also. It's just the last couple prints. May work
> > its way past it soon.
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Jack
> > --
Thanks Jack, No filters or hood. Only had two small flare patches below
the sun, I had much more fun removing the splotches from the dust on the
sensor ;-)
Cheers,
Drew.
Jack Davis wrote:
> Nice buttermilky sunset. Well placed reflection.
> Did you need to remove any/much flare? Was a filter
Good news Mark.
And a very nice shot.
It looks fine on my monitor, now calibrated.:-)
Detail is very good
Dave
On 4/15/07, Mark Cassino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I brought my malfunctioning A* 200 f4 to Peter's Camera in Grand Rapids
> last Friday. He gave it a very thorough going over, wal
Nice buttermilky sunset. Well placed reflection.
Did you need to remove any/much flare? Was a filter mounted?
Thanks for sharing.
Jack
--- drew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sunset this evening at Beachy head...
>
> http://www.rileyelf.free-online.co.uk/peso2/
>
> Hope you like...
>
> Andy.
>
Hmmm - not sure how I wound up here but looking over the last month:
- In a March snowflake shooting session I fumbled the AF360FGZ and it
fell just a foot or so, but in the cold that was enough to damage the
battery door latch. It works OK but doesn't really snap into place. At
any rate - I get a
On 15/4/07, drew, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Sunset this evening at Beachy head...
>
>http://www.rileyelf.free-online.co.uk/peso2/
>
>Hope you like...
>
>Andy.
I like. Very nice.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
___
I brought my malfunctioning A* 200 f4 to Peter's Camera in Grand Rapids
last Friday. He gave it a very thorough going over, walking through how
the lens lens joined to the body, how the linkage worked, etc.
He concluded that the lens was fine, but that the body was not stopping
down properly. S
Thats what i thought.
Thanks
Dave
On 4/15/07, Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Definitely USB1.1 ports on that. You'll need a USB2.0 card put in to get
> USB 2.0.
>
> Compter guy is on crack saying that because you have XP SP2, you must
> have USB2.0. The catch is if the computer came with
http://www.michaelhamilton.ca/2007/04/15/airplane-at-dusk/
K10D, DA70, iso100.
Comments, critiques welcome! Enjoy!
--
Cheers,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MichaelHamilton.ca
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Sunset this evening at Beachy head...
http://www.rileyelf.free-online.co.uk/peso2/
Hope you like...
Andy.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Think I'm on to something.;)
Got a panel that ICM(no color management) is unavailable. I believe
that was the wording.
I allowed color control and all OK. I think the program disallowed ICM
after first print, thus permitting a more accurate color thereafter.
Vista? Also, ink level check is grayed o
Hmmm. My tax returns come out of the bank:-(. But I don't let the
government hold my money :-).
Paul
On Apr 15, 2007, at 4:42 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> On Apr 15, 2007, at 7:52 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>>> ... feelin' happy i got mine done a week ago ...
>>
>> I've never hated you f
On Apr 15, 2007, at 7:52 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> ... feelin' happy i got mine done a week ago ...
>
> I've never hated you for your photography. I've been magnanimous
> about that.
> But I sort of hate you now.
About the same level of hate I have for my partner, I hope.
He had his ta
Nothing going on here. I've got a few. All with the SMC Pentax
85/1.8. The first one was yesterday. The second two were shot this
afternoon.
Grace does lipstick for the first time:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5853141
Tough Day. Grace goes to Grandma. A little under the weather
Greetings to you too, Lasse.
Yes the weather has been lovely this weekend :-)
In Denmark we had up to 23 degrees Celcius today - and sunny, naturally. Not
bad for April!
Canon makes great professional tools. Anyway, the most important thing is
that the photographer knows his/her equiment.
A good ph
Definitely USB1.1 ports on that. You'll need a USB2.0 card put in to get
USB 2.0.
Compter guy is on crack saying that because you have XP SP2, you must
have USB2.0. The catch is if the computer came with XP SP2, it would
most likely have USB2.0 ports, but just about anything older will have
ha
Mine had been fine, also. It's just the last couple prints. May work
its way past it soon.
Thanks!
Jack
--- Walter Hamler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Never had that problem with my 1800. It's pretty new, less than 6
> mos, and I
> haven't printed a lot on it, but it worked great from the very f
PC clone, made by MDG, sorta a Canadian version of Dell.
P4 with 1.4GHz and 768 ram. Unit about 5.5-6 years old.
Dave
On 4/15/07, Walter Hamler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> USB 1 or 2 is a function of the computer hardware/bios/motherboard
> architecture, not the OS. What type computer and what
On 4/15/07, David J Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi gang.
>
> Last month i took my PC into the local shop to add more Ram (was 256,
> now 728 DRAM) and to upgrade my 4 USB 1.1 connections to USB 2
> connections. After rebooting to check the Ram, he looked at my system,
> and said because i h
768MB ram I assume (256+512) :)
Well, adding USB2 usually consists in adding a new card inside the PC
(near graphics connection usually). You should connect the reader to
ont of those USB ports. NOT the usual ports neaar keyboard/mouse
connections. Those are still USB1. The new card provides USB2
Never had that problem with my 1800. It's pretty new, less than 6 mos, and I
haven't printed a lot on it, but it worked great from the very first print.
Walt
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
USB 1 or 2 is a function of the computer hardware/bios/motherboard
architecture, not the OS. What type computer and what processor. How old is
it?
Walt
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Sometimes i get odors around my computer. I think its mostly from the beer.
Dave
On 4/14/07, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Agreed. It's even more fun in some ways. No chemical odors wafting
> from the computer.
> Paul
> On Apr 14, 2007, at 10:42 AM, David Savage wrote:
>
> > Persona
Hi gang.
Last month i took my PC into the local shop to add more Ram (was 256,
now 728 DRAM) and to upgrade my 4 USB 1.1 connections to USB 2
connections. After rebooting to check the Ram, he looked at my system,
and said because i have XP and Service Pack II i should have USB 2.
I tried connecti
Scott Loveless wrote:
> The meter's bridge circuit is very similar to the K1000's. Just about
> any battery that will fit will work. An Energizer 397 will fit without
> spacers or modification. Wein cells are not necessary, don't last as
> long as a 397, and are overpriced, IMHO.
>
>
Shoul
Jens Bladt wrote:
> A Danish guy, whom I never met or spoke with, called me today. He has a
> Spotmatic SP + a Super Takumar 50mm lens and two Soligor lenses as
> well )wide angle nd 250mm, which he wants to find a good home for.
> I know very little about screw mount , so I thought I'd ask you gu
of course now, whenever the croc opens his mouth, all you hear is "tic,
tic, tic, tic, tic..."
--
Christian
http://photography.skofteland.net
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
My fairly new Epson R1800 is producing a VERY dark initial print.
Second print, etc. are fine.
Same whether calling for color or B&W.
Anyone(?)
Thanks,
Jack
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http:
average condition fully WORKING spotmatics are plentiful on ebay and
for cheap, if the meter aint working, it's about $25 item. Only
true stone mint fully working ones are hard to find and even those arent
that expensive,
maybe $100 at most unless black. The 50/1.4ST lens is a $25-$75 item
dependin
Jens Bladt wrote:
> A Danish guy, whom I never met or spoke with, called me today. He has a
> Spotmatic SP + a Super Takumar 50mm lens and two Soligor lenses as
> well )wide angle nd 250mm, which he wants to find a good home for.
> I know very little about screw mount , so I thought I'd ask you gu
A Danish guy, whom I never met or spoke with, called me today. He has a
Spotmatic SP + a Super Takumar 50mm lens and two Soligor lenses as
well )wide angle nd 250mm, which he wants to find a good home for.
I know very little about screw mount , so I thought I'd ask you guys :-)
This guy said the m
I noticed that it was just the window size.
When I shortened it on my larger monitor it looks
fine.
Thanks.
-Brendan
--- "Maris V. Lidaka Sr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Comes out fine under Firefox on my Dell PC - 19" LCD
> monitor @ 1280 x 1024
> pixels.
>
> Maris
>
> Brendan MacRae wrot
Comes out fine under Firefox on my Dell PC - 19" LCD monitor @ 1280 x 1024
pixels.
Maris
Brendan MacRae wrote:
> You're right, Boris.
>
> The index page is goofy on Firefox. Mine shifts the
> index view all the way to right. The detail view is
> fine.
>
> I'll see if I can mess with it.
>
> Than
Thanks, Marnie.
I've reduced the exif info to just the basics.
The thumbnails would be smaller with more images. So,
I thought since I had the room I'm make them a bit
bigger. With more files, I'll reduce their size or
maybe just find a standard size that works.
-Brendan
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wr
You're right, Boris.
The index page is goofy on Firefox. Mine shifts the
index view all the way to right. The detail view is
fine.
I'll see if I can mess with it.
Thanks again for the heads-up.
-Brendan
--- Brendan MacRae <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Thanks, Boris.
>
> I'll take a look as I r
I have four batteries, and no two are the same brand. They all seem
to last about the same, although it's hard to tell because I use them
two at a time. I doubt that there's any real difference between
brands. The cheapest ones from B&H or a similar vendor should be just
fine.
Paul
On Apr 1
Thanks, Boris.
I'll take a look as I run Firefox on my Mac sometimes.
-Brendan
--- Boris Liberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Brendan, on my computer (Windoze) running Firefox
> 2.0 the index page
> came out wider than 1680 pixels of my screen. I
> think this is something
> you might want to
Thanks for the report.
When you get back into your time machine and go home, think of us in
the present who are still waiting... ;-)
Godfrey
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
It's probably the same battery as the Impact and other names. Should
be fine. I've used other CTA branded batteries with no problems in
other cameras.
G
On Apr 15, 2007, at 8:34 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
> Godfrey, I noticed you mentioned the CTA charger. I bought today a CTA
> branded spare
your need still requires the same
RAW & Process/ or careful jpeg shoot process
for best results. Both of which are very time
consuming. Im not saying scanning film
would be easier, but what I was talking
about, which was nice, high quality prints,
is much easier from a labor standpoint to shoot fil
Very nice pix, but I really dislike the timed slide
show presentation.
Rick
--- Jens Bladt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/sets/72157600077914723/show/
> I konda like this. Do you?
> Regards
> Jens Bladt
>
> http://www.jensbladt.dk
>
> --
> No virus found in thi
The list giveth. The list taketh away.
So ends the lesson for today.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Well, I had had the DA 50-200 ordered at Adorama, but it was debatable when
> it would come. It showed in stock when I actually ordered it, but it got out
> of stock right after I ordered it.
>
>
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
> My original post on the topic was that with
> digital photography you cant get as good
> a results as you can with film with minimum
> effort like you can with film.
That's probably true if my eventual target is a printed photo. If my
target is a digital presentation, tho
1 - 100 of 149 matches
Mail list logo
