LOL! Talk about costs of production !
G
On Jun 16, 2008, at 8:08 PM, David Savage wrote:
True.
I was thinking more along the lines of whiskey.
Cheers,
Dave
At 10:50 AM 17/06/2008, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
We didn't *really* think you were feeding her beer... ]'-)
Godfrey
On Jun
Hi!
Is there a good resource where I can read about the way the modern
Pentax DSLRs (K10D?!) are constructed? I mean - which sensors are
situated where, this kind of stuff???
Notably, the AF sensors - they are placed after the focusing screen or
before it. I mean along the light path naturally.
Steve Desjardins asked:
Someone mentioned that some of the PS cameras are starting to fill the
niche rangefinders used to have. I'm not agreeing with this, but what is
the highest quality PS you can get?
A quick trawl of DPR's database got me these:
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/06/16 Mon PM 09:33:51 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT Motivation
Dave, hit the cycle training hard until next June and then you and Scott
Loveless can bring your bikes down to GFM. I'll race Frank and you
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/06/16 Mon PM 11:55:33 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Uh oh
- Original Message -
From: mike wilson
Subject: Re: Uh oh
How else _can_ you learn? Wobbly crap is fine for those with experience
and
From: Toine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/06/16 Mon PM 07:47:41 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: [OT] What the World Eats
The exhibition was on display in my city. If you see them next to each
other the difference in food consumption is crazy.
The difference
you might have chosen less cryptic words to tell me I forgot the URL... :-)
http://picasaweb.google.com/axelpics/General/photo#5212592888243411266
It looks very white on my screen...
Maybe slow down a little.
No rain, just clouds :-)
Quick grab out of the window when I noticed
the
My monolights pack up nicely into cases for travel. I've set them up
on location several times. They offer a lot more range and power than
on-camera flashes. But it would be nice to have the little guys
available for limited use.
Paul
On Jun 16, 2008, at 11:13 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
With
The deal killer is the shutter delay. In truth, I think the Leica is
a clone of the Panasonic.
Paul
On Jun 17, 2008, at 3:43 AM, Anthony Farr wrote:
Steve Desjardins asked:
Someone mentioned that some of the PS cameras are starting to
fill the
niche rangefinders used to have. I'm not
Tough contrast range.
I'm playing around with HDR and tone compression tools these days, and
I think it would have been possible to render detail in both the
highlights and the deep shadows in a scene like this without
compromising the feeling of extreme contrast. -If you had bracketed
exposures
It's the sort of tool you don't bring unless you're sure to need it.
Need seems assured now. :-)
Jostein
2008/6/16 Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 16/6/08, AlunFoto, discombobulated, unleashed:
Guess I'll have to bring the 600 in August then. :-)
I thought you would anyway! Since we're driving,
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 4:09 AM, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/06/16 Mon PM 09:33:51 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT Motivation
Dave, hit the cycle training hard until next June and then you and Scott
I don't know, But somthing tells me that there is some potential here
in unballansing the motif. The idea in the back of my head is that
cutting left and top wound make the girl dominate the frame more.
Could be a good thing, or could ruin the picture :-)
MaritimTim
2008/6/17 Bruce Walker [EMAIL
I was killing a few minutes Monday, waiting to drive to the bus, when
i had a look at my front garden. Lots of
dew and droplets on the flowers and leaves from the previous nights t storm
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=7419672
A dying tulip head.
D200, Tamron 90 macro some LR exposure
Beer, or apple juice aside, that seems to do a good job for that kind of fill.
One of the people that took that basic portrait class last year(and a
K10D owner)had one of these flash units on his Sigma 500.
I always thought his shots were under exposed. I guess it was not set
up properly then,
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 9:55 PM, George Sinos [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A lot of my equine sales come from people that have there own Canon
and Nikon Dslr's, but to their own admission, take poor photos with
them.
I have had a number of conversations with parents and the cameras they
have. First
what kind of advice are you looking for?
I used to live in Berlin for two years in the eighties, so i know at
least East Berlin somewhat. What kind of motif are you looking for,
people, architecture, landscapes?
12 days from now I plan to be in Berlin, wandering and
shooting.
I would
That is a well lite photo Paul
Good one
Dave
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 10:27 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's a pic of Grace after a hard day at the park. I shot this with the
lightsphere on the 540 flash. The exposure is close to the ambient light
value. I believe it was f3.2 @ 1/100th.
I think with all Pentax AF SLRS, the mirror is semi-translucent, and
with a second mirror behind it to divert light to AF sensors located
in the mirror house floor.
I may have misunderstood this completely, though... :-)
Jostein
2008/6/17 Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi!
Is there a good
Not quite OT - the latest issue of Rangefinder Magazine includes an
article on the photographer/writer team that created the photos and
subsequent book.
-p
mike wilson wrote:
From: Toine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/06/16 Mon PM 07:47:41 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Scott Loveless wrote:
Finally. Sorry I'm so late on this one. I'll try to make it up to all
of you. See it here: http://pug.komkon.org/
July's theme is Sports and Action. Submit photos here:
http://pdmlpug.org/?p=35
Just a reminder, max file size is 256k.
--
Scott Loveless
The fish eye look is very dramatic. Composition well chosen, Axel.
Thanks for post.
Jack
--- On Tue, 6/17/08, Axel Belinfante [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Axel Belinfante [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO: cloud contrast (now with URL!)
To: pdml@pdml.net
Date: Tuesday, June 17, 2008, 2:31
Like it, Dave. Tiny nit..maybe a little less stem and more room to the left.(?)
Jack
--- On Tue, 6/17/08, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Peso Tulip dew
To: Pentax Discuss pdml@pdml.net, Barb Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Yvette Sheppard
Interesting to see the buildings hanging over you with the fisheye.
Regards, Bob S.
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 4:31 AM, Axel Belinfante
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
you might have chosen less cryptic words to tell me I forgot the URL... :-)
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 10:27 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's a pic of Grace after a hard day at the park. I shot this with the
lightsphere on the 540 flash. The exposure is close to the ambient light
value. I believe it was f3.2 @ 1/100th. The ambient light is largely window
light.
Bach off, mate.
Jostein
2008/6/16 Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 16/6/08, Henk Terhell, discombobulated, unleashed:
Cotty schreef:
On 16/6/08, Henk Terhell, discombobulated, unleashed:
Walking in the centre of The Hague yesterday, I heard this Chopin Waltz
coming along, obviously part of a
Dave,
That's interesting, but it's not dying.
It's the tulip seed pod growing after the bloom.
Cut those of for more energy into the bulb instead of reproduction.
Regards, Bob S.
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 6:06 AM, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was killing a few minutes Monday, waiting
I'll see what I can do tomorrow.
2008/6/15 Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Love it! I'd like to see a larger image so as to marvel at its clarity
contrast, please. ;)
Jack
--- On Sun, 6/15/08, AlunFoto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: AlunFoto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO - Another
2008/6/15 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Another nice shot. Looks like you've got a handle on the big glass.
Paul
It came with a handle, on the tripod mount... :-)
Thanks Paul.
--
http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/
http://alunfoto.blogspot.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Notice the white spot on the RH head, I think that one is beginning to
shed its spring colour.
Jostein
2008/6/15 mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Colours vary from a dark ruddy brown to charcoal grey. White in winter.
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/06/15 Sun PM 06:00:32 GMT
You can loosen up the contrast a little this way...
Create a new layer and change its mode to Screen to create a lighter
layer, then use a layer mask to let the sky/clouds and the street bleed
through from the darker layer. I used 100% mask on the sky and about
25% on the street and building
The terns are even more mobile, acrobatic and fascinating than these.
Besides, they're less noisy. Terns are definately preferable to
black-headed gulls. :-)
2008/6/15 Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Easy to confuse at first glance with a common tern, but the terns are
beautiful and fascinating to
2008/6/16 Henk Terhell [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thanks for showing. Beautiful birds and symmetry.
You may keep this lens :)
Thanks Henk. :-)
--
http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/
http://alunfoto.blogspot.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
The focusing sensors are placed behind the mirror, at least that's where
they used to be, and I doubt that they've changed the location
recently. Boz's site has a diagram on this page;
http://kmp.bdimitrov.de/technology/AF/index.html
Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
Is there a good resource where
2008/6/16 Ken Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Nice shot but I take issue with your blog ;+]
The only times I'm reminded of its physical size are when taking the eye
away from the viewfinder, and when the AF occasionally start hunting.
I'm reminded of the physical size every time I need to move
hmmm...
I think my fear of heights will be particularly pronounced just then :-)
Jostein
2008/6/16 Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I am a bit ashamed, but I do envy you this lens. It deliverers.
evil mode
Why don't you and I take a lonely trip to the cliffs at Runde and test
it at in low
Humble thanks, m'lady! :-)
Jostein
2008/6/16 ann sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Lovely photo -- and I went and looked at your accepted stuff on the
Pentax gallery site as well...
which I had not gone to before --
woo woo -- just stunning stuff -
but I ain't surprised
best,
ann
AlunFoto
Fernando, Dave B., Toine, Christine...
And the rest of you, too!
Thanks for looking and commenting.
Best,
Jostein
2008/6/16 Fernando [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
What he said
On 6/16/08, Toine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Great capture and a great lens.
On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 6:53 PM, AlunFoto [EMAIL
- Original Message -
From: David J Brooks
Subject: Re: Uh oh
I try and explain they need faster shutter speeds etc to get the
action forzen. They don't want to listen, or care, and carry on in
Auto mode.
It happens a lot BTW.
This is what over automation has done to the market.
2008/6/17 Axel Belinfante [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
you might have chosen less cryptic words to tell me I forgot the URL... :-)
Where's the fun in that?
D :-)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the
Cotty, Dave B., Derby, Boris, Jack, Paul, Godfrey, Bruce, and Christine,
Thanks for having a look and taking time to comment on this shot.
It was indeed magic light from that hour at sunset.
We had just left the restaurant after dinner and a little rain,
and this shot was right there with the
I found the Sigma 500 to be consistently inconsistent:-), particularly with the
K10D. Never tried it with the K20D.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Beer, or apple juice aside, that seems to do a good job for that kind of fill.
Glad you like them. Seems like a nice project to finally justify
buying that tripod. ~Wondering how many ND Filters you need to stack
up to do this...~
On 6/17/08, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Those are very cool in a dark somewhat macabre way.
Thanks for posting them.
Cheers,
Nicely done. An interesting shot.
Paul
--- On Tue, 6/17/08, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Peso Tulip dew
To: Pentax Discuss pdml@pdml.net, Barb Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Yvette Sheppard [EMAIL PROTECTED], Sarah Bedford-James
Thanks Frank, Dave and anyone else I might have missed.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 10:27 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's a pic of Grace after a hard day at the park. I shot this with the
Jostien,
Wonderful shot of the pair. Looks like a posed set-up.
I noticed the white spot as well and thought he just didn't spend
enough time in make-up! ;-)
Regards, Bob S.
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 8:11 AM, AlunFoto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Notice the white spot on the RH head, I think that
Fernando,
We need to send those folks some bright paints and Mexican designers
to get some color into their lives! I know it's black white, but
it's grim...
Regards, Bob S.
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 8:37 AM, Fernando [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Glad you like them. Seems like a nice project to
ND filters would do it.
You can also use the in camera multiple exposure function to achieve a
similar result.
Cheers,
Dave
2008/6/17 Fernando [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Glad you like them. Seems like a nice project to finally justify
buying that tripod. ~Wondering how many ND Filters you need to
I'm in a grim mood lately...
I'll try to find an urban sombrero, that might help
:-)
On 6/17/08, Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Fernando,
We need to send those folks some bright paints and Mexican designers
to get some color into their lives! I know it's black white, but
it's
Axel,
I love playing with the fisheye!
On this shot, one might move a bit closer (unless that
involves stepping off the balcony!) or narrowing the
field of view a bit--the street light and yellow
something on the left are a bit distracting.
Rick
--- Axel Belinfante [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
What, and be transparent?
Axel Belinfante wrote:
you might have chosen less cryptic words to tell me I forgot the URL... :-)
http://picasaweb.google.com/axelpics/General/photo#5212592888243411266
It looks very white on my screen...
Maybe slow down a little.
No
I know you were trying to accentuate the clouds, but you could lighten
up the foreground a bit.
Axel Belinfante wrote:
you might have chosen less cryptic words to tell me I forgot the URL... :-)
http://picasaweb.google.com/axelpics/General/photo#5212592888243411266
It looks very white
Lite? I don't see any Miller®
David J Brooks wrote:
That is a well lite photo Paul
Good one
Dave
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 10:27 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's a pic of Grace after a hard day at the park. I shot this with the
lightsphere on the 540 flash. The exposure is close
thanks for showing this!
no need to remove it sooner than you wish.
i'v still got a lot -- ok, I'll be honest, all :-)
to learn regarding digital darkrooming.
only darkroom skills I vaguely recall are non-digital,
but what you described sounds a bit like the trick
of giving some parts more/less
Gang,
I promised to look into how various software support the existing
generations of *.PEF files.
Here are the raw file converters, Interestingly, not all support all
generations. The K20D has not penetrated as well as the K10D yet.
Hopefully the situation will improve over summer.
involves stepping out of the window.
I'm not sure what would be best.
I have been thinking about cropping a bit, but...
I think I'd hate to loose the left part, with the
building with red roof.
Somehow making the yellow sun sreens less bright
might be an improvement.
same way, cropping enough to
what you see are the edge of the roof (right)
and edge of the revolving window (left).
both indeed do hang over a bit.
thanks for looking,
Axel.
Interesting to see the buildings hanging over you with the fisheye.
Regards, Bob S.
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 4:31 AM, Axel Belinfante
[EMAIL
well, I'm still unsure about my choice of monitor and
its (lack of) calibration, so my first thought was actually
that this time I was seeing colours really different :-)
but I should have known better, having followed (more or less)
this group for about a year now :-)
by the way, joining was
The Leica DLux-3 is sibling to the Panasonic LX2. They share all the
hardware, other than the external case styling, but the image
processing firmware and JPEG settings are somewhat different
reflecting the two different companies' notions of what is best for
their clientele. They are both
Arggg. I should have known that.
Dave
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 9:08 AM, Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dave,
That's interesting, but it's not dying.
It's the tulip seed pod growing after the bloom.
Cut those of for more energy into the bulb instead of reproduction.
Regards, Bob S.
Thanks Paul.
It looks like rain here again. Maybe some more pictures later.:-0
Dave
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 9:37 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nicely done. An interesting shot.
Paul
--- On Tue, 6/17/08, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 7:06 AM, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was killing a few minutes Monday, waiting to drive to the bus, when
i had a look at my front garden. Lots of
dew and droplets on the flowers and leaves from the previous nights t storm
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 9:28 AM, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: David J Brooks
Subject: Re: Uh oh
I try and explain they need faster shutter speeds etc to get the
action forzen. They don't want to listen, or care, and carry on in
Auto mode.
It
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 10:02 AM, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lite? I don't see any Miller(R)
You would if you were at my desk
Dave
David J Brooks wrote:
That is a well lite photo Paul
Good one
Dave
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 10:27 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's a pic
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 9:36 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I found the Sigma 500 to be consistently inconsistent:-), particularly with
the K10D. Never tried it with the K20D.
Paul
To be honest, i'm not sure if he had done the up grade at that time or
not. However i like my 360 i bought last
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 11:16 AM, frank theriault
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 7:06 AM, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was killing a few minutes Monday, waiting to drive to the bus, when
i had a look at my front garden. Lots of
dew and droplets on the flowers and
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 8:54 AM, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Like it, Dave. Tiny nit..maybe a little less stem and more room to the
left.(?)
Jack
Thanks Jack.
I did crop it a bit but took some of the left. I ;ll see what i can do.
Dave
--- On Tue, 6/17/08, David J Brooks [EMAIL
It would be nice, for those of us that do not want to or cannot
afford, the upgrades, to have Adobe allow the newer raw files to work
with CS and or CS2.
I know they won't, but it would be nice.
Dave
On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 10:17 AM, AlunFoto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gang,
I promised to look
Jostein -
Minor info FWIW - RawShooter v1.2 does seem to support DNG
-p
AlunFoto wrote:
Gang,
I promised to look into how various software support the existing
generations of *.PEF files.
Here are the raw file converters, Interestingly, not all support all
generations. The K20D has not
2008/6/17 Paul Sorenson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Jostein -
Minor info FWIW - RawShooter v1.2 does seem to support DNG
But not .pef which is the point of the survey no?
Dave
AlunFoto wrote:
Gang,
I promised to look into how various software support the existing
generations of *.PEF files.
Adobe? Nice? Adobe's become to Microsoft of imaging software, without
the pleasant personality...
David J Brooks wrote:
It would be nice, for those of us that do not want to or cannot
afford, the upgrades, to have Adobe allow the newer raw files to work
with CS and or CS2.
I know they
Yup - but DNG was included in the spreadsheet and shown as not being
supported by RawShooter, so why not mention it?
-p
David Savage wrote:
2008/6/17 Paul Sorenson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Jostein -
Minor info FWIW - RawShooter v1.2 does seem to support DNG
But not .pef which is the point of
Sorry, you're right.
My brain is mush. Time for bed.
Later,
Dave
2008/6/18 Paul Sorenson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Yup - but DNG was included in the spreadsheet and shown as not being
supported by RawShooter, so why not mention it?
-p
David Savage wrote:
2008/6/17 Paul Sorenson [EMAIL
AlunFoto wrote:
Here are the raw file converters, Interestingly, not all support all
generations.
http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=pecuhsM9jAKPaNaarWcEZBg
Thanks, Jostein!
Minor point: you don't have a column to distinguish between the K100D
and the newer K100D Super. Their .PEF
Ralf: I like both very much. More great work here. Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: Ralf R. Radermacher [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax Mailingliste pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Monday, June 16, 2008 6:56 PM
Subject: PESO: More industrial kitsch
A classical situation - at least
I began when I was 14 with an SP500. I turned the focus ring until it
was clear and I turned the aperture ring until the needle centered.
Focusing was better and slower than with AF because I took the time to
do it and kept at it until the thing I wanted in focus was clear.
Exposure, OTOH, was
Really interesting. One thing we Americans obviously share with our
British cousins is the lack of fresh produce. ;-)
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL
It's interesting as a glimpse into the lives of a handful of families. It's
obviously not a valid comparison, given the size of the sample.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Steve Desjardins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Really interesting. One thing we Americans obviously
I got to play with a Canon Powershot G9 last weekend. Shutter
delay wasn't an issue. Admittedly most of the time I wouldn't
have noticed it, anyway - I was half-pressing the shutter to
see which AF point it was choosing (a habit I've got into with
my DSLRs; although I generally have the AF set
It's the same attitude as not letting a learner driver have
their first go on the road in a high-powered rear-engined car
in the wet at rush hour.
Spoilsport
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,
Some vintage-camera shots and generally enjoyable remarks. By the
way, this is a remarkable blog, Alex is one of my favorite living
photographers.
http://alexwaterhousehayward.com/blog/2008/06/my-first-love-aston-martins-with-ford.html
-T
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
From Boston.com, a very nice picture-bloggy-sorta-thing:
http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/
-T
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Very interesting, thanks.
I'm somewhat intrigued by the photo of people releasing 400,000
plastic balls into a reservoir (ergo man-made) to prevent the sunlight
from triggering a carcinogenic chemical reaction with the chlorine and
bromide in the water. I'm not a chemist or a water-scientist in
Lots of fun. Thanks for sharing.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Tim Bray [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Some vintage-camera shots and generally enjoyable remarks. By the
way, this is a remarkable blog, Alex is one of my favorite living
photographers.
It was 15 years ago. It's the sex tourist capital of the Baltic, now. Much
brighter.
From: Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/06/17 Tue PM 01:47:04 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: City of Shadows
Fernando,
We need to send those folks some bright
I haven't decided about bringing along my trusty ol 500/4,5 or not. My
legs sais no, my lust for close framing sais yes. On second thoughts.
There will probably be two FA* 600/4 at the cliffs that weekend. I
think I'll simply be a free loader ;-)
MaritimTim
2008/6/17 AlunFoto [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I forgot one more thing. I think the picture you showed me the other
night deserves PESO status. I comand you to post it :-)
MaritimTim
2008/6/17 AlunFoto [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2008/6/16 Ken Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Nice shot but I take issue with your blog ;+]
The only times I'm reminded of
It's the sort of tool you don't bring unless you're sure to need it.
And when you don't take, it an opportunity will present itself for its use.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: AlunFoto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Uh oh
It's the sort of
Could be a good thing, or could ruin the picture :-)
I don't see how that would ruin the picture in that the Picture is the
graduated steps and the way the figure becomes the next step.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: Tim Øsleby [EMAIL
Good try, but I think it needs more room to the edge on the left the
removal of the gold thingee in the URH corner.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax Discuss pdml@pdml.net; Barb Brooks
[EMAIL
I finally felt well enough to use the borrowed extension ladder
to get up on the roof and look at what the roofers had done.
Then I got sufficiently distracted shooting birds and helicopters
that I forgot to take pictures of where the roof is sagging.
Oops.
More stuff I've learned about shooting
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: AlunFoto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Doppler effect of a Chopin Waltz
2008/6/16 Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 16/6/08, Henk Terhell, discombobulated, unleashed:
Cotty schreef:
On 16/6/08, Henk Terhell,
I guess the weight reminder will hit me full force when meeting up
with Tim at the end of the month for some serious seabird photograpy
For me it really hit home in Denali, while tracking a herd of Caribou across
the tundra for a few miles - doubt I'll ever do that again. I kept it set up
on
On 17/6/08, AlunFoto, discombobulated, unleashed:
It's the sort of tool you don't bring unless you're sure to need it.
Need seems assured now. :-)
LOL
I would love to see it.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
while tracking a herd of Caribou across the tundra
Mark!
I wish I could say that (and be telling the truth).
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ken Waller
Sent: 17 June 2008 21:33
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: PESO
On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 12:53 PM, AlunFoto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://alunfoto.blogspot.com/2008/06/600mm-early-attempts.html
A link to my blog this time, hope you don't mind.
Yesterday I felt more comfortable with the 600mm, but it takes some
time to get used to.
I also tried out
What I don't get is the disapproving looks from the couple on the
right. In fact, they may make the pic (such as it is) more than the
two main subjects:
http://tinyurl.com/4qj8sn
http://bp2.blogger.com/_EaTEtfR4WJw/SFZZrVFlkuI/CTE/aWUG8Owl05w/s1600-h/jun_16_08+004.jpg
Hope you enjoy.
The look of the woman makes it - priceless.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO - Share and Share Alike
What I don't get is the disapproving looks from the couple on the
right. In fact, they may
2008/6/17 Ken Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I guess the weight reminder will hit me full force when meeting up
with Tim at the end of the month for some serious seabird photograpy
I guess the weight reminder will hit me full force when meeting up
with Tim at the end of the month for some serious
On Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:54:19 +0100, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Very interesting, thanks.
I'm somewhat intrigued by the photo of people releasing 400,000
plastic balls into a reservoir (ergo man-made) to prevent the sunlight
from triggering a carcinogenic chemical reaction with the
1 - 100 of 147 matches
Mail list logo
