2010/2/24 Miserere miser...@gmail.com:
Jostein,
Does the rear element of that 35mm f/3.5 have digital coating?
You mean fingerprints? :-)
Seriously though, I have no idea. Please tell me what this thing is
you're asking about, and why it is the single factor discerning
digital from
Yes, but it all depends - I had my 1973 Ford Escort stolen
twice, once when it was about eight years old and really
crappy to look at, then again about two years later when it
had been fixed up in a rather lush British Racing Green. Got
it back both times, although the first time the
John Coyle wrote:
What a waste of time to produce something which won't even work very well.
One wonders why Samsung didn't make the NX compatible with the K-mount in
the first place.
Because an adapter is in order due to different register distance, whichever
the mount you use.
Given
Jack Davis jdavi...@yahoo.com wrote:
http://www.imaging-resource.com/NEWS/1266899714.html
A perfect souffle interview. I think the most interesting thing he says is
that you can buy the KX in 100 colours in Japan.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Feb 24, 2010, at 12:14 AM, AlunFoto wrote:
2010/2/24 Miserere miser...@gmail.com:
Jostein,
Does the rear element of that 35mm f/3.5 have digital coating?
You mean fingerprints? :-)
Seriously though, I have no idea. Please tell me what this thing is
you're asking about, and why it is
2010/2/24 Tom C caka...@gmail.com:
Dichotomy again. What Pentax does must be correct, while what they do
not do is unnecessary, unneeded, or unwanted.
Sorry, Tom, this is not to point at you personally, but your statement
is exactly why I choose to call the 135 factor sensors Fool's Format
2010/2/24 Larry Colen l...@red4est.com:
The differences that I've heard are that film has the different colors on
different layers, where with digital you need all colors to focus in the
same plane. I've also heard that digital sensors are more sensitive to the
angle of incidence of the light
Balmy night last night. T-shirt and flippy skirt weather, it was. So I
took my Epson for a walk.
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/10/10_02/10_02_kingst/index.htm
--
der...@iinet.net.au
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
frank theriault wrote:
While doing my little magazine shoot on Saturday, one of the people we
bumped into and interviewed was a friend, Vanessa. As you can see,
she's cute as a button. This photo won't be used in the article
(we'll be using photos of folks and their bikes), but I thought I'd
On Feb 24, 2010, at 1:09 PM, Charles Robinson wrote:
There was a warehouse wall across from a brewery I was visiting in Houston.
The regular patterns of the corrugated metal caught my eye. 20 image
attempts later:
I think that most photographers would agree that there maybe a dozen
must have features on a camera. I know that I almost never touch
most of the bells and whistles on my K20. The problem that designers
face is that for every person, those dozen features are different.
The problem that
On Feb 24, 2010, at 2:39 AM, frank theriault wrote:
This guy stops in front of me with this big smile
on his face and wouldn't continue until I took his pic. So I did. I
liked the result ('cause I'm a sucker for smiles):
http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.com/2010/02/drive-by-smiles.html
frank theriault wrote:
As I was shooting Vanessa in Kensington Market (see yesterday's PESO)
I stepped back into the street so I could get her and her bike in a
few shots. A car approaches (the streets in Kensington are very
narrow and usually over-run by pedestrians, so cars have to take it
On Feb 24, 2010, at 3:30 AM, William Robb wrote:
I vaguely follow Canadian football, but I am smart enough to realize that in
the grand scheme of things, sports in general and televised sports in
particular are at best a diversion for
people who have no lives to speak of.
I only agree with
Bruce Dayton wrote:
Another from the same game - no crops, no processing
Pentax K-x, DA* 50-135/2.8 @ 103mm
ISO 3200, 1/400 sec @ f/4.0, Handheld
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/imgp0529.htm
Just saw these two. So clean and sharp. She floats
What's the psych with the warpaint?
D
--
Bong Manayon wrote:
A concept glamor portrait...
http://bongmanayon.posterous.com/
On of the 'routine' projects this year that I am finally proud of (not
someone else's party...). Shot with film...see the story in the blog.
Innocently I ask, what was the quality of the film shot over
On Feb 24, 2010, at 3:58 AM, Cotty wrote:
Hmm - in a way the corporate geeks are worse - not only do they want
value for money, they want it to look like they are getting all the
icing on the cake. I am shooting web video productions and I could
easily do it on my small solid-state HD camera.
Derby Chang wrote:
Bong Manayon wrote:
A concept glamor portrait...
http://bongmanayon.posterous.com/
On of the 'routine' projects this year that I am finally proud of (not
someone else's party...). Shot with film...see the story in the blog.
Innocently I ask, what was the quality of
2010/2/24 John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com:
Since the one I got ain't gettin' as much use as I think it should, why
would I want another one?
it opens up new alleys of creativity plus you can race yourself... I'd
take one ]:)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
2010/2/24 Tom C caka...@gmail.com:
I sense a gender of our PDML has stopped following this thread.
must be penis envy =P
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
like your style derby =)
2010/2/24 Derby Chang der...@iinet.net.au:
Balmy night last night. T-shirt and flippy skirt weather, it was. So I took
my Epson for a walk.
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/10/10_02/10_02_kingst/index.htm
--
der...@iinet.net.au
G'day All,
One from my trip to South Australia late last year:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/disavage/4384042231/
Direct link (~160kb)
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4071/4384042231_c7a8b053ff_o.jpg
D700, AF-S 24-70mm f2.8 @ 35mm, 1/15 @ f5.6, ISO 400
Enjoy.
Cheers,
Dave
--
PDML
On 24/2/10, David Savage, discombobulated, unleashed:
G'day All,
One from my trip to South Australia late last year:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/disavage/4384042231/
Direct link (~160kb)
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4071/4384042231_c7a8b053ff_o.jpg
D700, AF-S 24-70mm f2.8 @ 35mm, 1/15 @
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 12:15:57AM -0500, Tom C scripsit:
I almost never use the camera on my cell phone, granted it's about 3
years old.
The camera on mine scarcely deserves the name, *but* in terms of money
and manufacturing effort, it's cell phone cameras and a relatively small
space marked
On 24 February 2010 20:34, Cotty cotty...@mac.com wrote:
On 24/2/10, David Savage, discombobulated, unleashed:
G'day All,
One from my trip to South Australia late last year:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/disavage/4384042231/
Direct link (~160kb)
Thanks, Ann!
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
--- On Tue, 2/23/10, ann sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
From: ann sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com
Subject: PUG picks
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Date: Tuesday, February 23, 2010, 7:55 PM
I thought I did this already --
I so just read the subject line a PUG pricks.
Carry on.
DS
On 24 February 2010 08:55, ann sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
I thought I did this already --
Frank, Rick and Graydon made my faves...
Frank and Rick because of the spirit of celebration interstingly caught and
Graydon just
Getting close. Bluebells and Brugge are in; the third spot will be either
wellies, airplane, or bicycle-and-flowers.
Gotta do it this evening--choir rehearsal tomorrow, and company coming for the
weekend Friday.
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
--- On Tue, 2/23/10, Mark Roberts
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 4:28 AM, Derby Chang der...@iinet.net.au wrote:
He looks spooky in a David Lynch way. But his passenger is cabbage patch kid
kute
For me the kid makes the pic. Hard to know if he's smiling at me, or
if that's an embarrassed oh god, what the hell's dad doing now sort
of
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 7:55 PM, ann sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
I thought I did this already --
Frank, Rick and Graydon made my faves...
Frank and Rick because of the spirit of celebration interstingly caught and
Graydon just
because he captured so perfectly something beautiful that
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 7:09 PM, Charles Robinson charl...@visi.com wrote:
There was a warehouse wall across from a brewery I was visiting in Houston.
The regular patterns of the corrugated metal caught my eye. 20 image
attempts later:
It was a slow day and I was at my place mid-day so I thought I'd throw
the *istD with Vivitar f3.8 19mm in the backpack. Took a few
on-bike-while-working pix and this was the best of the bunch:
http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.com/2010/02/my-office.html
Hope you enjoy!
cheers,
frank
--
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 4:23 AM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
I think that most photographers would agree that there maybe a dozen must
have features on a camera. snip
I have three must have features:
1) shutter release
2) aperture control
3) focus
The rest is all frippery
cheers,
2010/2/24 Sandy Harris sandyinch...@gmail.com:
Ouch! Does anyone know if the 55 1.4 SDM exhibits the problem?
Or is it only the zooms?
I wouldn't know but it is making me question the wisdom of Pentax in
terms of both design and QC. I can't be apologetic of them much longer
if this goes on. I
2010/2/24 frank theriault knarftheria...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 4:23 AM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
I think that most photographers would agree that there maybe a dozen must
have features on a camera. snip
I have three must have features:
1) shutter release
2) aperture
edit:
2010/2/24 eckinator eckina...@gmail.com:
2010/2/24 frank theriault knarftheria...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 4:23 AM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
I think that most photographers would agree that there maybe a dozen must
have features on a camera. snip
I have three must
- Original Message -
From: eckinator
Subject: Re: SDM once agin
2010/2/24 Sandy Harris sandyinch...@gmail.com:
Ouch! Does anyone know if the 55 1.4 SDM exhibits the problem?
Or is it only the zooms?
I wouldn't know but it is making me question the wisdom of Pentax in
terms of
From: Jack Davis
A bit surprised at the term wildly successful. More women are
buying SLR's, as I read someplace, which is good and a partial
explanations. Don't especially care about the reason, but glad for
whatever success has been realized.
Now, maybe that makes some sense.
Basic black
As someone who is obviously compensating for a small pee pee, I think
I should add my thoughts on the whole FF question.
Yes I own a D700. Yes it's full frame. Did I buy it because it's full
frame. No, not really.
I bought it for several reasons. The main one being it's much
publicised low noise
Given the D700's (ie, the D3) it's price, that shouldn't be
a surprise
Should read:
Given the D700's pedigree (ie, the D3) it's price, that shouldn't be
a surprise
On 24 February 2010 21:58, David Savage ozsav...@gmail.com wrote:
As someone who is obviously compensating for a small pee pee,
From: Larry Colen
On Feb 24, 2010, at 12:14 AM, AlunFoto wrote:
2010/2/24 Miserere miser...@gmail.com:
Jostein,
Does the rear element of that 35mm f/3.5 have digital coating?
You mean fingerprints? :-)
Seriously though, I have no idea. Please tell me what this thing is
you're
Hi Jostein,
It's not a whine or a rant. It's something I've thought for years...
that Pentax should/would have a full frame DSLR. Obviously Pentax
thought so also at one point with the MZ-D, or whatever is was called,
before cancellation due to sensor issues.
As far as I can tell the only
- Original Message -
From: David Savage
Subject: Re: On FF but without intent to start a flame
And this is what any future Pentax FF DSLR has to live up too. It
wouldn't be enough to just put a FF sensor in a camera with the K20D
or K7 level of technology. Pentax would have to,
Meet Kayla.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/kayla1.html
K7, DA*55/1.4 @ f6.3.
Enjoy.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the
I've seen signs down here prohibiting what is termed lane splitting. I gather
this is what they're talking about. 'Pears a bit chancy. 8-(
Very well conceived, Frank.
Next, there will be a law declaring bikes a NO PHOTO ZONE.
;)
Jack
--- On Wed, 2/24/10, frank theriault
LoL..
J
--- On Wed, 2/24/10, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
From: John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com
Subject: Re: Ned Speaks
To: pdml@pdml.net
Date: Wednesday, February 24, 2010, 5:54 AM
From: Jack Davis
A bit surprised at the term wildly successful. More
women are
buying
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 8:30 AM, eckinator eckina...@gmail.com wrote:
I wouldn't know but it is making me question the wisdom of Pentax in
terms of both design and QC.
Cheers
Ecke
Hummm, ~we~ are the quality control.
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
I see keeping both hands on the whee does not apply to bikes.:-)
Good shot Frank. Just enough motion blur on the vehicles to really
have an impact.,
Dave
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 8:24 AM, frank theriault
knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
It was a slow day and I was at my place mid-day so I
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 9:46 AM, William Robb war...@gmail.com wrote:
Meet Kayla.
Hi Kayla.
Dave
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/kayla1.html
K7, DA*55/1.4 @ f6.3.
Enjoy.
William Robb
I thought you gave up models and went back to fruits and vegetables.??
Dave
--
PDML
Humm, hard to pick 1 or 2 but they both work for me.
Dave
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 7:09 PM, Charles Robinson charl...@visi.com wrote:
There was a warehouse wall across from a brewery I was visiting in Houston.
The regular patterns of the corrugated metal caught my eye. 20 image
attempts
I knew that :-)
ann
William Robb wrote:
Meet Kayla.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/kayla1.html
K7, DA*55/1.4 @ f6.3.
Enjoy.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit
Love the lighting and line work in this one.
D700...one day.
Dave
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 7:27 AM, David Savage ozsav...@gmail.com wrote:
G'day All,
One from my trip to South Australia late last year:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/disavage/4384042231/
Direct link (~160kb)
Unfortunately, the common wisdom seems to be that if you can't make the
photo with a Pentax you are a crap photographer who needs to gain more
skills, or that epic fail of apologism, that being the Pentax sits several
hundred dollars under the price of the competition, so the comparison isn't
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 9:23 AM, William Robb war...@gmail.com wrote:
Unfortunately, the common wisdom seems to be that if you can't make the
photo with a Pentax you are a crap photographer who needs to gain more
skills,
I'm a crap photographer who needs to gain more skills.
or that epic
Sentence, sentence, come follow me and step out this door.
BANG!
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 10:21 AM, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
Unfortunately, the common wisdom seems to be that if you can't make the
photo with a Pentax you are a crap photographer who needs to gain more
skills,
- Original Message -
From: Tom C
Subject: Re: On FF but without intent to start a flame
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 9:23 AM, William Robb war...@gmail.com wrote:
Unfortunately, the common wisdom seems to be that if you can't make the
photo with a Pentax you are a crap photographer who
- Original Message -
From: John Sessoms
Subject: Re: On FF but without intent to start a flame
Unfortunately, the common wisdom seems to be that if you can't make the
photo with a Pentax you are a crap photographer who needs to gain more
skills, or that epic fail of apologism, that
On 24 February 2010 22:46, William Robb war...@gmail.com wrote:
Meet Kayla.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/kayla1.html
K7, DA*55/1.4 @ f6.3.
Enjoy.
I did.
I never thought your resolution would stick :-)
I could pick nits about the feet but meh, I can't be bothered.
DS
--
Nice light.
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 2:17 AM, Derby Chang der...@iinet.net.au wrote:
Derby Chang wrote:
Bong Manayon wrote:
A concept glamor portrait...
http://bongmanayon.posterous.com/
On of the 'routine' projects this year that I am finally proud of (not
someone else's party...).
I think everyone jumping at the cheap K7s should consider that maybe
retailers are clearing inventory for a new improved K7 that will
incorporate processor/noise improvements (etc.) seen in the K-x. I
think the limited edition silver black is another way for Pentax
to clear out 1000 of the old
Yes, the K-x high ISO is a noticeable improvement over the K20D -
much less work afterwards - in fact, almost no work at all. Right
now, I am letting my oldest daughter use the K20D (she has an *istD)
while I work with the K-x. The biggest feature I am noticing on the
K20D that I miss right now
Well, hello there . . .:)
- Original Message
From: William Robb war...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Wed, February 24, 2010 6:46:33 AM
Subject: PESO: So Much For Resolutions
Meet
Kayla.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/kayla1.html
K7,
Really nice. Gives a great sense of the perils of biking in traffic...
Christian
-Original Message-
From: frank theriault knarftheria...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net
Sent: Wed, Feb 24, 2010 8:24 am
Subject: PESO - My Office
It was a slow day and I was at my
From: David Savage
On 24 February 2010 22:46, William Robb war...@gmail.com wrote:
Meet Kayla.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/kayla1.html
K7, DA*55/1.4 @ f6.3.
Enjoy.
I did.
I never thought your resolution would stick :-)
I could pick nits about the feet but meh, I
From: Bruce Dayton
Yes, the K-x high ISO is a noticeable improvement over the K20D -
much less work afterwards - in fact, almost no work at all. Right
now, I am letting my oldest daughter use the K20D (she has an *istD)
while I work with the K-x. The biggest feature I am noticing on the
K20D
On Feb 24, 2010, at 5:54 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
From: Jack Davis
A bit surprised at the term wildly successful. More women are
buying SLR's, as I read someplace, which is good and a partial
explanations. Don't especially care about the reason, but glad for
whatever success has been realized.
On Feb 24, 2010, at 7:50 AM, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: John Sessoms
Subject: Re: On FF but without intent to start a flame
Unfortunately, the common wisdom seems to be that if you can't
make the photo with a Pentax you are a crap photographer who needs
to
Yes, that's pretty sad. Is it mechanical or electronics that are
failing? It would seem that the lens would have plenty of travel to
sort things out mechanically. Is it weak electronics?
I get better results with the DA60-250/4 at the short end with
autofocus wide open than with most other
Nice shot.
On 2/24/2010 9:46 AM, William Robb wrote:
Meet Kayla.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/kayla1.html
K7, DA*55/1.4 @ f6.3.
Enjoy.
William Robb
--
{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\deff0\deflang1033{\fonttbl{\f0\fnil\fcharset0 Courier
New;}}
\viewkind4\uc1\pard\f0\fs20 I've just
On Feb 24, 2010, at 7:09 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
Humm, hard to pick 1 or 2 but they both work for me.
I'd be hard pressed to choose myself. I like them both for different
reasons.
Dave
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 7:09 PM, Charles Robinson
charl...@visi.com wrote:
There was a
On 2/24/2010 10:06 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 9:46 AM, William Robbwar...@gmail.com wrote:
Meet Kayla.
Hi Kayla.
Dave
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/kayla1.html
K7, DA*55/1.4 @ f6.3.
Enjoy.
William Robb
I thought you gave up models
Good stuff, Charles!
I like both of the corrugated metal shots, and a number of the others
on the gallery. :-)
G
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 4:09 PM, Charles Robinson charl...@visi.com wrote:
There was a warehouse wall across from a brewery I was visiting in Houston.
The regular patterns of the
- Original Message -
From: Bob Sullivan
Subject: Re: On FF but without intent to start a flame
Yes, that's pretty sad. Is it mechanical or electronics that are
failing? It would seem that the lens would have plenty of travel to
sort things out mechanically. Is it weak
On Feb 24, 2010, at 2:02 PM, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: Bob Sullivan
Subject: Re: On FF but without intent to start a flame
Yes, that's pretty sad. Is it mechanical or electronics that are
failing? It would seem that the lens would have plenty of travel to
Tom,
Your comments strike a chord with me.
I've owned Pentax gear since starting with an ME in 1978.
By 1993, I had purchased several lenses (M's) but only my 3rd body, a PZ-1.
That was 3 bodies in 15+ years and skipping multiple generations.
Then came digital...
I resisted until GFM and then
Bill,
Attractive photo, but the face is so white. Her natural color or hot lighting?
Regards, Bob S.
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 8:46 AM, William Robb war...@gmail.com wrote:
Meet Kayla.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/kayla1.html
K7, DA*55/1.4 @ f6.3.
Enjoy.
William Robb
--
- Original Message -
From: paul stenquist
Subject: Re: On FF but without intent to start a flame
Are you using selective autofocus? I use a single point for focus
exclusively. When shooting model, it goes on the eye of course. I
haven't had any problem getting good focus with
I don't think it's so much a matter of Pentax moving up to full-frame
as full-frame coming down to Pentax's current demographic. Right now
the entry point for full-frame is $2000 (U.S.) but absolutely no one
believes it's going to remain that high.
What's interesting to me is the question of
I agree. Her face is mime white. Lovely finely resolved image in all other
respects.
She does appear to be resting a couple of her right toes on the border of the
frame. ;)
Jack
--- On Wed, 2/24/10, Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Bob Sullivan rf.sulli...@gmail.com
Subject:
Sure looks scary to me!
ann
Jack Davis wrote:
I've seen signs down here prohibiting what is termed lane splitting. I gather
this is what they're talking about. 'Pears a bit chancy. 8-(
Very well conceived, Frank.
Next, there will be a law declaring bikes a NO PHOTO ZONE.
;)
Jack
--- On
I generally use the far outside points to avoid having to reframe excessively.
Works well for me.
Paul
- William Robb war...@gmail.com wrote:
- Original Message -
From: paul stenquist
Subject: Re: On FF but without intent to start a flame
Are you using selective
On Feb 24, 2010, at 2:42 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
I don't think it's so much a matter of Pentax moving up to full-frame
as full-frame coming down to Pentax's current demographic. Right now
the entry point for full-frame is $2000 (U.S.) but absolutely no one
believes it's going to remain that
- Original Message -
From:
Subject: Re: On FF but without intent to start a flame
I generally use the far outside points to avoid having to reframe
excessively. Works well for me.
The two outside points (the bars, not the squares) are almost never in the
right position for me,
Shocking everyone that I actually can take advice, I decided to take
some of the critizism to heart. Below is the revised version. Once
you've got a PSD file of the necessary important layers, tis easy to
make revisions.
paul stenquist wrote:
On Feb 24, 2010, at 2:42 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
I don't think it's so much a matter of Pentax moving up to full-frame
as full-frame coming down to Pentax's current demographic. Right now
the entry point for full-frame is $2000 (U.S.) but absolutely no one
believes
On Feb 24, 2010, at 3:17 PM, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From:
Subject: Re: On FF but without intent to start a flame
I generally use the far outside points to avoid having to reframe
excessively. Works well for me.
The two outside points (the bars, not the
On Feb 24, 2010, at 3:34 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
paul stenquist wrote:
On Feb 24, 2010, at 2:42 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
I don't think it's so much a matter of Pentax moving up to full-frame
as full-frame coming down to Pentax's current demographic. Right now
the entry point for
I wasn't really bothered by the previous background and the dark blob on the
right is somewhat distracting.
I prefer this green. :)
Jack
--- On Wed, 2/24/10, P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
From: P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com
Subject: PESO -- Chartreuse Coupe.n
Well I want something I can't that's well within current technology,
wouldn't cost nearly as much money as a 24x36mm sensor and would make my
legacy lenses more usable. If I got that I wouldn't care all that much
about a 24x36 sensor.
On 2/24/2010 3:35 AM, AlunFoto wrote:
2010/2/24 Tom
Speaking from your own experience, how do you like that lense. Hope its
worth to bid
http://cgi.ebay.de/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemnextitem=190374025449.html
many thanks,
Roman.
K20D, DA 10-17mm, DA* 16-50mm, FA 50mm, DA
what jack said! thank you for time, peter
cheers
ecke
2010/2/24 Jack Davis jdavi...@yahoo.com:
I wasn't really bothered by the previous background and the dark blob on the
right is somewhat distracting.
I prefer this green. :)
Jack
--- On Wed, 2/24/10, P. J. Alling
At 11:13 PM +0200 2/24/10, Roman Melihhov wrote:
Speaking from your own experience, how do you like that lense. Hope its
worth to bid
http://cgi.ebay.de/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemnextitem=190374025449.html
I bought one of them soon after buying my ZX-5N in 2000. At first I
did not care too
G'day All,
One from my trip to South Australia late last year:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/disavage/4384042231/
Direct link (~160kb)
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4071/4384042231_c7a8b053ff_o.jpg
D700, AF-S 24-70mm f2.8 @ 35mm, 1/15 @ f5.6, ISO 400
Enjoy.
Cheers,
Bit
So let's speculate on a future, (relitively near future, say two years
in the future), Pentax SLR lineup.
Professional:
645D: 30~40mp: 2-3 FPS takes 1.1~1.3x Crop on 645 lenses
Price ~$10,000 US
Semi-Professional/Advanced Amateur
K-7 Successor/Upgrade: ~12-20MP
I like the pose 'crispness' of the image, but I'd probably crop it in a
portrait mode to eliminate the blank ULH corner, cutting out somewhere
around her knees (the feet legs don't add IMO). YMMV.
You've done better.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
P. J. Alling wrote:
Shocking everyone that I actually can take advice, I decided to take
some of the critizism to heart. Below is the revised version. Once
you've got a PSD file of the necessary important layers, tis easy to
make revisions.
David J Brooks wrote:
Just enough motion blur on the vehicles to really
have an impact.,
Dave
Hmmm, might want to rethink that phrase under the circumstances, Dave
ann
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 8:24 AM, frank theriault
knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
It was a slow day and I was
On Feb 24, 2010, at 12:26 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
Shocking everyone that I actually can take advice, I decided to take
some of the critizism to heart. Below is the revised version. Once
you've got a PSD file of the necessary important layers, tis easy to
make revisions.
paul stenquist wrote:
Well, I hope you're right. As long as we get better autofocus and a fast
frame rate at the same time.
Wow. I couldn't care less about either of those things!
I look at full-frame as a replacement for my medium format gear and
both my medium format cameras are manual
You can do better.
Highlights are blown (on hew face and shoulder), her toes are cut.
--S
On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 8:27 AM, David Savage ozsav...@gmail.com wrote:
On 24 February 2010 22:46, William Robb war...@gmail.com wrote:
Meet Kayla.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/kayla1.html
1 - 100 of 203 matches
Mail list logo
