I always use Lexar cards and have never had this problem, though I should say I
don’t use the speed level you state below. I’m assuming you formatted both
cards in the K-3. Perhaps they are damaged and you can return them.
Sorry this is not much help.
Christine
> On Jan 8, 2016, at 12:06
Thank you very much, Frank!
On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 11:50 PM, knarf wrote:
> Wow!
>
> I love this. A great portrayal of sexy (without being sexist) , feminine
> strength. Quite enticing, the way the rope coils around her feet.
>
> Terrific!
>
> Cheers,
>
> frank
>
> On
Thanks, Jack.
On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Jack Davis wrote:
> Striking pose, Bruce!
> J
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Jan 5, 2016, at 7:54 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
>>
>> Another b of dancer Rachel Cornejo.
>>
>>
> meet-up with [...] Bob W. and Chris & Karin Mitchell [...] hip, fusion [...]
> fascinating/gruesome medical specimens [...]
we can see what you did there
Thanks for an excellent evening and your great generosity - hopefully I can
join you again tomorrow.
You have a Daunting day ahead of
an interesting and effective image!
I agree that the South Bank was a pleasant area for a stroll. Not the
Left Bank perhaps, but quieter than the other side of the Thames (at
least away from the Eye, the Globe and the Aquarium), with some
interesting restaurants, shops and side streets.
Dan
I would have called it "Inclined" instead of Tilt.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 10:31 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
> http://off-axis.brucemwalker.com/image/136948785582
>
> Molly Fassbender, November, 2015
> Hair and
On 9/1/16, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Then on Sunday we're off to Oxford for the day to meet up with
>Cotty the soon-to-be hat eater.
As Pentax intentions clearly intonate at CES :)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
|| (O) |Web Video Production
>From the Grounds for Sculpture:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18157272=lg
Comments are invited.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,
http://off-axis.brucemwalker.com/image/136948785582
Molly Fassbender, November, 2015
Hair and makeup by Judi Willrich
645Z, DFA645 90mm/2.8 Macro SDM, f:11, 1/125th sec, 100 ISO
Comments welcome.
--
-bmw
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Hi Godfrey:
I like the expression and pen position here—catches him in a thoughtful
moment—crossword, perhaps? BW rendering is very nice as well.
Cheers, Christine
> On Jan 8, 2016, at 12:02 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>
> This morning, while having breakfast at the
That's a "Goddess of Speed" Packard hood ornament
Thanks for the ID Darren
They were quite the pieces of art, weren't they?
- I can see I should have been collecting ornaments.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Darren Addy"
Don't sweat it, Dan. Inclined is fine too, but I feel that Tilt is
more economical, with just one syllable. :)
When I posted this image I decided to just let it to the talking.
I appreciate the look, and that you and PJ both thought about it.
Cheers!
On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 1:32 PM, Daniel J.
A classic image, with nice flow in the lines.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 2:36 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
> That's a "Goddess of Speed" Packard hood ornament. They were quite the
> pieces of art, weren't they?
>
> On
It's a neat photo of a cool ornament, but I was sort of surprised that
it was supposed to depict a woman. She looks more like the Dennis
Hopper character in "Apocalypse Now".
On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 2:29 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> Very nice. Love hood ornaments.
>
> Paul
Yes! There was a time when all you had to do was look at
the long hair and you knew it was a woman.
J
- Original Message -
From: "P.J. Alling"
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Saturday, January 9, 2016 1:05:19 PM
Subject: Re: PESO -
Yes, that's right I said it. Last time they made a change, I wasn't
happy, and used the proffered old style site as long as it was
available. This time they're not offering a "classic" view, and this
time they really need it. The new design looks good but navigation is
just awful. Before
Nice images, Paul. So sharp! Especially like that first one.
I can sympathize on the weight of hand-holding a beast of a lens like
that. How do you feel about monopods? My sister got me a Vanguard VEO
AM-264TR Monopod
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3HUq4DfLl6c
Note the video shows an optional
When I visited it, the linked-to page had several references to
the 645 version of the lens ('P' in the name, and an extra handle
opposite the foot), but there were also two A* K-mount versions.
It's probably not that much heavier than the A* 300/2.8.
On Sat, Jan 09, 2016 at 10:39:08AM +0100,
So I guess that would make it a wheel whoman...
On 1/9/2016 2:36 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
That's a "Goddess of Speed" Packard hood ornament. They were quite the
pieces of art, weren't they?
On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 1:20 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
Captured at a local car show -
More work with the 150-450.I’m very pleased, although I have to admit, it’s a
hunk to hold up in shooting position for a long time. (Birds don’t like
movement. I find I have to keep the lens at my eye and aimed toward the target
to get any decent shots.. After 20 minutes or so, that lens can
All very crisp captures of fine looking birds - especially like the first.
No issue with noise that I can see on the IPad.
-Original Message-
>From: Paul Stenquist Subject: big lens, little birds
>
>More work with the 150-450.I’m very pleased, although I have
Astonishingly sharp for hand-held at those focal lengths. "Steady Stenquist,
the Human Tripod".
Appealing subjects, too.
Rick
On Jan 9, 2016, at 4:50 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> More work with the 150-450.I’m very pleased, although I have to admit, it’s a
> hunk to hold up in shooting
Very nice. Love hood ornaments.
Paul via phone
On Jan 9, 2016, at 2:59 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
>> That's a "Goddess of Speed" Packard hood ornament
>
> Thanks for the ID Darren
>
>> They were quite the pieces of art, weren't they?
>
> - I can see I should have been
Some more fine work, Paul.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 4:50 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> More work with the 150-450.I’m very pleased, although I have to admit, it’s a
> hunk to hold up in shooting position for a
Thanks, Paul. As far as I could tell, they are just Art.
Rick
On Jan 8, 2016, at 10:16 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> Nice! But the underground illumination is puzzling. Are they vents for an
> underground mall or parking garage?
>
> Paul via phone
>
>> On Jan 8, 2016, at 9:40 PM, Rick Womer
Nice subject, I'd like the shot more if you had caught the full reflection.
-Original Message-
>From: "Daniel J. Matyola"
>Subject: PESO: Impression of Sailing
>
>From the Grounds for Sculpture:
>http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18157272=lg
>Comments are
That's a "Goddess of Speed" Packard hood ornament. They were quite the
pieces of art, weren't they?
On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 1:20 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
> Captured at a local car show - K3, SMC F 28-80, 1/1250, f4.5, 400 ISO
> I haven't been able to identify the make of car
It's not the size of the wand. it's the magician that wields it !
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "P.J. Alling"
Subject: Camera Size comparison between K-3 and Nikon D500
Firstly everyone who
I was trying to come up with a decent riff on this and the original
title, (given the subject), and all came up with were too wordy, and had
other drawbacks. So you'll all have to imagine that I wrote something
pity.
On 1/9/2016 10:38 AM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
I would have called it
I believe Bill Robb has one.
Paul via phone
> On Jan 9, 2016, at 12:09 PM, John Francis wrote:
>
>
> When I visited it, the linked-to page had several references to
> the 645 version of the lens ('P' in the name, and an extra handle
> opposite the foot), but there were also
It seems odd (with that size difference) that the Nikon is only 60
grams heavier. That would seem to indicate it is made of lighter
stuff. Does it have a magnesium frame inside like the Pentax?
On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 11:29 AM, P.J. Alling wrote:
> Firstly everyone who
On 2016-01-07 15:35 , Gonz wrote:
don't see this often:
http://www.ebay.com/cln/contours/Pentax-A-600mm/154084719018?_trksid=p2045573.m2687.l4914&_trkparms=reqid%3Dcoll_1452205959377_-1444967556%26collectionid%3D154084719018%26pos%3D4%26pid%3D1
i didn't even know eBay did "collections" — i
Your original post was pithy and quite satisfactory, and the image is
quite attractive and a real attention grabber, not to mention
technically superb.
Perhaps it is my old physics training coming out, but when I saw the
prop, "inclined plane immediately came to mind, and it seemed to me a
Firstly everyone who want's to feel a little smug about something Pentax
can follow the link...
http://camerasize.com/compare/#648,485
Secondly it's just annoying that Camera Size gets Canon and Nikon gear
entered immediately while some other manufactures take forever and some
relatively
On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Ken Waller wrote:
> Nice subject, I'd like the shot more if you had caught the full reflection.
Thanks, Ken; so would I.
I call this "Impression" of sailing because if it is a Seward Johnson
sculpture based on Monet's "Terrace at
Captured at a local car show - K3, SMC F 28-80, 1/1250, f4.5, 400 ISO
I haven't been able to identify the make of car this was on - should have
made note of it when I took the image.
Comments appreciated.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18148899
Kenneth Waller
Paul, as you obviously know, these are sharper shots. Same question; prox how
far away?
Especially like the last which has nice contrast.
J
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Stenquist"
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Saturday, January 9,
Your welcome, Paul.
J
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Stenquist"
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Saturday, January 9, 2016 2:50:56 PM
Subject: Re: big lens, little birds
I haven't seen a shot from that lens that wasn't sharp. But these are
They're called BPIs. Bob's Private Infernos. They are for tourists who don't
follow published advice.
http://www.siliconglen.scot/jokes/tourists.html
> On 09 January 2016 at 22:39 Rick Womer wrote:
>
>
> Thanks, Paul. As far as I could tell, they are just Art.
>
>
I can't afford it either :-). And Jack gets great results with his 50-300. I
only bought this because I'm going to need it for my car shoots with the full
frame camera. (Editors love that pull.) However, the lens has been a pleasant
surprise, so I'm sharing.
Paul via phone
> On Jan 9, 2016,
I haven't seen a shot from that lens that wasn't sharp. But these are minimal
crops. Shot at ten to twenty feet.
Paul via phone
> On Jan 9, 2016, at 5:41 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
>
> Paul, as you obviously know, these are sharper shots. Same question; prox how
> far away?
Was watching an old Carol Burnett the other night. Harvey Korman was carrying
a big F outfit with a zoom. Carol said something about checking out his Pentax.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please
You may have heard about the photographer discovering that one of his
images had been appropriated by ISIS for propaganda purposes. What you
may not have paid attention to is the service that alerted him of the
violation: Pixsy
http://www.pixsy.com/what-to-do-when-isis-steals-your-photo/
I had
I really wish people would quit showing how wonderful expensive lenses
that I can't afford are.
Paul Stenquist wrote:
More work with the 150-450.I’m very pleased, although I have to admit, it’s a
hunk to hold up in shooting position for a long time. (Birds don’t like
movement. I find I have
This is me, on the left:
http://cdn8.openculture.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/1Gustave-Dore-Ferinata-.jpg
B
> On 9 Jan 2016, at 23:48, WILSON MICHAEL wrote:
>
> They're called BPIs. Bob's Private Infernos. They are for tourists who don't
> follow published
I just checked it out. They are in beta now, and you request an invite to join.
On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 7:06 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
> You may have heard about the photographer discovering that one of his
> images had been appropriated by ISIS for propaganda purposes. What
On 1/8/2016 6:53 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I don't get bags. I have one of modest size that will hold a camera,
two lenses, a flash and a laptop. But all my "motherships" are hard,
indestructible Pelican cases.
They're like Goldilocks's eternal quest. That one's too big; this one's
too small.
John wrote:
On 1/8/2016 6:53 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I don't get bags. I have one of modest size that will hold a camera,
two lenses, a flash and a laptop. But all my "motherships" are hard,
indestructible Pelican cases.
They're like Goldilocks's eternal quest. That one's too big; this
Great shot! One can tell it's a Theriault by the bicycle nosing into the frame.
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 10:35 PM, knarf wrote:
> Appreciate your comments, Dave. Thanks!
>
> Cheers,
>
> frank
>
> On December 31, 2015 8:37:17 AM EST, David J
Darren Addy wrote:
Nice images, Paul. So sharp! Especially like that first one.
I can sympathize on the weight of hand-holding a beast of a lens like
that. How do you feel about monopods? My sister got me a Vanguard VEO
AM-264TR Monopod
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3HUq4DfLl6c
Note the
FWIW, it's listed on the Palm Springs Air Museum website as a
"Supermarine Spitfire Mark XIV+"
On 1/9/2016 2:27 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
You are most likely much more correct than I am, Alan!
I really do have to get a book and study up on these aircraft. :-) I
connect to them on a visual
I have a monopod, and I use it while hiking or shooting sports. But my best
opportunity for shooting small birds in my own yard is when I sit on a bench
that is about ten feet from the feeder. I've tried using the monopod while
seated but it was awkward. I
May try again.
Paul via phone
> On
Well, that's definitive... :-)
G
> On Jan 9, 2016, at 6:02 PM, John wrote:
>
> FWIW, it's listed on the Palm Springs Air Museum website as a
> "Supermarine Spitfire Mark XIV+"
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
I thought you were taller.
-Original Message-
>From: Bob W-PDML Subject: Re: PESO - South Bank
>
>This is me, on the left:
>
>http://cdn8.openculture.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/1Gustave-Dore-Ferinata-.jpg
>
>B
>
>
>> On 9 Jan 2016, at 23:48, WILSON MICHAEL
Thanks Dan.
Too bad NHTSA has essentially outlawed them.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Daniel J. Matyola"
Subject: Re: PESO - 'Wheelman"
A classic image, with nice flow in the lines.
Dan Matyola
Thanks Paul.
The issue I've had with hood ornaments is trying to capture them with a non
distracting background.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Stenquist"
Subject: Re: PESO - 'Wheelman"
You might try phoning them if its that important/irritating to you.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "P.J. Alling"
Subject: KEH.com changed their website once again and it sux.
Yes, that's right I
Thanks Darren.
It looks more male like to me.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Darren Addy"
Subject: Re: PESO - 'Wheelman"
It's a neat photo of a cool ornament, but I was sort of surprised that
it
The three feet and 'universal' at the bottom seem superfluous to me.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Larry Colen"
Subject: Re: big lens, little birds
Darren Addy wrote:
Nice images, Paul. So sharp!
What real difference would it make. They paid a designer to update their
site. A complaint from an sometimes customer isn't going to get them to
roll it back.
I just visited again, and a link to the "classic" site has appeared,
that works. So I'll browse using that until it disappears.
All lovely, Paul, send amazingly sharp for handheld. Very impressive!
Cheers, Christine
Sent from my iPad
> On Jan 9, 2016, at 3:50 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
>
> More work with the 150-450.I’m very pleased, although I have to admit, it’s a
> hunk to hold up in
I like this very much, Ken! The angle features nicely the implied motion of
the hood ornament! I might like to see a bit more punch to the rendering, but
that's just personal preference.
Cheers, Christine
Sent from my iPad
> On Jan 9, 2016, at 1:20 PM, Ken Waller
Wow! I think this is lovely. To my eye the lines are soft and elegant and the
light compliments those lines nicely. The body art is nicely featured. For sure
one of your best, Bruce!
Cheers, Christine
Sent from my iPad
> On Jan 9, 2016, at 9:31 AM, Bruce Walker
That's an intriguing looking ship. Very photo worthy. I think I agree with Ken
about the reflection.
Cheers, Christine
Sent from my iPad
> On Jan 9, 2016, at 12:51 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Jan 9, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Ken Waller
We had a fine meet-up with the ever-quotable Bob W. and Chris & Karin
Mitchell last night. Started with some nice Belgian ale at a pub noted
for its, well, nice Belgian ale, then went to dinner at a sort of hip,
fusion restaurant.
Earlier in the day, Lisa and I took in the Wildlife
That baby is from the 645 lineup.
Having once played with it on the 645D, my brief and shallow impression
is that fringing is not an issue on the crop format 645D, and a total
non-starter when coupled to a K-mount camera.
You'd have a harder time living with the sheer weight of the thing.
On 1/9/2016 1:25 AM, Alan C wrote:
I think you mean Supermarine Spitfire, Godfrey! Supercharged 27L V12
Rolls Royce Merlin/Griffon engines. When they changed the exhausts to
point backwards like that, the max velocity increased by 30mph. A
magnificent example.
Yep. That's a very late version
67 matches
Mail list logo