Chihuahuas have us all beat.
Jeffery
On Oct 30, 2010, at 6:14 PM, eckinator wrote:
2010/10/31 Jeffery Smith jsmith...@bellsouth.net:
The dude on the left is hung like a field mouse.
better not challenge a rodent when it comes to package to body weight
ratio... especially not a rat ]=P
I was thinking that its selling point is that it comes in a variety of colors.
Perfect for street work...nobody would dream that a terrorist would be using a
tangerine orange camera lens.
Jeffery
On Oct 31, 2010, at 3:29 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Dario,
It seems to me that this new lens
The Saints game is on in 45 min. I don't expect any visitors. The locals here
tried to have Halloween pushed up to yesterday.
Jeffery
On Oct 31, 2010, at 6:17 PM, Bob W wrote:
A hundred! That's far too many. You need to start giving them cough medicine
and a warning about strangers.
Like computers, it's pretty hard to predict what may be antiquated in a few
years. I haven't seen a floppy drive in years.
I bought my first screw-mount lenses in the late 60's, confident that they
would be around a long time. Then Pentax went to bayonet. I switched to Nikon,
figuring at least
Good effects. Hope the PUG has a 2010 theme that includes torn flesh.
I like the lighting too.
Jeffery
On Nov 1, 2010, at 11:36 AM, Sasha Sobol wrote:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/sobol/5134425479/
comments and critique welcomer as always
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
reading ability. My only
other long telephoto choices are 70-200 2.8 Sigma (10 years old), or a 50-200
Zuiko that I got with my E-1 (but I can use it on my more recent Panasonic.
Jeffery Smith
About to photography Bat Boy, like my reputation depends on it.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML
Pentax seems to be designing lenses for aps-sized sensors to the exclusion of
full-sized sensors. Is aps big enough? I guess so.
Jeffery
On Nov 1, 2010, at 10:04 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
From: Steven Desjardins
Many on this list want Pentax to produce a FF body. These would all
be
.
For the shoot previously mentioned, it was just me, the director, and the
actors on stage. I was not shooting from the audience during performance
time, so I was able to get close and didn't need the longer lens. Cheers,
Christine
- Original Message - From: Jeffery Smith
reach. If you decide to go with K-7,
I suggest a battery grip that may help your steadiness.
On 11/2/2010 5:13 AM, Jeffery Smith wrote:
I have been using faster lenses (77/1.8) for stage productions until
now, but want to get a bit closer with a zoom. Do any of you who have
this lens feel
I have a K-x and used it (for the first time) on the last stage production. I
didn't really have any DARK dark scenes, so it worked okay. I know this show
will have some serious darkness.
Jeffery
On Nov 2, 2010, at 3:46 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Nov 1, 2010, at 8:13 PM, Jeffery Smith wrote
was able to get close and didn't need the longer lens. Cheers,
Christine
- Original Message - From: Jeffery Smith jsmith...@bellsouth.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Monday, November 01, 2010 10:13 PM
Subject: Dare I use a 50-135 f/2.8 + K-7 to shoot
Because it was gratuitously offensive? Because its sole purpose was to offend?
If Robb wanted to call him that, he could have done it offlist, but wanted an
audience to see it. The audience saw it. If this list were entirely composed of
racist, sexist, homophobic members, then that sort have
Steve, this wasn't in response to your post. It was in response to the previous
ones that saw no fault in the ft post. Our two posts went out at about the
same time.
Jeffery
On Nov 2, 2010, at 9:45 AM, Jeffery Smith wrote:
Because it was gratuitously offensive? Because its sole purpose
a hoopla about that.
Seems a double standard exists.
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 10:45 AM, Jeffery Smith jsmith...@bellsouth.net
wrote:
Because it was gratuitously offensive? Because its sole purpose was to
offend? If Robb wanted to call him that, he could have done it offlist, but
wanted
Tomorrow night. I'll have something posted soon after. I'm going to try a PAW
again, to get my butt out of the house and shooting. With digital, there's not
excuse not to have a Picture A Day no less than a Picture A Week.
Jeffery
Jeffery
On Nov 2, 2010, at 10:59 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
Who
Hey! Everyone should pack heat! To protect ourselves against
Oh, never mind.
Jeffery
On Nov 2, 2010, at 11:18 AM, Charles Robinson wrote:
On Nov 2, 2010, at 10:52, Jeffery Smith wrote:
Religion, politics, sexual orientation, and race are not good topics for any
forum, and generally
What?! The rest of the world isn't following our lead?!
Jeffery
On Nov 2, 2010, at 11:51 AM, Tim Øsleby wrote:
Pardon me for pointing at the obviouis.
But this aint USA, it is PDML, a multicultural email list.
So. There is no THE Constitution here, at least not as I am aware off.
For the
Or vigilante group.
Down here in the lower 48, we're far more concerned about the cell phone images
of Brett Favre's pee pee.
Jeffery
On Nov 2, 2010, at 2:39 PM, Tom C wrote:
The one with the closest prison or firing squad takes precedence.
It's called the Law of Proximity.
On Tue,
Hope you the other Yankees got out there and voted, though I did feel like I
was playing pin the tail on the donkey in that voting booth.
Jeffery
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
video about the one I didn't vote for.
http://www.quinnforillinois.com/content/internet-sensation-glee-ad-over-10-hits
This political system is not functioning too well. :-(
Regards, Bob S.
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Jeffery Smith jsmith...@bellsouth.net wrote:
Hope you
Indeed. A couple more quantum leaps in noise control and maybe we can relegate
anti-shake to the history books. Just set the shutter speed at 1/8,000.
Jeffery
On Nov 2, 2010, at 6:42 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
iso 12800. I find it amazing that you even get a usable image, and
that one
Now, that's the third bladder-like object used to describe someone that I have
seen on this forum in the past week.
(1) [pompous] gas bag
(2) whoopee cushion
(3) douche bag
Amy I missing any? g
Jeffery
On Nov 3, 2010, at 7:48 AM, Doug Franklin wrote:
On 2010-11-03 4:40, Larry Colen
Try extraditing someone from Canada to the US. It's a PITA. We had a hell of a
time getting Charles Ng to come home.
Jeffery
On Nov 3, 2010, at 7:58 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Oh, it is then that you and I were looking at it from different angles. I
wasn't worried about Doug, as he was not
was made
(discussion of Pentax photography).
Jeffery
On Nov 3, 2010, at 8:13 AM, Boris Liberman wrote:
On 11/3/2010 3:05 PM, Jeffery Smith wrote:
Try extraditing someone from Canada to the US. It's a PITA. We had a
hell of a time getting Charles Ng to come home.
Jeffery
Well, I really
That ISO performance is the great equalizer. One rarely sees that ISO coupled
with a relatively slow shutter speed and a relatively large aperture. It would
be great for low light shots and shadowed shots in street photography.
Jeffery
On Nov 3, 2010, at 10:36 AM, P N Stenquist wrote:
While
Gaaa! Nuclear, not new-cue-lar!
Oh well, Carter and Bush II couldn't pronounce it either.
Jeffery
On Nov 3, 2010, at 3:39 PM, Cotty wrote:
Wondrous, shocking, frightening, all at once.
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2010/09/14/science/20100914_atom.html
--
Cheers,
Cotty
I finally bought one of the multidrawer tool chests for most of my photo
equipment (such as those used by car mechanics, sold at Sears). The drawers are
fairly shallow, and I can lock the chest inasmuch as I'm in a high crime area.
Jeffery
On Nov 3, 2010, at 6:09 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
Over
I shot a few hundred frames last night at a dress rehearsal. Took a K-7 and K-x
with me, with a 77 1.8 lens and 50-135 2.8 lens. There were MANY people on the
stage so both lenses ended up being a bit too long. But both had some problems
with the dramatic lighting conditions. When I tried using
good noise reduction algorithms and Boris
mentioned liking Topaz.
Regards, Bob S.
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 11:27 AM, Jeffery Smith jsmith...@bellsouth.net
wrote:
I shot a few hundred frames last night at a dress rehearsal. Took a K-7 and
K-x with me, with a 77 1.8 lens and 50-135 2.8 lens
of the
face of nearly everyone in the muscical.
Jeffery
On Nov 4, 2010, at 12:43 PM, Boris Liberman wrote:
On 11/4/2010 7:22 PM, Jeffery Smith wrote:
I'm going to start editing tonight. I'll give the Topaz a look. I really
need a new Mac (mine is 4 years old).
Jeffery
Jeffery,
Topaz
I would have to
walk half a mile wit a huge computer under my arm.
What I NEED to do is scour YouTube for a video on how to increase your memory
in a Mac.
Jeffery
On Nov 4, 2010, at 1:30 PM, Mat Maessen wrote:
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Jeffery Smith jsmith...@bellsouth.net wrote:
My
:
On 3 November 2010 17:22, Jeffery Smith jsmith...@bellsouth.net wrote:
Gaaa! Nuclear, not new-cue-lar!
Oh well, Carter and Bush II couldn't pronounce it either.
Jeffery
As a one-time nuclear physicist (sort of), this is a pet peeve of
mine. We should get one of these T-shirts, Jeff
That works for me, Boris! I'll wait for the K-3(?) to upgrade.
Jefery
On Nov 4, 2010, at 1:27 PM, Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
Just bought Topaz Denoise. Here is an image I processed with it. K-5 is good,
but I am not buying it - there is no need, really.
Have a look:
I think you're right. At least they have flesh colored mikes now. They used
to be darker.
Jeffery
On Nov 4, 2010, at 1:59 PM, Charles Robinson wrote:
On Nov 4, 2010, at 13:19, Jeffery Smith wrote:
My Mac seems to struggle (run very slowly) with Lightroom and Aperture, so
I've sort
supervisor
and she hated nucular. There was a guy in the class who used it and
she spent the whole semester correcting him until he eventually came
around to saying it right.
Seriously, I need to get that T-shirt :-D
--M.
On 4 November 2010 14:40, Jeffery Smith jsmith...@bellsouth.net wrote
chimping
photoshopping
On Nov 4, 2010, at 6:55 PM, Walter Hamler wrote:
The little talk went very well with the group today. I was pleased
with the general level of interest and knowledge from most. I
received one question that I thought was interesting, coming from a
senior; How many new
What is going on with that state? Last month, someone discovered that the Texas
state ballot has (and has had for some time) the Chilean flag rather than the
Texas flag printed on it.
Jeffery
On Nov 5, 2010, at 10:21 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
From: Bran Everseeking
Wikipedia also led the #1 digital encyclopedia (MS Encarta) to fold. There are
some strange people (like a guy at my workplace) who type complete bulls**t
into Wikipedia just to see how long it will be online before someone discovers
the errors.
And unlike the gold standard, Wikipedia has far
Good news: the K-7, 77/1.8, and 50-135 2.8 performed admirably, and I had no
issues with noise. I DON'T have to rush out and get a K-5 (...unless I want to).
Bad news: in the relative darkness, I tried to change modes from Aperture
Priority to Shutter Speed Priority, but accidentally hit the
My only points of reference are Sean Connery and the Fat Bastard.
Jeffery
On Nov 5, 2010, at 6:38 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
Scottish, no matter how much the Scots deny it, is an English dialect. Sting
certianly didn't grow up speaking Gaelic.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
STOP IT! I DON'T NEED A K-5!
Jeffery
On Nov 5, 2010, at 6:53 PM, Ralf R. Radermacher wrote:
It's been awful. Stormy and driving rain. I was soaking wet within
minutes. Still, I had to try it out.
http://the-real-fotoralf.blogspot.com/2010/11/werkendam.html
Taken tonight at the lock
I remember the outrage when Vaughn Meader came out with the LP The First
Family in 1962 in which he imitated President Kennedy's voice. My 7th grade
teachers were infuriated with this lack of respect for the president. What a
difference 50 years makes.
Jeffery
On Nov 5, 2010, at 7:04 PM, P.
looking for.
Accurate metering and focus, well that's icing on the cake.
Jeffery
On Nov 5, 2010, at 7:21 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Nov 5, 2010, at 5:01 PM, Jeffery Smith wrote:
STOP IT! I DON'T NEED A K-5!
Unless you have use of high ISO, autofocus and accurate metering.
I am very
don't use
blogs, Flickr, etc. have any recommendations as to which Mac software might be
best for maintaining a photo-based web site?
Jeffery Smith
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
.
For WYSIWYMG, I can't suggest anything since I avoid those tools like
the plague.
-Adam
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Jeffery Smith jsmith...@bellsouth.net wrote:
I'm no longer a PC guy (computer platform OR politically correct). I used to
maintain my web site with Namo Web Editor
there,
Freeway Express looks most like Name Web Editor, but I don't know a single soul
who uses it, which is scary,
Jeffery
On Nov 7, 2010, at 6:08 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 11:38 AM, Jeffery Smith jsmith...@bellsouth.net
wrote:
I'm no longer a PC guy (computer platform
:
On Nov 7, 2010, at 11:38 AM, Jeffery Smith wrote:
I'm no longer a PC guy (computer platform OR politically correct). I used to
maintain my web site with Namo Web Editor for Windows. I need to get a good
web editor for the Mac to basically reconstruct my site from the ground up.
I am
Hanging on for dear life?
Jeffery
On Nov 8, 2010, at 1:56 PM, DagT wrote:
http://www.thrane.name/page3/page7/files/page7-1000-full.html
K20D, da*50-...@80mm, 1/180s, f/13, ISO200
DagT
http://www.thrane.name/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
This has undoubtedly been asked before, but here goes. Are Samsung
cameras/lenses corresponding to similar Pentax items not sold in the USA? I
recall that Samsung started a line of dSLR cameras and lenses (badged as
Schneider) a year or two ago, but have never heard of or seen them since.
Yeah, these days. I pretty much live that too.
Jeffery
On Nov 12, 2010, at 5:10 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
and I live the old guy eyeing her
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
DId you play with this image in black and white? It looks like it would be a
natural for monochrome.
Jeffery
On Nov 12, 2010, at 6:42 PM, paul stenquist wrote:
Thanks Christine. Took an hour off at the end of the day for photos. Hope to
do more this weekend.
Paul
On Nov 12, 2010, at 7:30
Ditto on Open Office. Haven't had the urge to use MS Office in years.
Jeffery
On Nov 13, 2010, at 7:09 PM, Sandy Harris wrote:
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 1:53 AM, David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com wrote:
Staples has the Office dot mac for sale at $128 for the student and
home version.
Needs
This K-5 is looking like a speed demon. Thanks for all of the examples of what
it can do at high ISO.
Jeffery
On Nov 13, 2010, at 8:36 PM, paul stenquist wrote:
K-5 and DA* 60-250, ISO 3200
I've shot pics in this pizza place before. Always bounced flash off the
ceiling. With the K-5, I
Hard to look at his site for more than a minute without being reminded numerous
times to donate money to him. Even the Hare Krishnas give it a rest every now
and then.
Jeffery
On Nov 17, 2010, at 11:15 AM, Miserere wrote:
Well, in a roundabout way...
Photoshop allows a large measure of filter effects in converting color to
BW, using slider tools that show the preview of the filter's effects. The
biggest problem I have when shooting digital is blown highlights that I cannot
burn and basically have to replace using cut a paste from an
, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Jeffery Smith jsmith...@bellsouth.net
wrote:
Photoshop allows a large measure of filter effects in converting color to
BW, using slider tools that show the preview of the filter's effects.
Filter effects isn't the right expression
The same experience with the Sigma 30/1.4. I bought it to shoot indoors at wide
open aperture. Not very good. Much better outdoors at 5.6. Unfortunately, it's
big and heavy, and Pentax makes a 31 that is smaller and better wide open.
Right now, the 30/1.4 is a body cap for my K100.
Jeffery
On
PM, Jeffery Smith jsmith...@bellsouth.net
wrote:
The same experience with the Sigma 30/1.4. I bought it to shoot indoors at
wide open aperture. Not very good. Much better outdoors at 5.6.
Unfortunately, it's big and heavy, and Pentax makes a 31 that is smaller and
better wide open.
Right
Well, you did warn us that it was every so often. We'll wait for a while. :-)
Jeffery
On Nov 21, 2010, at 4:08 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
I kind of liked the lights of the firetruck in the rain. Fortunately I had
the 16-50 on the K20 so I was undaunted by the weather. ISO 400 f/2.8 1/15
sec
I was never one to bracket when shooting film, and most of my wasted images
were due to dull subject matter and poor choice of subject/angle/telephone pole
projecting from the subject's head, not exposure. My biggest hurdle with
digital is what seems to be a lack of exposure latitude that I can
My problem has always been the reverse...things looking dead when they are
really alive.
Jeffery
On Nov 21, 2010, at 8:17 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
Ha! I wasn't familiar with Brownian Movement photography before.
So, I've already learned something by asking.
-- Walt
this blog post:
http://theonlinephotographer.typepad.com/the_online_photographer/2009/05/do-not-fear-the-sun.html
~nick
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 8:10 PM, Jeffery Smith jsmith...@bellsouth.net
wrote:
I was never one to bracket when shooting film, and most of my wasted images
were due to dull
Based on the reviews I've read, I would concur with Paul. I would love to have
either lens.
Jeffery
On Nov 22, 2010, at 5:19 PM, paul stenquist wrote:
The DA* 16-50/2.8 is terrific. Some early samples had element alignment
problems, but that seems to have been resolved. The DA 12-24 is also
:23 PM, paul stenquist wrote:
On Nov 22, 2010, at 6:29 PM, Jeffery Smith wrote:
Based on the reviews I've read, I would concur with Paul. I would love to
have either lens.
Jeffery
BTW, while I like both lenses, I find the 16-50 much more useful. The wide
end is adequate for most
Gaaa! (mustbuyglass.)
On Nov 22, 2010, at 7:22 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
Get the glass. Bodies may come and go, but lenses are forever. :-)
I have a 16-50 and it's really great, especially paired to the 50-135.
-bmw
On 10-11-22 7:42 PM, Jeffery Smith wrote:
And the 16-50
I have the Tamron, which is why I can't justify buying something that is very
similar to it. But it is a very nice, small, light zoom lens. I've had it since
2004 and I don't think it is still being manufactured.
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/columns/sm-nov-04.shtml
This is the article
If I ever want to sell my Leica M6, I'll use the Kuwait Craigslist.
Jeffery
On Nov 23, 2010, at 2:40 PM, Doug Franklin wrote:
http://thenextweb.com/me/2010/11/23/kuwait-dslr-camera-ban-now-in-effect/
I haven't been able to verify or refute the information so far.
--
Thanks,
DougF
There are several RAW file types. I usually use DNG instead of PEF (both are
RAW) because the DNG is a more universal format that PS recognizes. Sony has
apparently figured out how to make compressed RAW files that don't lose any
detail in the compression.
Jeffery
On Nov 23, 2010, at 5:36 PM,
I would switch to RAW even with non-existent processing skills. The RAW
conversion process isn't really difficult, and your results will probably be
better. I don't like the camera doing any sharpening, color balance, etc.
Jeffery
On Nov 23, 2010, at 6:31 PM, Eric Weir wrote:
Given my
I'm pretty sure that on the K-7, a 16 gb card holds about 650.
Jeffery
On Nov 23, 2010, at 7:00 PM, Eric Weir wrote:
On Nov 23, 2010, at 7:41 PM, Jeffery Smith wrote:
I would switch to RAW even with non-existent processing skills. The RAW
conversion process isn't really difficult
I vote for #2, and I don't even have it.
Jeffery
On Nov 23, 2010, at 7:10 PM, Tanya Love wrote:
So I really am needing a good wide angle zoom. I've been procrastinating on
it for ages and making do with my 18-55mm kit lens, but it's not fast
enough, and optically, could be better too.
RAW processing isn't really scary. It just uses files that have not been
modified by in-camera processing/tweaking. The only thing that is really
noticeably off is color balance, but the RAW processing software usually has
the choices that the camera would (auto, tungsten, daylight, shade,
In New Orleans, the locals used to refer to dimes (in general) as silver
dimes. That threw me for a while since silver dimes had not been made for
years when I moved here.
I used to run across the occasional Indian Head cent. I guess we are really
dating ourselves with these admissions. ;-)
stamp sized LCD.
Jeffery
On Nov 23, 2010, at 8:07 PM, Eric Weir wrote:
On Nov 23, 2010, at 8:31 PM, Jeffery Smith wrote:
RAW processing isn't really scary. It just uses files that have not been
modified by in-camera processing/tweaking. The only thing that is really
noticeably off is color
A full frame dSLR in RAW mode with a 1 gb card is more like what you would get
on a roll of film. :-)
Jeffery
On Nov 23, 2010, at 7:27 PM, Eric Weir wrote:
On Nov 23, 2010, at 8:04 PM, eckinator wrote:
367 on 2GB for a 10 MP K10D so should be closer to 1000 on 4GB for a 6
MP starkist I
Not a problem in the South. You just have to go through the window INTO a
house, and the owner shoots you.
Jeffery
On Nov 23, 2010, at 8:29 PM, Walter Gilbert wrote:
Lens prices make me glad I live in a town where there are no structures
tall enough from which to defenestrate myself.
to blow me away with
his Sigma dSLR images.
Jeffery
On Nov 23, 2010, at 9:02 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Jeffery Smith jsmith...@bellsouth.net
wrote:
I would switch to RAW even with non-existent processing skills. The RAW
conversion process isn't really
is impossible).
-Adam
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:13 PM, Jeffery Smith jsmith...@bellsouth.net
wrote:
One of the ironic mistakes that Sigma made was having RAW only dSLRs. That
ensured that the photographer had the maximum potential files, but because
the camera was ostensibly aimed
The 16-50 is about $750 in the US. You are down under?
Jeffery
On Nov 23, 2010, at 10:43 PM, Tanya Love wrote:
Thanks for all of the feedback guys. Yep, I know that the AOV is quite
varied in this grouping - I am more interested really in the widest end, and
the speed (and of course
model), but the
shipping via air was prohibitive. And you can forget getting a bicycle shipped
from AUS to US.
Jeffery
On Nov 23, 2010, at 11:28 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
On Tue, 23 Nov 2010 22:54 -0600, Jeffery Smith
jsmith...@bellsouth.net wrote:
The 16-50 is about $750 in the US. You
One must dispose of those batteries in an appropriate manner. Apparently you
have to swallow them first.
Jeffery
On Nov 24, 2010, at 8:57 AM, drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
That should make it popular with older photographers.
-Original Message-
From: Tanya Love tanyal...@bigpond.com
It's nearly 5,000 pixels wide.
On Nov 25, 2010, at 12:16 PM, Dario Bonazza wrote:
I find this picture quite fascinating in more than one way:
www.dariobonazza.com/public/K5_00898_1.jpg
K-5, ISO 12800, 1/200s f/4, Sigma 17-70mm @70mm f/4 (full aperture) focused
on the guitar.
Dario
This K-5 must be selling like hotcakes. I signed up for an in stock alert
from BH. The K-5 apparently go back into stock yesterday but sold out
yesterday. They're now backordered again.
Jeffery
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to
with the 31mm Limited lens.
I couldn't get it ordered before it was out of stock.
I called and asked how to get the lens.
They had me order one and charge it.
One was shipped to me about 3 days later.
Regards, Bob A.
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Jeffery Smith jsmith...@bellsouth.net
Sullivan wrote:
Talk to a person...
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 9:47 AM, Jeffery Smith jsmith...@bellsouth.net
wrote:
I had added it to my cart (the K-5). I balked for a few hours. When I went
back and signed in, it had been removed from my cart with an explanation
that they were out of stock
, 2010, at 2:06 PM, drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
That's a pain. WL figured that doing that would make faculty go home early
to wait for packages.
-Original Message-
From: Jeffery Smith jsmith...@bellsouth.net
Sender: pdml-boun...@pdml.net
Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 11:23:46
To: Pentax
Has a certain Lensbaby or Holga feel to it.
Jeffery
On Nov 28, 2010, at 9:52 AM, SV Hovland wrote:
http://album.heime.org/Default.aspx?albummode=Pagealbumpath=%2falbum%2ftemporary%2fIMGP0587.JPG
Taken with K-5 and DA70/2,4 in Sandnes, Norway today.
Created in the camera with several
I think it is like pearl (sort of a shiny matte, like Agfa paper from 30 years
ago).
Jeffery
On Nov 30, 2010, at 6:32 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
I've got no idea what they mean by lustre.
Anybody know what the differences are? Which is better?
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from
Strange finding. They discovered a bacterium that uses arsenic in place of
phosphorus in its DNA. That is somewhat earth-shaking in the biology field, as
no other organism on earth has been able to substitute other elements in DNA.
Jeffery
On Nov 30, 2010, at 3:46 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
Love a good street photo.
Jeffery
Sent from my iPad
On Apr 22, 2012, at 20:45, frank theriault knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
An alternate title might be If there's really a God, get me out of here:
http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.ca/2012/04/trust-and-obey_22.html
Hope you enjoy.
I kept mine because it is so small and light with the 40/2.8. Most of what
I've shot in the past 4 years has been indoors, low light (college plays and
musical productions) with the K-x or K-5.
Jeffery
On Apr 23, 2012, at 4:59 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
Nope, i sold mine amd my sisters a few
I had heard some time (over a year) ago that some catastrophic setbacks in the
production of their play station cost so much money, they would never make any
money on it and would likely lose a load of money that would have to be made up
through other parts of Sony.
Jeffery
On Apr 24, 2012,
Godfrey,
What have you been using in place of CS5? Do you just go with the RAW file
editor that comes with the camera?
Jeffery
On Apr 24, 2012, at 12:24 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I've used Photoshop CS5 so little I see no point to upgrading yet
again to CS6. It would be a waste of
with the Leica M9. But I'd been using Lr for
years already at that point ... ! :-)
G
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 10:26 AM, Jeffery Smith jsmith...@gmail.com wrote:
Godfrey,
What have you been using in place of CS5? Do you just go with the RAW file
editor that comes with the camera?
Jeffery
G! I prefer dark brown freckles to light brown freckles. But girls are
often traumatized by either form. Tell the girl I think they're cute.
There's a Mexican boxer with freckles, and he's adored by his countrymen for
them (Canelo Alvarez?).
Sent from my iPad
On Apr 24, 2012, at 20:53,
Manfrotto is pricing itself steeply these days. This Slik looks good for the
price.
http://www.amazon.com/Slik-Heavy-Duty-Tripod-Fluid-Effect-Built-In/dp/B6HOKW/ref=sr_1_2?s=electronicsie=UTF8qid=1335406182sr=1-2
Hard to tell how solid it is. This is one thing that is best bought in a
Good composition.and bokeh. Okay, you can't take credit for the latter, but
can take credit for acquiring the lens and using it wide open.
Jeffery
Sent from my iPad
On Apr 26, 2012, at 20:58, David Savage ozsav...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks Dan.
Dave
On 27/04/2012, Daniel J. Matyola
If one was ever wondering if the Sigma 28/1.8 tended to flare, this should put
the question to rest.
Jeffery
On Apr 27, 2012, at 3:06 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
I've always been somewhat of a bottom-feeder when it comes to
equipment (you remember me, Mr. Bang-for-the-buck Guy) so this K-5 is
My is seriously prone to search wildly for focus when I'm shooting close
objects.
Jeffery
On Apr 27, 2012, at 4:13 PM, Tom C wrote:
I've started having problems with this lens that are weird. I don't
think it's operator error...
It didn't want to AF last time I had it on (was using more
I'm looking forward to seeing some images taken with the Sigma. A friend of
mine just bought the Pentax 10-17, but I don't like the distortion of it. I'm
hankering' for a good ultra wide angle, and it is going to either be Pentax or
Sigma.
Jeffery
On Apr 27, 2012, at 3:50 PM, Darren Addy
201 - 300 of 505 matches
Mail list logo
