On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 12:47:39AM +, Eric Featherstone wrote:
On 16/03/07, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm reviewing some of my photos for the Pentax Gallery that were shot as
.tifs early on and find that there's no EXIF data. Is this normal behavior
for .tifs out of the *ist D?
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 09:34:56PM -0400, Mark Roberts wrote:
John Francis wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 05:09:21PM -0400, Mark Roberts wrote:
Hey Dario, now you're not the only one with motorcycle racing photos
in
the gallery!
:-P
Are you sure those are permitted under the terms
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 02:31:24PM -0800, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I have to replace my coffee grinder, so I'm asking everyone who may grind
their own beans what grinder they may have and if they are satisfied with
it. I want to get a burr grinder, not one with a rotating blade. I've had
my
There's a post in the dpreview forums linking to a web page
http://www.idfoxx.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=18662sid=6bbf1ecbb3a940a790f1363fecfe0730
announcing a Windows Shell Extension that lets the standard
Windows file browser know how to extract thumbnails from .PEFs
(and from a plethora of
On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 12:28:55AM +0900, David Savage wrote:
On 3/17/07, John Francis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's a post in the dpreview forums linking to a web page
http://www.idfoxx.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=18662sid=6bbf1ecbb3a940a790f1363fecfe0730
announcing a Windows
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 04:26:34PM +0100, Wilko Bulte wrote:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 09:33:48PM +0900, David Savage wrote..
That bloke didn't think it all the way through did he?
Make that: that bloke did not think at all, did he?
He could well have qualified for a Darwin Award himself..
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 10:33:50AM +, mike wilson wrote:
From: Brian Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/03/22 Thu AM 04:00:25 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Facts about the PDML's favorite photographer
Family List?
PDML??
Adams family.
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 09:43:50AM -0600, Tom C wrote:
Did you guys realize that as of yesterday there's not a single entry in the
Glamour/Fashion and Sports/Action categories?
Really? I should get off my backside and submit one or two, then ...
I've had an account since the gallery
There's one around here - for a small commission I'll pick one
up and deliver it for you.
So if you've got a spare $1.3 million or so lying around ...
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 08:41:17PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Holy hell that's fast! But wouldn't you know it, there isn't a Bugati
On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 10:21:03AM -0700, Jay Taylor wrote:
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Just took a look on Boz site to see what that looked like. Quite the
monster!
Enjoy it. :-)
If you don't mind my asking, what does something like that cost these
days?
Godfrey
Godfrey,
I
On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 11:30:08AM -0800, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
There are times that I have wished for a larger format than 35mm and even
the formats on 120/220 film. For whatever reason - and the reasons varied
at different times - I could not see getting and using a large format
camera,
On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 11:48:33AM -0700, Siddheshwar Lohar wrote:
I have been using this MZ-30 camera (now its obsolete) of course since long.
It started giving some message on its LCD when I switch it on. It shows me
the message Av-- and keeps blinking, nothing happens, i cannot see any
On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 11:39:17AM -0700, Rick Womer wrote:
That link works! Very nice. I wonder--does the shake
reduction let you shoot hand-held, or is the lens just
too heavy?
I'd never consider trying to use that lens hand-held; it's
just too heavy (and too unwieldy). But I'd expect the
And that's the fault of the American legal system, not
the British legal system ...
While I wish you luck in your case, I think it's a great
deal better to have a verdict based on the merits of the
case, rather than on anyones ability to pay for lawyers.
On Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 08:41:13PM
It's not a travesty - it's a problem with two different systems
interacting. If this were being tried in a UK court the legal
aid system would provide a lawyer for the plaintiff, but it wouldn't
necessarily provide a lawyer from the most expensive firm in town
(or, at any rate, it wouldn't pay
On Wed, Mar 28, 2007 at 04:34:44PM +0200, Ralf R. Radermacher wrote:
Markus Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm sorry for you Peter but wonder what kind of insurance would cover such
an accident.
My camera insurance (Alte Leipziger Versicherung AG) covers theft, loss,
and all kinds of
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 04:27:01PM -0400, John Sessoms wrote:
From:
P. J. Alling
I ask myself the same question at the ATM, (stupid programmers...)
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Shel
Why in Hell should I have to Press 1 for English?!!!
Speaking of stupid, did you know McDonalds has
You *are* out of the loop. San Jose was one of the host cities for
the round of 16 this year, so the local media coverage was intense.
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 01:20:49PM -0800, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I guess I'm outa the loop - never heard of it.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Bob
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 05:23:38PM -0600, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist
Subject: Re: Battery life on K10D, counter reset ?
I never erase a card before putting it in the camera. I always just
reformat the full card in camera.
That has been my
On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 12:28:54AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 3/29/2007 4:26:26 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You missed it. Look again.
Paul
On Mar 29, 2007, at 7:11 PM, Jim Apilado wrote:
An unusual title for the subjects. I might
On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 03:29:14PM -0700, Bill Lawlor wrote:
Battery Grip D-BG2 for K10D in like new condition. I only put it on the
camera for a day, then decided it was not my style. All papers included.
$100 .
Grrr. My one arrived from BH today.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Mine do (Pelican 1510 and 1620).
I'm considering one more - a roll-around tool box from OSH.
It doesn't have any internal fittings, so I'd need to put
something together from all the other bags, inserts, etc.,
but it has the distinct advantage of being tough enough to
stand on, making it
On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 01:42:13PM -0400, Kenneth Waller wrote:
Dave, if you've got half a day, you gotta go to Valley of Fire state park.
About 70 miles north east of Vegas. Otherworldly! Its a small park but well
worth the trip.
Kenneth Waller
Hmmm. I'm wending my way towards Vegas;
On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 03:05:46PM -0400, David J Brooks wrote:
A 16-45 and 50 200 going to be good enough for this Ken. I'm travelling light.
I'm not :-) I've got the 80-200 as well as the K10D, *ist-D, 18-55,
10-17, 28-105 and a couple of 50mms. But I'm driving, not flying.
--
PDML
On Sat, Apr 14, 2007 at 11:13:55AM -0700, Juan Buhler wrote:
On 4/14/07, Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is no easy way around this - the Leica M8 IS a lovely camera.?
But it's not for the same work as a Pentax DSLR. Can you imagine shooting
soccer game (with a 170-500mm zoom)
On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 09:11:27AM -0400, Mark Roberts wrote:
I'll put the list on my web site if we start compiling it here...
Current home page: //http:www.panix.com/~johnf/
PAW Gallery://www.jfwaf.com/PAW/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
I'll put the list on my web site if we start compiling it here...
I could mirror it (or even host it) on pdml.us, if you like.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 05:25:02PM -0400, Cory Papenfuss wrote:
Ditto, for the new HD-DVD and BLuRay disc formats,
no rentals available yet, even though these HD
players have been out for over a year or more.
HD-DVD and BluRay can both kiss my a$$. DRM'd to where they won't
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 08:40:48PM -0400, Cory Papenfuss wrote:
Sir, the typical Blu-Ray/HDDVD buyer is not
going to still use an older HD set that
doesnt have HDMI interface anyway,
As good as they were, none of the
older HD sets that dont have HDMI input
are as good as the best HD
On Thu, Apr 19, 2007 at 08:47:38PM -0400, Cory Papenfuss wrote:
you guys are not really with it, there are hundreds of networks
showing 1000's of programs a month, so there still are tons
of good shows, movies, and events available. NO, its
not all good, probably mostly not good, but with
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 12:46:55PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 4/20/2007 12:56:21 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hi Marnie
I always carry a large white plastic sack folded in my photo bag outside
pocket. I use it for wet ground and could
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 08:13:08PM -0400, Cory Papenfuss wrote:
It doesnt go out much and things
like my PC and direcTV HDDVR
are on batttery backup UPS
anyway.
wow.
What's wow about that? I'm sure many of us use a UPS for our
PCs; I've got one that's earmarked to be put on my
On Fri, Apr 20, 2007 at 06:37:36PM -0600, Tom C wrote:
From: J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' pdml@pdml.net
Subject: RE: OT - for those of you who have DVDequipthatcan playPAL
systemDVD's
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2007
On Sat, Apr 21, 2007 at 01:38:20PM -0400, Walter Hamler wrote:
Thanks P.J., I managed to get a photo uploaded, but with great difficulty.
It seems that no matter what I did when resizing a pic from the K10 that was
shot in JPEG Fine down to the required pixel size and then saving with a new
On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 06:20:19AM -0700, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I tend doubt that - can you substantiate your claim. In talking with
people at a couple of labs here, they say the most popular subject they get
are babies and - believe it or not - cats.
You can even combine the two, and take
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 04:43:07PM -0400, ann sanfedele wrote:
Luka Knezevic - Strika wrote:
would this perhaps do for green?
http://i119.photobucket.com/albums/o126/concavex/_IGP6182_2.jpg
luka
hmmm - a bit of a stretch - for our 6 shot wheel (or rectangle) start
with those
That looks like the sort of explanation Calvin's dad would provide :-)
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 10:01:05PM +0100, Bob W wrote:
It's photon residue, popularly known as 'light lint'. It's scientific
Latin name is 'Floccus lucis'.
The stuff that the filter stops from going into the lens has to
I'd guess you have AMD processors. Intels (or the latest
generation of AMDs) work fine with Lightroom, but earlier
AMD chipsets lack one particular set of extended instructions.
Unfortunately, Lightroom makes heavy use of those instructions.
On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 08:57:25PM -0400, AlexG
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 09:00:56AM -0700, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Perhaps I wasn't clear. What I want(ed) to know was if there is some way
to generate a true raw file, in either a format like PEF or DNG either
directly from the camera or by resizing the file in some editing software
(without
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 12:39:46PM +0200, Dario Bonazza wrote:
http://www.pentax.co.jp/english/support/
Thanks, Dario.
Brief summary: It's the release of the Remote Assistant software
for the K10D - this necessitates a firmware upgrade. Apart from
that there's no new functionality (or, at
No he isn't.
If you keep the same camera position, and the same aperture
(not the same f-stop; the same aperture diameter), and you
magnify the central portion of the image from the shorter
focal length lens to the same final size as the image from
the longer focal length lens the DOF will be
Don't forget today is the last day for the $199 lightroom pricing
On Mon, Apr 30, 2007 at 06:57:34AM -0700, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Apr 29, 2007, at 9:57 PM, Maris V. Lidaka Sr. wrote:
I've now transferred my CDs to 2 external hard drives for storage and
backup and it's time to
You don't get the heat. Small land masses (such as New Zealand
or the UK) have weather that is dominated by ocean temperatures.
That's why the UK doesn't have the same climate as Hudson Bay,
and NZ is far more temperate than Mexico (or inland Australia).
On Thu, Sep 20, 2007 at 04:07:03PM
On Fri, Sep 21, 2007 at 08:38:38AM -0400, Adam Maas wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
David Savage wrote:
http://news.ninemsn.com.au/article.aspx?id=76588
Short version: Australia's Virgin Mobile phone company ran an ad
campaign using photos from Flickr that had been posted under Creative
On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 10:40:31PM +0100, mike wilson wrote:
John Graves wrote:
Mike,
If only the world worked the way we think it should. My brother found
the obit in the Boston Public Library as a microfilm copy of the paper.
The Library doesn't retain newspapers after they
Gee thanks. Now how do I get this arrow out of my butt?
Ob.Trivia - did you know that archery targets are called 'butts'?
Do you know why?
As far as the Pentax Gallery goes - I didn't submit originally
for a couple of reasons; my first attempt didn't work (because
I was trying to
On Thu, Sep 27, 2007 at 03:43:38PM -0700, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Sep 27, 2007, at 3:09 PM, John Francis wrote:
Gee thanks. Now how do I get this arrow out of my butt?
Ob.Trivia - did you know that archery targets are called 'butts'?
Do you know why?
I knew
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 03:01:38PM -0400, Scott Loveless wrote:
Tom C wrote:
On 9/28/07, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip Some of us might think it's a lot of mystical
droppings from the rear of a bull,snip
Bob,
You've got a way with words...
;-)
cheers,
frank
I saw
Add another voice in support of this lens for fun shots.
I got a chance to borrow the predecessor - the F 17-28 - at a PDML
meet back in the days of film, so When I got the K10D I also bought
the DA 1-17.
Here's a shot from a trip to Seattle last week:
On Mon, Oct 01, 2007 at 12:04:23PM +, mike wilson wrote:
From: Evan Hanson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/09/30 Sun PM 09:39:41 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: GESO: Kim and Tony's Wedding
My brother in-law Tony got married yesterday. It's hard to
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 08:18:49PM +0200, Boris Liberman wrote:
Godfrey, I find it incredibly strange that Pentax produced DA 40 and DA
70 that cover full frame (presumably, but most probably so) obviously
knowing it and not having advertised it in any way.
Why? The lenses work just fine
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 03:57:32PM -0400, Steve Desjardins wrote:
The cups look like they are actually attached at some odd angle. For
some reason, I'm reminded of the Daleks in the old Dr. Who series.
Stuff just stuck onto inverted trash cans at odd angles.
On Tue, Oct 02, 2007 at 08:08:37PM -0400, Adam Maas wrote:
The conversion is 1.6 times for the small Canon bodies, so take your 28,
multiply by 1.6 and you have the equivalent in 35mm terms (Which is 45mm
or so). And it's all because the sensor is smaller than a 35mm frame of
film, not
On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 11:50:59PM +0100, Cotty wrote:
On 03/10/07, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
you can play with mine sometime if you like
hey big fella that's the best offer I've had all day
That doesn't surprise me in the slightest.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 09:01:14AM -0500, Charles Robinson wrote:
On Oct 4, 2007, at 0:18, John Celio wrote:
Good point about the foreground. Someone else mentioned clearing the
branches from the river. That idea both intrigues and repulses
me. On the
one hand, it might make the
On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 12:56:11PM -0700, Jack Davis wrote:
Was visiting the local State Wildlife Area (Gray Lodge) earlier today.
Nearly directly overhead sun lighting up the larger flight feathers of
a California Turkey Vulture.
(Considerable cropping).
On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 11:10:50AM -0400, graywolf wrote:
The issue with copyrights, trademarks, and patents is that they have been
ordained as property by law thus extending the same property rights to them.
And
because of that they have to be registered with the government before the
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 10:23:09AM -0400, Rebekah wrote:
I don't see how this guy making money off of the photographs could be
considered damages. They certainly didn't lose any money just
because he made some . . .
That's the argument used to justify file sharing, software copying, etc.
And
In and out?
I see it load at low resolution first, and then get replaced by
the higher-resolution image. This is the usual way to show a
progressive .JPG (it's just about the only reason for the format)
On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 05:36:55PM -0700, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Nice photo.
Is it
Err, no. He's quoting a Yule Tide carol.
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 09:33:43AM -0600, William Robb wrote:
Perhaps it shouldn't, but you are trying to make your point by quoting a
Christmas carol.
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: Scott Loveless
Subject: Re: 2008
On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 01:42:37PM -0400, Scott Loveless wrote:
P. J. Alling wrote:
Oh, how wonderful, maybe it'll start a war and they'll kill each other
off, thus helping the with the population problem and bringing peace to
the rest of us.
That ought to be short. I doubt the
http://www.jfwaf.com/temp/RennFaire.jpg
Not my usual style of shot at all, but I rather like it ...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
On Thu, Oct 11, 2007 at 03:47:01PM -0600, Tom C wrote:
A few shots from a short detour in downtown Dallas after work. Lot's of
good architecture. Very little captured here. Not my normal stuff of
course.
http://photo.net/photodb/presentation.tcl?presentation_id=358322
You need to
On Fri, Oct 12, 2007 at 10:53:57AM -0400, graywolf wrote:
Sad story, Dave. The only way I have found to keep people from stealing your
images off the internet, is to not have them on the internet.
Unfortunately the web was never intended to be secure, it was developed by
academics for
It's nothing to do with the age of the aircraft, and everything
to do with choices made by the aircraft operator. Just what is
provided in the way of services at each seat depends on what the
operator specifies, but just about every aircraft being flown
today could provide payphone service if
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 06:54:15PM -0700, John Celio wrote:
How do you decide what to cut and what to keep when you've shot more than
one good photo of a subject?
Assuming you feel like all or most of the photos of said subject are good,
how do you distance yourself from your personal
Indeed. In fact I'm thinking about getting a Garmin GPS unit
that also incorporates an MP3 player, and which understands
the audio book format.
Mind you, I'll still buy some things on actual CDs - I'm too
much of an old fogey to be entirely happy with electronic-only
media delivery. And while
On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 03:00:02PM -0700, Bob Blakely wrote:
I've tentatively decided to bu this lens as it is the perfect length and
speed for shooting Hockey games from my preferred vantage point at the ice
in Anaheim, CA (Ducks). Any comments regarding this lens would be greatly
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 06:45:25AM +0100, Peter Fairweather wrote:
The A* 200/2.8 was my first foray into good glass. I've still got it,
and with the smaller sensor of the DSLRs it's getting a fair bit more use,
especially paired with the AF 1.7x adapter
Oddly enough I am thinking of
As Paul says, Almost.
To my eye it's a bit of camera shake (which is why the rear of
the car is slightly blurred), plus the change in angle during
the shot which makes the front of the car even more blurred
than the rear).
A K10D would help cut down on the camera shake :-)
I assume the
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 03:46:48PM -0400, Mark Roberts wrote:
A few days ago Mike J had a really interesting historical tale of
camera marketing and product lines:
http://theonlinephotographer.typepad.com/the_online_photographer/2007/10/in-the-early-19.html
Apropos of nothing: I just love
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 12:21:49PM -0600, Tom C wrote:
I can't see non-645 owners jumping to a 645D in masses.
The 645D would be a low volume seller compared to a 24 x 36 FF body. . .
That's a big assumption; I'm by no means convinced you are right.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On Fri, Oct 19, 2007 at 10:06:18AM -0400, Mark Roberts wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From what Adam has told us about the newest sensors, 12
megapixels with good noise characteristics might well be possible
at 1.5.
Could be. But every so often I look at what Nikon's getting from 12
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 07:25:12PM -0400, John Sessoms wrote:
From: pnstenquist
I went on a Saab press junket to Sweden in 1981. Saab engineers
demonstrated the Viggens short takeoff distance. It was truly amazing
how quickly it got off the ground. The Swedish air force parked them
in
Remember the old maxim: Never attribute to malice that which
can be adequately explained by stupidity.
It's standard practice for Adorama (and also for several other
mail-order suppliers) to cancel an order if they are unable to
fulfil the order within the originally-estimated timeframe.
In
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 01:33:45PM -0700, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Oct 18, 2007, at 1:14 PM, frank theriault wrote:
Can we talk about the Lockheed F-104 Starfighter? Please Bob?
There's a
plane that is gorgeous. The B-58 Hustler gives me goosebumps too.
That was the most
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 04:14:26PM -0400, frank theriault wrote:
On 10/18/07, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can we talk about the Lockheed F-104 Starfighter? Please Bob? There's a
plane that is gorgeous. The B-58 Hustler gives me goosebumps too.
That was the most beautiful aircraft
On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 12:33:04PM -0400, ann sanfedele wrote:
Adam Maas wrote:
A Viper before sunset:
http://flickr.com/photos/mawz/1673348246/
Larger/Direct link:
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2348/1673348246_129bcc621a_b.jpg
*istDS, 18-55 DA, ISO400, 1/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
O -
On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 07:48:17PM -0600, Tom C wrote:
With the caveat regarding who knows about Pentax?...
I'd take a full frame sensor that did very well between 200 - 400 ISO any
day (ISO 800) w/b nice, over any sensor that had marginal high ISO
performance at 1600 and above. I find
You get less electrons with 220v, but they're more excited.
On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 04:51:50PM +0200, Thibouille wrote:
We have 220 volts a well and we have two tiny little metal plugs.
Weird... poor plugs... so many electrons... :D
2007/10/23, Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Rick,
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 06:43:36AM +0800, David Savage wrote:
On 10/24/07, Igor Roshchin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Some people may have heard about new fires in Southern California.
Fires are burning in Malibu, Orange County, and San Diego and county.
Here is a very impressive picture:
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 12:35:07AM -0400, Doug Franklin wrote:
Adam Maas wrote:
There's only 2 flying Lanc's, 1 in the UK and one here in Canada, based
out of Hamilton, about an hour west of Toronto. A beautiful bird, but
small by todays standards.
Yeah, I think there's only one
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 01:45:19PM +0800, David Savage wrote:
At 01:38 PM 24/10/2007, John Francis wrote:
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 06:43:36AM +0800, David Savage wrote:
I was just wondering last night after seeing the latest reports. Do
they (state land management department) do
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 06:53:13PM +0100, mike wilson wrote:
Adam Maas wrote:
Doug Franklin wrote:
Adam Maas wrote:
If you want a great sounding bird, very little beats a Lancaster, with
it's 4 Merlins.
I've never been near a running Lanc, though I've seen them on static
display
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 05:39:36PM -0400, frank theriault wrote:
On 10/24/07, graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, the B-25 only had 28 cylinders, while the Lancaster had 48. But it
always
seemed that the radials sort of rumbled while the v-12's sort of snarled.
The
one that always
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 04:59:07PM -0700, skye pdml wrote:
both ferries leave from approx the same place (side by side) as can be
shown at wsdot.wa.gov/ferries and are timed so that you can often take
photos of the one ferry from the other ferry.
Bainbridge ferry (35-40min?) takes less time
On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 08:10:12PM -0400, John Francis wrote:
http:///www.jfwaf.com/PAW
Make that http://www.jfwaf.com/PAW/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above
shots
from the locks cruise (and a whole lot more besides)
came on a single day I had to myself in Seattle after
a business trip - as I wasn't prepared to get up in
time for a 6:30am flight I had to take one at 8:30pm.
Fortunately, as you can see, I had great weather.
--- John Francis [EMAIL
Ain't that the truth! Some people probably aren't used to the
shallow DOF of a f2.8 lens. What would they do with a f1.4?
On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 02:15:40PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can't remember a lens introduction that didn't result in complaints from the
photographically
That's a good question - it's always worth finding good beers.
It appears that several of use like this type of capture:
here's my contribution from July of this year:
http://www.jfwaf.com/July2007/image.php?name=Trip01
(the pub is the World's Wonder in Kent, near Ashford)
For a more
On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 10:13:13AM -0700, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Oct 25, 2007, at 8:42 AM, William Robb wrote:
... A 14mm lens on an APS-C format camera isn't all that ultrawide.
It's matter of accommodation and perspective. 91 diagonal degrees is
pretty darn ultrawide to me, it's
On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 10:24:01AM -0700, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Oct 25, 2007, at 8:44 AM, Charles Robinson wrote:
On Oct 25, 2007, at 9:55, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Only thing I would nitpick
about is that I think they should have put the zoom ring where the
focus ring is and
On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 04:00:30PM -0400, Christian wrote:
Jack Davis wrote:
I've again picked up this thread and probably skipping over this
comment offered by others,
me too
but it was always obvious to me that the V
formed by holding up the middle and index fingers signified a V
On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 11:59:51PM -0400, Doug Franklin wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As for the lighting it was quite simple. I just put f/11 to put a
background into dark, and 360 flash with the little white plate (it is
called 'catch light' in the manual as I remember) brings the
I agree. I've got to get myself a decent tripod before I
try again - my attempts show too much camera shake.
On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 11:21:49AM -0700, Bruce Dayton wrote:
Well, it is a better moon than I have ever done and I have even
cheaper glass than you do for that kind of thing. Nice
Based on my (possibly faulty) recollection of my attempts - a
600 and a 2x is just about perfect for a 1.5x crop moon shot;
you'd really want a little more for film. Stacking a 2x and a
1.4x would probably be about right, although that might add too
much optical softness (as well as increasing
On Fri, Oct 26, 2007 at 02:15:53PM -0400, Scott Loveless wrote:
Long rant. You've been warned.
I think you may have missed the point, Dave. This is a jab at the
unwashed masses who insist on using the internet. Having worked a
variety of support jobs, from the lowly DSL help desk to
On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 02:17:43PM -0400, John Sessoms wrote:
From: Bob W
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/in_pictures/7064879.stm
What the heck is that thing carrying?
It looks like some kind of crane-mounted platform; maybe it's
used in places where it would be difficult to erect scaffolding?
Yep. Grace looks quite happy, too.
On Sun, Oct 28, 2007 at 06:17:36PM -0400, Bill Owens wrote:
It's fantastic to see a child so happy.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul
Stenquist
Sent: Sunday, October 28, 2007 5:54 PM
On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 08:25:23PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-- Original message --
From: Thrainn Vigfusson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sheep would of course never climb a glacier on their
own, since there is nothing to eat.
That would probably stop me as
701 - 800 of 5970 matches
Mail list logo
