Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Wondering how far back you consider old to be :)
Anything before the launch of the *ist D, is sooo last century hides ;-)
Malcolm
Bob W wrote:
The nearest plague pit to me that I know of is in Deptford,
about 1.5 miles away in the church of St. Nicholas. The great
Christopher Marlowe was thrown into the pit after he was
murdered, and remains there to this day. People are not
inclined to open plague pits.
Which is
Cotty wrote:
Interestingly, I haven't seen many for sale. Not in dealers'
ads in AP, nor on eBay. I think most people buying these
cameras have considered the facts and are not going to
stomach the heavy loss in selling used. If you've bought a
D60 for £1600 (me) then you're (me) hardly
frank theriault does it again:
One of the guests knew of a cafe/restaurant that is always
looking for new art, and he said he'd give them a call to see
if he could hook us up. So, I went to meet with the cafe
owner last night, portfolio in hand, and he liked it. Wants
12 pieces up on
Mark Cassino wrote:
Anyhow - I have to say it was a lot of fun. Projected
slides - even at a decent size (I projected mine to 4 feet on
the long axis and sat about 8 feet away) look a lot better
than scanned slides. Projecting seems to be much more
forgiving than scanning, especially
Nick Clark wrote:
Hi Malcolm
The King and Tinker is actually in Whitewebbs Lane. It's at
the opposite end of the golf course to the Rose and Crown, to
the right of Whitewebbs House, which is now a restaurant. If
you come out of the drive to Whitewebbs House, turn right,
it's in the dip
frank theriault didn't type:
The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds.
The pessimist fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
Yet another darn commercial!
Malcolm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, here's a poll:
How many shots so far with your *ist D?
I'm at 1565
I'm SURE I'm mid to low on the list.
201. Not bad really on how often I see it (mutters). The other user has
pushed it well into 4 figures.
Malcolm
Cotty wrote:
Sensurround and loads of popcorn :-)
My goodness; the last time I heard the word sensurround, it was in a record
by the Sex Pistols.
Malcolm
Note 1# Sex Pistols were a punk group of the previous century.
Note 2# Record is a primitive recording medium superseded by the CD DVD.
Lon Williamson wrote:
Yeah, hats off to Adelheid and Jostein.
Certainly!!
Pentax USA used to host this list. I understand why they
dropped it.
I've only known PDML in the capable hands of Doug Brewer. What were the
reasons Pentax gave for discontinuing the list?
Malcolm
Lon Williamson wrote:
I only know what Doug put on the PDML home page.
Look around a bit there.
I've only known PDML in the capable hands of Doug Brewer. What were
the reasons Pentax gave for discontinuing the list?
Within moments I was e-mailed the definitive posting off list.
graywolf wrote:
Yes they do.
But when it is on a mailing list sponsered by Pentax, there
are liability issues involved. On a public list, as the PDML
is now, they don't have to worry about it.
Our Johnny read, on the Official Pentax Mailing list, how to
modify his strobe, stuck his
A little problem.
I took the *ist D FAJ 18-35 up to the school and took some pictures,
during which I got caught in a snowball fight but unfortunately the lens
took the full impact of one. At the time I wiped it clean with a lens cloth
and thought no more of it, as classes were starting. When I
Norm Baugher wrote:
For those who have purchased the sunkist, and are relative
digital newbies - how has this affected your film camera
usage? E.g. when I bought my 6x7, my 35mm shooting went down
by about 75%. Just curious...
35mm BW - same level
35mm Slide - up 20%
67 - same level,
wendy beard wrote:
I sold all my film bodies (including my beloved LX and 3
MXs) to buy the D.
And I couldn't be happier.
Christian
**THUD** (that's me fainting). You sold ALL your MXes. Oh, I
could ~never~ be happy without my MX(es) Hmmm. I'd sell the
LX though. Anyone want to buy
frank theriault wrote:
I just thought that Canon fitted the bill better than Leica.
You know, people buying Canon's because that's what they see
guys on the sidelines of major sporting events using on TV.
This is not meant as a criticism of Canons higher end pro
stuff, which is
frank theriault wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2069017
Way to go, Frank!
Malcolm
mike wilson wrote:
Just managed to enviegle a pause in my slaving over house
alterations from she who must be obeyed. Who does indeed
appear to have an inexhaustible requirement for Vim.
You can still get VIM??
2. My favourite for this month is Jostein's moss shot.
Sharp, detailed,
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Absolutely more innocent ... it's becoming more and more
difficult to photograph kids in this way. Their parents are
afraid that a stranger may be more than just a wandering
minstrel photographer. In some neighborhoods around here
parents won't even let their kids
John Francis wrote:
Nor, for that matter, does using film somehow make you more
of a real photographer than using digital. It's not the
equipment - it's the eye behind the viewfinder, and the mind
behind the eye, that count.
I most certainly agree.
Some people on this list - say Shel
William Robb wrote:
My present heavyweight is the Manfrotto 028, which seems
good under the 6x7, though the Zone VI Standard is still
the best tripod I have used.
I am a big fan of wood tripods.
Having compared the specification between the 055 and 028, I can see why.
Now to compare
Cotty wrote:
As far as still photography goes, I don't usually shoot (for
pleasure) in places that might be contentious. I don't do
buildings etc. Shopping precincts (malls) are a specialty for
shit-hot security guards ready to pounce etc etc over here
also.
Photography outdoors is
A question I have wanted to ask for a while. When I first bought my MXs 20
years + ago, the choice offered was simple; a camera body or a 50mm lens
option (or whatever lens you wanted).
Sometime in between there came a change.
I acquired the *ist D with the 18-35mm and realised I hadn't seen a
William Robb wrote:
Around here, the change seemed to happen mid 1980's, not
long after autofocus became mainstream.
Many thanks to everyone for the replies on this subject. That's what happens
when you don't buy a camera for 19 years. Still, I've made up for that now
;-)
Malcolm
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
So, why do people feel they have to justify digital.
Regardless of anyone's feelings about it, it's just a
camera, a tool for a job, for the hobbyist or family snap
shooter something that gives one pleasure, maybe makes
getting final prints easier or faster. I don't
Boris Liberman wrote:
What do I really need as a hobby photographer? Two film
bodies, a few
prime lenses, flash, bag, tripod and a few low value accessories.
Anything else is non essential. Justification of *any*
additional items
isn't a road to go downespecially for me
Let
Bob W wrote:
UK:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/1226423.stm
US:
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/fun/dennis.asp
(not very menacing)
Ah!
Thanks to Bob W John F.
Malcolm
William Robb wrote:
Because within 5 years you won't be able to get film for
it?
I saw some rotten devil sending his girlfriend into the local camera shop to
get film for his Optio 550.
Malcolm
Buy the LX. Best camera I've ever owned, including the *ist D. If Pentax had
produced a LX-D
Norm Baugher wrote:
Just cruising around Ebay, checking them out, haven't done it
in a while. Man, have prices come down!
Yet there is one piece of Pentax MF equipment which eludes me. For the
sixth time yesterday, I lost an eBay item for this thing (I won't mention
what) and now it's two
I don't know where to start with this one Frank!
Pentax used to make a pro toaster. They still make several
medium sized multi slice toasters that are used my pros, but
in the smaller two-slice toaster, they have concentrated on
the domestic market ever since the advent of electronic
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A couple of years ago I bought a 6X7 kit, a body, four lenses
and various filters and hoods all in good condition. The body
is an early model with no MLU; I had it serviced by Harrow Technical.
I'm amazed by the quality of the big negs, I've had no
trouble with
Nick Clark wrote:
Just made a speculative bid on eBay for a brand new body
only, not expecting to get it - unfortunately I won it for
£732.56! How do I tell my wife?
Help!
Nice!
If your wife reacts like mine to the camera, you'll only see it once in a
while anyway. She thinks it's
Shel wrote:
http://home.earthlink.net/~digisnaps/puffy.html
I love the detail of this photo - but I have found pictures without some
sort of scale to measure things by alarm people. We all know how big a
squirrel is, but is it that without some sort of reference, it could be as
though it was
frank theriault wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2142532
It has a 'wall of death' type of look about it. Unusual.
Malcolm
Dag T wrote:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2145549
This is the sort of picture which advertisers use - and the viewer is left
wondering what the product will be. I like the use of colour. Thought
provoking.
Malcolm
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Thanks. Table top can be a lot of fun. You don't have to pay
the models and nobody complains that you're taking too long.
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2145098size=lg
Tasty! The arrangement of the lemons and knife makes this. Very different
from the
frank theriault wrote:
Hi Frank,
Well, it has a wall of somthing look about it, eh? g
Funny, but the guy wasn't going very fast at all - I mean
look at the bike he's riding, pulling a trailer, and all
bundled up with winter clothes. It was freaking cold that
day, IIRC, and he was
Bob S. wrote:
http://www.members.aol.com/rfsindg/Paw2-5.jpg
Graphic detail capture excellent. Hurts to look at!
Malcolm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good grief, that's way worse than
http://members.aol.com/greenfalc1/wound.jpg
although, my picture was taken with a Pentax (Optio 550) ERN
Ouch! Is their a pain PUG coming up?
Malcolm
http://home.earthlink.net/~scbelinkoff/robs-pic.jpg
With bottom and top cropped.
It's incredible how much difference that makes.
Malcolm
First weeks picture from me then!
This was taken 30m from my house, about a couple of minutes after it broke
and started taking the road surface away. I had time to take this before a
thunderstorm broke but I still got wet running back to the house. The road
was closed for about three and a half
Comments/criticism welcome.
This is a REAL car
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2153283size=lg
Coming Through
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2153308size=lg
Penguin
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2153327size=lg
The Race
frank theriault wrote:
I liked the Charger Daytonas, with the high rear wing and the
nosecone.
One of the more outrageous cars that Detroit has ever produced.
IIRC, the Dodge Charger Daytona, and it's corporate sister,
the Plymouth Roadrunner were produced in relatively limited
John wrote:
Thanks again Cotty. I find AP classifieds a bit of a waste
of time as
the stuff is normally long before sold to subscribers, who
must get
their issue a day earlier. I just buy a copy now and then
at the
supermarket.
Subscribers normally get theirs a week early.
Malcolm
---
Hello folks,
Having spent many weeks bed bound, I have just started to read the thousands
of e-mails that have been downloaded for me during that time. I note from
what little I have read, that the new digital camera won't disappoint, so I
am glad to have waited rather than bought another
Does anyone remember when this was first available to buy, rather than all
the hype that seemed forever to lead up to it?
Thanks,
Malcolm
PS - As it's April 3rd, better finish on a song:
Who Brings the Cheese on April 3rd?
It's the Cheese Weasel!
He's not a silly bunny or a reindeer or a bird
Thanks John,
Late 2003 IIRC
I think I'm overdue some enablement then.
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
John Whittingham wrote:
The K20D is very nice, and the prices have come down quite a bit, but I
still enjoy using the *istD.
I've just spent an enjoyable few minutes browsing the Park Cameras website.
If only I could decide on the lens package...
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Hi John,
Park Cameras always seem a little pricey to me, I've had very good
service from SRS and cheaper prices for genuine UK products. As an
examle:
DA 15mm f/4 ED AL
Park Cameras £569.99
SRS Microsystems £479.00
Might be worth a look, I generally just go for the body only option
frank theriault wrote:
Who Brings the Cheese on April 3rd?
It's the Cheese Weasel!
He's not a silly bunny or a reindeer or a bird
He's the Cheese Weasel!
He's got a funny little tail and funny buck teeth
and he doesn't bring fish and he doesn't bring beef
so you'd better be good
Hi John,
I'd like to increase my lens collection. I think that's fair enough
after a break of 5 years from buying!
I agree, the first thing I went looking for was something for the wide
end, I can thoroghly recommend the DA 16-45/4 very good lens and not
too expensive. Most of my kit
Hi Bob,
But having said that I will give some thought to a small but high-
quality
camera that I can leave in my bag with my other day-to-day crap. Any
ideas?
I wanted a digital camera I could leave in the car and forget. I was
recommended the Technika SH340T 3.1MP, takes an SD card (up to
Bob W wrote:
http://brickfieldterrace.wordpress.com/
Long overdue. Excellent.
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
William Robb wrote:
This is absolutely classic. A must read.
http://www.picstips.com/pentax/pentax-k-7-hands-on-preview.html
Must normally write the instructions for the assembly of flat packed
furniture.
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Beats a tripod and a long lens to get close to your subject!
http://www.trademe.co.nz/Trade-Me-Motors/Boats-marine/Motorboats/auction-274
622678.htm
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please
I love this digital revolution.
In the time I have been wondering about updating the ist D to a K10D, the
K20D came out. Now I have pretty much made up my mind to go for the later
version, this happens.
With film, I could be indecisive for years about the same camera!
Malcolm
--
PDML
Scott Loveless wrote:
PUG's up. http://pug.komkon.org/
The standard of PUG is now astonishing. Congratulations all.
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
http://knarf-underground.blogspot.com/2008/11/more-chimping-on-tube.html
Wonderful photo.
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Bong Manayon wrote:
Yeah, the LX would be a choice (probably because I never owned
one...); but my choice would be the Titanium version:
http://www.mir.com.my/rb/photography/hardwares/classics/pentaxlx/pentax
y2k/index.htm
I don't know who (or why?) these limited edition versions are
mike Wilson wrote:
They are probably never going to be cheaper than they are now. At
least, until the total demise of society and/or the demolition of Earth
for a hyperspace bypass. Bought and serviced now, it will still be
functional long after film is processable or possibly obtainable.
Bob W wrote:
Here is a small page of photos, some from Lyons last weekend, and some
from
yesterday. Nothing world-shattering, but I hope you enjoy them.
http://www.web-options.com/Dec7/
The street light in the trees on the South Bank is fantastic.
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
Bob W wrote:
Have you seen my buttocks?
I can't believe you've lost them!
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Steve Desjardins wrote:
They have stuff like this in Texas. It's call a rifle. ;-)
Another use for film then. No CCD issue there.
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
Bob W wrote:
I played with an S2 and an M9 and now I have to win the lottery, or
start
mugging rich old ladies.
I've always fancied owning a Leica and I had to look up how much they were
being launched at, having read your posting.
Gasp! Lottery win territory.
Malcolm
--
PDML
Is this getting through?
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Well, the test got through so here is a picture I took last Sunday. This is
the first time I've taken a picture for the enjoyment of just being out with
a camera for some considerable time and I had great fun.
The discussion on the K-7 has been fascinating.
Luka Knezevic-Strika wrote:
the vertical branch is distracting, the focus a little off, or too
shallow, and the white balance simce not entirely correct (it's too
warm i think) the light is well, a bit boring - sun only and all that,
and the subject is also kind of uninteresting. so, your
Jack Davis wrote:
I get it, but those things don't ripen around here 'til fall. Have
already started enjoying this season's production.
Nice scene.
A bumper harvest this year, taken on a warm day with not a cloud in the sky.
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
frank theriault wrote:
You did well to make that harsh light very nice looking. Scrumptious
looking apple!
Nicely done.
Thanks Frank.
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the
Tom C wrote:
Not being argumentative, just thinking out loud and thinking that
because of the short life cycle of digital products, maybe our
parameters for measuring them should also be changing.
Before the introduction of the *ist D, this was discussed at length and from
memory, most of
Bob Sullivan wrote:
You held out a long time and will be blown away by the K-7.
Anti-shake, more pixels, better rendering,,,you're gonna love it!
Some adjustment of your photo processing software hardware may be
necessary.
I still have my original *ist DS.
It has been superceded by better
Steve Desjardins wrote:
I have an *istD sitting right behind me in my office at work. It's the
official dept. camera. We will continue to use it until it breaks. We
just don't' need more MP or AF speed. Eventually, I think that more
cameras will be like that. $2000 or less, 32 MP,
Two quick points:
Cost. Pure and simple the cost of film purchase and development makes
digital capture right for 90%+ of my photography.
E6 - I've always seen this as a different animal. Whilst it is available, it
is an 'as well as'.
I've always had issues with film or digital for certain uses
Tom C wrote:
Certainly! Whenever I attempt to venture back to film, I can't seem
to seriously do it (regardless of how much I enjoy the smell of a
freshly open film canster).
How interesting. I don't feel anywhere near as confident with a digital
camera as I do with film and I suspect in
frank theriault wrote:
http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.com/2009/10/all-day-breakfast.html
I love the shadows cast across the pavement.
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
Marnie wrote:
http://www.mapphotography.com/PAWS/pages/store.htm
Tell me if you agree.
(I've thought about taking the foliage out from under the tree, but
think
that might not be an improvement. I've also thought about adding
vignetting, ditto, might not improve it.)
I'd really
frank theriault wrote:
I love my new neighbourhood (I've been here since April). Lots of
down-and-out types (I live two blocks from Toronto's largest
psychiatric facility), lots of new loft condos and yuppies, and lots
of art galleries. Walking down the street always brings interesting
frank theriault wrote:
http://z.about.com/d/architecture/1/0/B/l/glasshouse.jpg
At one time I had one of these in my garden. Granted it had more panes of
glass, was smaller and I called it a greenhouse but in essence there were
few differences (other than price - I bet this costs).
More
Hi Doug,
About five years ago, a development of six of these were put up
twenty mins
walk from me in a gated development off a main road.
Is there a chance that knowing the location more precisely, I could
find
out more about them? If they're private homes, probably not, unless
the
Bob W wrote:
Well done - I'm very impressed by anyone who can run further than I
can.
Which is to say, I'm very impressed by most people who can run. The
furthest
I've ever run without stopping is 5 miles, and that took me nearly an
hour.
As am I. I used to walk a six mile circuit every
Hi Doug,
Well, if I can realistically expect to afford a completely custom home,
it means the Lottery Fairy visited and price is, practically, not
really
an object. So, if I'm gonna dream, I'm gonna dream big. :-)
Anyway, I'm more about the land than the house. If price is no object,
Hi Bob,
I started jogging about 5 years ago, having not run outdoors since
school,
and only on the treadmill when I had gym membership. I followed a plan
I
found on a squash training site (I'd started playing squash again, and
needed to fitten up) which basically tells you to build up
Walking 6 miles and running 6 miles will burn more or less the same
number
of calories - it's the amount of energy needed to move a certain weight
a
certain distance - but running does it more quickly. I think it will
give
your cardio system a lot more exercise though, which is more
Hi John,
Right click on a location on the map and select What's Here and
google
will give you Longitude Latitude. You can use the numbers Google Maps
gives you as a link.
If you're talking about what I think you're talking about try plugging
51.669177,0.003191 into Google Maps as your
Here's a little offering from the HOUR of webcam video I recorded last
night. Included the exhibition photographs and some music to pad it out
to 7 and a half minutes.
Two places to see -
Flash video on my website:
http://www.seeingeye.tv/pages/chicago.html
Really enjoy watching that,
Hi Jack,
Color..
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=501
BW..
http://photolightimages.com/aspupload/detail.asp?ID=502
K20, da55~...@55mm, f/11, 1/30, ISO 100, bean bag/SUV hood rest
When I've looked at my own photos of older buildings, it's normally an easy
choice as to
Hi Jack,
I get that, Malcolm! Elements separator themselves by their color and,
perhaps as a result, give the image more 'depth.'(?)
The other thing I forgot to add is about the nature of a BW photograph.
Here we are with all the modern technology of colour, multi-frame shots and
video - and
Hi Bill,
As the subject line says, there are pictures. Fifty three of them, in
fact.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/gesos/chicago/index.html
Great pictures one and all.
The picture of the fire truck with a pristine stuffed toy mounted on the
radiator grill was a surprise. Over
Having asked the question and read the replies carefully, I've come to the
conclusion that the DFA100mm f2.8 WR macro is the one I want. It is also one
that far exceeds my current budget, so I have started to save for it. In the
meantime, I've acquired some close up lenses, which have solved the
A couple of months ago, I finally got a K-7. Unlike most new owners, I've
only really got to open the box and use it in the last week, after actually
reading the manual first (I know, very odd). I bought the ist D when it
first came out and I've never seen up close any of the other Pentax DSLRs,
Bob W wrote:
http://m.gizmodo.com/5553765/are-cameras-the-new-guns
the answer to that is No. If you carry a camera you get arrested
immediately. If you carry a gun you can drive around the countryside
shooting people at random.
Cotty wrote:
I have one of these in a box somewhere upstairs. Goodness knows where
I
could use it now in this day and age.
Aircraft photography?
Surrounded by other photographers you might get away with that, but given
recent events, anything that looks slightly different from a normal
Bob W wrote:
Two interviews next week - fingers crossed!
Best of luck Bob, I hope one of them is what you want and offered to you.
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
Done and very happily so.
Just go here and press the Donate button:
http://www.pdml.net/
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Bob W wrote:
Some quite nice photos here, with sound, from this year's Horse Fair:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/magazine/8728149.stm
This is one of the things I've been wanting to photograph for years and
never get round to (bit like GFM). It's one of the stock events for UK
I like just about everything on the K-7 as much of the LX, except the lack
of interchangeable viewfinders. I note that Nikon produces a DR-6 waist
level interchangeable viewfinder, so how much of a demand is this for
manufacturers today? A quick look on Google provided a waist level
viewfinder
Thanks Bob,
I should think a live-view lcd screen would take the place of a waist-
level
finder these days, and be more versatile. I used to have a waist-level
finder for my LX, but rarely used it - I was in blinkered collector
mode
when I had the LXs, and wanted to own the whole system,
P. J. Alling wrote:
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1604247/PESO/PESO%20--%20%20pleasefindher.html
Sad subject material, wonderfully captured.
Malcolm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
The great benefit of sticking with Pentax for me has been the continued use
of M42 screw thread lenses. I use them with a small Pentax K ring to M42
thread in both my film and digital SLRs. I've recently acquired for a very
small sum a 200mm M42 lens that has a T mount attached to it. As it still
Thanks Toine,
M42 thread isn't the same as Tmount M42 is 42x1.0 and Tmount 42x0.75.
If you apply some force a Tmount adapter fill fit on a M42 lens. You
won't get infinity focus with this combination.
Tmount are made for special lenses and other things like microscope
and telescope adapters.
701 - 800 of 1859 matches
Mail list logo
