Also allows for some logistical synchronization in the global
distribution channel(s) --- where needed.
Otis Wright
Mark Roberts wrote:
Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 29 Jul 2003 at 11:27, Mark Roberts wrote:
Sounds about right. The official embargo date is some time in
It has been my experience that major competitors -- to the extent they
are interested -- have knowledge of competitive product specs long
before they are released to the general public.
Otis Wright
Mark Roberts wrote:
Rob Studdert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 29 Jul 2003 at 11:27, Mark
I would guess from the thrust of past communciations that the feeling is
mutual -- to say the least.
Otis Wright
Bruce Rubenstein wrote:
There are some folks here that I would love to run some medical
experiments on with that lens.
BR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You may remember that
And now we have software written by non-humans. New it would happen.
Right on Keith.
Otis Wright
Keith Whaley wrote:
Well, I'll be danged!
There WAS some validity to it.
However, I don't think it was a human that entered a zero as a divisor,
that caused the software problem.
Warnings that a
Are you sure its a generational thing. I don't recall getting very many
prints from slides which account for 95 percent (best guess) of my
personal (as opposed to work related) photo work since 1958. Never
had much use for prints once I discovered slides. I now keep print
film in one
. he figured that slides account for less than 1% of total film sales of Fuji USA. he didn't know the actual number though, but it is miniscule compared to their print film sales.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: Otis C. Wright, Jr. rusty.@att.net
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July
First camera: Brownie Hawkeye (ca. 1952) followed by Argus and then
Petri
First Pentax: Spotmatic (SP) (ca. 68) followed by Spotmatic F in 74
and a couple of ES IIs and a few more lenses in recent years.
No K mount gear.About the time that move appeared on the horizon
My experience is decidedly different over quite a long period and a wide
variety of products. In the main, their valuing factors may have been
different from mine, but I don't recall and instance were my experience
differed significantly with their findings (I sure it happened but on
the
Been a long time in this valley. When do we get to climb the next
mountain?
Otis Wright
T Rittenhouse wrote:
Well, I submit that each handmade custom photographic print is distinct,
that an expert can tell if it was printed by the photographer or by someone
else, that even two prints
Nice Touch.
Good luck.. Have a great time and take good care. Looking forward to
hearing about it all when you have time to join visit with us again.
Otis Wright
T Rittenhouse wrote:
Interesting only to my friends on the list. I guess you ain't one, so ignor
the thread.
To those who
What little out-of-warrantee digital camera repair I've run into has
been almost all due to damage of one sort or another or heavy use
bordering on abuse. In all cases repair has been quite expensive, which
supports the suggestion that repair of low end devices will for the most
part not be
All though the spare camera may well make repair feasible which surely
is a cost factor in itself, direct cost savings may not be so great. My
experience is that labor/overhead are by far the major cost contributors
to most repairs. Often the cost to recover a part from an assembly
exceeds
Are you promising to be on the next plane.
Otis
Bruce Rubenstein wrote:
See, I told you. All you serious Pentax users should seek camera
asylum in Norway. No one would make fun of you, or show disrespect for
your beloved brand of camera, which will be taken care of forever.
Then there are those items that get set aside for
inspection.
I lost mail (letters) to and from 'Oz this past Christmas. First time
that has happened in many years.
Otis
Rob Studdert wrote:
On 8 Mar 2003 at 10:50, Craig Schroeder wrote:
The 2 times that I bought things
Nice catch. I use the SMC Takumar lens twice a week on the average.
I didn't see the difference even with the hint.
Otis.
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
you got it.
Lens has been repaired most likely.
JCO
-Original Message-
From: Paul Stenquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday,
As we all know, in time, all things come to end.Keep an eye on the
Sun..
At this venue, they just pass. Fortunately.
Otis
Brendan wrote:
Children, children when will it end :p
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote: Bahahahah :)
And I was about to say that Pal = Bruce
There goes wave-particle duality into the wastebasket again.
Must be a new breed of photons.
Otis
Bruce Rubenstein wrote:
Don't approach it from digital signal processing, because it has
nothing to do with what's going on. The phenomenon of interest is
where the photon hits the
This has been my experience also. However, use my digital (which does
have a fairly capable computer interface) mostly for field work.
That said, I have observed that there are some number of users who do
take advantage ot the direct linkage along with computer control and in
some cases
101 - 118 of 118 matches
Mail list logo
