On Fri, 23 Feb 2007, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
My home page in the browser just loads the home page on my website. :-)
Mine does too. Check it out:
http://tinyurl.com/18r
Kostas
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Fri, 23 Feb 2007, Jack Davis wrote:
Makes me think of Howard De Von's (SP) restaurant that once existed in
Monterey, CA.(early 70's) If given 24 hrs notice, they would prepare
you a complete bulls head, including the eyes, which the menu noted as
being a special delicacy.
My late (and
On Fri, 23 Feb 2007, Scott Loveless wrote:
On 2/23/07, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eating eyeballs strikes me as a little unsightly.
You should try it and see for yourself.
Yeah, but I see his point.
Kostas
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007, Markus Maurer wrote:
accessories.
So far I have two bottles of the same age and that glass and some old silver
plates.
You can see them here, but this is by far not what I want to achieve in the
end, it's some bad photoshopping so far as an exercise only :-)
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007, Markus Maurer wrote:
Another tricky decision for me will be what things to clean beside the
glass and where to leave the original dust on
You may want to give it a different feel by leaving the glass in a
damp environment to get dusty and even get some spider webs.
I
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I'm not confusing anything you total bag of shit.
Now shut the fuck up and go die painfully.
Hey, I did not subscribe to the PDML to read such nonsense.
Please don't quote JCO (swearing at him is OK).
On Feb 14, 2007, at 12:51 PM, J. C. O'Connell
On Thu, 15 Feb 2007, John Whittingham wrote:
Wasn't that sentence supposed to have a question mark?
William Robb
You're just being pedantic now 8)
Isn't he by half! ;-)
Rhetorical questions occasionally end with a full-stop or an
exclamation mark. In my use that casued William's remark, I
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007, John Whittingham wrote:
dont be confused by the K24/2.8. It'not a real
K lens, its just a later M lens they didnt designate
as M because of the size. The real K24 is the original
K24, the K24/3.5.
Well, now you've told me something there, I never knew. Thanks John.
I
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007, John Whittingham wrote:
I just checked Boz's site, indeed it was made 1977-84, definitely in the M
era, the appearance has more of the black of the K than any of my M lenses
which appear blue/black in my collection.
Yes, but how about the engraving at the front.
Kostas
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007, Adam Maas wrote:
Pentax DSLR's with M42 lenses (which
offer metering only via the green button hack or DoF preview
Is that true with M42s? I thought that it meters fully in Av mode
without any user intervention.
Kostas
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007, Bob W wrote:
with Carl Zeiss. Certainly it is very like modern CZ lenses in its
looks, and rather different from other K lenses in the gnurly part of
the focus ring, if I remember correctly. It feels like a CZ to me, and
is very similar in shape and feel to the CZ 21/2.8
What happened with this?
Kostas
On Thu, 25 Jan 2007, Patrice LACOUTURE (GMail) wrote:
Hello,
Some of you may have noticed my latest GESO, about a nice conjunction
between the thin moon crescent and the planet Venus last Saturday (GESO
visible here):
On Sun, 11 Feb 2007, Brian Walters wrote:
I've seen good Z20's go for as little as $50 while the much less
capable MZ-50 seems to have no trouble in fetching $100 or more.
That's because the MZ-50 has a shutter, while the Zs have a vibrator.
If you are ok with the cripple, the MZ-50 is a
On Sun, 11 Feb 2007, Peter Lacus wrote:
It is not typical of the era, I am afraid.
may I ask you why?
It has nice overall rendition, but is fairly unsharp in wide
apertures.
Kostas
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Thu, 8 Feb 2007, Igor Roshchin wrote:
BTW, there was a recent eBay auction where you can see the trunk
it normally comes with:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=190071886400
It's impressive. :-)
Wow! Thanks Igor.
Kostas
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Sat, 10 Feb 2007, Peter Lacus wrote:
yep, when I bought my istDs last month I acquired also one of those.
It's my first lens from the legendary K-series. Since my istDs
familiarization phase is over now, it's a good time to give it a try...
It is not typical of the era, I am afraid.
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, Igor Roshchin wrote:
Heavy on the pocket and beyond:
Seemingly a rear lens: A 400/2.8
http://www.adorama.com/US%20%20%20%20248576.html
The price seems to be rather reasonable: $2.5K for this expensive lens.
(I cannot justify anything over $1000 for myself.)
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I've heard less credible rumors on the DA55, but here's hoping it's
an f/2 or faster too!
That should be extremely straightforward:
http://kmp.bdimitrov.de/lenses/primes/normal/K55f1.8.html
Kostas
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, Cotty wrote:
On 7/2/07, Joseph Tainter, discombobulated, unleashed:
UPS and others charge extortionate brokerage fees
and if they fail to deliver, their collection points are miles away.
Parcel Force collection points are scattered evenly about and the
nearest is a ten
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007, William Robb wrote:
Cute brunette with a black eye today.
And the other one?
Kostas
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
Subject: Re: 77mm f1.8 ltd
Bastards at Don's Photo are worse than this list.
They stuck a 70mm in front of me today.
And sure enough, it's still there as we speak :-)
Enjoy!
Kostas
--
PDML
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Best dogs I've owned were mongrels. The best of al of them was half
English Foxhound, half German Shepherd. She was brilliant, fast and
athletic. She could open the front gate or leap over the five-foot
back fence. She could tell time and would come
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Scott Loveless Subject: Re: I gotta brag
On 1/30/07, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
small children who couldn't take a hint. Got any recommendations for
a low key breed that gets along well with small kids?
On Wed, 31 Jan 2007, Boris Liberman wrote:
I've had a car crash this morning.
Oh dear. Pleased you are well.
Kostas
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007, Ralf R. Radermacher wrote:
Well, obviously there are limits. Just found this on their website:
http://www.cafeliegeois.com/kopi_luwak.htm
270 USD for 15 cups.
I am taking orders. I have seen how my 18-mth old ferments corn;
should be easy.
Payment in Pentax equipment
On Sat, 27 Jan 2007, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Given the different format proportions of the E-1 compared to an *ist
D/DS, the relationship is 5Mpixels spread over an 18x13.5 mm sensor
vs a 20.9x15.7 mm sensor. In area, that comes to about 35% less light
gathering power at the sensor.
Is the
On Mon, 29 Jan 2007, William Robb wrote:
We had the annual obedience trial at the old dog club this weekend.
My little Rottie puppy won a PCD title in three trials, and qualified in all
four trials.
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/brag/jester_pcd.html
Well done!
Pentax content:
K10D
On Fri, 26 Jan 2007, Peter Lacus wrote:
The K 28/3.5 might be the sharpest and best resolving 28 of them all.
Unfortunately, it's as slow as a crippled mule. But I still use mine.
if 3.5 is slow as a crippled mule, how would you characterize for
example 16-45/4 zoom?
Err, a mid-(price)
On Tue, 23 Jan 2007, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I disagree. As a seller, I never leave feedback until the buyer does.
Well, that's not how the game is played:
--
http://pages.ebay.co.uk/help/ebayexplained/selling/index.html
5.
On Wed, 24 Jan 2007, Paul Stenquist wrote:
On Jan 24, 2007, at 5:53 AM, Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jan 2007, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I disagree. As a seller, I never leave feedback until the buyer does.
Well, that's not how the game is played:
That's the way the game is played
On Wed, 24 Jan 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The rules I deleted were yours and yours alone. Ebay has no specific policy
in regard to feedback timing or sequence.
There was an ebay URL there as well; I promise I did not hack into
that site.
Kostas
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On Mon, 22 Jan 2007, Adam Maas wrote:
http://www.mawz.ca/sets/deadheads/index.html
Trying out the Autoviewer software that Godfrey used for his recent
GESO, and quite liking it.
Is 5/6 a digital capture? I really like the texture of the background.
Kostas
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On Mon, 22 Jan 2007, Scott Loveless wrote:
We hear a lot about 31mm and 77mm LTD lenses. It's been a while since
anyone has mentioned much about the 43.
My recollection of comments I have read here is that it is a very good
lens, just not on par with the other two. Not on price either, I
On Tue, 23 Jan 2007, Digital Image Studio wrote:
I just stumbled upon a gallery of some particularly good work too:
http://www.motljus.com/motljus5_0.php?language=english
Kostas
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Fri, 19 Jan 2007, Bob Shell wrote:
Anyone who stays home and takes care of kids is not unemployed!
My experience says he is a hero.
My hat off to you Scott. I hope you enjoy your new occupation.
Kostas
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Fri, 19 Jan 2007, DagT wrote:
Many women, however, told my wife that she was a bad mother for
leaving her kids...
I have a great idea: I will do the same (or just announce so) and then
sieve off above idiots.
Kostas
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Fri, 19 Jan 2007, Bruce Dayton wrote:
As one who shoots weddings and portraits regularly, I have to caution
on too wide a shooting. Although the prime is probably better
corrected for linear distortion, you have to be cautious about
shooting too close with too wide a lens. The reason is
On Wed, 17 Jan 2007, Patrick Genovese wrote:
Pros:
Sharp... even wide open though it is not at its best.. by f5.6 -
f8 its tack sharp
Sorry, I am struggling to understand this statement as a pro. At f8
all lenses are created equal. Is there a typo in the even...
sentence above?
Kostas
On Tue, 16 Jan 2007, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
A strange feeling. I still have three exposures to go on that roll
of film.
Nice story, well written. Thanks Godfrey.
I am wondering if I can still write my name on paper. Sure, I can type
it, see below :-) Never had good hand-writing anyway.
On
All the best Shel. I hope it all goes well.
Kostas
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Digital Image Studio wrote:
series lenses certainly does not limit my ability to manual focus. In
fact I much prefer the consistency and feel of the the focus ring
grips on the A series lenses if I'm to be honest. This is simply my
opinion of course.
And I prefer to MF
On Tue, 9 Jan 2007, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I take pictures, I don't wax ecstatic over how many lenses I've got
or how wonderful the old shit was.
sick of this nonsense
Then move to a different thread. This is a Pentax list and ecstasy
over our Pentax equipment is on topic.
Kostas
--
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Bob W wrote:
Scots English
Isn't that an oxymoron?
nope, it's a dialect. Ask Rabbie Burns and Robert Louis Stevenson.
Ask Ally next door, ken!
Kostas
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Excessive ecstasy over equipment is a sign that your priorities are
out of whack.
Is there such a thing as non-excessive ecstasy?
By the way, passing judgement on people's priorities is out of whack.
etc. Stated over and over again, obsessively
On Tue, 9 Jan 2007, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Jan 9, 2007, at 6:46 AM, mike wilson wrote:
What about the use of would have for had? As in, If I would
have written it properly, nobody could have been offended.
Correct US use? It sounds diabolical to me.
It's a colloquialism or vernacular
On Wed, 10 Jan 2007, Digital Image Studio wrote:
Sill have two, but I've owned about ten over the years, mostly M, yes
they feel good but in reality the top end A series lenses that I have
retained are practically just as good.
Having owned plenty of lenses from the K, M, and A era, it is my
On Mon, 8 Jan 2007, Bob Shell wrote:
One year the phone company put my photography studio in the yellow
pages under Welding instead of Wedding. We could have sold a lot of
acetylene that year !!!
snip
It's funny in hindsight, but sure wasn't at the time.
I apologise for laughing loud :-)
On Mon, 8 Jan 2007, John Celio wrote:
I found a job.
Well done John! The early start may work well esp. if you also leave
early. Beat the traffic, do things while the shops are open, come home
at daylight, that kind of thing.
Kostas
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Mon, 8 Jan 2007, Frits W?thrich wrote:
You want to promote NHS ???
Sure, anything but medical emergency forces sale.
Kostas
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Mon, 8 Jan 2007, Adam Maas wrote:
The s is correct, z is american usage (Sadly common in Canada as the
schools teach correct english less and less).
Not sure what correct means in this case. I am lead to believe that
the American spelling is closer to the original spelling of the words.
Don't do that too often but...
On Fri, 5 Jan 2007, John Francis wrote:
After all, the FA* 80-200/f2.8 didn't cost that much.
Mark!
Kostas (buying three built-in electrical appliances and getting change
instead)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Tue, 2 Jan 2007, Tim ?sleby wrote:
Don't believe you.
With an IQ of 50 you should have trouble opening a door on your own ;-)
Loss of 50 IQ points. But we agree, he must have started pretty high.
Not sure if get well soon applies, Graywolf, but here goes anyway.
You had mentioned a visit
On Mon, 1 Jan 2007, Steven Larson wrote:
Where?
Markus is in Switzerland.
Kostas
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Fri, 29 Dec 2006, P. J. Alling wrote:
The important thing, Kostas, is how many do you still have? (If it's
less than 10 you need more...)
I am OK even by your criteria :-)
Kostas (should really be losing some more and using the rest much
more)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On Fri, 29 Dec 2006, W. Guy Finley wrote:
Hello all! Found this list after intensely studying Stan's Pentax
Welcome. Stan is great ;-)
both along with the new Metz SCA adapter so hopefully I should be
Not sure this will work with the K110D.
So, I look forward to tips and suggestions, any
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
No, the distances aren't precise, but I can get a more accurate idea the
next time I drive past the scene. I think I'll put the Lufkin in the Domke
on my way out later t'nite.
How about a FF body with the 18mm on it? If it works you know what you
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006, Digital Image Studio wrote:
We'll see, none of us know what will happen and even if they prosper
using your car analogy will we end up having Jags that are essentially
now just another Ford with a Jag badge?
Interesting analogy:
- The Real Jaguars are still Real Jaguars
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006, mike wilson wrote:
On a side issue: anyone seen a SCART/RF adaptor? I assume it would have to
be a powered black box. Can't find one anywhere.
Like that?
http://www.maplin.co.uk/Module.aspx?ModuleNo=33050criteria=scart%20RF%20modulatordoy=22m12
Kostas
--
PDML
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006, Digital Image Studio wrote:
It's pretty easy to add to a design
My AV Receiver has a Midnight setting; does this compress and is
this effectively what we are talking about?
Kostas
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006, mike wilson wrote:
Could be what I'm looking for. Thanks. What did you google for?
I didn't. I went into maplin.co.uk and searched for SCART RF
modulator.
Kostas
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006, Mark Roberts wrote:
I wonder if Hoya's HMC filters will now get the Pentax SMC treatment.
Maybe the super HMC (or whatever they call them).
Kostas
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006, Cotty wrote:
On 21/12/06, Mark Erickson, discombobulated, unleashed:
Fish and chips always does that to me. It's the greasy batter. Tastes
great going down, makes me feel like crap later
You've not eaten real fish and chips then lad ;-)
I always go for the
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006, Adam Maas wrote:
Actually, max movement is around 2.5mm on the DX format sensors.
So you are on 36+5=41mm already. The K-mount is 49mm wide, I think.
Kostas
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Tue, 19 Dec 2006, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Excellent. Used DSLR selling prices are holding up better than I
expected.
I sure hope so for all you, boys and girls, but I would not deduct any
conclusions from sales made on the 19th of Dec.
Charles, how about offering it as a BIN only at a price
On Tue, 19 Dec 2006, Mark Erickson wrote:
...you've processed (or had processed) a roll of film recently
I am still film-only. Last week I took delivery of what turned out to
be my best roll ever wrt keepers (Tri-X +1).
Kostas
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Wed, 20 Dec 2006, Bob Shell wrote:
I'm very interested in music, and have been working with synthesized
music since the first Moogs in the late 60s. As a holiday present
for my friends I have created my version of Bach's Wachet Auf/
Sleepers Awake and put it here for download as an mp3
On Wed, 20 Dec 2006, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
A pity. My only interest in 35mm film would be for the Hasselblad
XPan, which I would think would be a natural for your panorama
interests.
I skimmed through your BW workflow and immediately saw the light. I
just placed an order for more Tri-X.
On Mon, 18 Dec 2006, Timothy Sherburne wrote:
Walter Hamler wrote:
http://store.garyfonginc.com/licl.html
Anyone have and hands on experience with these units. There is a cloud
version and a clear version.
You could always try this...
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006, Adam Maas wrote:
Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006, P. J. Alling wrote:
I think it's nicely ironic that my AF280T flash units have better
functionality with the new generation of DSLRs than newer generation AF500s.
It's exactly as ironic as the fact
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, Bob W wrote:
Film is readily available in London in many places, such as
supermarkets, pharmacists and tourist kiosks.
You did mean 35mm, yes? Other than that, Bob is right, these are
historic cities with definite, unique character each.
Kostas
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
On Fri, 15 Dec 2006, Digital Image Studio wrote:
Some of that post war mentality of my grandparents must have rubbed
off on me. I see this regular and forced redundancy of what are
essentially physically long lived objects as a ridiculous waste of
resources and my cash. And I really despise
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Tom C wrote:
At least Sigma updates their flash. With Pentax you need a whole new unit.
Och aye! Sigma updates their TTL flashes to become P-TTL?
Kostas
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, William Robb wrote:
It's more stuff being left off that limits support for older equipment,
in this case, an analogue flash control.
Not sure what you are saying here, William. The AF-500FTZ is digitally
controlled, isn't it? It's the rear-facing sensor for TTL that is
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006, Tom C wrote:
Yeah I understand that technology changes... It doesn't help though that I
bought their most expensive flash unit and that now it's basically useless.
:-) Long before the life of the product itself has been exhausted.
That's an aperture-simulator kind of
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006, Tom C wrote:
Why would I shoot film just to use my flash unit?
I have many reasons to shoot film, as you know, but you should use
film because you bought a flash that is designed for a film camera.
Kostas
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006, P. J. Alling wrote:
I think it's nicely ironic that my AF280T flash units have better
functionality with the new generation of DSLRs than newer generation AF500s.
It's exactly as ironic as the fact that M42 have better functionality
than the pre-A bayonets: it's
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, mike wilson wrote:
Well, the camera is about 1/3rd cheaper in the US than the cheapest
UK price. By the time you have added duty, postage and VAT it will
be about the same, I suspect. The advantage being that US stockists
have some to sell.
Last time I checked,
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, mike wilson wrote:
Don't get me wrong, Kostas. _I'm_ not interested in buying one. 8-)))
Who cares; what does the wife say?
Kostas :-)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, David Savage wrote:
I don't think they trying to make digital images look like film,
rather they're goal is to try and have the high ISO digital noise look
more like grain as opposed to pixels.
That's what I read in Ken's translation: film-grain-like noise.
Kostas
--
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006, David Savage wrote:
On 12/12/06, Patrick Genovese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've never used P-TTL so please be kind to me and forgive my ignorance
on the subject.
The literature seems to suggest that to do wireless P-TTL you need a
flash unit acting as a controller and a
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006, Boris Liberman wrote:
On 12/12/06, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I went for a walk today and filled a 2G card with K10D RAW/DNG
exposures. I put the FA20-35 on it, used autofocus almost
exclusively, and just went snapping around the neighborhood. About
120
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006, Jan van Wijk wrote:
You can do that with The AF360FGZ, AF540FGZ and the
builtin flash of the *istD, you can NOT do that (yet) with
the builtin flash of the K10D!
I seem to recall Ken's transaltion to suggest it is mutually exclusive
with SR or sth.
I actually did some
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006, David Savage wrote:
On 12/12/06, Kostas Kavoussanakis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006, David Savage wrote:
On 12/12/06, Patrick Genovese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've never used P-TTL so please be kind to me and forgive my ignorance
on the subject
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006, Boris Liberman wrote:
SR: how does 35mm at 1/8 work on this?
http://homepage.mac.com/godders/neighborhood-K10D/source/16-imgp0725.html
Not a clue. I am trying to see if there is any significant picture
quality difference between *istD and K10D given same lens and same
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006, David Savage wrote:
I can attest that the hot shoe adapter F won't let the flash pop up
filly (As stated in the AF-540 FGZ manual)
Even if it did (eg Z1-p), it does not clumb on the hotshoe, so the
flash is liable to lose contact with the shoe/make contact with hard
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006, Joseph Tainter wrote:
So there is an Re: at the head of this. Can anyone see it?
Yeah!
Kostas
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
His first name is Attila, his surname is Boros. :-)
In some cultures surname goes first, without the coma between them.
Kostas
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Sun, 10 Dec 2006, graywolf wrote:
By the way, if anybody is interested, I am going down to Duke Tuesday to
see a specialist as the doctors here in Boone, and previously in
Charlotte, have all thrown up their hands and said I don't know what is
wrong with you.
Good luck Graywolf. A
On Mon, 4 Dec 2006, Dario Bonazza wrote:
Here are some of those pics, as published in my website:
Some amazing pictures, thanks for sharing Dario.
http://www.dariobonazza.com/gianna/gn1096.jpg
Can you explain to me the layers on the light please? What causes that
effect?
Kostas
--
PDML
On Fri, 8 Dec 2006, William Robb wrote:
I should probably have moved to a new technology flash with the istD, I
might have been happier with TTL performance.
You would have gone P-TTL then, P meaning a pre-flash. Not sure what
it does to dogs' expressions (although it's meant to be pretty
On Fri, 8 Dec 2006, Dario Bonazza wrote:
http://www.dariobonazza.com/provv/art11.jpg
Gobsmacking detail. Too sharp (eg right cheek)? What lens, again?
Kostas
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Wed, 6 Dec 2006, Digital Image Studio wrote:
Assuming that they are cashed up sufficiently to fulfill the demand
that they have created though their aggressive pricing.
Rob, what aggressive pricing?
SRPs and actuals from http://www.parkcameras.com/
No Canon 40D
Canon 30D 1,100 742
On Mon, 4 Dec 2006, John Whittingham wrote:
Thanks for that Adam on Boz's site the DS2 is listed as HS whatever that
is,
Look for High-Speed flash in
http://kmp.bdimitrov.de/technology/hot-shoe/index.html
Kostas
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Mon, 4 Dec 2006, P. J. Alling wrote:
Bob Shell wrote:
On Dec 4, 2006, at 4:00 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
Sailboats, waterfalls, not a lot of each print but in the aggregate a
few, but single shot I've sold the most of is this...
http://www.mindspring.com/~pjalling/PESO_--_untitledv.html
On Tue, 5 Dec 2006, J and K Messervy wrote:
Imagine a slow moving baseball game that goes for 5 days and you'd be
getting sort of close.
You forgot the woollie pullie. That's what makes it a real sport. Oh,
and the butcher recruited for a referee, white coat an' a'.
Kostas
--
PDML
On Tue, 5 Dec 2006, John Whittingham wrote:
It's looking that way, not to worry. I'm not sure how the AF280T would
perform, I think it's analogue only so would work with the *ist D but not
later bodies that are digital only such as the KD's.
As an auto?
Kostas
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
On Tue, 5 Dec 2006, John Whittingham wrote:
No idea, isn't it nmissing the connection fot the digital pin?
Not great with electronics, but I am guessing that all a flash needs
so as to operate in self-quenching auto is something to tell it
flash. That's the middle round contact and the ground
On Tue, 5 Dec 2006, Patrick Genovese wrote:
Despite all this I beleive that their conservative approach has proven
to be a wise one. for example never releasing the MZ-D --- the
panasonic sensor it was supposed to use is what killed Contax.
Philips (Dalsa) sensor.
I beleive that the next
On Tue, 5 Dec 2006, Tom C wrote:
Yes it's good for Pentax that the new K10D is in such high demand. It's bad
that they will inevitably lose some sales (bodies and lenses) because of
non-supply, especially those potential customers with no reason to have any
brand-loyalty to Pentax.
2
On Tue, 5 Dec 2006, P. J. Alling wrote:
I couldn't find the original PESO but I've put up a new Web sized image
it's here:
http://www.mindspring.com/~morephotos/PESO_--_untitledvbw.html
Thanks P. J.
Kostas
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
1 - 100 of 2070 matches
Mail list logo
