Mark Roberts wrote:
Keep in mind that most of the peer judging is apparently done by
Jostein. ;-)
This looks like the ultimate occasion to quote Henrik Ibsen:
Peer, you're lying. :-)
Jostein
--
http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/
http://alunfoto.blogspot.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
LOL Frank, that sure makes me feel better.
Jack
--- frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Dec 19, 2007 10:22 AM, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Keep in mind that most of the peer judging is apparently done by
Jostein. ;-)
One can't know what to expect from peer judging
On Dec 19, 2007, at 8:05 AM, frank theriault wrote:
One can't know what to expect from peer judging when one is
peerless...
Mark!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly
I like it Bruce. I'm into Slice o' Life photography myself. There's
nothing wrong with your photo. You're just dealing with folks who prefer to
see bugs, birds such. These people can be recognized buy their profound
utterances, such as:
Hibble bibble bobble bibble bop. Gubble gobble gabble
BTW:
I just noticed a thread on the DPReview Pentax board started by a
photographer who submits to two judged for admission galleries, the
Pentax Gallery and Onexposure.net. It seems all the photos rejected by
Pentax are accepted by Onexposure.net... and all the ones rejected by
Onexposure
I e-mailed them once at least half a year ago and got no reply. Then I
lost my interest.
Henk
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Brian Walters
Sent: 18 December, 2007 8:10 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Pentax gallery
at least half a year ago and got no reply. Then I
lost my interest.
Henk
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Brian Walters
Sent: 18 December, 2007 8:10 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Pentax gallery etc.
Hi Tom
You forgot to mention the aperture simulator...
Stan Halpin wrote:
http://graywolfphoto.com/pentax/pdml-faq.html
PESO = Photo Every So Often
GESO = Gallery Every So Often
PAW = Photo A Week
Using these as subject-line email headers allows the use of filters
for those who want to divert,
ago and got no reply. Then I
lost my interest.
Henk
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Brian Walters
Sent: 18 December, 2007 8:10 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Pentax gallery etc.
Hi Tom
Send them another message
Yes, that's certainly true
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/SL/
Quoting Thomas Wannenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Thanks Brian and Henk,
Its a really nice gallery so I would be proud to have a
Hi:
My two cents is that I find the kid's tongue visually distracting, my
eye has to look twice to see if it's just a really large lollipop or
something else. His facial expression seems to produce a sense of
unease too. What am I supposed to be feeling when I look at the photo?
P.
On 12/14/07,
I have been off the list for a long time and just got back. Since I
got back:
what is a PESO, GESO, and PAW?
I get that they are image submissions but what do the acronyms mean?
I looked for a FAQ and couldn't find one.
I stumbled on the Pentax Photo Gallery and emailed them to ask if I
http://graywolfphoto.com/pentax/pdml-faq.html
PESO = Photo Every So Often
GESO = Gallery Every So Often
PAW = Photo A Week
Using these as subject-line email headers allows the use of filters
for those who want to divert, or delete, messages involving posting
and discussion of members'
Hello...
How long ago did you email Pentax Photo Gallery? I takes them awhile
to reply and I doubt if they would turn you down. That's the easy
part ...
Cheers!
Bong
On Dec 18, 2007 12:58 AM, Thomas Wannenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have been off the list for a long time and just got
Hi Bong,
Thanks for the reply, its been about two weeks. I used the email
thingy on the website.
Tom
On Dec 17, 2007, at 12:45 PM, Bong Manayon wrote:
Hello...
How long ago did you email Pentax Photo Gallery? I takes them awhile
to reply and I doubt if they would turn you down.
Thanks, that makes so much sense.
On Dec 17, 2007, at 12:18 PM, Stan Halpin wrote:
http://graywolfphoto.com/pentax/pdml-faq.html
PESO = Photo Every So Often
GESO = Gallery Every So Often
PAW = Photo A Week
Using these as subject-line email headers allows the use of filters
for those who
Hi Tom
Send them another message. It shouldn't take that long and there's no reason
why they'd turn you down.
For future reference, there's a PDML FAQ here:
http://graywolfphoto.com/pentax/pdml-faq.html
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney,
Thanks Dave.
...is there something that says who's photo it is.??
No, not in the voting stage.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery
Ken, your 600mm shots have always amazed me
Bruce Dayton wrote:
You may be right - what I have seen lately is similar. Dramatic
landscapes or major wildlife (600/4 territory) seem to dominate these
days. People, slice of life and such don't seem to do very well. My
hit rate these days is down to about 1 in 30 - even though I have
Bruce Dayton wrote:
Here are the current counts for the categories:
Let's sort them:
Nature - 1077
Landscapes - 907
Travel - 474 (mostly nature/landscape again)
Cityscape/Urban - 466 (sort of landscape, isn't it?)
Macro - 464 (mostly nature again)
Wildlife - 446 (again)
Total for
The slant may tend to reflect the ratio of submissions. The
acceptance, as a percentage of offerings, is an unknown.
Jack
--- Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here are the current counts for the categories:
Abstract - 283
BW - 292
Cityscape/Urban - 466
Documentary - 295
Food - 67
I have recently submitted 3 landscape shots, all we're rejected in
about 4-5 days or so.
I submitted another today, landscape/BW themes, so we'll see.
Although the four pictures that did make it, we're submitted early and
most likely accepted on a we may not get a lot of response feelings,
are
Not sure if i commented on the shot Bruce, but if viewing on the photo
gallery would have given it a thumbs up.
Its the kid to the left that helps make the photo IMO
Dave
On Dec 15, 2007 1:03 AM, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I might expect that of the final judges, but the peer
I agree. No matter the subject, there is no question that it's much
more difficult to get an image accepted now than was the case in the
beginning.
Not disagreeing with Paul that there may be a genre sensitive policy in
place, but it's clear that landscapes bounce back as declined freely
and with
My last set of submissions had a 25% success rate.
2x landscapes (both declined)
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/K10D/_IGP9486_sml.jpg
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/K10D/_IGP9690.jpg
1x Action/sport/people (declined)
posters with a lot of accepted images
are being rejected outright.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery
You may be right - what I have seen lately is similar. Dramatic
landscapes or major
I'm beginning to think that somehow posters with a lot of accepted images
KW are being rejected outright.
KW Kenneth Waller
KW http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
KW - Original Message -
KW From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
KW Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery
You may be right - what I have seen
On Sat, Dec 15, 2007 at 02:26:12PM -0800, Bruce Dayton wrote:
You may be right. You have submitted some great stuff and I would
expect your level of submissions to be fairly consistent. If they are
rejecting as you surmise, it would be good of them to let us know so
that we don't waste time
outright.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery
You may be right - what I have seen lately is similar. Dramatic
landscapes or major wildlife (600/4 territory) seem to dominate these
days
I need to see if my perceptions are off base or not. I was rather
surprised that the photo I recently showed of the kid with lollipop
was declined without even making it to the judges. I would have
thought it would have made it through the peer judging. Let me know
if I am perceiving
I need to see if my perceptions are off base or not. I was rather
surprised that the photo I recently showed of the kid with lollipop
was declined without even making it to the judges. I would have
thought it would have made it through the peer judging. Let me know
if I am perceiving
Bruce, why do not think it was not seen by the judges?
Jack
--- Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need to see if my perceptions are off base or not. I was rather
surprised that the photo I recently showed of the kid with lollipop
was declined without even making it to the judges. I
Hello Jack,
speed of rejection - about 1 day.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Friday, December 14, 2007, 3:31:13 PM, you wrote:
JD Bruce, why do not think it was not seen by the judges?
JD Jack
JD --- Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I need to see if my perceptions are off base or not. I was
I've found it's very hard to get a kid pic in the gallery. I've only
made it with one of hers. The blowing bubbles shot was rejected in
one day. Based on what PDML members indicated in terms of recent
accepted pics, only dramatic landscapes make the grade. I rarely
submit any more. In
So you are indicating a no vote - at least that is what I am
hearing...which is fine, just trying to learn.
--
Bruce
Friday, December 14, 2007, 3:25:01 PM, you wrote:
JT I need to see if my perceptions are off base or not. I was rather
JT surprised that the photo I recently showed of the kid
Well that would be presumptions of me. You are a far better photographer
than I am.
I'm just guessing here.
Joe
-
So you are indicating a no vote - at least that is what I am
hearing...which is fine, just trying to learn.
--
Bruce
Friday, December 14, 2007, 3:25:01 PM, you wrote:
JT
You may be right - what I have seen lately is similar. Dramatic
landscapes or major wildlife (600/4 territory) seem to dominate these
days. People, slice of life and such don't seem to do very well. My
hit rate these days is down to about 1 in 30 - even though I have two
in the collection and
Bruce, I told you to include a little more of the right side guy's
face. ;-))
Jack
--- Joseph Tainter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well that would be presumptions of me. You are a far better
photographer
than I am.
I'm just guessing here.
Joe
-
So you are indicating a no vote -
Remember my speedy rejection whine awhile back?
I contacted Carolyn who said that she had, also, had a one day
rejection, was going to re-submit her image and suggested I do the
same. She stated that there had been some voting issues during that
particular time. I did re-submit my image and it was
I first posted it here to get ideas on cropping - only one person
suggested taking out everything but the boy - everyone else felt there
was some context to be had by leaving some of the teammates in.
Thanks for your thoughts. I am trying to figure out what is worth
submitting these days.
--
I may do that - my reason to ask here is to see if most people also
feel it should have been rejected or not. If most do, then it isn't
worth resubmitting and I learn something more about my photos. For
this one, I felt it was better than a quick rejection - but maybe I'm
wrong.
--
Bruce
I was better than a quick rejection, but I doubt that you could get it
accepted. I don't think it's what they're looking for. Fair? Maybe not, but
that seems to be the way things are.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I may do that
Bruce Dayton wrote:
So you are indicating a no vote - at least that is what I am
hearing...which is fine, just trying to learn.
I don't think I would have expected that photo to make the cut, Bruce.
The bar is set very high these days. That photo has just enough
shortcomings (composition and
I don't know why that would be the case, but there is no question that
you're in a position to realistically assess the work you're offering
and have the experience and detachment needed to objectively judge its
merits.
Naive it may be, but while there is no question the bar has been
raised, I
I don't know why it would be the case either, but observation suggests that
only landscapes have a fair chance of acceptance. I'm okay with that. Perhaps
the judges feel they need more of that genre. But I do believe it's very
difficult to score in some categories.
Paul
--
Well, I'd give it a thumbs up if it came up whiile I was voting. Definitely
worth a resubmission in my view.
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/SL/
Quoting Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I need to
I might expect that of the final judges, but the peer reviewing is one
of the concerns.
--
Bruce
Friday, December 14, 2007, 5:42:33 PM, you wrote:
MR Bruce Dayton wrote:
So you are indicating a no vote - at least that is what I am
hearing...which is fine, just trying to learn.
MR I don't
Here are the current counts for the categories:
Abstract - 283
BW - 292
Cityscape/Urban - 466
Documentary - 295
Food - 67
Glamour/Fashion - 38
Landscapes - 907
Lifestyle - 189
Macro - 464
Nature - 1077
Portraiture - 327
Sports/Action - 123
Travel - 474
Wildlife - 446
Yeah, when you look at the
In a message dated 12/14/2007 4:24:21 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I first posted it here to get ideas on cropping - only one person
suggested taking out everything but the boy - everyone else felt there
was some context to be had by leaving some of the teammates in.
So far today I've noticed five strange images on my Artist's Page in
awaiting review status. Anyone else experienced this?
Must be duplicate artist's numbers.(?)
I deleted them and have sent Carolyn two advisory emails.
Jack
__
Do You Yahoo!?
I'm going to closely monitor my submissions page 'til I hear from
Carolyn. She, of course, won't receive the emails until tomorrow
earliest.
Jack
--- Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't see anything unusual on my page - maybe it is what you said -
duplicate artist ID.
--
Bruce
I don't see anything unusual on my page - maybe it is what you said -
duplicate artist ID.
--
Bruce
Sunday, November 4, 2007, 9:15:50 AM, you wrote:
JD So far today I've noticed five strange images on my Artist's Page in
JD awaiting review status. Anyone else experienced this?
JD Must be
Jack Davis wrote:
So far today I've noticed five strange images on my Artist's Page in
awaiting review status. Anyone else experienced this?
Must be duplicate artist's numbers.(?)
I deleted them and have sent Carolyn two advisory emails.
You might want to change your password. Just in case.
I'm going to give it another day or so, but is a good suggestion. Been
no additional images show up on my Artist's Page and I've come across
a couple of the images while voting. Want'a guess how I voted? It's OK,
they were bad. :)
Jack
--- Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jack Davis wrote:
Wasn't but a few weeks ago it took about two weeks for a decision to be
made on offerings to the Pentax Gallery. Happened to my last five which
I had posted over a period of a few days. All five were declined at the
same time after a couple weeks, as I said.
Two days ago I offered the two Bodie
I couldn't even bring myself to make my comment...
Mark Roberts wrote:
Cotty wrote:
I used to have a GF years ago into obedience training.
Nah... You're making it too easy, Cotty.
--
Remember, it’s pillage then burn.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
The judge's criteria.(?)
Same thing as having a print accepted into a juried exhibit. Not a
competition unless ultimately vying for ribbons again other accepted
work.
Obviously not the case with the Pentax Gallery.
Jack
--- William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message
On 9/27/07, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
frank theriault wrote:
I think my problem with the Pentax Gallery is that I don't know what
the standard is. How can I aim for a target if I can't see it?
And it's a moving target, to boot. You never know who may be voting on
your
- Original Message -
From: Jack Davis
Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery Resignation
The judge's criteria.(?)
Same thing as having a print accepted into a juried exhibit. Not a
competition unless ultimately vying for ribbons again other accepted
work.
Obviously not the case
Yes, the judge's criteria..what else?
Now, let's move on.(?)
Jack
--- William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Jack Davis
Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery Resignation
The judge's criteria.(?)
Same thing as having a print accepted into a juried exhibit
: 27 September 2007 23:10
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery Resignation
Gee thanks. Now how do I get this arrow out of my butt?
Ob.Trivia - did you know that archery targets are called 'butts'?
Do you know why?
As far as the Pentax Gallery goes
William Robb wrote:
There have been occassions when a dissenting opinion has
triggered an outpouring of loathing and abuse at the
transgressor, also.
Yes, it puzzles me greatly. I just cannot imagine how deeply invested
in their views about someone else's photos these folks must be.
There
Agreed - it is irritating, and the acceptance/rejection procedure is
inconsistent. Several people have resubmitted images that were previously
declined and had them accepted.
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
overanalyzing. :-)
Tom C.
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery Resignation
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 20:02:43 -0700 (PDT)
..especially kind people.
Jack
--- Tom C [EMAIL
- Original Message -
From: Jack Davis
Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery Resignation
I don't see this as a competition. I'm not hoping to win Best of
Show, just a good enough nod.
If you are wanting to get a picture into a judged gallery, then what you are
hjoping is that your picture
We went to Crufts in London every year for 4 years...
The secret of longevity?
Tom C.
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: pentax list PDML@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery Resignation
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 09:35:36 +0100
On 27/09/07, William
Cotty wrote:
I used to have a GF years ago into obedience training.
Nah... You're making it too easy, Cotty.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the
On 9/27/07, Brian Walters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
And I'm a bit more enthusiastic about my photography - and that has to be a
good thing...
I'm glad for you, but I find that having every single photo that I
submitted rejected (with no reasons, I might add, so I really don't
know ~why~)
I don't see this as a competition. I'm not hoping to win Best of
Show, just a good enough nod.
Best set your A alarm.
Jack
--- William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Jack Davis
Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery Resignation
Actually, I consider I'm just
On 9/28/07, Malcolm Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
H
Should you send a picture of something disagreeable - but what if that were
then accepted?
We all know you take great pictures anyway, so why worry.
I'm not worried.
;-)
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri
From: Tom C
Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery Resignation
Overall I find people to be too easily impressed.
I find people too reluctant to label crap as what it is.
William Robb
Different sides of the same coin?
I need to back up a step. The reality is that most non-photographer people
look
Kenneth Waller wrote:
The reality is that most non-photographer people look at images and
have an
initial reaction.
The same holds true for a lot of photographer people.
And that's not *necessarily* a bad thing. The tendency to
over-intellectualize and/or nit-pick can be just as unproductive
Certainly, they do. But then the brain should probably get involved.
Tom C.
From: Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery Resignation
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 10:32:56 -0400
/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery Resignation
- Original Message -
From: Tom C
Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery Resignation
Overall I find people to be too easily impressed.
I find people too
Hi Frank,
I'm glad for you, but I find that having every single photo
that I submitted rejected (with no reasons, I might add, so I
really don't know ~why~) doesn't do much for my enthusiasm...
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
Perhaps they
You obviously learned a lot from her...
Norm
Cotty wrote:
Oh boy. I used to have a GF years ago into obedience training.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
The reality is that most non-photographer people look at images and have an
initial reaction.
The same holds true for alot of photographer people.
Kenneth Waller
http://tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery Resignation
I find people too reluctant to label crap as what it is.
I agree.
Kenneth Waller
http://tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery Resignation
- Original Message -
From: Tom C
Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery
The standard is there to be seen, but you need to learn how, and then be
willing to judge your own
pictures against those of others.
Bingo !
Kenneth Waller
http://tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery Resignation
On 27/09/07, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed:
I've judged a few contests. They are pretty damned subjective.
You wanna see really subjective judging, start hanging out at dog shows.
Oh boy. I used to have a GF years ago into obedience training. She had a
cross lab/collie called Sherpa -
On 27/09/07, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
I find that creating works that please someone else is a lot more
demanding, tiring, frustrating and annoying than creating things that
please just myself.
You are not taking enough pictures of blonde, blue-eyed, baby girls. From
On 27/09/07, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
I find that creating works that please someone else is a lot more
demanding, tiring, frustrating and annoying than creating things that
please just myself.
You are not taking enough pictures of blonde, blue-eyed baby girls. From
On 28/09/07, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
Cotty wrote:
I used to have a GF years ago into obedience training.
Nah... You're making it too easy, Cotty.
She trained *me* :-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
/0140190740/
ref=sr_1_1/026-6533884-2100457?ie=UTF8s=booksqid=1191003104sr=8-1
--
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Mark Roberts
Sent: 27 September 2007 23:05
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: RE: Pentax Gallery Resignation
On 28/09/07, Norm Baugher, discombobulated, unleashed:
You obviously learned a lot from her...
I certainly learned how to beg!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
On 9/28/07, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip Some of us might think it's a lot of mystical
droppings from the rear of a bull,snip
Bob,
You've got a way with words...
;-)
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
In a message dated 9/28/2007 2:11:33 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You are not taking enough pictures of blonde, blue-eyed, baby girls. From
my experience, totally out of focus or completely misexposed are merely not
very good. All others are excellent or superb.
Tom C wrote:
On 9/28/07, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip Some of us might think it's a lot of mystical
droppings from the rear of a bull,snip
Bob,
You've got a way with words...
;-)
cheers,
frank
I saw the mystical droppings from the rear of a dog lying on the sidewalk
On 9/28/07, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip Some of us might think it's a lot of mystical
droppings from the rear of a bull,snip
Bob,
You've got a way with words...
;-)
cheers,
frank
I saw the mystical droppings from the rear of a dog lying on the sidewalk
yesterday and almost took a
.
Kenneth Waller
http://tinyurl.com/272u2f
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery Resignation
That's true to some extent. But on a list like this, which is largely a
social community, one has to exercise some restraint. In the past, one
member
No, just subjectively judged as good enough. Nothing to do with where
it may fall in the balance of accepted or declined.
Jack
--- William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Jack Davis
Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery Resignation
I don't see
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 03:01:38PM -0400, Scott Loveless wrote:
Tom C wrote:
On 9/28/07, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip Some of us might think it's a lot of mystical
droppings from the rear of a bull,snip
Bob,
You've got a way with words...
;-)
cheers,
frank
I saw
- Original Message -
From: Jack Davis
Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery Resignation
No, just subjectively judged as good enough. Nothing to do with where
it may fall in the balance of accepted or declined.
Well then, good enough as compared to what?
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Boris Liberman
Sent: 27 September 2007 05:08
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery Resignation
Strange.
I really thought that you were rather competitive person, Cotty. I
am
fairly competitive
On 27/09/07, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
Cotty has always striven to be the least competitive person. If he
finds someone less competitive than himself, he works and works, and
trains and trains until he is less competitive than the other person.
He can't stand it if someone is less
On 27/09/07, Boris Liberman, discombobulated, unleashed:
I really thought that you were rather competitive person, Cotty. I am
fairly competitive, but in photography I don't feel any desire to prove
anything. So I don't really participate in competitions...
My competitive side extends solely
From: ann sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/09/27 Thu AM 03:24:42 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery Resignation
Gonz wrote:
Oops that should have been family Leporidae. I'm not sure whether
Frank is a Rabbit or a Hare.
wabbit
Frank, I think your photographs are beautiful. Screw the gallery.
rg2
On 9/27/07, mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: ann sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/09/27 Thu AM 03:24:42 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Pentax Gallery Resignation
On 9/27/07, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Actually I see any photographic competition as utterly pointless. snip
I agree 100%!
Funny thing is, I didn't see The Pentax Gallery as a competition. I
thought that as long as the photos met a minimum standard, they were
in, and it would
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/27/07, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Actually I see any photographic competition as utterly pointless.
snip
I agree 100%!
Funny thing is, I didn't see The Pentax Gallery as a competition. I
thought that as long as the photos met a minimum standard
201 - 300 of 903 matches
Mail list logo
