On Nov 28, 2007 9:06 PM, Igor Roshchin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Overall, I am surprised why the manufacturers of digital cameras have
reserved only unique file names for their cameras (even
though I understand their desire to stay with 8+3 naming scheme).
I wish they would allow the
It's a file naming standard. I guess the various manufactures are
sticking to it, though they often seem to violate other standards often
enough.
David J Brooks wrote:
On Nov 28, 2007 9:06 PM, Igor Roshchin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Overall, I am surprised why the manufacturers of digital
Hello everyone,
I believe I've seen somebody mentioning on this list this problem,
but I couldn't find the thread, so I apologize for bringing
up this question again.
I've been using serial number option in my *ist DS to number the
files. After it created the file IMGP.PEF located in
Far as I'm aware, nothing changed in this regard with the *ist DS up
to the last firmware.
Best solution is to not rely upon the in-camera numbering to always
produce unique file names. It's easy for the camera to get thrown off
by what's on the card. I download files into folders organized
Thanks, Godfrey.
I also copy files into the directories named as MMDD-event.
The problem here is that it all occured more or less within the
same event.
I don't like renaming files as a routine process, as depending on the
situation, they may be transferred and developed onto two different
On Nov 28, 2007, at 6:06 PM, Igor Roshchin wrote:
I also copy files into the directories named as MMDD-event.
The problem here is that it all occured more or less within the
same event.
Not much you can do when that happens other than rename the files
themselves as needed.
I don't
6 matches
Mail list logo
