According to a video about NYC's still vibrant analog photography
community presented on CNN.com
Interesting because it's treatment of the subject is as if it's
ancient technology.
http://www.cnn.com/video/#/video/living/2011/08/18/natpkg.film.not.dead.yet.cnn?hpt=hp_abar
Tom C.
--
PDML
Fucking hipsters!
But seriously, who cares if they still shoot film. Great for them.
There is nothing noble about how the data is recorded, only how people
remember it.
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 4:55 PM, Tom C caka...@gmail.com wrote:
According to a video about NYC's still vibrant analog
Entertaining presentation.
It's kinda like the famous quote by Nietsche in Also Sprach Zarathustra
... Film *is* dead, it just doesn't know it yet.
;-)
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 1:55 PM, Tom C caka...@gmail.com wrote:
According to a video about NYC's still vibrant analog photography
community
On 8/19/2011 16:55, Tom C wrote:
According to a video about NYC's still vibrant analog photography
community presented on CNN.com
Interesting because it's treatment of the subject is as if it's
ancient technology.
You're looking at it wrong, that's a thousand dollars or hard to find
spare parts. Just from experience, however, the one needed for a
critical repair will be missing or broken.
On 6/17/2011 11:15 AM, John Sessoms wrote:
Film's not dead, but the scanner apparently is.
$1000 for a broken
Proof of this is recent eBay auction:
Nikon Super Coolscan 8000 ED Film Scanner 8000ED 166220
Item condition: For parts or not working
Ended: Jun 16, 201112:57:31 PDT
Winning bid:
US $1,072.00 [ 28 bids ]
Shipping:
$49.95 UPS Worldwide Expedited
Seller:
Member id shutterbladeoutlet
I'm picking up my new V700 on Monday so I can scan my 6x7 negs I shot
a couple of weeks ago.
DS
On 17 June 2011 20:22, Gasha cir...@konts.lv wrote:
Proof of this is recent eBay auction:
Nikon Super Coolscan 8000 ED Film Scanner 8000ED 166220
Item condition: For parts or not working
Ended:
Not so great news are that my Neopan 400 reserves are depleted, and Fuji
closed production for 400 and 1600 speed 120 format film :(
Ordered some Neopan Across 100 rolls, will try to burn some film during
my short Norwegian trip next week. 6x7 this time.
Gasha
David Savage wrote:
I'm
Why does a good sale price on a discontinued scanner mean that film
is not dead? it just means that medium format film scanners are
becoming scarce because there isn't enough demand to keep them in
production and used prices are rising as a result, even parts are
becoming valuable
I had the same thought, to be honest. This is more of a going out of
business sale.
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi gdigio...@gmail.com wrote:
Why does a good sale price on a discontinued scanner mean that film
is not dead? it just means that medium format film scanners
Film's not dead, but the scanner apparently is.
$1000 for a broken scanner?
From: Gasha
Proof of this is recent eBay auction:
Nikon Super Coolscan 8000 ED Film Scanner 8000ED 166220
Item condition: For parts or not working
Ended: Jun 16, 201112:57:31 PDT
Winning bid:
US $1,072.00 [ 28
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Film is not dead ...
Message-ID: 4dfb470c.3010...@konts.lv
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Proof of this is recent eBay auction:
Nikon Super Coolscan 8000 ED Film Scanner 8000ED 166220
Item condition: For parts
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Why does a good sale price on a discontinued scanner mean that film
is not dead? it just means that medium format film scanners are
becoming scarce because there isn't enough demand to keep them in
production and used prices are rising as a result, even parts are
becoming
the daisies! Its chemical processes are now history! It's
off the twig! It's kicked the bucket! It's shuffled off its mortal
coil, run down the curtain and joined the bleedin' choir invisible!!
FILM IS DEAD!!
How understated.
(Beautiful plumage though.)
just like peacock feathers. :-)
--
Godfrey
the daisies! Its chemical processes are now history! It's
off the twig! It's kicked the bucket! It's shuffled off its mortal
coil, run down the curtain and joined the bleedin' choir invisible!!
FILM IS DEAD!!
I loaded the MX yesterday. Necrofilmia? It's gonna be pissed when it
finds out
On 17/06/2011 14:22, Gasha wrote:
Proof of this is recent eBay auction:
Nikon Super Coolscan 8000 ED Film Scanner 8000ED 166220
Item condition: For parts or not working
Ended: Jun 16, 201112:57:31 PDT
Winning bid:
US $1,072.00 [ 28 bids ]
Shipping:
$49.95 UPS Worldwide Expedited
Seller:
Member
Yes, actually film is dead.
Same goes for oil-painted portraits.
Same goes for hand-made automobiles.
Of course one may still purchase a custom oil portrait.
And there are some small boutique auto companies who make them by hand.
This death is a matter of market presence, not existence.
Sincerely
: Gasha cir...@konts.lv
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Fri, June 17, 2011 8:22:36 AM
Subject: Film is not dead ...
Proof of this is recent eBay auction:
Nikon Super Coolscan 8000 ED Film Scanner 8000ED 166220
Item condition: For parts or not working
Ended: Jun 16, 201112:57:31
Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
Yes, actually film is dead.
Same goes for oil-painted portraits.
Same goes for hand-made automobiles.
Of course one may still purchase a custom oil portrait.
And there are some small boutique auto companies who make them by hand.
This death is a matter of market presence
Spelling corrected (damned spell checker...)
Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
Yes, actually film is dead.
Same goes for oil-painted portraits.
Same goes for hand-made automobiles.
Of course one may still purchase a custom oil portrait.
And there are some small boutique auto companies who make them
available on eBay because it was
discontinued.
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:53 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi gdigio...@gmail.com wrote:
Why does a good sale price on a discontinued scanner mean that film
is not dead? it just means that medium format film scanners are
becoming scarce because there isn't
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 6:06 PM, David Parsons parsons.da...@gmail.com wrote:
Back when I had an interest in scanning my old film, the common
recommendation was to buy a Nikon 5000 scanner off eBay, then resell
it when you were done with the project. Even at $500, you could
basically get your
On Jun 18, 2011, at 10:07 AM, Mark Cassino wrote:
I paid almost twice that for a refurbished ED 8000 a while back... Damn
quirky
scanner and software but it really makes the 6x7 exposures sing. I don't
shoot
as much film as I'd like to, but then, I don't shoot as many pixels as I'd
No reason for film to be entirely dead. It is not feeling very well, but
it is quite alive nontheless.
Boris
On 2/19/2011 3:17 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
http://www.petapixel.com/2011/02/18/35mm-sprocket-hole-panoramic-photos/
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http
On Sun, Feb 20, 2011 at 12:36 AM, Scott Loveless sdlovel...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 8:17 AM, David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.petapixel.com/2011/02/18/35mm-sprocket-hole-panoramic-photos/
My last two brain cells died looking at that.
Then my work here is
On 20/02/2011 6:56 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
My last two brain cells died looking at that.
Then my work here is done, now its off to the Pentax Forums to help them
Good luck with that.
--
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://www.petapixel.com/2011/02/18/35mm-sprocket-hole-panoramic-photos/
Dave
--
Documenting Life in Rural Ontario.
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
York Region, Ontario, Canada
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 19/02/2011 7:17 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
http://www.petapixel.com/2011/02/18/35mm-sprocket-hole-panoramic-photos/
Given the nature of that article, it would be better if it were dead.
--
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
William Robb wrote:
On 19/02/2011 7:17 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
http://www.petapixel.com/2011/02/18/35mm-sprocket-hole-panoramic-photos/
Given the nature of that article, it would be better if it were dead.
On the other hand, how about this one???
On 19/02/2011 9:36 AM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
On the other hand, how about this one???
http://www.petapixel.com/2010/12/10/turn-film-into-ribbon-bows-for-presents/
Yup, kill it and put it out of it's misery.
--
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
William Robb wrote:
On 19/02/2011 7:17 AM, David J Brooks wrote:
http://www.petapixel.com/2011/02/18/35mm-sprocket-hole-panoramic-photos/
Given the nature of that article, it would be better if it were dead.
It's so great that you're back on the PDML, Bill. ;-)
--
Mark Roberts - Photography
Ok, this does NOT make me a true believer.
Good film work still surpasses DSLR work
while good digital work is also useful.
Each has its advantages and disadvantages.
=
DSLR/DigitalDarkroom:
--
Hardware software cost more.
Hard to get a
On 19/02/2011 4:22 PM, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
Ok, this does NOT make me a true believer.
Good film work still surpasses DSLR work
while good digital work is also useful.
Each has its advantages and disadvantages.
=
DSLR/DigitalDarkroom:
On Sat, Feb 19, 2011 at 8:17 AM, David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.petapixel.com/2011/02/18/35mm-sprocket-hole-panoramic-photos/
My last two brain cells died looking at that.
--
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com/fivetoedsloth/
__o
_'\,_
(*)/ (*)
--
PDML
On Dec 27, 2010, at 18:12, David Parsons wrote:
Love the first review:
Customer Reviews
I hate the New Hipstapack.
BTW, it would be nice to tell people that that page forces iTunes to
open when the page loads.
I wondered what that was all about. Chrome said this page is trying to
Yeah, I use chrome too. I didn't realize that iTunes was the culprit.
I'm so used to ads trying to do something stupid that I assume I have
to tell most of them to shut up.
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 10:04 AM, Charles Robinson charl...@visi.com wrote:
On Dec 27, 2010, at 18:12, David Parsons
From: David Parsons
Love the first review:
Customer Reviews
I hate the New Hipstapack.
BTW, it would be nice to tell people that that page forces iTunes to
open when the page loads.
Not if you don't have iTunes installed.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
No film isn't dead, but this just might kill it, from embarrassment.
On 12/24/2010 10:53 AM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
Check out this iPhone App.
http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/hipstamatic/id342115564?s=143441ls=1
--
Where's the Kaboom? There was supposed to be an Earth-shattering Kaboom
Love the first review:
Customer Reviews
I hate the New Hipstapack.
BTW, it would be nice to tell people that that page forces iTunes to
open when the page loads.
On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 10:53 AM, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
Check out this iPhone App.
Sorry, I didn't even think of that.
-Original Message-
From: David Parsons parsons.da...@gmail.com
Sender: pdml-boun...@pdml.net
Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 19:12:42
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail Listpdml@pdml.net
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Film is Really Dead
I'm confident digital can, at least as well as film, do all sorts of
'nasty ugly drawings' on purpose.
Just because it feels trendy.
The beauty of digital 'you never faked anything analog with such
ease'. LOL (or not?)
2010/12/24 Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com:
Check out this iPhone App.
Check out this iPhone App.
http://itunes.apple.com/us/app/hipstamatic/id342115564?s=143441ls=1
--
Steve Desjardins
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the
From: William Robb
Did you know that Moosamin is one of the last bastions of film use in
Canada?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dvu2QPQLlYA
That's cool, but where do you get the film developed?
Wallyworld no longer has film labs, and I think all the drug chains will
soon follow suit. So if
Easy. You hope people don't think it out.
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 9:38 AM, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
From: William Robb
Did you know that Moosamin is one of the last bastions of film use in
Canada?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dvu2QPQLlYA
That's cool, but where do you
I spent a year in Moosamin one summer, 1996 i think
Dave
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 11:57 PM, William Robb war...@gmail.com wrote:
Did you know that Moosamin is one of the last bastions of film use in
Canada?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dvu2QPQLlYA
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
Did you know that Moosamin is one of the last bastions of film use in
Canada?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dvu2QPQLlYA
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly
On 30 September 2010 13:57, William Robb war...@gmail.com wrote:
Did you know that Moosamin is one of the last bastions of film use in
Canada?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dvu2QPQLlYA
I gotta get me one o them, digital sux!
--
Rob Studdert (Digital Image Studio)
Tel: +61-418-166-870 UTC
William Robb war...@gmail.com wrote:
Don't chimp, just take another picture.
If you don't have time to take another picture, did you waste it chimping?
Mark!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,
- Paul Sorenson allarou...@earthlink.net wrote:
According to the web site of one local wedding shooter. He says...
*Film or Digital? Don't be fooled - newer isn't always better.
Digital is wonderful in the studio - under controlled lighting and
from
short distances - but
On Apr 22, 2009, at 7:59 PM, Paul Sorenson wrote:
Food for thought...
Baloney followed by Indigestion most likely.
G
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the processor, at least - but the proper preview is the
scanned neg or the contact sheet IF it's pro grade AND the magnifying is
adequate.
LF
William Robb escreveu:
- Original Message - From: Bob Sullivan
Subject: Re: Film is not dead
Maybe they are checking to see if they got the shot
- Original Message -
From: pnstenqu...@comcast.net
Subject: Re: Film is not dead
- Paul Sorenson allarou...@earthlink.net wrote:
According to the web site of one local wedding shooter. He says...
blah blah blah here
Bologna
I think the point any wedding
On Apr 23, 2009, at 9:33 AM, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: pnstenqu...@comcast.net
Subject: Re: Film is not dead
- Paul Sorenson allarou...@earthlink.net wrote:
According to the web site of one local wedding shooter. He says...
blah blah blah here
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist
Subject: Re: Film is not dead
I think the point any wedding photographer should take away from
this, and there is a valid point within the self serving hype is
that chimping at something fast paced like a wedding is the wrong
thing
Bologna
Oh, I agree!! I was more than a little surprised that a pro photog
would put that on his web site - it's so blatantly uninformed.
-p
pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
- Paul Sorenson allarou...@earthlink.net wrote:
According to the web site of one local wedding shooter. He
- Original Message -
From: Paul Sorenson
Subject: Re: Film is not dead
Bologna
Oh, I agree!! I was more than a little surprised that a pro photog
would put that on his web site - it's so blatantly uninformed.
There is more truth there than you are seeing.
William Robb
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
Good point. I rarely chimp at a wedding. I take some test shots in key
locations before the action begins and check my histograms. When there's
real downtime, I'll review a few key frames. Chimping can become a
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: pnstenqu...@comcast.net
Subject: Re: Film is not dead
- Paul Sorenson allarou...@earthlink.net wrote:
According to the web site of one local wedding shooter. He says...
blah blah blah here
Bologna
I think the point
According to the web site of one local wedding shooter. He says...
*Film or Digital? Don't be fooled - newer isn't always better.
Digital is wonderful in the studio - under controlled lighting and from
short distances - but definitely is not suitable for weddings. Digital
is finicky and
Maybe they are checking to see if they got the shot.
Are the film shooters so great that they don't need to check if eyes are open,
or dopey expressions are in the frame?
Seems like a big reach to say,
We do it right the first time, every time! No need to check.
Regards, Bob S.
On Wed, Apr 22,
- Original Message -
From: Bob Sullivan
Subject: Re: Film is not dead
Maybe they are checking to see if they got the shot.
Are the film shooters so great that they don't need to check if eyes are
open,
or dopey expressions are in the frame?
In the time it takes you to chimp your
On 14/4/09, Cesar Matamoros II, discombobulated, unleashed:
Hoping to spend more time with the PDML family,
At the end of May by any chance.?
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
Nice photos indeed, but one of the commentators (form National Trust or
whatever was the name) was being filmed in such a wondrous way that tree
was growing straight out of his upper appendage.
You live in beautiful country, sir, but I know that for a witness...
;-).
Boris
Cotty wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7997559.stm
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7997559.stm
--
Cheers,
Cotty
nice to see a little friend perched on the pier.
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
Nice photos.
Dave
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 5:24 PM, Cotty cotty...@mac.com wrote:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7997559.stm
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=| http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML
On 14/4/09, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
nice to see a little friend perched on the pier.
You mustn't refer to cesar like that ;)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML
Cotty,
Now, now, easy my friend :-P I guess I do need to follow the list to
make sure all of you behave...
Personal 'stuff' has kept me from following the list and I really need
to correct this at some point.
Hoping to spend more time with the PDML family,
César
Panama City, Florida
Cotty
Well...no .-)
But it is going to be fun to take pictures with a FOV like an old 35mm
and DOF like a 127mm.
I´ll post some PESOs when I´ve made som pictures.
DagT
Den 11. april. 2008 kl. 00.15 skrev Godfrey DiGiorgi:
I suppose next you're going to suggest that we should really all be
I look forward to seeing them! :-)
And one of these days I'll pull that P645 out and run a roll of film
through it!
G
On Apr 11, 2008, at 8:36 AM, DagT wrote:
Well...no .-)
But it is going to be fun to take pictures with a FOV like an old 35mm
and DOF like a 127mm.
I´ll post some
You should. MF is great for such things as portraits.
Three boys:
http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id=319510
http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id=320087
http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildekritikk/vis_bilde.cgi?id=337569
(last one is digitized by photographing the
- Original Message -
From: DagT [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(last one is digitized by photographing the negative with K10D .-)
DagT
Wow! The K10D shoots negatives quite well. These are very nice AND I
wanted to say I thought your portrait H in the PUG was superb work. Cheers,
Christine
Den 11. april. 2008 kl. 23.12 skrev Christine Aguila:
- Original Message -
From: DagT [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(last one is digitized by photographing the negative with K10D .-)
DagT
Wow! The K10D shoots negatives quite well. These are very nice
AND I
wanted to say I thought your
Here it is:
http://i106.photobucket.com/albums/m265/dagthrane/_IGP5688-Razzle.jpg
No AF, no exposure meter, maximum 6 exposures at 0.1 pictures per
second with grafmatic back but it´s a rangefinder with 4x5 film
format .-)
DagT
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Don't let Greywolf know he might be jealous.
DagT wrote:
Here it is:
http://i106.photobucket.com/albums/m265/dagthrane/_IGP5688-Razzle.jpg
No AF, no exposure meter, maximum 6 exposures at 0.1 pictures per
second with grafmatic back but it´s a rangefinder with 4x5 film
format .-)
DagT
I suppose next you're going to suggest that we should really all be
thinking of daguerrotype and bromoil as being the only true ways to
produce beautiful photographs... ];-)
G
DagT wrote:
Here it is:
http://i106.photobucket.com/albums/m265/dagthrane/_IGP5688-Razzle.jpg
No AF, no
Whats next, Cotty buys a blimp.:-)
Looks like a nice grab.
Dave
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 4:31 PM, DagT [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here it is:
http://i106.photobucket.com/albums/m265/dagthrane/_IGP5688-Razzle.jpg
No AF, no exposure meter, maximum 6 exposures at 0.1 pictures per
second with
AP article that's actually fair and balanced. It's an interesting read.
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/P/PHOTOGRAPHERS_FILM?SITE=APSECTION=HOMETEMPLATE=DEFAULTCTIME=2007-09-19-13-49-01
http://tinyurl.com/2ljb36
Quote from the end of the article: I think that in the next five years
On 21/09/07, Scott Loveless, discombobulated, unleashed:
Queue the holy warriors.
Holy warriors don't like waiting ;-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
I think that in the next five years
you're going to see almost a retro backlash because of the things that
film gives you that you can't get with digital.
what, like good pictures? ducking for cover
rg2
On 9/21/07, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 21/09/07, Scott Loveless, discombobulated,
Scott Loveless wrote:
AP article that's actually fair and balanced. It's an interesting
read.
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/P/PHOTOGRAPHERS_FILM?SITE=APSECTION=HOMETEMPLATE=DEFAULTCTIME=2007-09-19-13-49-01
http://tinyurl.com/2ljb36
Quote from the end of the article: I think that in
Mark Roberts wrote:
Scott Loveless wrote:
AP article that's actually fair and balanced. It's an interesting
read.
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/P/PHOTOGRAPHERS_FILM?SITE=APSECTION=HOMETEMPLATE=DEFAULTCTIME=2007-09-19-13-49-01
http://tinyurl.com/2ljb36
Quote from the end of the
Nice article, good read. Many of the comments
expressed I share though none are a big surprise.
Obviously, film has a look that many of us can't live
without.
-Brendan
--- Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AP article that's actually fair and balanced.
It's an interesting read.
On Sep 21, 2007, at 9:38 AM, Scott Loveless wrote:
AP article that's actually fair and balanced. It's an
interesting read.
http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/P/PHOTOGRAPHERS_FILM?
SITE=APSECTION=HOMETEMPLATE=DEFAULTCTIME=2007-09-19-13-49-01
http://tinyurl.com/2ljb36
Quote from the
On Jun 26, 2005, at 11:05 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Isn't that called Ego Googling when you search for yourself on
the web?
Some people I know have some very interesting namesakes...
Cheers,
- Dave
http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/
On 6/26/05, Larry Levy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And where does that place Lumpy (Mr. Greenjeans)?
Actually, he was the Godfather. Not just of Pee Wee Herman (which he
was), but in the Don Corleone sense, of the whole late-50's early-60's
Children's TV empire. No one could make a move
Captain Kangaroo Mr Rogers were some of the good things I watched
with my kids on TV. Pee Wee Herman was another matter... never up to
the quality of the first two. The loss of Jim Henson is positively
sad. The Muppets are my #2 favorite right behind the Rocky and
Bullwinkle series. (Is there
Bob Sullivan wrote:
The Muppets are my #2 favorite right behind the Rocky and
Bullwinkle series. (Is there any truth to the rumor that the Boston
police think Miska is Boris Badenoff's son?) :-)
I understand why you say that. The Rocky and Bullwinkle show was unusual
the way it appealed
frank theriault fantasized (gloriously) about Mr. Greenjeans
Actually, he was the Godfather. Not just of Pee Wee Herman (which he
was), but in the Don Corleone sense, of the whole late-50's early-60's
Children's TV empire. No one could make a move without him:
Jim Henson: Godfather, there's
Mr. Theriault, you are a very strange man, um err. wabbit?
frank theriault wrote:
On 6/26/05, Larry Levy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And where does that place Lumpy (Mr. Greenjeans)?
Actually, he was the Godfather. Not just of Pee Wee Herman (which he
was), but in the Don Corleone
On 6/26/05, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mr. Theriault, you are a very strange man, um err. wabbit?
That was my favourite scene from the Godfather. I don't know why, it
just was. It just seemed to perfect a parody to miss out on...
vbg
You can act like a man!! slap!
Ya gotta love
On 6/26/05, Tom Reese [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I understand why you say that. The Rocky and Bullwinkle show was unusual
the way it appealed to kids and adults. There were two levels of humor
with odd references and puns that only adults would understand. There's
some very funny stuff in
On 6/26/05, Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Captain Kangaroo Mr Rogers were some of the good things I watched
with my kids on TV. Pee Wee Herman was another matter... never up to
the quality of the first two. The loss of Jim Henson is positively
sad. The Muppets are my #2 favorite
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: Shel Belinkoff
Subject: PAW PESO GESO POW WOW ZOWIE - Film is Not Dead
http://home.earthlink.net/~pdml-pics/not-dead.jpg
Just a quick and dirty snap ... but it depicts a Universal Truth LOL
Can
you find the deeper meaning hidden
http://home.earthlink.net/~pdml-pics/not-dead.jpg
Just a quick and dirty snap ... but it depicts a Universal Truth
LOL Can
you find the deeper meaning hidden within the arcane symbolism?
Hmm. Stuffed toy mooseheads support film forever?
Godfrey
On 24/6/05, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://home.earthlink.net/~pdml-pics/not-dead.jpg
Just a quick and dirty snap ... but it depicts a Universal Truth LOL Can
you find the deeper meaning hidden within the arcane symbolism?
Film is not dead, just pretending to be asleep
On Jun 25, 2005, at 7:44 PM, Cotty wrote:
Film is not dead, just pretending to be asleep.
It's pining...
Cheers,
- Dave (someone had to say it)
http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/
Did you know that Bob Keeshan, before his role as Captain Kangaroo, spent
five years playing Clarabell the Clown on The Howdy Doody Show?
Shel
[Original Message]
From: frank theriault
As I just posted in reply to Shel's initial post, I was thinking of
Mr. Moose on Capt. Kangaroo. There
On 6/25/05, Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Did you know that Bob Keeshan, before his role as Captain Kangaroo, spent
five years playing Clarabell the Clown on The Howdy Doody Show?
I did not know that.
It could turn up as a Jeopardy question (I mean answer) someday.
Thanks for the
@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PAW PESO GESO POW WOW ZOWIE - Film is Not Dead
On 6/24/05, Mat Maessen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought they had bunny ears...
As I just posted in reply to Shel's initial post, I was thinking of
Mr. Moose on Capt. Kangaroo. There was a rabbit on that show, too
1 - 100 of 254 matches
Mail list logo
