On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 9:21 AM, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rick Womer wrote:
2. If you want to read about QC problems, scroll through a Canon forum
someday.
Check *this* out:
http://robgalbraith.com/bins/multi_page.asp?cid=7-8740-9068-9357
I was talking to my Henrys rep last
Mine also.
Godfrey - www.gdgphoto.com
On Aug 9, 2008, at 7:55 PM, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Apparently someone had to get it.
Bob Blakely wrote:
Am I the only person who's DA* 16-50 worked great out of the box and
continues to do so?
Regards
Bob...
Apparently someone had to get it.
Bob Blakely wrote:
Am I the only person who's DA* 16-50 worked great out of the box and
continues to do so?
Regards
Bob...
---
I don't mind if you don't like my manners.
I don't like them
Last time I wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Antti-Pekka Virjonen
Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2008 10:10 AM
I just got a note that my K10D is back from warranty service (just
slightly over 1 week, I'm happy to have the official Pentax
warranty service in my city). I don't know yet if
Well...
1. Cotty's favorite lenses are (ummm...) modified Pentax lenses.
2. If you want to read about QC problems, scroll through a Canon forum someday.
Rick
http://photo.net/photos/RickW
--- On Wed, 8/6/08, Antti-Pekka Virjonen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The body was fine in the tests.
Rick Womer wrote:
2. If you want to read about QC problems, scroll through a Canon forum
someday.
Check *this* out:
http://robgalbraith.com/bins/multi_page.asp?cid=7-8740-9068-9357
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE
- Original Message -
From: Antti-Pekka Virjonen
Subject: RE: K10D (V1.30 firmware) and DA* 16-50/2.8 focus problems
I am a bit hesitant to buy another DA* lens now. Should I sell all my
Pentax gear and follow Cotty to the dark side now ;-)?
I would be very hesitant about buying
, and I haven't heard many
complaints about that lens.
Paul
On Aug 6, 2008, at 9:22 AM, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Antti-Pekka Virjonen
Subject: RE: K10D (V1.30 firmware) and DA* 16-50/2.8 focus problems
I am a bit hesitant to buy another DA* lens now. Should I
That was an interesting read; thanks for that
On 8/6/08, Mark Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rick Womer wrote:
2. If you want to read about QC problems, scroll through a Canon forum
someday.
Check *this* out:
http://robgalbraith.com/bins/multi_page.asp?cid=7-8740-9068-9357
--
PDML
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist
Subject: Re: K10D (V1.30 firmware) and DA* 16-50/2.8 focus problems
I suspect that quality control issues are what has delayed the DA*
60-250. Hopefully, this long delay is a sign that Pentax is revising
manufacturing and/or quality
I suspect that quality control issues are what has delayed the DA*
60-250. Hopefully, this long delay is a sign that Pentax is revising
manufacturing and/or quality control procedures.
Maybe they will rehire Nguyen.
William Robb
-
That would help, but the problem now is that they
Am I the only person who's DA* 16-50 worked great out of the box and
continues to do so?
Regards
Bob...
---
I don't mind if you don't like my manners.
I don't like them myself. They're pretty bad.
I grieve over them long winter
Mine either worked out of the box or I can't tell it's bad. It looks
great to me. GS
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 12:57 PM, Bob Blakely [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am I the only person who's DA* 16-50 worked great out of the box and
continues to do so?
Regards
Bob...
On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 10:57:00AM -0700, Bob Blakely wrote:
Am I the only person who's DA* 16-50 worked great out of the box and
continues to do so?
No.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit
Bob Blakely wrote:
Am I the only person who's DA* 16-50 worked great out of the box and
continues to do so?
You're not! Mine has also been great from the word go.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,
Mark Roberts wrote:
Rick Womer wrote:
2. If you want to read about QC problems, scroll through a Canon forum
someday.
Check *this* out:
http://robgalbraith.com/bins/multi_page.asp?cid=7-8740-9068-9357
- Original Message -
From: Bob Blakely
Subject: Re: K10D (V1.30 firmware) and DA* 16-50/2.8 focus problems
Am I the only person who's DA* 16-50 worked great out of the box and
continues to do so?
No, but there have been a remarkable number of QC complaints off that lens.
Far more
No, you are not alone. I got the first one on the list, I think, and
it has been fine all along.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Wednesday, August 6, 2008, 10:57:00 AM, you wrote:
BB Am I the only person who's DA* 16-50 worked great out of the box and
BB continues to do so?
BB Regards
BB Bob...
BB
I wrote:
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2008 2:42 PM
It seems that my K10D does not focus correctly at infinity but
instead focuses a lot closer when shooting landscapes for example
(front focus?). This seems to happen more at the wide end (16mm)
of the lens.
Shooting portraits or other
Good to hear.
I'm still seeing problems with my K10D and a few of my DA lenses, but
my FA lenses seem ok.
I'll be sending the camera and lenses in, to see what needs adjusting.
Dave
On Wed, Apr 23, 2008 at 3:09 AM, Antti-Pekka Virjonen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wrote:
Sent: Wednesday,
Antti, what you are describing is a lens with a defect--apparently
a fairly common defect. Your images still appear approximately okay
because at 16 mm the depth of field is so great.
I agree it being a defect. On the other hand, I could not get any
sharper images or better image quality by
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 6:20 AM, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 26/3/08, Antti-Pekka Virjonen, discombobulated, unleashed:
It seems that my K10D does not focus correctly at infinity
Is there an echo in here??
is there an echo in here??
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
2008/3/28, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 6:20 AM, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 26/3/08, Antti-Pekka Virjonen, discombobulated, unleashed:
It seems that my K10D does not focus correctly at infinity
Is there an echo in here??
is there an echo in
From: AlunFoto [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2008/03/28 Fri AM 08:57:19 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: K10D (V1.30 firmware) and DA* 16-50/2.8 focus problems
2008/3/28, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 6:20 AM, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Subject: Re: K10D (V1.30 firmware) and DA* 16-50/2.8 focus problems
It seems that my K10D does not focus correctly at infinity but
instead
focuses a lot closer when shooting landscapes for example (front
focus?). This seems to happen more at the wide end (16mm) of the
lens.
Shooting portraits
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Joseph Tainter
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2008 3:45 AM
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: K10D (V1.30 firmware) and DA* 16-50/2.8 focus problems
It seems that my K10D does not focus
It appears that at 16mm the lens is not focused all the way to infinity
but the resulting pictures of remote objects are still as sharp as they
can get (well within DOF) even at f2.8.
Antti, what you are describing is a lens with a defect--apparently a
fairly common defect. Your images still
Hi,
I've been a bit out from the pdml traffic lately. I guess this has been
discussed before (and there is a lot of discussion in the web about
front or back focus problems), but here goes (again?)...
It seems that my K10D does not focus correctly at infinity but instead
focuses a lot closer
I wrote:
...
I've been reading some discussion which suggested the problem is
with the SMD and maybe downgrading the firmware to V1.20 would
solve the problem (by using the focus motor in the K10D body).
...
Ouch, that should have been SDM instead of SMD.
Antti-Pekka
On 26/3/08, Antti-Pekka Virjonen, discombobulated, unleashed:
It seems that my K10D does not focus correctly at infinity
Is there an echo in here??
. ;-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
It seems that my K10D does not focus correctly at infinity but instead
focuses a lot closer when shooting landscapes for example (front
focus?). This seems to happen more at the wide end (16mm) of the lens.
Shooting portraits or other subjects in the few meters range the focus
seems to be right
31 matches
Mail list logo
