On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 06:42:01AM -0500, Nick Wright wrote:
I designed for 1280 pix wide.
I have a screen with considerably more horizontal pixels than that, but I
don't maximize my browser window. This is partly because I have a lot of
things going on, but also because unadorned paragraphs of
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 22:55 -0500, Nick Wright
nickwright1...@gmail.com wrote:
Okay, the blue link color has been changed. Seems a little easier on
the eyes to me, what do you all think?
Yes, looks better.
And I also like the fact that you've changed the Fine Art page to have
two images, each
As to the images on the fine art page.
I use a program called Shutterbug to build my website. It's an
excellent program and I really enjoy how it works ... mostly.
It does have quite a number of quirks though.
On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 3:35 AM, Brian Walters supera1...@fastmail.fm wrote:
On Wed,
Also, I'm surprised about the 1280 thing. I've been watching my stats
since I put up the blog and it seems to me that the great majority of
folks visiting my site were set at 1280.
This may well be because those viewing at lower resolution don't come back.
The way to look at it is: How many
Clean layout...but the link colour on the text dosn't show out that well
on the grey and what default width did you design for, mines set on
1024x786 and I have to scroll left to right to view the menu
Feroze
Nick Wright wrote:
http://www.nickdavidwright.com/
Thanks in advance!
--
I designed for 1280 pix wide.
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 5:48 AM, Feroze angel...@telkomsa.net wrote:
Clean layout...but the link colour on the text dosn't show out that well on
the grey and what default width did you design for, mines set on 1024x786
and I have to scroll left to right to view
Nick Wright wrote:
http://www.nickdavidwright.com/
Thanks in advance!
Nice, clean. I'd say it's a good fit for your style; it represents you
well. I like the way the gallery looks and works.
This could be simply an observation or could be a complaint: this is a
click and try site.
On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 21:30 -0500, Nick Wright
nickwright1...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.nickdavidwright.com/
Thanks in advance!
--
~Nick David Wright
http://www.nickdavidwright.com/
It's a nice, clean design and the menu navigation is intuitive. The
only hitch I found was the
Oh, and one more suggestion.
Let Mark Roberts know about the site so that he can add it to his PDML
Members' Web Sites Page:
http://www.robertstech.com/pdml.htm
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/SL/
On 22/4/09, Nick Wright, discombobulated, unleashed:
I designed for 1280 pix wide.
Interesting. I used to set my pages at 800 wide (to accommodate people
on older monitors) but have since widened out to 1000 pixels. I figure
anything that makes it easier on the viewer means more likely to
Nick Wright wrote:
http://www.nickdavidwright.com/
Thanks in advance!
Nice, clean design. Few nits. I'd redesign to make the page width at
least partially fluid or, failing that, fit a 1024-pixel screen (still
the recommended optimum design width). And move the navigation menu to
the left
Cotty wrote:
On 22/4/09, Nick Wright, discombobulated, unleashed:
I designed for 1280 pix wide.
Interesting. I used to set my pages at 800 wide (to accommodate people
on older monitors) but have since widened out to 1000 pixels. I figure
anything that makes it easier on the viewer means more
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Nick Wright nickwright1...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.nickdavidwright.com/
Thanks in advance!
--
~Nick David Wright
http://www.nickdavidwright.com/
Works for me!
Well done.
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 8:50 AM, Mark Roberts msrobert...@ysu.edu wrote:
(ending with / instead of ). Fix that and it looks like
your code will validate completely.
. Overall, I'd be thrilled if my students came up with
anything as good!
I'd be thrilled if I knew what that meant.:-)
Dave
--
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 8:58 AM, Mark Roberts msrobert...@ysu.edu wrote:
Cotty wrote:
On 22/4/09, Nick Wright, discombobulated, unleashed:
I designed for 1280 pix wide.
Interesting. I used to set my pages at 800 wide (to accommodate people
on older monitors) but have since widened out to
As others have said, a fine, clean design.
However: even assuming that your design was for 1280 pixels wide,
placing the only controls on the main page all the way to the right of
that format is problematic ... many will get to the page, not see the
controls, find nothing responsive to the
Okay, the blue link color has been changed. Seems a little easier on
the eyes to me, what do you all think?
Also, I'm surprised about the 1280 thing. I've been watching my stats
since I put up the blog and it seems to me that the great majority of
folks visiting my site were set at 1280.
Thanks
- Original Message -
From: Nick Wright
Subject: Re: OT: New web site, give me your thoughts
Okay, the blue link color has been changed. Seems a little easier on
the eyes to me, what do you all think?
Also, I'm surprised about the 1280 thing. I've been watching my stats
since I put
http://www.nickdavidwright.com/
Thanks in advance!
--
~Nick David Wright
http://www.nickdavidwright.com/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
19 matches
Mail list logo
