Hi,
With a last name like fenstermacher, you'd think I'd have this German
thing down...
it's pretty easy really:
-ei- is like ice, lice, rice, nice, dice, mice, spice, Zeiss...
-ie- is like wiener, as in schnitzel.
alles in ordnung!
---
Bob
Thursday, October 10, 2002, 3:24:00 PM, you
Perhaps only in the window-making business?
Collin O'Brendemuehl
:)
With a last name like fenstermacher, you'd think I'd have this German
thing down...
Expectations are getting steeper all the time. A week ago it wouldhave
bebeen enough to be sub $US2000.
Regards,
Anthony Farr
- Original Message -
From: Chris Brogden [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(snip)
and
with a $1000 DSLR based on an MZ body, their stock would shoot up faster
than a
On Tue, 1 Oct 2002, gfen wrote:
Again, who else has AF 645 cameras? Quite a few.. but who has a
silent, quick focus 645? No one. Its a wide open market.
Yup. If Pentax came out with USM and IS lenses for their 645 camera, and
with a $1000 DSLR based on an MZ body, their stock would shoot up
I've been kindof thinking about this too. But I've
been thinking more along the lines of medfo lenses
with USM. Think about it... a 645 or even 67 lens with
a USM driven AF.
Nick
--- Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
gfen,
Boy, I gotta admit you have a very interesting idea
there...
On Tue, 1 Oct 2002, Nick Wright wrote:
I've been kindof thinking about this too. But I've
been thinking more along the lines of medfo lenses
with USM. Think about it... a 645 or even 67 lens with
a USM driven AF.
I think you'd need an AF 67, first.. But yeah. I actually forgot the USM
idea
Well I remember a few years ago, someone here posed
the question as to why Pentax had not introduced an AF
67 camera. I believe the general consensus was
something along the lines that the motor required to
focus such large lenses would be much too big for the
camera body. But with USM the motor
7 matches
Mail list logo
