On 20 May 2010 17:51, John Francis jo...@panix.com wrote:
I think there may be a communication problem here. By .. that does this ...
I thought you meant the reply command was generating the cross-reference
headers (In-Reply-To: and References:), not that your mail interface was
always
I'm using Asus EEE 701 (oldest) 4Gb SSD model for more than 2 years.
Startup time is impressive - no need to suspend.
Just power off and then power on :)
It is running Linux.
You can drop it with no fear (i did at least 2 times)
Writes are not rocket fast (about the same 25-30mb/sec), but seek
On 19 May 2010 19:57, steve harley p...@paper-ape.com wrote:
just noticed this buried in the Chicago thread (i use a true threaded mail
reader, so if you use reply to post something on a new topic, it will
still get threaded with whatever you reply to)
hijack
My ISP has recently changed its
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 08:57:30AM +0100, mike wilson wrote:
On 19 May 2010 19:57, steve harley p...@paper-ape.com wrote:
just noticed this buried in the Chicago thread (i use a true threaded mail
reader, so if you use reply to post something on a new topic, it will
still get threaded with
On 20 May 2010 15:40, John Francis jo...@panix.com wrote:
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 08:57:30AM +0100, mike wilson wrote:
On 19 May 2010 19:57, steve harley p...@paper-ape.com wrote:
just noticed this buried in the Chicago thread (i use a true threaded mail
reader, so if you use reply to post
If you're using gmail, then you can configure it to work with a a pop
client, such as Thunderbird. I'm sure your ISP also offers this
option. Once it's set up it's much bette, (though some peoples mails
don't seem to thread properly.
I had noticed that Gmail has recently upgraded their web
After using it for a day, I got used to it. Not perfect, but not
certainly not terrible.
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 9:15 AM, P. J. Alling
webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
If you're using gmail, then you can configure it to work with a a pop
client, such as Thunderbird. I'm sure your ISP also
I suppose, but I run a real e-mail client, so I don't have to get used
to it. Only problem is that I really should check the online junk
folder more often. I haven't figured out hot to disable it entirely and
sometime it catches something important.
On 5/20/2010 11:39 AM, Tom C wrote:
On 5/20/10, P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
I had noticed that Gmail has recently upgraded their web interface to make
it unsuable to anyone used to either the web page metaphor or a real e-mail
client. I'm sure someone, somewhere must like it.
I'm one.
It is definitely far
The simple fact that threads are all compressed under the same header
in gmail makes finding and reading e-mails easier, and makes the
overall appearanceof the inbox much smaller.
I read yesterday that the next version of hotmail will be adopting the
same approach.
Tom C.
On Thu, May 20, 2010
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 03:49:18PM +0100, mike wilson wrote:
On 20 May 2010 15:40, John Francis jo...@panix.com wrote:
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 08:57:30AM +0100, mike wilson wrote:
On 19 May 2010 19:57, steve harley p...@paper-ape.com wrote:
just noticed this buried in the Chicago thread (i
From: P. J. Alling
If you're using gmail, then you can configure it to work with a a pop
client, such as Thunderbird. I'm sure your ISP also offers this
option. Once it's set up it's much bette, (though some peoples mails
don't seem to thread properly.
Probably mine among them. I
On 2010-05-14 20:53 , William Robb wrote:
I'm wondering what the consensus on these new beasties is?
I am planning on an upgrade to Win7 and adding some ram, and am
wondering if I should get one of these as a C drive as well.
I am thinking of one of the 40 or so gb ones, since I don't use my C
On 2010-05-19 14:57, steve harley wrote:
i have done some study [on SSDs]
If you really want the ultimate in balls-to-the-wall performance, look
into the SSDs that have a PCI Express x16 interface rather than a SATA
interface.
You can't really RAID them, beyond two drives, because you run
On 2010-05-19 14:56 , Doug Franklin wrote:
On 2010-05-19 14:57, steve harley wrote:
i have done some study [on SSDs]
If you really want the ultimate in balls-to-the-wall performance, look
into the SSDs that have a PCI Express x16 interface rather than a SATA
interface.
should have
- Original Message -
From: steve harley
Subject: Re: Solid State Hard Drives
On 2010-05-14 20:53 , William Robb wrote:
I'm wondering what the consensus on these new beasties is?
I am planning on an upgrade to Win7 and adding some ram, and am
wondering if I should get one
they seem to be very expensive compared to nebulous state HDs. I have just
ordered a new machine and went through the same questions as you, but
decided I couldn't afford them as yet. I believe the read/write speeds are
also still relatively low and that there's some way to go before they
become
On 15/05/2010, p...@web-options.com p...@web-options.com wrote:
they seem to be very expensive compared to nebulous state HDs. I have just
ordered a new machine and went through the same questions as you, but
decided I couldn't afford them as yet. I believe the read/write speeds are
also still
I'm wondering what the consensus on these new beasties is?
I am planning on an upgrade to Win7 and adding some ram, and am wondering if
I should get one of these as a C drive as well.
I am thinking of one of the 40 or so gb ones, since I don't use my C drive
for anything other than OS and
On 5/15/10, William Robb war...@gmail.com wrote:
I am thinking of one of the 40 or so gb ones, since I don't use my C drive
for anything other than OS and programs.
I have almost exactly that setup, though on a Linux machine.
40 gig SSD for root with swap /var and /home on rotating
media.
On May 15, 2010, at 2:53 PM, William Robb wrote:
I'm wondering what the consensus on these new beasties is?
There are good ones and crap ones. I seem to recall that Intel ones are pretty
good but someone else is bound to know more than me.
I've decided that my next laptop will have an SSD.
21 matches
Mail list logo
