Kostas, thank you for clearing this up.
Godfrey, no offense taken.
--
Attila
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Hello, Attila.
What do you think about the camera?
It was one of the 10 K10D's which reached Romania?
I was able to play with one, just a little. Except for a small
ergonomic glitch (I think the body is too thick for my hand, but it's
nothing too serious) I liked it very much. And the SR seems
Hello Alex,
Thursday, December 14, 2006, 2:03:18 PM, you wrote:
ACS What do you think about the camera?
I'm very pleased with it. This being my first DSLR ever, I have
nothing to compare against. Size is just right, and it has a nice
balance with the DA 16-45.
ACS It was one of the 10 K10D's
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Aside from speed testing, that is.
I went for a walk today and filled a 2G card with K10D RAW/DNG
exposures. I put the FA20-35 on it, used autofocus almost
exclusively, and just went snapping around the neighborhood. About
120 some exposures in all fit on a 2G
On Dec 14, 2006, at 4:43 PM, Mark Cassino wrote:
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Aside from speed testing, that is.
I went for a walk today and filled a 2G card with K10D RAW/DNG
exposures. I put the FA20-35 on it, used autofocus almost
exclusively, and just went snapping around the neighborhood.
Hi!
Can you please elaborate further about the improvement over the
DS part?
- more pixel resolution
- more dynamic range
Har! Now, kind sir, will you please tell me what kind of
improvement in
dynamic range you observe so far?
I have not done quantified
Aside from speed testing, that is.
I went for a walk today and filled a 2G card with K10D RAW/DNG
exposures. I put the FA20-35 on it, used autofocus almost
exclusively, and just went snapping around the neighborhood. About
120 some exposures in all fit on a 2G card.
I processed the DNGs
Godfrey, I would have expected some very immediate, some popping
improvement over *istD(S). I am not seeing it. These are all fine
pictures, and you're very strong photographer indeed, however, I don't
see anything that will tell me - look, Boris, this is where K10D
outdoes all its older brothers
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006, Boris Liberman wrote:
On 12/12/06, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I went for a walk today and filled a 2G card with K10D RAW/DNG
exposures. I put the FA20-35 on it, used autofocus almost
exclusively, and just went snapping around the neighborhood. About
120
I went for a walk today and filled a 2G card with K10D RAW/DNG
exposures. I put the FA20-35 on it, used autofocus almost
exclusively, and just went snapping around the neighborhood. About
120 some exposures in all fit on a 2G card.
http://homepage.mac.com/godders/neighborhood-K10D/
Good
Hi!
Godfrey, I would have expected some very immediate, some popping
improvement over *istD(S). I am not seeing it. These are all fine
pictures, and you're very strong photographer indeed, however, I don't
see anything that will tell me - look, Boris, this is where K10D
outdoes all its
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006, Boris Liberman wrote:
SR: how does 35mm at 1/8 work on this?
http://homepage.mac.com/godders/neighborhood-K10D/source/16-imgp0725.html
Not a clue. I am trying to see if there is any significant picture
quality difference between *istD and K10D given same lens and same
Hello Godfrey,
Very simple but pleasant photos:) I must admit that I would have
walked past many of those without noticing them.
--
Attila
Tuesday, December 12, 2006, 11:06:31 AM, you wrote:
GD Aside from speed testing, that is.
GD I went for a walk today and filled a 2G card with K10D
I must admit that I would have
walked past many of those without noticing them.
My point exactly.
__
Jerome Reyes Photography
http://exposedfilm.net
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Boris,
That's an unrealistic expectation. Both the *ist D and *ist DS are
very competent cameras. You will not see major improvements at web
resolution rendering between them and the K10D if you are exploiting
their capabilities to the fullest.
I've been completely unconcerned with the
On Dec 12, 2006, at 7:21 AM, Jerome Reyes wrote:
I must admit that I would have
walked past many of those without noticing them.
My point exactly.
Thank you both for the compliments, Jerome and Boris A!
Godfrey
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Yes indeed! Or the eye behind it... ;-)
Godfrey
On Dec 12, 2006, at 2:54 AM, Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
Other than that, it's a camera, it just does it best to not get in the
way of the lens attached to it.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
His first name is Attila, his surname is Boros. :-)
In some cultures surname goes first, without the coma between them.
Kostas
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
My apologies Attila. Both for the ordering issue and for the misspell!
G
On Dec 12, 2006, at 9:24 AM, Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
His first name is Attila, his surname is Boros. :-)
In some cultures surname goes first, without the coma between them.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Hi!
Godfrey, thank you for such a well detailed and thought out response. My
reply is between your lines.
That's an unrealistic expectation. Both the *ist D and *ist DS are
very competent cameras. You will not see major improvements at web
resolution rendering between them and the K10D
You're welcome, Boris. More discussion follows...
That's an unrealistic expectation. Both the *ist D and *ist DS are
very competent cameras. You will not see major improvements at web
resolution rendering between them and the K10D if you are exploiting
their capabilities to the fullest.
On 12/12/06, Jerome Reyes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I went for a walk today and filled a 2G card with K10D RAW/DNG
exposures. I put the FA20-35 on it, used autofocus almost
exclusively, and just went snapping around the neighborhood. About
120 some exposures in all fit on a 2G card.
I had virtually the same thought. How in the world could one fill a 2GB
card in one walk?
Cory
- Original Message -
From: Jerome Reyes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 7:16 AM
Subject: Re: my first shots with the Pentax K10D
687 is my fave... lots of good stuff - but that works the best for me.
ann
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Aside from speed testing, that is.
I went for a walk today and filled a 2G card with K10D RAW/DNG
exposures. I put the FA20-35 on it, used autofocus almost
exclusively, and just went
Hi!
Finally, I managed to extract the most necessary bit of information from
you, Godfrey! I'll get to that in due course.
My large -half size renderings are only 1000 pixels on the vertical
dimension at best. That is insufficient to image at the quality I
desire for A3 size prints. And
On Dec 12, 2006, at 9:31 PM, Boris Liberman wrote:
I think its simply calibrated better for the class of users that
Pentax expected to be interested in it, and that user group is more
inclined to use RAW and higher-end fine tuning of JPEGs destined for
post processing rather than prints
26 matches
Mail list logo
