Re: OT: WARNING Beware Firefox 58.0.1

John wrote: DO NOT UPGRADE Completely hosed my browser. Cannot browse due to firefox POPUPS. Maybe you should upgrade to 58.0.2. Perhaps it fixes your internal conflicts... 58.0.2 on Windows is working fine here. Mark Roberts Fri, 16 Feb 2018 19:09:04 -0800 wrote: Zos

Re: WARNING Beware Firefox 58.0.1

Nor here - 58.0.2 Alan C -Original Message- From: Igor PDML-StR Sent: 17 February, 2018 10:15 AM To: PDML@pdml.net Subject: Re: OT: WARNING Beware Firefox 58.0.1 John wrote: DO NOT UPGRADE Completely hosed my browser. Cannot browse due to firefox POPUPS. Maybe you

Re: OT: WARNING Beware Firefox 58.0.1

>People still use firefox? I use Chrome for sites I login using my Google account. A single login saves time. And I use the Google Search Engine when I don't care about being watched. For the rest, I use other browsers (including Firefox) and search engines (Duck Duck Go most frequently). Bulent

Re: PDML Photo Annual #10 Coming in 2018

As I understand the rules, at least one has to be included. Otherwise, I would never have made any of the annuals! Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 12:27 PM, Boris Liberman wrote: > Well, I've just uploaded 3 pics for the

Re: OT: WARNING Beware Firefox 58.0.1

Well I'm having no problems at all with firefox...on WIndows 7 Pro.  I use chrome for random browsing and facebook (words with friends seems to work better in Chrome) but for ebay and all such business related stuff it's Firefox and my email is Thunderbird so any links clicked on in email

Re: OT: WARNING Beware Firefox 58.0.1

updated the other day and so far so good, on the iMac Dave On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 8:36 AM, ann sanfedele wrote: > Well I'm having no problems at all with firefox...on WIndows 7 Pro. I use > chrome for random browsing and > facebook (words with friends seems to work better

Re: PDML Photo Annual #10 Coming in 2018

AnnSan, Gonz - you're way too kind. In fact, let me check. Indeed, this photo appears in the PDML Annual 2013. I may have re-processed it for posting to 500px. My processing style appears to change quite a bit over time... Boris On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 11:34 PM, Gonz

Re: PDML Photo Annual #10 Coming in 2018

Well, I've just uploaded 3 pics for the book. Let's see if any of them makes it :-). On Sat, Feb 17, 2018 at 1:47 PM, Boris Liberman wrote: > AnnSan, Gonz - you're way too kind. In fact, let me check. Indeed, this > photo appears in the PDML Annual 2013. > > I may have

Re: Mystery focusing screen

> On Feb 17, 2018, at 2:55 PM, Eric Weir wrote: > > As mentioned recently, I’m in the process of selling my K-5. In gathering > things to be included in the package when there’s a buyer, I found the case > from the Katzeye split image focusing screen that I had installed

Re: PDML Photo Annual #10 Coming in 2018

Most years I do struggle to find any that I am really confident about submitting. Last year, I had the Blue and Beige image from Santa Fe, which was a no-brainer, but nothing stood out like that for me this year, so I agonized for quite a while. Dan Matyola

Re: OT: WARNING Beware Firefox OOPS 58.0.2

That's a OOPS there. It's 58.0.2 that hosed my browser. I had 58.0.1 on my mind because I was trying to find a way to roll back to it. On 2/17/2018 03:15, Igor PDML-StR wrote: John wrote: DO NOT UPGRADE Completely hosed my browser. Cannot browse due to firefox POPUPS. Maybe

Re: PESO: Cardinal

Actually, it is camouflage, as these fish live in relatively deep water, where the red will not be bright or ever really lreddish. Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 7:22 AM, Jack Davis wrote: > Conspicuous camo. ?? HA! >

Re: Mystery focusing screen

> On Feb 17, 2018, at 4:31 PM, John wrote: > >> On 2/17/2018 14:55, Eric Weir wrote: >> As mentioned recently, I’m in the process of selling my K-5. In gathering >> things to be included in the package when there’s a buyer, I found the case >> from the Katzeye split

Re: OT: WARNING Beware Firefox 58.0.1

On 2/16/2018 20:35, Paul Sorenson wrote: Also no problems with 58.0.2 on Win 10.  Maybe the problem lies with the search engine.  Do you get the same response browsing to other sites? -p No, I never got that response browsing ANY site until I installed the "upgrade" to 58.0.2 and then I got

Mystery focusing screen

As mentioned recently, I’m in the process of selling my K-5. In gathering things to be included in the package when there’s a buyer, I found the case from the Katzeye split image focusing screen that I had installed in the camera. Inside was another focusing screen, a bracketed one, in a

Re: PDML Photo Annual #10 Coming in 2018

I know how you feel. I struggle every year to select three that are good enough to submit. Except for the first year, the photo Mark selected was not the one I considered the best of my submissions. On 2/17/2018 13:32, Daniel J. Matyola wrote: As I understand the rules, at least one has to

Re: Mystery focusing screen

On 2/17/2018 14:55, Eric Weir wrote: As mentioned recently, I’m in the process of selling my K-5. In gathering things to be included in the package when there’s a buyer, I found the case from the Katzeye split image focusing screen that I had installed in the camera. Inside was another

Re: K1-II spec leaked, seems like minor improvements only

The K1 to me is an ideal portrait/landscape camera, not so great for events, the fact that they managed to deliver the trio of pro-spec zooms at launch was admirable but they seem a miss match for the body. A couple of high quality portable primes (the 15-30 is a great lens, I have the Tamron

Re: K1-II spec leaked, seems like minor improvements only

I shoot football and baseball with the K-1 and never fill the buffer, but I rarely shoot more than three or four frames in a burst and take a lot of singles. Paul > On Feb 17, 2018, at 7:56 PM, Rob Studdert wrote: > > The K1 to me is an ideal portrait/landscape

Re: K1-II spec leaked, seems like minor improvements only

Yeah that would work, the action is there then gone quickly too giving the buffer time to refresh. A lot of my shoots are pretty intense, dance, fire and music shows. The fire stuff is over pretty quickly and you need to overshoot to get a few decent frames it's happening so fast. A lot of music