Jerry, list,
Well, that's cleared up about Schleiermacher's pursuits. And the second
quote needs to be read with a bit of care; it took me a re-reading to
notice that Peirce didn't say that Schleiermacher treated a special
metaphysics as prior to logic, in 'a vicious order of thought'; Peirce
Ben, List
Thanks for citations. I will study them in some detail and from several
perspectives. Very important to me.
On Apr 14, 2014, at 9:10 PM, Benjamin Udell wrote:
> Or did Schleiermacher start out in theology?
Yes, the three theology students studied at Tubingen together in the early
Jerry, list,
I wonder whether there was more than one Schleiermacher. Or did
Schleiermacher start out in theology? Or maybe Peirce was in some sort
of error or insufficient information about Schleiermacher in the first
quote below. Anyway, here are the results. In the third quote, Peirce
cred
Ben, List
On Apr 14, 2014, at 8:06 PM, Benjamin Udell wrote:
> He mentions Schleiermacher a few times in passing.
Would you be so kind as to post the references to Schleiermacher?
He played a critical role in the trio of students (with Schelling and a poet
whose name I forget,) who moved f
Jeffrey D., list,
For my part I don't have an opinion on whether Peirce should have paid
more attention to hermeneutics and genealogical thinking and should have
had a higher opinion of dialectics. Still, for what it's worth, I've
done a little text-searching in CP, W, and CN, and here are som
On Apr 14, 2014, at 8:39 AM, Sungchul Ji wrote:
> Recently I chanced to read the first few pages of a recent book on
> Heidegger who is supposed to be phenomenologist, but the book never
> mentioned Peirce's phenomenology (or phaneroscopy) who preceded Heidegger
> by half a century. Was there a
Ulysses,
Sorry it took so long to respond to your email.
> Sung do you define the triadic sign as a network or do you use a network
> to represent the triadic sign?
I would say I do both, because I believe that the concept (or the mental
image) of the “triadic sign” is a neuronal dissipative str
Jeff,
Let me expose my ignorance.
Recently I chanced to read the first few pages of a recent book on
Heidegger who is supposed to be phenomenologist, but the book never
mentioned Peirce's phenomenology (or phaneroscopy) who preceded Heidegger
by half a century. Was there any influence of Peirce'
