OK, Gary F.
No need to go into such deepness. My remark was mostly accidental.
As I said, I follow and agree with your opinion on the core argument.
V.
2015-05-18 18:22 GMT-03:00 Gary Fuhrman :
> Vinicius, you wrote,
>
>
>
> [[ I meant to say that a sign must be general (a type or legisign)
> whe
Vinicius, you wrote,
[[ I meant to say that a sign must be general (a type or legisign) whenever it
represents dynamic objects such as natural classes, laws of nature and fictious
entities such as mathematical objects. ]]
Agreed. Such objects are hypostatic abstractions, I’d say, so I wou
