List,
This post began as my (hopefully) final note on the theme of reducing the
frequency of posts to the forum.
"To enjoy freedom we have to control ourselves." Virginia Woolf
This was the sum total of Gary Fuhrman's blog entry for today.
http://gnusystems.ca/wp/2018/02/of-course/
Of course
Kirsti, list,
Thanks Kirsti for reminding us that in most cases it is probably best not
to, say, reply to All but only to Peirce-L. The way my email is set up,
even if I am Cc'd I only get the Peirce-L post, but I can imagine how
irksome it must be to get 200 Peirce-L posts in a little over a
List,
I too second Gary Richmonds note. I'd like to add that multiple postings
seem to be adjunct to this problem.
People send to personal mailboxes in addtion to the list.
If just that gets left out, the mass of mails would not look so awfull,
so hopeless.
Best, Kirsti
Ia mail is sent
Peircers,
I also have to unsubscribe periodically, as I don't have time
even to scan for relevance, and many postings recently appear
to move ever so agonizingly and asymptotically toward first
principles without quite grasping them, much less applying
them to non-trivial problems in any field
List,
I've gotten several off-list responses to my post on frequency of posting
which messages move me to reiterate "please post as you see fit!" and to
add what I've written here several times in the past, namely, that the best
approach to dealing with posts that you're not interested in is to
