[PEIRCE-L] Re: de Waal Seminar : Chapter 5. Semeiotics, or the Doctrine of Signs

2014-04-07 Thread Jon Awbrey
Jeff, There's a rather long history of people borrowing Peirce's terminology while leaving his definitions and methods behind. I see that fine old tradition has now been extended to category theory, graph theory, and who knows what else. The full title of Peirce's 1870 Logic of relatives is

[PEIRCE-L] Re: de Waal Seminar: Chapter 5. Semeiotics, or the Doctrine of Signs

2014-04-03 Thread Jon Awbrey
Frank, Thanks a million for your time and obvious care in reviewing my notes! You catch me entering on a period of intermittent travel, so it may be the middle/end of the month before we can get down to details, but I'll start now in stepwise refinement mode, with a few off the cuff remarks and

[PEIRCE-L] Re: de Waal Seminar: Chapter 5. Semeiotics, or the Doctrine of Signs

2014-03-26 Thread Jon Awbrey
As far as ends go, if it's good enough for Goethe it's good enough for me. Das Ewig-Weibliche zieht uns hinan. Cheers, Jon http://inquiryintoinquiry.com On Mar 26, 2014, at 5:32 PM, Jeffrey Brian Downard jeffrey.down...@nau.edu wrote: Jon, List, Your reference to the Latin and Greek

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Re: de Waal Seminar: Chapter 5. Semeiotics, or the Doctrine of Signs

2014-03-25 Thread Edwina Taborsky
, or that fossil fish, suffice to create the triadic sign? Edwina - Original Message - From: Vinicius Romanini To: Jon Awbrey Cc: peirce-l@list.iupui.edu 1 Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2014 1:14 PM Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Re: de Waal Seminar: Chapter 5. Semeiotics, or the Doctrine of Signs