You are right: It is random, i.e. meaningless. I had not focused on "meaning", but on "representation" (thirdness): I thought it was representation, because there is both an immediate and a dynamical object. But, as there is no meaning transmitted, it is nor real thirdness neither real
Randomness can hardly be meaningless if it also implies chance which for
Peirce mean First. I suppose I am missing something. Usually do.
"... chance ... a mathematical term to express with accuracy the
characteristics of freedom or spontaneity." Peirce: CP 6.202
Books http://buff.ly/15GfdqU
Helmut, List ~
"A photon hits an atom: The photon and the atom (tokens) are the immediate
object, the hitting event is the representamen, the effect (electron jumps to a
higher orbit) is the interpretant ..."
Why did the photon hit the atom? The collision ('hitting event') is the
Sung, List,
And is a physical interaction a triadic Sign? Eg: A photon hits an atom: The photon and the atom (tokens) are the immediate object, the hitting event is the representamen, the effect (electron jumps to a higher orbit) is the interpretant, and the types "photon" and "atom"
Sung, List,
And is a physical interaction a triadic Sign? Eg: A photon hits an atom: The photon and the atom (tokens) are the immediate object, the hitting event is the representamen, the effect (electron jumps to a higher orbit) is the interpretant, and the types "photon" and "atom" are the
Hi,
Correction:
Please change " . . . dyadic communications cannot lead to any
communication." in my previous post to
". . .dyadic interactions cannot lead to any communication."
Thanks.
Sung
-- Forwarded message --
From: Sungchul Ji
Date: Sun, Oct