Re: [PEIRCE-L] Is there a phaneron?

2016-02-23 Thread Clark Goble
> On Feb 20, 2016, at 11:15 AM, John Collier wrote: > > Thanks Clark. I don’t think of Heidegger as a phenomenologist as much as an > existentialist (view from studying Heidegger from Bert Dreyfus). Merleau > Ponty fits the Husserlian model more closely, I think. <> I always enjoy Dreyfus’ stu

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Is there a phaneron?

2016-02-22 Thread Jerry Rhee
correct in focusing on the differences with Peirce here. > > > > John Collier > > Professor Emeritus and Senior Research Associate > > University of KwaZulu-Natal > > http://web.ncf.ca/collier > > > > *From:* CLARK GOBLE [mailto:cl...@lextek.com] > *Sen

RE: [PEIRCE-L] Is there a phaneron?

2016-02-20 Thread John Collier
University of KwaZulu-Natal http://web.ncf.ca/collier From: CLARK GOBLE [mailto:cl...@lextek.com] Sent: Friday, 19 February 2016 9:14 PM To: Peirce-L Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Is there a phaneron? On Feb 19, 2016, at 9:08 PM, CLARK GOBLE mailto:cl...@lextek.com>> wrote: On Feb 19, 2016, at 4

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Is there a phaneron?

2016-02-20 Thread Ozzie
day, 19 February 2016 3:32 PM > To: cl...@lextek.com > Cc: Peirce-L > Subject: Aw: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Is there a phaneron? > > Clark, list, > thank you for the hint to Husserl. Now I just have looked him up at > Wikipedia, and I think I like his phenomenology. I just had read

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Is there a phaneron?

2016-02-19 Thread Jerry Rhee
Hi everyone, I think the following is a good example of phaneroscopy, a kind of survey of the sum total of experiences to get at some generality through scrutiny but absent judgments about good/bad. http://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2016/02/18/467138913/did-a-pesticide-cause-microcephaly

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Is there a phaneron?

2016-02-19 Thread CLARK GOBLE
> On Feb 19, 2016, at 9:08 PM, CLARK GOBLE wrote: > >> >> On Feb 19, 2016, at 4:03 PM, John Collier > > wrote: >> >> Husserl explicitly uses the idea of “bracketing” questions of existence in >> phenomenology. In other words, you ignore existence and truth issues. 

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Is there a phaneron?

2016-02-19 Thread CLARK GOBLE
> > On Feb 19, 2016, at 4:03 PM, John Collier wrote: > > Husserl explicitly uses the idea of “bracketing” questions of existence in > phenomenology. In other words, you ignore existence and truth issues.  <> Yes, in that they are similar. In other ways they are quite different. The list starte

RE: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Is there a phaneron?

2016-02-19 Thread John Collier
Raulien [mailto:h.raul...@gmx.de] Sent: Friday, 19 February 2016 3:32 PM To: cl...@lextek.com Cc: Peirce-L Subject: Aw: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Is there a phaneron? Clark, list, thank you for the hint to Husserl. Now I just have looked him up at Wikipedia, and I think I like his phenomenology. I just had read

Aw: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Is there a phaneron?

2016-02-19 Thread Helmut Raulien
Clark, list, thank you for the hint to Husserl. Now I just have looked him up at Wikipedia, and I think I like his phenomenology. I just had read something about and from Habermas, especially about the dualism of system and "Lebenswelt" (life-world). Now just I have seen, that the term "Lebenswel

Re: [PEIRCE-L] Is there a phaneron?

2016-02-19 Thread Clark Goble
> On Feb 19, 2016, at 1:47 PM, Helmut Raulien wrote: > > "[B]y the phaneron I mean the collective total of all that is in any way or > in any sense present to the mind, quite regardless of whether it corresponds > to any real thing or not. If you ask present when, and to whose mind, I reply >