Tom, my response is interleaved:
From: Tom Gollier [mailto:tgoll...@gmail.com]
Sent: 14-Oct-14 7:58 PM
I have to say, I just don't get this idea of real facts from reading Peirce.
On the one hand, we have the denotation of the subject, something we all seem
to agree on. On the other
Gary, you asked:
What other ways to you have in mind?
I would have to say I think any logical relationship can link an index and
icon. Thus, myself and my fingerprints might even be a better example
for the point I'm trying to make. Instead of the implicative relationship
associated with
I have to say, I just don't get this idea of real facts from reading
Peirce. On the one hand, we have the denotation of the subject, something
we all seem to agree on. On the other hand, Peirce describes the
signifying of the predicate, in discussing the icon more generally, as:
If it [an
: Tuesday, October 14, 2014 4:57 PM
To: Peirce List; biosemiot...@lists.ut.ee
Subject: Re: [PEIRCE-L] RE: Natural Propositions, Chapter 3.7 - 3.9
I have to say, I just don't get this idea of real facts from reading Peirce.
On the one hand, we have the denotation of the subject, something we all
List:
(N.B.: This post includes abstract technical rhetoric which may be
incomprehensible to non-technical readers.)
Sung's suggestion (copied below) is far to simple (in my opinion).
The triadic triad requires triple and higher order articulations of the
metaphysical forms of inquiry into
