ve been discussing in this thread. As someone with zero formal training in formal logic, I’m really looking forward to this as a way into deeper understanding of Peirce’s whole philosophy.
Gary f.
From: Edwina Taborsky [mailto:tabor...@primus.ca]
Sent: 16-Oct-17 08:24
To: peirce-l@list.i
bor...@primus.ca]
Sent: 16-Oct-17 08:24
To: peirce-l@list.iupui.edu; Jeffrey Brian Downard
Subject: Re: Re: RE: RE: [PEIRCE-L] Lowell Lecture 1: overview
Jeff, list
"Thought is not necessarily connected with a brain. It appears in
the work of bees, of crystals, and throughout
t;>>>>>
>>>>>>> I presume you are being sarcastic.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I have always accepted the reality of generals and have posted this
>>>>>>> view frequently. What is Thirdness? My point,
your next posting.
>>>>>
>>>>> Edwina
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon 16/10/17 9:21 AM , g...@gnusystems.ca sent:
>>>>>
>>>>> Edwina, List,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>&g
t;>>>>> and time, whether as a concept/word or a material entity [bacterium]. I
>>>>>> don't see that Reality/Generals have any existence 'per se' outside of
>>>>>> their articulation within Signs...and this view has been stated often
>>>
>>>>>> and time, whether as a concept/word or a material entity [bacterium]. I
>>>>>> don't see that Reality/Generals have any existence 'per se' outside of
>>>>>> their articulation within Signs...and this view has been stated often
>>>&
From: Edwina Taborsky [mailto:tabor...@primus.ca]
Sent: 16-Oct-17 08:24
To: peirce-l@list.iupui.edu; Jeffrey Brian Downard
Subject: Re: Re: RE: RE: [PEIRCE-L] Lowell Lecture 1: overview
Jeff, list
"Thought is not necessarily connected with a brain. It appears in
From: Edwina Taborsky [mailto:tabor...@primus.ca]
Sent: 16-Oct-17 08:24
To: peirce-l@list.iupui.edu; Jeffrey Brian Downard
Subject: Re: Re: RE: RE: [PEIRCE-L] Lowell Lecture 1: overview
Jeff, list
"Thought is not necessarily connected with a brain. It appears in
t;>>
>>>>> It’s good to see that you now accept the reality of generals, as your
>>>>> previous post appeared to reject it. That said, we need to focus on
>>>>> logical
>>>>> issues rather than metaphysical ones, as we dig deeper into Peir
me to
>>>> digest Lowell 1 before we move ahead.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> As you are no doubt aware, CP 4.551 is a paragraph from “ Prolegomena
>>>> to an Apology for Pragmaticism” (1906), which was his last and most
>>>>
le system, I think we need to follow the development of EGs,
>>> starting with his first presentation of them to an audience, namely Lowell
>>> 2. Thanks to the SPIN project, we now have a chance to follow that
>>> development step by step. Peirce re
ca]
Sent: 16-Oct-17 08:24
To: peirce-l@list.iupui.edu; Jeffrey Brian Downard
Subject: Re: Re: RE: RE: [PEIRCE-L] Lowell Lecture 1: overview
Jeff, list
"Thought is not necessarily connected with a brain. It appears in
the work of bees, of crystals, and throughout the purely
Jeff, list
"Thought is not necessarily connected with a brain. It appears in
the work of bees, of crystals, and throughout the purely physical
world"not only is thought in the organic world but it develops
there. But as there cannot be a General without Instances embodying
13 matches
Mail list logo
