Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Biosemiosis (was Lowell Lecture 3.12

Helmut, list, I have to run off to a very busy late afternoon/evening soon, but wanted to quickly respond to your post. You wrote: HR: I think, the presyllable "idio" has had a bad connotation to me due to the word "idiot", which was the reason for my quibbling, but I´ve looked it up, and it

Aw: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Biosemiosis (was Lowell Lecture 3.12

Gary, List, I think, the presyllable "idio" has had a bad connotation to me due to the word "idiot", which was the reason for my quibbling, but I´ve looked it up, and it does not only mean "merely self-related", but also "special". Still, by the way you put it:   " Similarly, cenoscopic

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Biosemiosis (was Lowell Lecture 3.12

Helmut, list, You wrote: "Maybe I have had the wrong concept about idioscopy: I thought that it was observing phenomena without connecting them to cenoscopy such as semiotics/logic." I think you have the "observing phenomena" part of idioscopy right but, as I understand it, not the "without

Aw: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Biosemiosis (was Lowell Lecture 3.12

Gary List, Maybe I have  had the wrong concept about idioscopy: I thought that it was observing phenomena without connecting them to cenoscopy such as semiotics/logic. Best, Helmut    22. Januar 2018 um 23:24 Uhr Von: "Gary Richmond"   Helmut, list,   You wrote: 

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Biosemiosis (was Lowell Lecture 3.12

Helmut, list, You wrote: If biology is idioscopic, and semiotics is cenoscopic, then, just following the rules of linguistics, which in my understanding say that the first half of a double-word is a restriction, but not a modification, of the second half, I would say, that biosemiotics is

Aw: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Biosemiosis (was Lowell Lecture 3.12

Gary, List, If biology is idioscopic, and semiotics is cenoscopic, then, just following the rules of linguistics, which in my understanding say that the first half of a double-word is a restriction, but not a modification, of the second half, I would say, that biosemiotics is cenoscopic, and

Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: [PEIRCE-L] Biosemiosis (was Lowell Lecture 3.12

BODY { font-family:Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;font-size:12px; }Jon - you have used those terms before- therefore, it is irrelevant that you haven't used them in the current thread. And I disagree that forbidding such terms as 'unPeircean' and 'more/less legitimate' would block 'the